How do I get flex-shrink to actually shrink an item? - html

I have a simple flex-box layout and I would like the middle item to shrink right down, but I cannot get any situation where the flex-shrink property works.
I've tried removing the flex-wrap property on the flex-container and changed the values of the flex items, but it still doesn't work?
In the code below, how do I get the middle div to shrink to a flex-shrink value of 10 like the code would suggest it should do?
Many thanks in advance for any help.
body {
padding: 20px;
font-family: arial;
}
p {
color: white;
}
.container {
background-color: #666;
max-width: 800px;
height: 800px;
margin: 0 auto;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
}
.item {
padding: 10px;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.item1 {
flex: 1 1 0;
background-color: red;
min-width: 200px;
}
.item2 {
flex: 2 10 0;
background-color: blue;
}
.item3 {
flex: 1 1 0;
background-color: green;
}
<section class="container">
<div class="item item1">
<h1>ITEM1</h1>
</div>
<div class="item item2">
<h1>ITEM2</h1>
</div>
<div class="item item3">
<h1>ITEM3</h1>
<p> - this is the third item with more content</p>
</div>
</section>
https://codepen.io/emilychews/pen/rYeoza

That's not how flex-shrink works.
The job of flex-shrink is to distribute negative free space in the container among items. This means it will shrink items proportionally when the items would otherwise overflow the container.
But there is no overflow condition in your container.
The first column (.item1) is 200px in width.
Your second column (.item2) has no fixed width. It is set to consume free space.
Your third column (.item3) has no fixed width. It is also set to consume free space.
Therefore, flex-shrink has nothing to do. In a container with width: 800px, where only 200px is used, flex-shrink is never called into action.
You have flex-shrink enabled on your three columns (with values 1, 10 and 1, respectively). If you disable flex-shrink on all of them you'll notice that it makes no difference to the layout.
Here's your demo with flex-shrink: 0 applied to all three times: revised codepen
For a detailed explanation of how flex-shrink works, see this post:
How does flex-shrink factor in padding and border-box?

Related

flex column equal width without specifying width [duplicate]

