I have a CSS-overwriting issue. There is a parent selector for a whole div which sets the styling for all inputs within. I have some inputs in it which I do want to have another styling for. Even though I put these stylings below the parents in the CSS-file, they still can not overwrite the parents css. Please see embedded CSS for further explanation. (I prefer to not use !important).
The CSS that gets applied (defined at the top of CSS-file)
#content #newPost .inner .inputs button {
width: 70%;
height: 50px;
background-color: #F7F9FA;
text-align: center;
margin: 15px 0 0 15%;
cursor: pointer;
border: 1px solid #A0A0A0;
transition: 0.2s;
}
The CSS that should get applied (defined at bottom)
#resultArray .team button {
width: 40px;
height: 100%;
border: none;
background-color: #E3E8E8;
color: #000;
padding: 0;
text-align: center;
margin: 0;
cursor: default;
}
HTML
<div id='newPost'>
<div class='inner'>
<div class='inputs'>
<div id='resultArray'>
<div class='current'><button disabled>1</button><input>
</div>
</div>
<input placeholder='Title'>
<textarea placeholder='Content'></textarea>
<button id='publishPost'>Publish</button>
</div>
So far I got from your CSS and markup code problem is chaining in CSS selection. You can try apply following selector:
#content #newPost .inner .inputs #resultArray button {
width: 40px;
height: 100%;
border: none;
background-color: #E3E8E8;
color: #000;
padding: 0;
text-align: center;
margin: 0;
cursor: default;
}
Also when you try to override long chain CSS selector you should understand properly CSS Selection Precedence rules.
How long is CSS selection chain it's dose not matter if you uderstand following precedence:
In CSS slection every selector have a mathamatical value: each tag = 1, each .class = 10 or pseudo class such as :hover, :active = 10, #id = 100, inline styling = 1000 and for !important = infinity. You can't never override one !important without another !important.
So form your first selection is "#content #newPost .inner .inputs button" = 100 + 100 + 10 + 10 + 1 = 221
But for "#resultArray .team button" = 100 + 10 + 1 = 111
So second selection will never precedence over first selection.
Also for better understanding see here.
you have extra close this div
<div id='resultArray'>
<div class='current'><button disabled>1</button><input>
</div>
</div>
remove this one and
justify you code like:
<div class='inputs'>
<div id='resultArray'>
<div class='current'><button disabled>1</button><input>
</div>
<div class='int'>
<input placeholder='Title'>
</div>
<div class='int'>
<textarea placeholder='Content'></textarea>
</div>
<button id='publishPost'>Publish</button> -->
</div>
than start work : https://jsfiddle.net/yhsLvc7g/1/
edit: wait... also there is no .team class in your html, so that selector points nowhere
--
Your first selector is WAY more specific than the bottom one, so it will be applied despite being above in the cascade flow.
You need to beat the specificity of the 2 ids, 2 classes and 1 tag of the top selector. That's A LOT of specificity, which means you need to use at least 2 ids + at least 2 classes + at least 1 tag to beat it, then the cascade will take over. Setting an additional class (so 2 + 3 + 1) or an additional ID (so 3 + 2 + 1) will beat it too.
So you need to do something ridiculous like
#content #newPost .inner .inputs #resultArray .team button
That being said, your CSS is extremely overqualified, which means you'll encounter issues like these by the millions.
What you should really be doing is changing the first selector (and all those that you have in such fashion) for less specificity, something like
.inner .inputs button
will probably do the trick
Here's a good resource to understanding CSS specificity:
Related
Intro
The vue-slide-up-down plugin appends the attribute hidden to target element to hide it. According documentation, this method is preferred:
"use-hidden" property
Whether to apply the "hidden" attribute to the element when closed.
Defaults to true. This hides the component from the screen and from
assistive devices. The internal elements of the component are
completely invisible, and cannot be focused on (by a keyboard or
assistive device). (This is probably what you want!) If you need, set
this property to false to not use the hidden attribute. This could be
used if you wanted to have a min-height requirement on your component.
Note that this can create accessibility issues, specifically for users with a keyboard or screen reader.
