I'm trying to make a grid column span every row, including implicit rows.
I came across this question asking how to span all grid rows. The second answer has a correction stating a better solution. This seems like it would work, but my own example, and the comments on the second answer, indicate that it doesn't work.
The W3 spec gives this a very close example as well.
Is there something wrong with my code, or is this possibly a bug in Firefox, Chrome, and Safari?
I also have this example in a CodePen here.
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.container {
border: 1px solid #666;
max-width: 1000px;
padding: 10px;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 150px 1fr 300px;
/* grid-template-rows: repeat(auto) [rows-end]; Doesn't seem to help */
/* grid-template-rows: [rows-start] repeat(auto) [rows-end]; Doesn't seem to help */
grid-template-rows: repeat(auto);
grid-gap: 10px;
margin: 10px auto;
grid-auto-flow: row dense;
/* justify-items: stretch; */
/* align-items: stretch; */
}
.container>* {
grid-column: 2 / 3;
padding: 10px;
outline: 1px solid #666;
}
.pop {
grid-column: 1 / 2;
/* grid-column: 1 / -1; If I switch to this, this div will span the full width of the grid, which is exactly what I'm trying to do with rows*/
}
.tertiary {
grid-column: 1 / 2;
}
.secondary {
grid-column: 3 / 3;
grid-row: 1 / -1;
/* Doesn't work */
/* grid-row: rows-start / rows-end; Doesn't work */
/* grid-row: 1 / rows-end; Also doesn't work */
/* grid-row: 1 / span 7; This works, but I need to span an unknown number of rows*/
/* grid-row: 1 / span 99; This is gross and creates 99 rows */
}
<div class="container">
<div class="secondary">Secondary - why doesn't this span all the way to the bottom of the grid?</div>
<div class="tertiary">Tertiary</div>
<div class="tertiary">Tertiary</div>
<div class="tertiary">Tertiary</div>
<div>Primary</div>
<div>Primary</div>
<div>Primary</div>
<div class="pop">Span tertiary and primary</div>
<div>Primary</div>
<div class="tertiary">Tertiary</div>
<div>Primary</div>
<div>Primary</div>
</div>
There are two obstacles in your way.
First, this line of CSS code in your .container rule:
grid-template-rows: repeat(auto);
This code is invalid. The argument in the repeat() notation must begin with a positive integer, which specifies the number of repetitions. You don't have that, so the code doesn't work. More details in the spec.
Second, even if the code above was correct, let's say:
grid-auto-rows: auto; (which happens to be the default setting anyway)
Your column would still not span all rows.
This is because, as you may have seen in the other answer you cited, a track definition can be set to cover all perpendicular tracks only in the explicit grid.
So this would work:
grid-template-rows: repeat(6, auto);
revised demo
The rest of the problem is covered in detail in the other answer you cited.
Related
This question already has answers here:
Make a div span two rows in a grid
(2 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I have a little problem. I'm trying to program such a layout with HTML and CSS:
Here's the picture of what i want
I looked at this question:
Flexbox 3 divs, two columns, one with two rows . The only problem is that you can't give the divs a margin without them destroying the layout.
If the left image is higher, then the two right images should use the remaining space. (There are only a few boxes that I tried to place correctly first. I wanted to do the styling privately, so do not wonder.)
Here is my code what I have tried so far (Press full page. In this little window you can only see the mobile version):
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
#showroom {
height: 500px;
width: 100%;
background: red; /* To see showroom Background */
padding: 1em;
display: flex;
}
#boxOne {
height: 100%;
width: 50%;
background: grey;
margin: 10px;
float: left;
}
#showroom #boxTwo {
width: 50%;
height: 50%;
background: grey;
margin: 10px;
}
#showroom #boxThree {
width: 50%;
height: 50%;
background: grey;
margin: 10px;
}
#media only screen and (max-width: 750px) {
#showroom {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
flex-direction: column;
}
#showroom #boxOne, #showroom #boxTwo, #showroom #boxThree {
height: 33.3%;
width: 100%;
}
}
<div id="showroom">
<div id="boxOne"></div>
<div id="boxTwo"></div>
<div id="boxThree"></div>
</div>
Update
To make the #boxOne wider, we should look at the grid parent, which we are saying is 3 columns wide, with each column representing 120px.