I want to use Flexbox that has some number of items that are all the same width. I've noticed that Flexbox distributes the space around evenly, rather than the space itself.
For example:
.header {
display: flex;
}
.item {
flex-grow: 1;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid black;
}
<div class="header">
<div class="item">asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf</div>
<div class="item">z</div>
</div>
The first item is a lot bigger than the second. If I have three items, four items, or n items, I want them all to appear on the same line with an equal amount of space per item.
Any ideas?
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/gbJBqM
Set them so that their flex-basis is 0 (so all elements have the same starting point), and allow them to grow:
flex: 1 1 0px;
Your IDE or linter might mention that the unit of measure 'px' is redundant. If you leave it out (like: flex: 1 1 0), IE will not render this correctly. So the px is required to support Internet Explorer, as mentioned in the comments by #fabb;
You need to add width: 0 to make columns equal if contents of the items make it grow bigger.
.item {
flex: 1 1 0;
width: 0;
}
Detail:
flex: 1 1 0 is the same as
flex-grow: 1; flex-shrink: 1; flex-basis: 0;
and if the parent container can not provide enough space for the native-size added together of every item (no space to grow), we need to make the width: 0 to give every item the same start point to grow.
You could add flex-basis: 100% to achieve this.
Updated Example
.header {
display: flex;
}
.item {
flex-basis: 100%;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid black;
}
For what it's worth, you could also use flex: 1 for the same results as well.
The shorthand of flex: 1 is the same as flex: 1 1 0, which is equivalent to:
.item {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 1;
flex-basis: 0;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid black;
}
The accepted answer by Adam (flex: 1 1 0) works perfectly for flexbox containers whose width is either fixed, or determined by an ancestor. Situations where you want the children to fit the container.
However, you may have a situation where you want the container to fit the children, with the children equally sized based on the largest child. You can make a flexbox container fit its children by either:
setting position: absolute and not setting width or right, or
place it inside a wrapper with display: inline-block
For such flexbox containers, the accepted answer does NOT work, the children are not sized equally. I presume that this is a limitation of flexbox, since it behaves the same in Chrome, Firefox and Safari.
The solution is to use a grid instead of a flexbox.
When you run this snippet, make sure to click on full page to see the effect properly.
body {
margin: 1em;
}
.wrap-inline-block {
display: inline-block;
}
#div0, #div1, #div2, #div3, #div4 {
border: 1px solid #888;
padding: 0.5em;
text-align: center;
white-space: nowrap;
}
#div2, #div4 {
position: absolute;
left: 1em;
}
#div0>*, #div1>*, #div2>*, #div3>*, #div4>* {
margin: 0.5em;
color: white;
background-color: navy;
padding: 0.5em;
}
#div0, #div1, #div2 {
display: flex;
}
#div0>*, #div1>*, #div2>* {
flex: 1 1 0;
}
#div0 {
margin-bottom: 1em;
}
#div2 {
top: 15.5em;
}
#div3, #div4 {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3,1fr);
}
#div4 {
top: 28.5em;
}
<p>Normal scenario — flexbox where the children adjust to fit the container — and the children are made equal size by setting {flex: 1 1 0}</p>
<div id="div0">
<div>
Flexbox
</div>
<div>
Width determined by viewport
</div>
<div>
All child elements are equal size with {flex: 1 1 0}
</div>
</div>
<p>Now we want to have the container fit the children, but still have the children all equally sized, based on the largest child. We can see that {flex: 1 1 0} has no effect.</p>
<div class="wrap-inline-block">
<div id="div1">
<div>
Flexbox
</div>
<div>
Inside inline-block
</div>
<div>
We want all children to be the size of this text
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="div2">
<div>
Flexbox
</div>
<div>
Absolutely positioned
</div>
<div>
We want all children to be the size of this text
</div>
</div>
<br><br><br><br><br><br>
<p>So let's try a grid instead. Aha! That's what we want!</p>
<div class="wrap-inline-block">
<div id="div3">
<div>
Grid
</div>
<div>
Inside inline-block
</div>
<div>
We want all children to be the size of this text
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="div4">
<div>
Grid
</div>
<div>
Absolutely positioned
</div>
<div>
We want all children to be the size of this text
</div>
</div>
I’m not an expert with Flexbox, but I got there by setting the basis to 50% for the two items I was dealing with. Grow to 1 and shrink to 0.
Inline styling: flex: '1 0 50%',
None of these solutions worked for me, but this did:
.header {
display: flex;
}
.item {
width: 100%;
}
/* Demo styles, for aesthetics. */
.demo {
margin: 3rem;
}
.demo .item {
text-align: center;
padding: 3rem;
background-color: #eee;
margin: 0 1.5rem;
}
<div class="demo">
<div class="header">
<div class="item">
1
</div>
<div class="item">
2
</div>
<div class="item">
3
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="demo">
<div class="header">
<div class="item">
1
</div>
<div class="item">
2
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="demo">
<div class="header">
<div class="item">
1
</div>
<div class="item">
2
</div>
<div class="item">
3
</div>
<div class="item">
4
</div>
<div class="item">
5
</div>
</div>
</div>
None of these answers solved my problem, which was that the items weren't the same width in my makeshift flexbox table when it was shrunk to a width too small.
The solution for me was simply to put overflow: hidden; on the flex-grow: 1; cells.
On the child element of flex,
flex: 1 1 25%
this will allow to have four items.
If you want to add more items then you can decrease the %.
This will work even if you wrapping items, like a Grid, but not so simple you should show where it will wrap in media queries)).
Example:
.flex-item {
flex: 0 0 calc(25% - (45px / 4))
}
It works like this:
$n: 4; // Number of columns
$gap: 15px; // Margin pixels
.flex-parent {
display: flex;
gap: $gap;
}
.flex-item {
flex: 0 0 calc(100% / $n - (($n - 1) * $gap / $n));
}
I was having a similar issue and found a way to cheat.
As others have said, flex-basis and flex-grow: 1 are the way to keep items the same size, but the last row is an exception when there are too few items (they fill all available space, making them larger than the other items). To stop this from happening, I added an empty spacer item with visibility: hidden and set the flex-grow value inline based on a quick calculation of how many items there were.
This is easier if you know the width of the parent container but even if you don't, you can set the flex-grow value on the spacer using media queries and breakpoints.

