I am creating a section plane like:
this.viewer.loadExtension("Autodesk.Section")
const SectionTool = this.viewer.getExtension("Autodesk.Section")
SectionTool.load()
SectionTool.activate()
SectionTool.tool.setSectionPlane(this.hitTest.face.normal, this.hitTest.point)
const state = this.viewer.getState();
this.viewer.restoreState(state);
This works pretty well, and I get the section plane. But I am not able to interact with this plane like when creating with UI buttons. Can anyone point me in the correct direction to make this possible?
Thank you in advance!
Why store the hitTest results, then restore the other aspects of states without the cutplanes (if they were captured in the saved states ...) and then restore the cutplanes programmatically from the hittest results ... something like:
const hitTest = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('hitTestResult'))
delete state.cutplanes
viewer.restoreState(state)
const SectionTool = viewer.getExtension("Autodesk.Section")
SectionTool.activate()
SectionTool.tool.setSectionPlane(hitTest.face.normal, hitTest.point)
I am currently working an application that is using a Cesium Viewer. I need to be able to display a collection of shapes that will be updated dynamically. I am having trouble understanding the best way to do this.
I currently am using Entities and using CallbackProperties to allow for the updating of shapes.
You can through this into a sandcastle to get an idea of how I am doing this. There is a polygon object that is being used as the basis for the cesiumCallback, and it is getting edited by another piece of code. (simulated with the setTimeout)
var viewer = new Cesium.Viewer('cesiumContainer', {});
var polygon = {};
polygon.coordinates = [
{longitude: 0, latitude: 0, altitude: 0},
{longitude: 10, latitude: 10, altitude: 0},
{longitude: 10, latitude: 0, altitude: 0}
];
// converts generic style options to cesium one (aka color -> material)
var polOpts = {};
// function for getting location
polOpts.hierarchy = new Cesium.CallbackProperty(function() {
var hierarchy = [];
for (var i = 0; i < polygon.coordinates.length; i++) {
var coordinate = polygon.coordinates[i];
hierarchy.push(Cesium.Cartesian3.fromDegrees(coordinate.longitude, coordinate.latitude, coordinate.altitude));
}
return hierarchy;
}, false);
viewer.entities.add({polygon: polOpts});
setInterval(function(polygon){
polygon.coordinates[0].longitude--;
}.bind(this, polygon), 1000);
The polygon being passed in is a class that generically describes a polygon, so it has an array of coordinates and style options, as well as a render method that calls this method renderPolygon passing in itself.
This method of rendering shapes works for everything I need it to, but it is not very performant. There are two cases for shapes updating, one type of shape will be updated over a long period of time, as a slow rate like once every few seconds. The other is shapes that will will get updated many times, like thousands, in a few seconds, then not change again for a long time, if ever.
I had two ideas for how to fix this.
Idea 1:
Have two methods, a renderDynamicPolygon and a renderStaticPolygon.
The renderDynamicPolygon method would do the above functionality, using the cesiumCallbackProperties. This would be used for shapes that are getting updated many times during the short time they are being updated.
The renderStaticPolygon method would replace the entities properties that are using callbackProperties with constant values, once the updating is done.
This creates a lot of other work to make sure shapes are in the right state, and doesn't help the shapes that are being updated slowly over a long period of time.
Idea 2:
Similarly to how the primitives work, I tried removing the old entity and adding it again with its updated properties each time its need to be updated, but this resulted in flickering, and unlike primitives, i could not find a async property for entities.
I also tried using primitives. It worked great for polylines, I would simply remove the old one and add a new one with the updated properties. I was also using the async = false to ensure there was no flickering. This issue I ran into here was not all shapes can be created using primitives. (Is this true?)
The other thing I tried was using the geometry instance using the geometry and appearance. After going through the tutorial on the cesium website I was able to render a few shapes, and could update the appearance, but found it close to impossible to figure out how to update the shapes correctly, and also have a very hard time getting them to look correct. Shapes need to have the right shape, a fill color and opacity and a stroke color, opacity and weight. I tried to use the polygonOutlineGeometry, but had not luck.