Now let's look at #boxOne for a second, and catch/fix an error I introduced.
#boxOne {
grid-column: 1; /* Oops—this is wrong */
grid-row: 1 / 3;
}
We declared the grid to be 3 columns, yet #boxOne is only spanning a single column. The other boxes are also spanning a single column. Here's what our grid looks like now.
You can see that we're not even using that third column. Let's adjust #boxOne to span twice as wide as the other boxes. One really important detail is to count from the first vertical line. Think of the column like this:
Now it should be clear what we need to do.
#boxOne {
grid-column: 1 / 3;
…
}
The other boxes we'll place at the span place where #boxOne left off.
#boxTwo {
grid-column: 3;
…
}
#boxThree {
grid-column: 3;
…
}
Now things are looking the way we want.
I would approach this using CSS Grid. In your example, the images would implicitly take up the necessary space, and you wouldn't need to use px values in the line declaring grid-template-columns. In your case, you could replace 120px with 1fr which is a fractional unit utilized by CSS Grid.
Another advantage of using CSS Grid is that you can avoid a lot of additional width and height settings, as well as using margins for the gaps between items.
#showroom {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 120px);
gap: 1rem;
}
#boxOne {
grid-column: 1 / 3;
grid-row: 1 / 3;
}
#boxTwo {
grid-column: 3;
grid-row: 1 / 2;
}
#boxThree {
grid-column: 3;
grid-row: 2 / 3;
}
#showroom > * {
background-color: #444;
padding: 20px;
border-radius: 5px;
}
<div id="showroom">
<div id="boxOne"></div>
<div id="boxTwo"></div>
<div id="boxThree"></div>
</div>
Recently I have started learning CSS Grid. I am currently working on a landing-page section that consists of 6 rows and 9 columns. I have two elements that should fill out this section.
What have I tried to fix the issue:
I googled the issue and read about functionality such as "3 / span 2" to choose a starting position.
I tried the grid-column-start method, starting from Auto, 0 and 1.
My HTML
<div class="landing-page">
<div class="container">
<div class="landing-page-item image">Image</div>
<div class="landing-page-item text">Text Here</div>
</div>
</div>
My SCSS
.landing-page {
height: 100vh;
width: 100vw;
background: rgb(2,0,36);
background: linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(2,0,36,1) 0%, rgba(9,9,121,1) 35%, rgba(0,212,255,1) 100%);
box-shadow: 0 12px 21px #7889b6;
.container {
padding-top: 100px;
display: grid;
height: 100%;
grid-template-rows: repeat(6, 1fr);
grid-template-columns: repeat(9, 1fr);
grid-column-start: 1;
}
}
.landing-page-item {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
&.image {
grid-row: span 4;
grid-column: span 2;
background-color: green;
}
&.text {
grid-row: span 4;
grid-column: span 6;
background-color: red;
}
}
What I expected to happen:
Image start at the most top-left grid and fills out 2 columns and 4 rows.
Text starts right next to the Image and fills out 6 columns and 4 rows.
What actually happens:
The image fills out two columns to display the error in a clearer way. What have I done wrong?
I looked at what outside sources could interfere with it. It turns out that clearfix.less:14 added a css attribute: content: " "; This is seemingly done to provide a Clearfix. I renamed my container to main-content and the issue was solved.
One of the main selling points of the CSS grid is that it eliminates container DIVs.
But I found a very common layout in which this doesn't appear to be true.
This page is supposed to have 4 areas: header, side, main and footer. But notice that side and main have a different background, so how is this possible to achieve with CSS grid without creating a container element for side and main, and turning the grid into header, side+main, footer?