🌎 Source
The problem is the element with hidden attribute obeys to Schrödinger paradox: "this elements is existing, but in the same time not existing". Below example shows what it means.
Target
When the ".ControlsGroup" (designated by blue) is visibly last, it must provide the vertical space l1 below self inside ".Container" (designated by light yellow):
When the ".ErrorsContainer" (designated by orange) is visible, it must retire l2 px from ".ControlsGroup" and provide vertical space l3 below self:
The usage of padding-bottom of container is not allowed because basically we don't know at advance what will be placed inside ".ControlsGroup", so each element MUST know:
How much to retire from specific previous element
How much of vertical space it needs to provide below self when going last.
<div class="Container">
<div class="ControlsGroup"></div>
<div class="ErrorsContainer"></div>
</div>
Problem
When ErrorsContainer is visible, everything is all right: in below example, l2 is 24px and l3 is 36px:
.Container {
background: #FFECB3;
overflow: auto;
}
.ControlsGroup {
height: 300px;
background: #03A9F4;
}
.ErrorsContainer {
height: 40px;
background: #FF9800;
margin-bottom: 36px;
}
.ControlsGroup + .ErrorsContainer {
margin-top: 24px;
}
🌎 Fiddle
Now, if to add hidden attribute to .ErrorsContainer, no l1 space (between bottom of .ControlsGroup and bottom of .Container) will be:
🌎 Fiddle
Let's try to add below CSS rule that means "when .ErrorsContiner with attribute hidden going after .ControlsGroup, push it to 12px (l3)":
.ControlsGroup + .ErrorsContainer[hidden="hidden"] {
margin-bottom: 12px;
}
Nothing will change. The effect like .ErrorsContainer does not exist.
Next, lets try to add below rule that means "When ControlsGroup going last, make 12px of extra space inside the parent":
.ControlsGroup:last-child {
margin-bottom: 12px;
}
Nothing will change because .ErrorContainer actually exists and it's the last child.
Now how to define the l3 when .ErrorsContainer is hidden?
We can do some math here and consider x where l1 + x = l2. The idea is to always have the l1 and when the ErrorsContainer is visible we add to it a margin-top equal to x to get l2 instead of l1. I will also use flexbox to avoid margin collapsing and make sure the margin add and not collapse.
I am using CSS variables to illustrate but it's not mandatory:
.Container {
--l1:30px;
--x:-15px; /* so l2 = 15px */
--l3:10px;
background: #FFECB3;
display:flex;
flex-direction:column;
overflow: auto;
border:2px solid;
margin:5px;
}
.ControlsGroup {
height: 100px;
background: #03A9F4;
}
.ErrorsContainer {
height: 40px;
background: #FF9800;
margin:var(--x) 0 var(--l3);
}
.ControlsGroup {
margin-bottom:var(--l1);
}
<div class="Container">
<div class="ControlsGroup"></div>
<div class="ErrorsContainer" hidden></div>
</div>
<div class="Container">
<div class="ControlsGroup"></div>
<div class="ErrorsContainer"></div>
</div>
I have a structure such as :
<div class='container'>
<div class='half-screen'></div>
<div class='half-screen'></div>
<div class='half-screen'></div>
<div class='half-screen'></div>
</div>
I have to add divs dynamically and I'm wondering if there's a way to create the relationship dynamically so that a bar is inserted before every two divs with the half-screen class, i.e. before every 2n+1 div.half-screen.
There may be other ways to restructure and use css for top-border on each half screen but I'm curious to know if I can solve this using the + css adjacent operator
.container {
&.half-screen + .half-screen + .half-screen {
&:before {
border-top: 1px solid #ccc;
display:block;
}
}
}
I think you were on the right track with 2n+1 and :before, just missing a couple steps, unless I'm misunderstanding. Is this what you're trying to achieve?
.half-screen:nth-child(2n+1):before {
content: '';
width: 100%;
margin: 10px 0;
height: 1px;
background: black;
display: block;
}
<div class='container'>
<div class='half-screen'>1</div>
<div class='half-screen'>2</div>
<div class='half-screen'>3</div>
<div class='half-screen'>4</div>
<div class='half-screen'>5</div>
<div class='half-screen'>6</div>
</div>
No, you can't.
