I have a Methode from an API. It returns a promise which resolves to an $ctrl(?) object. This objects should contain a measurement and will be updated whenever it receive a new data.
getMeasurements.latest(filter) //only a object to filter through all measurements
.then(function (latestMeasurement) {
$ctrl.latestMeasurement = latestMeasurement;
});
My problem is that I don't know how to work with this data or display it in my html file. How does $ctrl work?
Here the documentation of the API
$ctrl is the view model object in your controller. This $ctrl is a name you choose (vm is another most common name), if you check your code you can see the definition as $ctrl = this;, so basically its the this keyword of the controller function.
So now if you are using $ctrl.latestMeasurement = 'someValue', then its like you are adding a property latestMeasurement to controller function.
Now how to use it in HTML?
To access the latestMeasurement property in HTML your code must have <h1>{{$ctrl.latestMeasurement}}</h1> (H1 tag is just an example.)
Here $ctrl is different from what I explained above on controller part. Here $ctrl is the value used for controllerAs property of the controller. But $ctrl is the default value of the controllerAs property, so your code may not have the controllerAs property defined, so Angular will take default value $ctrl in HTML.
This is where most people gets confused. So let me explain,
Assume in your new controller you have declared your this keyword to variable vm, and you set your controllerAs property to myCtrl, i.e;
controllerAs: 'myCtrl' while defining controller properties.
var vm = this; in your controller function.
In this case in js you have to use vm for setting values, and in HTML you have to use myCtrl. For example,
in JS controller function vm.test = 'Hello world';
in HTML <span ng-bind="myCtrl.test"></span>
The result Hello world will be displayed in your page.
Why $ctrl and not $scope?
The view model object model concept is introduced in AngularJS 1.5, it is actually part of migrating to Angular 2 where $scope no longer exsist. So in 1.5 they introduced new approch but did not removed $scope completely.
Hope the answer helped.
For basic Javascript concepts you can see http://javascriptissexy.com/16-javascript-concepts-you-must-know-well/
For more detailed AngularJS $ctrl concept you can see https://johnpapa.net/angularjss-controller-as-and-the-vm-variable/
I suppose you are toking about this.
In this case, the
$ctrl.latestMeasurement
can means:
$ctrl, the controller where you are running this code. You can change it by $scope for example, and get the same result.
latestMeasurement, the variable where you want to store the last value of the measurement.
To explain my point of view let see the code below
<div ng-app="MeasurementApp">
<div ng-controller="MeasurementController">
<h1>{{latestMeasurement2}}</h1>
</div>
</div>
There you can see a simple angularjs app that shows a variable called latestMeasurement2 in a div and its controller called MeasurementController. Then, to display the value let check your code.
angular.module('MeasurementApp', [])
// creating the controller
.controller('MeasurementController', function(c8yMeasurements, $scope) {
// creating the variable and let it empty by now.
$scope.latestMeasurement2 = "";
// Your code
var filter = {
device: 10300,
fragment: 'c8y_Temperature',
series: 'T'
};
var realtime = true;
c8yMeasurements.latest(filter, realtime)
.then(function (latestMeasurement) {
// The latestMeasurement is where the measurement comes
// Here we just assign it into our $scope.latestMeasurement2
$scope.latestMeasurement2 = latestMeasurement;
});
});
As the documentation says
// $scope.latestMeasurement2 will be updated as soon as a new measurement is received.
$scope.latestMeasurement2 = latestMeasurement;
Hope this helps!
Related
I'm trying to set up a function in Polymer 1.0 which will allow a JSON response to tell my application which {{BindingVariable}} in which to insert the response. Unfortunately, the syntax for referencing these binding variables seems to be similar to this:this.BindingVariable, which doesn't allow for dynamic variable names.
What I really need is a way to reference these dynamically like how we can reference anything else in the DOM/PolyDOM. For example: document.querySelector('#'+elementID).
Is there any way to reference binding annotations dynamically? I've searched through the entire Polymer DOM and can't find them listed anywhere even though I know they're in the page.
example
app._onResponseRetrieved = function(e) {
for (var key in e.detail.response) {
// none of these work, but they demonstrate what I'm trying to accomplish
// this.key = e.detail.response[key];
// this.querySelector(key) = e.detail.response[key];
// window[key] = e.detail.response[key];
// document[key] = e.detail.response[key];
// Polymer.dom(key) = e.detail.response[key];
}
JSON Sent to _onResponseRetrieved
{"contactFormOutput":"Success!"}
Binding Annotation in index.html
<div>{{contactFormOutput}}</div>
this[key] = e.detail.response[key];
Javascript allows [] on any object for dynamic property referencing
I have problems binding this JSON to my list view.
http://pubapi.cryptsy.com/api.php?method=marketdatav2
No data is displayed.