You need to think of this in terms of a 4-column grid...then assign your divs to the appropriate rows & columns.
The background can be managed by a pseudo-element on the body although I prefer a page containing div. Same effect.
Codepen Demo
Nore info: Breaking Out With CSS Grid Layout
.page {
display: grid;
min-height: 100vh;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 100px 300px 1fr;
grid-template-rows: min-content 1fr min-content;
grid-gap: .5em;
}
.page::before {
content: "";
grid-column: 1 / 5;
grid-row: 2 / 3;
z-index: -2;
background: pink;
}
header {
background: red;
padding: 1em 0
}
footer {
background: blue;
padding: 1em 0;
}
aside {
background: green;
}
main {
background: rebeccapurple;
}
header,
footer {
grid-column: 2 / 4;
}
aside {
grid-column: 2 / 3;
grid-row: 2;
}
main {
grid-column: 3 / 4;
grid-row: 2;
}
<div class="page">
<header>HEADER-CONTENT</header>
<aside></aside>
<main></main>
<footer>FOOTER CONTENT</footer>
</div>
In this case I substituted different widths for demo purposes...
grid-template-columns: 1fr 100px 300px 1fr;
for say
grid-template-columns: 1fr 300px 640px 1fr;
Where the total of 300px + 640px equates to your 940px "container" width. These can be adjusted as you prefer.
* {
/* CSS Reset! */
margin: 0;
/* They cascade, so for them to be accessible in
the sidebar div, you have to make them available for all */
--SideBarButtonSide: 36px;
--SideBarOffsetX: 16px;
--SideBarOffsetY: 17px;
}
#SideBar {
position: fixed;
top: calc(2*var(--SideBarOffsetY) + var(--SideBarButtonSide));
}
#SideBar #SideBarGrid {
display: grid;
--SideBarTextHeight: 45px;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 250px 1fr;
grid-template-rows: 40px 200px 20px var(--SideBarTextHeight) 20px 200px;
}
#SideBarGrid #BrandLogo {
grid-column: 2 / 3;
grid-row: 2 / 3;
margin: auto;
}
#SideBarGrid #SideBarText {
grid-column: 2 / 3;
grid-row: 4 / 5;
text-align: center;
line-height: var(--SideBarTextHeight);
font-size: 35px;
}
#SideBarGrid #SideBarLinks {
/* 1 / 2 and 3 / 4 work just fine! but try 2 / 3! */
grid-column: 2 / 3;
grid-row: 6 / 7;
}
https://codepen.io/Whiteclaws/live/vpbRXL
https://imgur.com/a/fAHVd
This problem is a bit hard to put into words, so please just have a look at the codepen for yourself...
The small codepen and imgur gallery describes the issues pretty well.... You can switch to position: relative and it'll work just fine! but that would defy the point of a sidebar...
Note: One more thing, it breaks at three elements, if i only put in two (brand logo and sidebar text, it works fine!!)
Note2: It breaks even without the links, for that matter, just having the SideBarLinks div inside breaks it!
Try to change grid-template-columns: 1fr 250px 1fr; to grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr 250px;. That is what you want?
I'm trying to achieve this layout with flexbox:
Is it possible with flexbox? I can't wrap these in separate sections at the moment, so it's just a huge list like so:
<li>2x2</li>
<li>1x1</li>
<li>1x1</li>
<li>1x1</li>
<li>1x1</li>
<li>1x1</li>
<li>1x1</li>
Any input would be greatly appreciated
If anyone finds this question, too: It was answered here and I successfully implemented it using CSS Grid. The trick is to scale all elements for the "small" grid and manually enlarge to first one to use two rows and two columns.
JSFiddle Example for 6 columns and 3 rows
grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, minmax(100px, 1fr));
grid-auto-rows: 50px;
grid-gap: 10px;
}
grid-item:first-child {
grid-column: 1 / 4;
grid-row: 1 / 3;
}
grid-item {
background-color: red;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
color: white;
font-weight: bold;
}
answer on stack overflow