What would be the best way to implement this? Are one of these options headed the right way or is there some other method of doing this I have not uncovered yet?
[Edit] I added an answer of where I have gotten, but still not complete and looking for answers.
I have came up with a pretty good solution to this, but it still has one small issue.
I made too ways of showing entities. I am calling one render and one paint. Render uses the the Cesium.CallbackProperty with the isConstant property true, and paint with the isConstantProperty false.
Then I created a function to change the an entity from render to paint and vice vera. It goes through the entities callback properties an uses the setCallback property to overwrite the property with a the correct function and isConstant value.
Example:
I create a ellipse based on a circle object I have defined.
// isConst is True if it is being "painted" and false if it is being "rendered"
ellipse: lenz.util.extend(this._getStyleOptions(circle), {
semiMinorAxis: new Cesium.CallbackProperty(
this._getRadius.bind(this, circle),
isConst
),
semiMajorAxis: new Cesium.CallbackProperty(
this._getRadius.bind(this, circle),
isConst
),
})
So when the shape is being updated (while the user is drawing a shape) the shape is rendered with the isConstant being false.
Then when the drawing is complete it is converted to the painted version using some code like this:
existingEntity.ellipse.semiMinorAxis.setCallback(
this._getRadius.bind(this, circle),
isConst
);
existingEntity.ellipse.semiMajorAxis.setCallback(
this._getRadius.bind(this, circle, 1),
isConst
);
This works great performance wise. I am able to draw hundreds of shapes without the frame dropping much at all. I have attached a screen shot of the cesium map with 612 entities before and after my changes, the frame rate is in the upper right using the chrome render tool.
Before: Locked up at fps 0.9
Note: I redacted the rest of the ui, witch makes the globe look cut off, sorry
And after the changes: The fps remains at 59.9, almost perfect!
Whenever the entity is 'converted' from using constant to not constant callback properties, it and all other entities of the same type flash off then on again. I cannot find a better way to do this conversion. I feel as thought there must still be some thing I am missing.
You could try using a PositionPropertyArray as the polygon's hierarchy with SampledPositionProperty for any dynamic positions and ConstantPositionProperty for any static positions. I'm not sure if it would perform any better than your solution, but it might be worth testing. Here is an example of how it might work that you can paste into the Cesium Sandcastle:
var viewer = new Cesium.Viewer('cesiumContainer', {});
// required if you want no interpolation of position between times
var noInterpolation = {
type: 'No Interpolation',
getRequiredDataPoints: function (degree) {
return 2;
},
interpolateOrderZero: function (x, xTable, yTable, yStride, result) {
if (!Cesium.defined(result)) {
result = new Array(yStride);
}
for (var i = 0; i < yStride; i++) {
result[i] = yTable[i];
}
return result;
}
};
var start = viewer.clock.currentTime;
// set up the sampled position property
var sampledPositionProperty = new Cesium.SampledPositionProperty();
sampledPositionProperty.forwardExtrapolationType = Cesium.ExtrapolationType.HOLD;
sampledPositionProperty.addSample(start, new Cesium.Cartesian3.fromDegrees(0, 0)); // initial position
sampledPositionProperty.setInterpolationOptions({
interpolationAlgorithm: noInterpolation
});
// set up the sampled position property array
var positions = [
sampledPositionProperty,
new Cesium.ConstantPositionProperty(new Cesium.Cartesian3.fromDegrees(10, 10)),
new Cesium.ConstantPositionProperty(new Cesium.Cartesian3.fromDegrees(10, 0))
];
// add the polygon to Cesium viewer
var polygonEntity = new Cesium.Entity({
polygon: {
hierarchy: new Cesium.PositionPropertyArray(positions)
}
});
viewer.zoomTo(viewer.entities.add(polygonEntity));
// add a sample every second
var counter = 1;
setInterval(function(positionArray) {
var time = new Cesium.JulianDate.addSeconds(start, counter, new Cesium.JulianDate());
var position = new Cesium.Cartesian3.fromDegrees(-counter, 0);
positionArray[0].addSample(time, position);
counter++;
}.bind(this, positions), 1000);
One nice thing about this is you can set the timeline start/end time to a reasonable range and use it to see your polygon at any time within the sample range so you can see the history of your polygons through time (See here for how to change the timeline start/end time). Additionally, you don't need to use timers to set the positions, the time is built in to the SampledPositionProperty (although you can still add samples asynchronously).