Data.js
(function () {
"use strict";
var _list;
WinJS.xhr({ url: 'http://pubapi.cryptsy.com/api.php?method=marketdatav2' }).then(
function (response) {
var json = JSON.parse(response.responseText);
_list = new WinJS.Binding.List(json.return.markets);
},
function (error) {
//handle error
}
);
var publicMembers =
{
itemList: _list
};
WinJS.Namespace.define("DataExample", publicMembers);
})();
HTML:
<section aria-label="Main content" role="main">
<div id="listItemTemplate" data-win-control="WinJS.Binding.Template">
<div class="listItem">
<div class="listItemTemplate-Detail">
<h4 data-win-bind="innerText: label"></h4>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="listView" data-win-control="WinJS.UI.ListView" data-win-options="{itemDataSource : DataExample.itemList, itemTemplate: select('#listItemTemplate'), layout: {type: WinJS.UI.GridLayout}}"></div>
</section>
I feel that the API is not that well formed.
Isnt this part a bit odd?
"markets":{"ADT/XPM":{...}...}
There are three things going on in your code here.
First, a ListView must be bound to a WinJS.Binding.List's dataSource property, not the List directly. So in your HTML you can use itemDataSource: DataExample.itemList.dataSource, or you can make your DataExample.itemList dereference the dataSource at that level.
Second, you're also running into the issue that the declarative binding of itemDataSource in data-win-options is happening well before DataExample.itemList is even populated. At the point that the ListView gets instantiated, _list and therefore itemList will be undefined. This causes a problem with trying to dereference .dataSource.
The way around this is to make sure that DataExample.itemList is initialized with at least an empty instance of WinJS.Binding.List on startup. So putting this and the first bit together, we have this:
var _list = new WinJS.Binding.List();
var publicMembers =
{
itemList: _list.dataSource
};
With this, you can later replace _list with a different List instance, and the ListView will refresh itself.
This brings us to the third issue, populating the List with your HTTP response data. The WinJS.Binding.List takes an array in its constructor, not an object. You're passing the parsed JSON object straight from the HTTP request, which won't work.
Now if you have a WinJS.Binding.List instance already in _list as before, then you can just walk the object and add items directly to the List as follows:
var jm = json.return.markets;
for (var i in jm) {
_list.push(jm[i]);
}
Alternately, you could populate a separate array and then create a new List from that. In this case, however, you'll need to assign that new List.dataSource to the ListView in code:
var jm = json.return.markets;
var markets = [];
for (var i in jm) {
markets.push(jm[i]);
}
_list = new WinJS.Binding.List(markets);
var listview = document.getElementById("listView").winControl;
listview.itemDataSource = _list.dataSource;
Both ways will work (I tested them). Although the first solution is simpler and shorter, you'll need to make sure to clear out the List if you make another HTTP request and repopulate from that. With the second solution you just create a new List with each request and hand that to the ListView, which might work better depending on your particular needs.
Note also that in the second solution you can remove the itemDataSource option from the HTML altogether, and also eliminate the DataExample namespace and its variables because you'll assign the data source in code each time. Then you can also keep _list entirely local to the HTTP request.
Hope that helps. If you want to know more about ListView intricacies, see Chapter 7 of my free ebook from MSPress, Programming Windows Store Apps with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, Second Edition.
I'm trying to use $sanitize provider and the ng-bind-htm-unsafe directive to allow my controller to inject HTML into a DIV.
However, I can't get it to work.
<div ng-bind-html-unsafe="{{preview_data.preview.embed.html}}"></div>
I discovered that it is because it was removed from AngularJS (thanks).
But without ng-bind-html-unsafe, I get this error:
http://errors.angularjs.org/undefined/$sce/unsafe
Instead of declaring a function in your scope, as suggested by Alex, you can convert it to a simple filter :
angular.module('myApp')
.filter('to_trusted', ['$sce', function($sce){
return function(text) {
return $sce.trustAsHtml(text);
};
}]);
Then you can use it like this :
<div ng-bind-html="preview_data.preview.embed.html | to_trusted"></div>
And here is a working example : http://jsfiddle.net/leeroy/6j4Lg/1/
You indicated that you're using Angular 1.2.0... as one of the other comments indicated, ng-bind-html-unsafe has been deprecated.