Flexbox children have not the same size [duplicate]

I want to use Flexbox that has some number of items that are all the same width. I've noticed that Flexbox distributes the space around evenly, rather than the space itself.
For example:
.header {
display: flex;
}
.item {
flex-grow: 1;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid black;
}
<div class="header">
<div class="item">asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf</div>
<div class="item">z</div>
</div>
The first item is a lot bigger than the second. If I have three items, four items, or n items, I want them all to appear on the same line with an equal amount of space per item.
Any ideas?
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/gbJBqM
Set them so that their flex-basis is 0 (so all elements have the same starting point), and allow them to grow:
flex: 1 1 0px;
Your IDE or linter might mention that the unit of measure 'px' is redundant. If you leave it out (like: flex: 1 1 0), IE will not render this correctly. So the px is required to support Internet Explorer, as mentioned in the comments by #fabb;
You need to add width: 0 to make columns equal if contents of the items make it grow bigger.
.item {
flex: 1 1 0;
width: 0;
}
Detail:
flex: 1 1 0 is the same as
flex-grow: 1; flex-shrink: 1; flex-basis: 0;
and if the parent container can not provide enough space for the native-size added together of every item (no space to grow), we need to make the width: 0 to give every item the same start point to grow.
You could add flex-basis: 100% to achieve this.
Updated Example
.header {
display: flex;
}
.item {
flex-basis: 100%;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid black;
}
For what it's worth, you could also use flex: 1 for the same results as well.
The shorthand of flex: 1 is the same as flex: 1 1 0, which is equivalent to:
.item {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 1;
flex-basis: 0;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid black;
}
The accepted answer by Adam (flex: 1 1 0) works perfectly for flexbox containers whose width is either fixed, or determined by an ancestor. Situations where you want the children to fit the container.
However, you may have a situation where you want the container to fit the children, with the children equally sized based on the largest child. You can make a flexbox container fit its children by either:
setting position: absolute and not setting width or right, or
place it inside a wrapper with display: inline-block
For such flexbox containers, the accepted answer does NOT work, the children are not sized equally. I presume that this is a limitation of flexbox, since it behaves the same in Chrome, Firefox and Safari.
The solution is to use a grid instead of a flexbox.
When you run this snippet, make sure to click on full page to see the effect properly.
body {
margin: 1em;
}
.wrap-inline-block {
display: inline-block;
}
#div0, #div1, #div2, #div3, #div4 {
border: 1px solid #888;
padding: 0.5em;
text-align: center;
white-space: nowrap;
}
#div2, #div4 {
position: absolute;
left: 1em;
}
#div0>*, #div1>*, #div2>*, #div3>*, #div4>* {
margin: 0.5em;
color: white;
background-color: navy;
padding: 0.5em;
}
#div0, #div1, #div2 {
display: flex;
}
#div0>*, #div1>*, #div2>* {
flex: 1 1 0;
}
#div0 {
margin-bottom: 1em;
}
#div2 {
top: 15.5em;
}
#div3, #div4 {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3,1fr);
}
#div4 {
top: 28.5em;
}
<p>Normal scenario — flexbox where the children adjust to fit the container — and the children are made equal size by setting {flex: 1 1 0}</p>
<div id="div0">
<div>
Flexbox
</div>
<div>
Width determined by viewport
</div>
<div>
All child elements are equal size with {flex: 1 1 0}
</div>
</div>
<p>Now we want to have the container fit the children, but still have the children all equally sized, based on the largest child. We can see that {flex: 1 1 0} has no effect.</p>
<div class="wrap-inline-block">
<div id="div1">
<div>
Flexbox
</div>
<div>
Inside inline-block
</div>
<div>
We want all children to be the size of this text
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="div2">
<div>
Flexbox
</div>
<div>
Absolutely positioned
</div>
<div>
We want all children to be the size of this text
</div>
</div>
<br><br><br><br><br><br>
<p>So let's try a grid instead. Aha! That's what we want!</p>
<div class="wrap-inline-block">
<div id="div3">
<div>
Grid
</div>
<div>
Inside inline-block
</div>
<div>
We want all children to be the size of this text
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="div4">
<div>
Grid
</div>
<div>
Absolutely positioned
</div>
<div>
We want all children to be the size of this text
</div>
</div>
I’m not an expert with Flexbox, but I got there by setting the basis to 50% for the two items I was dealing with. Grow to 1 and shrink to 0.
Inline styling: flex: '1 0 50%',
None of these solutions worked for me, but this did:
.header {
display: flex;
}
.item {
width: 100%;
}
/* Demo styles, for aesthetics. */
.demo {
margin: 3rem;
}
.demo .item {
text-align: center;
padding: 3rem;
background-color: #eee;
margin: 0 1.5rem;
}
<div class="demo">
<div class="header">
<div class="item">
1
</div>
<div class="item">
2
</div>
<div class="item">
3
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="demo">
<div class="header">
<div class="item">
1
</div>
<div class="item">
2
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="demo">
<div class="header">
<div class="item">
1
</div>
<div class="item">
2
</div>
<div class="item">
3
</div>
<div class="item">
4
</div>
<div class="item">
5
</div>
</div>
</div>
None of these answers solved my problem, which was that the items weren't the same width in my makeshift flexbox table when it was shrunk to a width too small.
The solution for me was simply to put overflow: hidden; on the flex-grow: 1; cells.
On the child element of flex,
flex: 1 1 25%
this will allow to have four items.
If you want to add more items then you can decrease the %.
This will work even if you wrapping items, like a Grid, but not so simple you should show where it will wrap in media queries)).
Example:
.flex-item {
flex: 0 0 calc(25% - (45px / 4))
}
It works like this:
$n: 4; // Number of columns
$gap: 15px; // Margin pixels
.flex-parent {
display: flex;
gap: $gap;
}
.flex-item {
flex: 0 0 calc(100% / $n - (($n - 1) * $gap / $n));
}
I was having a similar issue and found a way to cheat.
As others have said, flex-basis and flex-grow: 1 are the way to keep items the same size, but the last row is an exception when there are too few items (they fill all available space, making them larger than the other items). To stop this from happening, I added an empty spacer item with visibility: hidden and set the flex-grow value inline based on a quick calculation of how many items there were.
This is easier if you know the width of the parent container but even if you don't, you can set the flex-grow value on the spacer using media queries and breakpoints.