However, this also means that the position depends on the current time in the timeline instead of a real-time array value. And you might need to keep track of a time somewhere if you aren't adding all the samples at once.
I've also never done this using ellipses before, but the semiMinorAxis and semiMajorAxis are properties, so you might still be able to use a SampledProperty.
Of course, this doesn't really matter if there are still performance issues. Hopefully it will improve as you don't need to recreate the array from scratch each callback and, depending on how you're getting the data to update the polygons, you might be able to add multiple samples at once. This is just speculation, but it's something to consider.
EDIT
Cesium can handle quite a bit of samples added to a sampled position, for example in the above code if you add a million samples to the position it takes a few seconds to load them all, but renders the polygon at any time without any performance issues. To test this, instead of adding samples using a timer, just add them all directly to the property.
for (var i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
var time = new Cesium.JulianDate.addSeconds(start, i, new Cesium.JulianDate());
var position = new Cesium.Cartesian3.fromDegrees(-(i % 2), 0);
positions[0].addSample(time, position);
}
However, if you run into memory problems currently there is no way to remove samples from a position property without accessing private variables. A work around would be to periodically create a new array containing new position properties and use the previous position property array's setValue() method to clear previous values or perhaps to use a TimeIntervalCollectionProperty as in this answer and remove time intervals with the removeInterval method.
I am trying to define a rotated pole projection in Proj4JS where the north pole is now is 48N and 176E. I haven't been able to find any other example of rotated-poles in Proj4JS so I have tried to convert one I found for PROJ.4.
proj4.defs('myProjection', '+proj=ob_tran +o_proj=latlon +o_lon_p=-176 +o_lat_p=48 +lon_0=0 +a=1 +to_meter=0.0174532925199');
That line of JS is run without problem, but when I try to use that projection
proj4('EPSG:4326', 'myProjection', [175, -41]);
I get this error
uncaught exception: myProjection
I've tried replacing the projection definition the one for WGS84 and it works fine, so I believe my use of the function is correct, it's the parameters in that string that I am unsure of.
I think what you want is the so-called Azimuthal Equidistant projection. It's the best choice for measuring true distances radiating away from a center point.
If this is what you're looking for, I asked a similar question a while back over on GIS.SE, and for the coordinate you provided (48N, 176E), you could declare the Proj4js projection definition as so..
Proj4js.defs["CUSTOM:10001"] = "+proj=aeqd +lat_0=48.0 +lon_0=176.0 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs";
I hope it helps.
I took an intro level flash course in college this semester and our final task was to make a mini-flash game.
I had to make a pipe-dream type game where there are a number of levels, and in each level you have to align the pipes so that the water flows and then you can pass to the next level.
I successfully made the first level, but upon making the second level,
where I placed a lot of curved pipes (by curved pipes I mean the attached image: ![Curved Pipe]: (http://imgur.com/mwpXAMn) )
I discovered that the method I use to decide when a level is complete is not working properly.
I was using HitTestObject, basically, I was testing whether 2 objects, Pipe_1, and Pipe_2, were intersecting. If all pipes intersected in the correct way, then procession to the next level is granted.
The problem with this I discovered is that flash has bounding boxes for movie clips you make, and that HitestObject uses bounding boxes to test for hits. Therefore, when you rotate a leftpipe so that it does not touch a straight pipe on screen, the bounding boxes still touch and it returns "collision" when in fact it is not actually touching on screen.
I looked up and found that you can use HitTestPoint but I can't figure out how to somehow make dynamic variables (that change upon rotation of object) that store one or two specific points on the leftpipe, say the two ends of it.
Once If I figure out how to get these values into a variable correctly, then I can figure out how to do HitTestpoint.