Instead, you'll want to do something like this:
<div ng-bind-html="preview_data.preview.embed.htmlSafe"></div>
In your controller, inject the $sce service, and mark the HTML as "trusted":
myApp.controller('myCtrl', ['$scope', '$sce', function($scope, $sce) {
// ...
$scope.preview_data.preview.embed.htmlSafe =
$sce.trustAsHtml(preview_data.preview.embed.html);
}
Note that you'll want to be using 1.2.0-rc3 or newer. (They fixed a bug in rc3 that prevented "watchers" from working properly on trusted HTML.)
You need to make sure that sanitize.js is loaded. For example, load it from https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/[LAST_VERSION]/angular-sanitize.min.js
you need to include ngSanitize module on your app
eg: var app = angular.module('myApp', ['ngSanitize']);
you just need to bind with ng-bind-html the original html content. No need to do anything else in your controller. The parsing and conversion is automatically done by the ngBindHtml directive. (Read the How does it work section on this: $sce). So, in your case <div ng-bind-html="preview_data.preview.embed.html"></div> would do the work.
For me, the simplest and most flexible solution is:
<div ng-bind-html="to_trusted(preview_data.preview.embed.html)"></div>
And add function to your controller:
$scope.to_trusted = function(html_code) {
return $sce.trustAsHtml(html_code);
}
Don't forget add $sce to your controller's initialization.
The best solution to this in my opinion is this:
Create a custom filter which can be in a common.module.js file for example - used through out your app:
var app = angular.module('common.module', []);
// html filter (render text as html)
app.filter('html', ['$sce', function ($sce) {
return function (text) {
return $sce.trustAsHtml(text);
};
}])
Usage:
<span ng-bind-html="yourDataValue | html"></span>
Now - I don't see why the directive ng-bind-html does not trustAsHtml as part of its function - seems a bit daft to me that it doesn't
Anyway - that's the way I do it - 67% of the time, it works ever time.
You can create your own simple unsafe html binding, of course if you use user input it could be a security risk.
App.directive('simpleHtml', function() {
return function(scope, element, attr) {
scope.$watch(attr.simpleHtml, function (value) {
element.html(scope.$eval(attr.simpleHtml));
})
};
})
You do not need to use {{ }} inside of ng-bind-html-unsafe:
<div ng-bind-html-unsafe="preview_data.preview.embed.html"></div>
Here's an example: http://plnkr.co/edit/R7JmGIo4xcJoBc1v4iki?p=preview
The {{ }} operator is essentially just a shorthand for ng-bind, so what you were trying amounts to a binding inside a binding, which doesn't work.
I've had a similar problem. Still couldn't get content from my markdown files hosted on github.
After setting up a whitelist (with added github domain) to the $sceDelegateProvider in app.js it worked like a charm.
Description: Using a whitelist instead of wrapping as trusted if you load content from a different urls.
Docs: $sceDelegateProvider and ngInclude (for fetching, compiling and including external HTML fragment)
Strict Contextual Escaping can be disabled entirely, allowing you to inject html using ng-html-bind. This is an unsafe option, but helpful when testing.
Example from the AngularJS documentation on $sce:
angular.module('myAppWithSceDisabledmyApp', []).config(function($sceProvider) {
// Completely disable SCE. For demonstration purposes only!
// Do not use in new projects.
$sceProvider.enabled(false);
});
Attaching the above config section to your app will allow you inject html into ng-html-bind, but as the doc remarks:
SCE gives you a lot of security benefits for little coding overhead.
It will be much harder to take an SCE disabled application and either
secure it on your own or enable SCE at a later stage. It might make
sense to disable SCE for cases where you have a lot of existing code
that was written before SCE was introduced and you're migrating them a
module at a time.
You can use filter like this
angular.module('app').filter('trustAs', ['$sce',
function($sce) {
return function (input, type) {
if (typeof input === "string") {
return $sce.trustAs(type || 'html', input);
}
console.log("trustAs filter. Error. input isn't a string");
return "";
};
}
]);
usage
<div ng-bind-html="myData | trustAs"></div>
it can be used for other resource types, for example source link for iframes and other types declared here
Background:
I'm trying to run a callback when something inside the code of a directive in AngularJS happen.