I know you're thinking .a + .a + .a matches the third element with a class of a, but keep in mind it also matches the fourth element with a class of a. CSS doesn't really say "Oh, we already used that element for this selector, we won't use it again."
I'm building some sort of framework where the content of the page can be edited with ContentTools. A requirement of ContentTools is that the regions must be parents.
If you try this:
<h1 data-editable data-name="heading">Content</h1>
It wont work as a region has to contain editable block level elements. A way around this is to wrap the tag like so:
<div data-editable data-name="heading">
<h1>Content</h1>
</div>
But I just want to make the text editable, so I automatically wrapped the inner elements in a div. This works but it affects the styles.
Is there a way to make a div 'transparent', so it will inherit all styles?
I tried the following code.
To be clear: In this example I don't write the h1 css, so i have no influence over which styles are used.
$("[data-editable]").wrapInner("<div class='innerWrap'></div>");
/* example h1 css, could be anything */
body > h1{
font-size: 40px;
color: red;
font-family: sans-serif;
border: 3px solid green;
background-color: blue;
padding: 5px;
}
.innerWrap{
all: inherit;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<h1 data-editable data-name="heading">Content</h1>
As you can see some things work. But things like a border will double.
It has to be no difference with or without the innerWrap.
Is it possible to do this with css? It has to work on every css property.
I think you need to wrap the h1 with a div not div with h1.
for eg. .wrapInner() will produce something like
<h1 data-editable="" data-name="heading">
<div class="innerWrap">Content</div>
</h1>
But what you want is
<div data-editable data-name="heading">
<h1>Content</h1>
</div>
So please try with .wrap() instead of .wrapInner()
$("[data-editable]").wrap("<div class='innerWrap'></div>");
h1{
font-size: 40px;
color: red;
font-family: sans-serif;
border: 3px solid green;
background-color: blue;
padding: 5px;
}
.innerWrap{
all: inherit;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<h1 data-editable data-name="heading">Content</h1>
.innerWrap{
all: inherit; /* remove it*/
}
As a default behaviour, if you not specify css props for ".innerWrap" it will look same as parent only
The ability to make an individual element editable standalone as opposed to as part of a collection (e.g in a region) is currently being worked on: https://github.com/GetmeUK/ContentTools/issues/79
There is however a short-term imperfect approach you could try, first change you're HTML as follows:
<h1 data-editable data-name="heading">
<span data-inline data-ce-tag="h1">Content</span>
</h1>
This will make the h1 tag the region and tell ContentTools/Edit to treat the inner span element as a h1 (text) element (thanks to the data-ce-tag).
But the next problem is that if the user hit's return you'll end up with a new paragraph tag inside of your h1 - which we don't want. This is where the data-inline attribute comes in, we need to listen for mount events and if the element mounted has the data-inline attribute we'll modify its behaviour so it can't do certain things which might produce undesirable events:
ContentEdit.Root.get().bind('mount', function(elem) {
// We're only interested in elements that are marked as inline
if (elem.attr('data-inline') === undefined) {
return;
}
// Change the default behaviour of the element
elem.can('drag', false);
elem.can('drop', false);
elem.can('remove', false);
elem.can('spawn', false);
});
You can find out more about modifying behaviours here, along with their current limitations here.
I'm trying to create a HTML widget:
HTML:
<div>
<h1 class="title" data-bind="title">Title</h1>
<div>
<h1 id = "dc1" class="dc">DC1</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1 id = "dc2" class="dc">DC2</h1>
</div>
<p class="updated-at" data-bind="updatedAtMessage"></p>
</div>
And I need to be able to set the background color of the id="dc1" and id="dc2" elements dynamically in CoffeeScript. I plan to do this by adding a class with a background color setting:
SCSS:
&.up {
background-color: green;
}
&.down {
background-color: red;
}
.dc {
background-color: orange;
font-size: 30px;
float: left;
width: 50%;
}
So far I have managed to set the whole widget background but not the child elements mentioned above:
I have been using:
CoffeeScript:
$(#node).removeClass('up down')
$('#dc1').removeClass('up down')
$('#dc2').removeClass('up down')
$(#node).addClass('down')
$('#dc1').addClass('down')
$('#dc2').addClass('up')
Note ultimately I will add the classes depending on some data rather than hard coding them to 'up' or 'down' in the coffeescript.