Also, I know of the LocaltoGlobal function but no matter what I try it keeps coming up with:
"Scene 1, Layer 'Layer 1', Frame 1, Line 30 1118: Implicit coercion of a value with static type Object to a possibly unrelated type flash.geom:Point."
meaning I don't know the correct code to store an x and a y coordinate as dynamic variables.
edit: ok since a person asked, I hunted this piece of code off the web and this is the one I was trying to play around with but to no avail:
How to use HitTest for 2 rectangles, r1 is rectangle 1 r2 is rectangle 2.
var r1width:Number = 135.0; //width of retangle 1 whith rotation 0
var r2width:Number = 93.0; //width of retangle 2 whith rotation 0
var p1:Object = {x:(r1width/2), y:(r1width/2)};
var p2:Object = {x:(-r1width/2), y:(r1width/2)};
var p3:Object = {x:(-r1width/2), y:(-r1width/2)};
var p4:Object = {x:(r1width/2), y:(-r1width/2)};
r1.localToGlobal(p1);
r1.localToGlobal(p2);
r1.localToGlobal(p3);
r1.localToGlobal(p4);
var p5:Object = {x:(r2width/2), y:(r2width/2)};
var p6:Object = {x:(-r2width/2), y:(r2width/2)};
var p7:Object = {x:(-r2width/2), y:(-r2width/2)};
var p8:Object = {x:(r2width/2), y:(-r2width/2)};
r2.localToGlobal(p5);
r2.localToGlobal(p6);
r2.localToGlobal(p7);
r2.localToGlobal(p8);
if((r2.hitTest(p1.x, p1.y, true))||(r2.hitTest(p2.x, p2.y, true))||(r2.hitTest(p3.x,
p3.y, true))||(r2.hitTest(p4.x, p4.y, true)))
{
trace('collision');
}
if((r1.hitTest(p5.x, p5.y, true))||(r1.hitTest(p6.x, p6.y, true))||(r1.hitTest(p7.x,
p7.y, true))||(r1.hitTest(p8.x, p8.y, true)))
{
trace('collision');
}
I did not write this code and it does not work. I'm not sure what "Object" is because I've never used it before, I'm assuming in this case it's sort of acting like a coordinate pair.
Also, this code is to hittest 2 rectangles, whereas I'm using an L-shaped pipe, so the x/y calculation would be quite different I imagine.
This code above gives the same error that I posted before:
Implicit coercion of a value with static type Object to a possibly unrelated type flash.geom:Point.
and it gives it first on line r1.localToGlobal(p1);
Instead of using Object, you need to use Point like so:
var p1:Point = new Point(r1width/2, r1width/2);
I need to get the coordinates of a MovieClip according to another nested MovieClip in Actionscript 3.
Here's the context of MovieClip1:
Stage > Container > MovieClip1
Here's the context of MovieClip2:
Stage > Container > OtherMovieClip > MovieClip2
I'm trying to get the coordinates (X, Y) of MovieClip1 according to MovieClip2. For example, once I get the coordinates, I could set the X and Y of another MovieClip inside MovieClip2 so that it would be at the same coordinates as MovieClip1.
I've tried working with localToGlobal and globalToLocal but I can't get the result that I am trying to achieve.
EDIT:
Here's the code I've tried:
var localPoint:Point = new Point(MovieClip1.x, MovieClip1.y);
var globalPoint:Point = MovieClip2.localToGlobal(localPoint);
var containerLocalPoint:Point = Container.globalToLocal(globalPoint);
I'm not sure if I am understanding you correctly, but here's what I think you want to do :
Get the global location of MovieClip1 using localToGlobal.
Convert that global location to a local location within MovieClip2 using globalToLocal.
Use that location to set the x,y of your 3rd clip inside MovieClip2
I could code this out for you, but I think you are best helped by examining the logic of this solution and utilizing that to solve your problem.
If the logic is not the problem, then the question is really "How do I use localToGlobal and/or globalToLocal ?", which has surely been answered on this site, so a quick search can help you with the details.