Vertical alignment flexbox

I am trying to place child elements in parent element using flexbox like in this image -- >
https://ibb.co/Wpph8fP.
I know that this is possible by doing three columns then use flex, then flex-column in the first column and center other two vertically.
The thing is, that I need do this in one parent div. 4th element is wrapped and it creates column with 1st element, then I need to center vertically two other elements.
This is what I have already done:
the code is here https://codepen.io/MrEyelet/pen/wLxygN?editors=1100
To use one flex, first set flex-direction to column and set wrap toflex-wrap.
And, the part that needs to be on two lines has a variable height to avoid line breaks.
Next, set the flex property to none, setting margin enough to make a line break in the part that needs to be on one line. This will force flex items to break and keep the size of the item.
flex - Values[mdn]
none
The item is sized according to its width and height properties. It is fully inflexible: it neither shrinks nor grows in relation to the flex container. This is equivalent to setting "flex: 0 0 auto".
body {
background: tomato;
margin: 0;
}
.parent {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
flex-flow: column wrap;
height: 100vh;
}
.child {
width: 30%;
height: 200px;
margin: 20px 0;
background: indigo;
}
/* add below */
.child:nth-of-type(-n+2) {
flex: 1 0 calc(50% - 40px);
}
/* add below */
.child:nth-of-type(n+3) {
flex: none;
margin: 50% 0;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child child-1">
</div>
<div class="child child-2">
</div>
<div class="child child-3">
</div>
<div class="child child-4">
</div>
</div>

How to make flexbox items shrink correctly when in a nested container?

If I set up a nested flexbox container like so:
<div class="container1">
<div class="grow1">
<div class="container2">
<div class="grow2"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
...and then set the width of grow2 such that it is wider than container1 then grow2 overflows container1.
I believe this should not happen since flex elements are supposed to shrink when they are larger than the flex container.
If I set the flex-basis of grow2 then this works as expected.
Please see the following example for a demo:
https://jsfiddle.net/chris00/ot1gjjtk/20/
Please use Chrome or Firefox for this
Furthermore, I read that the flexbox spec says that width and flex-basis should have the same effect (when using horizontal layouts) which they clearly don't.
Now I could just use flex-basis instead of width, but... Edge does the same thing for both flex-basis and width, and it does it in the "wrong" way. IE11 does it wrong also (although that appears to have multiple flexbox bugs).
Please check out the demo with Edge.
So how is this supposed to work?
Are there bugs in all browsers?
Is flex-basis actually supposed to be different from width (in simple horizontal layouts)?
Or is Edge correct and both width and flex-basis are supposed to overflow the parent container?
Finally, is there a workaround that can fix the overflow for Edge (and even IE11)?
.container1 {
margin-top: 10px;
display: flex;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
background-color: red;
}
.grow1 {
flex-grow: 1;
height: 40px;
background-color: green;
}
.container2 {
display: flex;
height: 30px;
background-color: yellow;
}
.grow2a {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-basis: 400px;
height: 20px;
background-color: turquoise;
}
.grow2b {
flex-grow: 1;
width: 400px;
height: 20px;
background-color: turquoise;
}
<div class="container1">
<div class="grow1">
<div class="container2">
<div class="grow2a">Working (flex-basis)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container1">
<div class="grow1">
<div class="container2">
<div class="grow2b">Not working (width)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The Problem