But nothing happends.. Am I getting selecting the id="dc#" elements correctly?
If it helps with context I'm doing this for Dashing
Your SCSS doesn't make sense so I'd guess that your missing an error from the SCSS-to-CSS conversion. An & in SCSS is a reference to the parent selector:
& will be replaced with the parent selector as it appears in the CSS
so have &.up at the top level makes no sense and should generate an error. If we fix the SCSS so that .up and .down apply only to .dc:
.dc {
/* ... */
&.up {
background-color: green;
}
&.down {
background-color: red;
}
}
then everything seems to work just fine.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/9y9uywm9/
You can use Sassmeister (and other similar online tools) to see what SCSS thinks of your original SCSS.
I have 5 buttons without any Class or ID. Here's my code:
HTML
<button>Btn1</button>
<button>Btn2</button>
<button>Btn3</button> <!-- I don't want this elem to get the CSS styles -->
<button>Btn4</button>
<button>Btn5</button>
CSS
button {
width: 100px;
height: 45px;
background-color: #12aeef;
border: none;
box-shadow: 0px 5px 3px #888888;
}
Demo on jsFiddle.
How can I make the 3rd element not get the CSS styles?
As an alternative to Mihai's answer, if you'd like to be able to use it on more than element, add a class to any appropriate button:
<button class="nostyle">
Then in your CSS, simply change button to button:not(.nostyle).
That's it! ...what, you were expecting more work?
Here's the updated code:
button:not(.nostyle) {
width: 100px;
height: 45px;
background-color: #12aeef;
border: none;
box-shadow: 0px 5px 3px #888888;
}
<button>Btn1</button>
<button>Btn2</button>
<button class="nostyle">Btn3</button>
<button>Btn4</button>
<button>Btn5</button>
Abusing OP' wording:
We want to remove styling (i.e.: the styling was already applied to the element and we want it removed) without any Classes or ID (i.e.: HTML must not be touched).
First and foremost how do we "reset" some CSS properties that have already been inherited by an element?
This requires some knowledge of the defaults ex.:
width: auto; // the default for sizes is auto
But also some investigation regarding the rest of your css because you may have some reset stylesheet included into your project which tells all elements everywhere to have behave diferently (this usually applies to paddings / margins / borders etc.).
Now that we know how to "reset" the CSS properties we need to identify the element to which we apply this "reset".
We can use :nth-child(), a CSS3 pseudo selector that finds child elements which ocupy the nth offset within the parent regardless of element type.
Put it together and we have:
button:nth-child(3) {
width: auto;
height: auto;
background: none;
/* ... */
}
Ignoring OP' wording but offering a better solution:
Try Connors last fiddle for the most efficience and elegance, or his first for full compatibility.
i don't think there is a cross browser way to do this in css without class or id so For Cross Browser Compatability you can do something like this
<div class="container">
<button>text 1</button>
<button>text 2</button>
<div class="no-style">
<button>text 3</button>
</div>
<button>text 4</button>
<button>text 5</button>
</div>
with this CSS
.no-style{
display:inline;
}
.container > button {
background:skyblue;
}
Fiddle
But if your not worried about browser compatability you can use
button:not(:nth-child(3)){
background:skyblue;
}
Fiddle
If you cannot change the HTML or the CSS stylesheet, you can try this jQuery (untested):
<script type='text/javascript' src='http://code.jquery.com/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script type='text/javascript'>
var buttons = $('button');
var styles = {'width': 'auto', 'height': 'auto', 'background': 'none', 'box-shadow': ''};
buttons[2].css(styles);
</script>
CSS pseudo clsses may help you. More info on nth child pseudo class can be obtained from Click Here
button:nth-child(3) {
// Your CSS Here
}