Pertinent code:
HTML:
<img-cropper onselect="updateAvatarData" x="100" y="100" src="{{tempAvatar}}" id="avatarCropper"/>
Controller:
$scope.updateAvatarData = function(c){
alert("¡¡¡Funciona!!!!");
};
Directive:
<<more code up here>>
link: function(scope,element, attr) {
scope.wsId = attr.id+'WS';
scope.pvId = attr.id+'preview';
scope.x = attr.x;
scope.y = attr.y;
scope.aspectRatio = scope.x/scope.y;
scope.previewStyle = "width:"+scope.x+"px;height:"+scope.y+"px;overflow:hidden;";
scope.onSelectFn = scope.$eval(attr.onselect);
<<more code down here>>
The problem is in that last line "scope.onSelectFn = scope.$eval(attr.onselect);". That "scope.$eval(attr.onselect);" returns 'undefined'. The attr.onselect works fine, it returns the name of the function typed on the 'onselect' attribute.
I have made others directives with functions passed via attibutes with no problem, but am unable to find what I am doing wrong here.
Thanks in advance
Why you are doing like this when u can easily use '&' feature available with angular
calling method of parent controller from a directive in AngularJS
Still if you want to call parent function like this then you should be using $parse instead of eval see a very below small example when using
link: function (scope,element,attrs) {
var parentGet = $parse(attrs['onselect']);
var fn = parentGet(scope.$parent);
fn();
},
scope.$eval(attr.onselect) should work.
Here is a working fiddle (tested in Chrome) with a minimal link function:
link: function(scope, element, attr) {
scope.onSelectFn = scope.$eval(attr.onselect);
console.log(attr.onselect, ',', scope.onSelectFn);
scope.onSelectFn();
},
The only other thing I can think of is that since onselect is an HTML attribute, maybe it doesn't work on some other browsers. So maybe try using a different attribute name.
By default, $eval only evaluates the given expression against the current scope. You can pass in a different data object to evaluate against, and in your case it is the parent scope. You should call it like this:
scope.onSelectFn = scope.$eval(attr.onselect, scope.$parent);
See the documentation here
Apologies if this has already been mentioned or answered but I have looked for a few days and cannot work this out. I am new to both Knockout and StackOverflow so bear with me please.
I am working with CakePHP and have some JSON returned from my controller which is in the following format
{"countries":[{"Country":{"id":"1","country":"England"}},{"Country":{"id":"2","country":"Wales\/Cymru"}},{"Country":{"id":"3","country":"Scotland"}},{"Country":{"id":"4","country":"Republic of Ireland"}},{"Country":{"id":"5","country":"Northern Ireland"}}]};
I am hoping to have the above counties appear as an item in a select statement with the value being set to 1 and the text displayed as the country. However I cannot seem to get knockout to do this for me. I am sure this is a simple question to those familiar with knockout but I cannot understand what to do all I see is the list of objects but do not know how to access the object properties on the data-bind
HTML
<select data-bind="options:countries, optionsText:'Country'"></select>
Javascript
var viewModel = {};
var data = {"countries":[{"Country":{"id":"1","country":"England"}},{"Country":{"id":"2","country":"Wales\/Cymru"}},{"Country":{"id":"3","country":"Scotland"}},{"Country":{"id":"4","country":"Republic of Ireland"}},{"Country":{"id":"5","country":"Northern Ireland"}}]};
var jsData = ko.mapping.fromJS(data);
ko.applyBindings(jsData);
I have created a simple JSFiddle http://jsfiddle.net/jbrr5/14/ to show what is happening any help would be appreciated with this small challenge
Your data has an odd structure. It's like this:
- countries
- Country
- id
- country
The actual id and country is another level deep in the array of countries. You'd have to do some hacking around just to get those to appear in the select element as-is. It would be better if you just mapped to the inner Country objects.
var mappingOptions = {
'countries': {
'create': function (options) {
// map to the inner `Country`
return ko.mapping.fromJS(options.data.Country);
}
}
};
var viewModel = ko.mapping.fromJS(data, mappingOptions);
ko.applyBindings(viewModel);
Updated fiddle
You have very complex structure of array. For your case you have to write 'Country.country' in options binding but it doesn't work because binding cannot parse such complex expression. Instead of using options and optionsText bindings you can use foreach:
Here is working fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/vyshniakov/jbrr5/18/
But I would recommend you change structure of your data to
{"countries":[{"id":"1","country":"England"}]};
or map data accordingly. In this case you could use options binding:
<select data-bind="options:countries, optionsText:'country', optionsValue:'id'"></select>