As far as the spec is concerned, this isn't an issue pertaining to flex-basis, width, flex-grow or flex. It's something entirely different.
4.5. Implied Minimum Size of Flex
Items
To provide a more reasonable default minimum size for flex items, this
specification introduces a new auto value as the initial value of
the min-width and min-height properties defined in CSS 2.1.
In other words, a flex item, by default, cannot be smaller than the length of its content (essentially, the longest word or fixed-size element).
The item cannot stay within its container (or even render a scroll bar or ellipsis), because its content is not permitted to overflow. The content simply expands the item. This behavior applies to fixed-sizing, as well (such as the flex-basis: 400px in your code).
Again, the initial settings are:
min-width: auto, in row-direction
min-height: auto, in column-direction
For a more complete explanation see this post:
Why doesn't flex item shrink past content size?
Solution for Chrome, Safari, Firefox and Edge
The standard solution to this problem is simple: override the default.
In your code, add min-width: 0 to .grow1.
That solves the problem in Chrome, Safari, FF and Edge.
.container1 {
margin-top: 10px;
display: flex;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
background-color: red;
}
.grow1 {
flex-grow: 1;
height: 40px;
background-color: green;
min-width: 0; /* NEW */
}
.container2 {
display: flex;
height: 30px;
background-color: yellow;
}
.grow2a {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-basis: 400px;
height: 20px;
background-color: turquoise;
}
.grow2b {
flex-grow: 1;
width: 400px;
height: 20px;
background-color: turquoise;
}
<div class="container1">
<div class="grow1">
<div class="container2">
<div class="grow2a">Working (flex-basis)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container1">
<div class="grow1">
<div class="container2">
<div class="grow2b">Not working (width)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
revised fiddle 1
Solution for IE11
In IE11, contrary to spec guidance, the flex min-width / min-height default values are already 0, yet the flex item still breaks out.
The defaults are 0 because when the flexbox spec was first released, the min-* properties did not deviate from the CSS 2.1 initial values, which are 0.
Later, after browsers had completed their implementations, the flex min-* values were updated to auto. Chrome, Safari, FF and Edge made the update. IE11 did not.
The reason the flex items break out in IE11 relates to another issue: the browser wants an explicit width on the container
In your code, add flex-basis: 100% to .grow1.
More details here:
Why IE11 doesn't wrap the text in flexbox?
flexbox flex-basis: 0px in Chrome
.container1 {
margin-top: 10px;
display: flex;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
background-color: red;
}
.grow1 {
flex-grow: 1;
height: 40px;
background-color: green;
flex-basis: 100%; /* NEW */
}
.container2 {
display: flex;
height: 30px;
background-color: yellow;
}
.grow2a {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-basis: 400px;
height: 20px;
background-color: turquoise;
}
.grow2b {
flex-grow: 1;
width: 400px;
height: 20px;
background-color: turquoise;
}
<div class="container1">
<div class="grow1">
<div class="container2">
<div class="grow2a">Working (flex-basis)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container1">
<div class="grow1">
<div class="container2">
<div class="grow2b">Not working (width)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
revised fiddle 2 (IE11)
More Browser Discrepancies
Evidence appears to exist (in this question and other examples I've seen) that Webkit-based browsers are no longer honoring the auto default defined in the spec.
Moreover, the adherence to the auto standard may vary based on which property is used for sizing: flex-basis vs. width / height
As discussed in the following post, these properties should render the same way.
What are the differences between flex-basis and width?

Nested flexboxes not wrapping in chrome or IE

I have a few nested flexboxes that I want to use for a responsive website, and they work properly in firefox, but not in chrome or IE. The links should be able to wrap so that they are on top of one another when you make the screen smaller.
The links wrap properly here: http://jsfiddle.net/6796b/
But when they are in another flexbox they stop wrapping and overflow (Note: Only the green "links" aren't wrapping/stacking properly. Everything else works as intended.): http://jsfiddle.net/3525C/8/
HTML:
<div class="header">
<div class="logo">logo</div>
<div class="nav">
<div class="link">link one</div>
<div class="link">link two</div>
<div class="link">link three</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.header {
text-align: center;
display: flex; /* If I take this line out the links wrap properly again, but everything else breaks. */
flex-flow: row wrap;
}
.logo {
flex: 1 0 auto;
min-width: 100px;
background-color: red;
}
.nav {
flex: 1 0 auto;
background-color: lightgray;
text-align: center;
}
.link {
display: inline-block;
background-color: green;
}
You have to apply a flex-shrink value of 1 in order for the flex item to be flexible. See edit 9.
The default being: flex: 0 1 auto which allows the flex item to "shrink to its min-size when there is insufficient space"
In your case, setting flex: 1 0 auto allows nav to grow, but the 0 prevent it from being allowed to shrink, even in overflow situations (your case here with inline-blocks).
i.e. If you want 'everything' to wrap inside a flex container, set its flex items to flex: auto;
EDIT: Changed flex: 1 1 auto; for flex: auto; for compatibility concerns, due to auto being possibly replaced by a 'main-size` keyword in the near future.