I am trying to undertake a yum upgrade on one of my servers and I am getting this error:
Could not retrieve mirrorlist https://cds.rhel.updates.googlecloud.com/pulp/mirror//client/rhel6/x86_64 error was
14: Peer cert cannot be verified or peer cert invalid
I've looked across the internet and the common answer is turn SSL off however this doesn't work either.
https://cds.rhel.updates.googlecloud.com/pulp/repos/client/rhel6/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found"
Trying other mirror.
To address this issue please refer to the below knowledge base article
https://access.redhat.com/articles/1320623
If above article doesn't help to resolve this issue please open a ticket with Red Hat Support.
Has anyone else been experiencing this? What have I been doing wrong?
Thanks in advance for any help that you can provide,
Sam
This question was answered the google issue tracker at this URL: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/67348923
Related
I am installing various versions of openshift 4.x but i am getting the above mentioned error..
My bootstrap node comes online and pick the given ip which i gave in dhcp file and i am able to ssh it successfully aswell from my Loadbalancer but whenever i start the master node i get (GET error: Get https://api-int.openshiftX.yyyy.com:22623/config/master) sometimes its like GET error: Get https://api-int.openshiftX.yyyy.com:22623/config/master: EOF) and also i get this error too sometimes.(GET error: Get https://api-int.openshiftX.yyyy.com:22623/config/master: x509 :certificate is expired or is not yet valid. )
Can somebody help me on this.
I am trying to establish an event subscription via zmq from my locally running sawtooth network. As soon as I start my event-subscriber container, I get the error "interrupted system call".
I am following the example from here https://github.com/danintel/sawtooth-cookiejar/tree/master/events/go
I have tried using validatorUrl as tcp://localhost:4004 tcp://validator-0:4004
note: validator-0 is my local container name for the validator
Also, have tried with the direct IP of the validator container tcp://<IP>:4004
zmqConnection.RecvMsgWithId() is throwing the error.
The error I am getting is exactly at this line https://github.com/danintel/sawtooth-cookiejar/blob/master/events/go/src/events_client.go#L105
Can someone please help for the probable reasons or the way I can debug this one?
I do not know, but one possible cause is this example was recently updated to a new version of Go, 1.11 (from 1.9) after your posting:
https://github.com/danintel/sawtooth-cookiejar/pull/9
Because of this error:
Loading input failed: unsupported version of go: exit status 2: flag provided but not defined: -compiled
The issue was related to inter-pod communication. So the issue was, my event subscriber client was in a completely different pod than the pod where the validator container was running. In that case, we need to used the FQDN of that pod. Refer to the link below.
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/dns-pod-service/#pod-s-hostname-and-subdomain-fields
Guys!
I'm new to Bizagi and I'm trying to connect it to Alfresco Community 5.2 version. I have troubles with the url.
I followed these steps:
http://help.bizagi.com/bpm-suite/en/index.html?setting_ecm_bizagi.htm
The problem is when I create new repository in the url field I'm putting this link: http://citstnlab02:9080/alfresco/cmis
and I get an error "Cannot connect with the specified repository". Also the link doesn't open in my browser - it gives me 404 error. I tried with couple more links like:
/alfresco/cmisws
/alfresco/api/-default-/public/cmis/versions/1.1/atom
/alfresco/api/-default-/public/cmis/versions/1.0/atom
/alfresco/api/-default-/public/cmis/versions/1.1/browser
and any of them is working.
Can anyone tell me what url should I use and if I should make any additional changes to Alfresco?
Thank you in advance!
Best regards,
Albena Mincheva.
I've been searching for a while now and I can't find the exact list of all fail to load error code/error description of google chrome.
I'm talking about this the highlighted text
Can someone give me a link?
I did some digging and I must admit, it's not easy to find a full exhaustive list of all (Chromium) networking error codes.
The full list of all Chromium error codes can be found in the file net_error_list.h:
https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/net/base/net_error_list.h
It looks like Google Chrome prepends ERR_ to all the codes listed in the above list.
However, error codes in XHR error responses are slightly different. These codes follow the format of the linux system file errno.h as defined by POSIX.1-2001, or C99:
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/errno.3.html
Finally, some common NodeJS errors have been listed at the NodeJS API Documentation:
https://nodejs.org/api/errors.html#errors_common_system_errors
I'd like to end this answer with a simple comparison example. The error of an operation timeout would be named as follows by the listed 'standards':
TIMED_OUT internally in Chromium.
ERR_TIMED_OUT displayed in Google Chrome.
ETIMEDOUT in the XHR error object (error.code).
Using your example:
CONNECTION_REFUSED -> internally in Chromium
ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED -> displayed in Google Chrome
ECONNREFUSED -> in linux (POSIX.1) or network error stacks
By the way for only listing all error codes
USE :
chrome://network-errors/
It's about 220 in total as of now in chrome version (69.0.3497.100)
I have chromium Version 97.0.4692.71 (Official Build), snap (32 bit), on Description: Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS. The problem was solved using the command in the terminal
chromium --no-sandbox
after that everything worked.
in the new version 1.3 of ORION if I make a GET http request on the root of the server, the broker immediately breaks down.
I set the logs at DEBUG level and de trace levels to 0-255, the execution seems to be correct. There is no trace which help us undestand what is happening before the crash.
We tried in diferent ORION installations(docker from docker HUB, on CENTos OVM)
Anyone knows what is happening?
Thanks in advance.
I just did a quick test and I can confirm that this is a bug. A recent change in the detection of the API version uses the URI PATH without first checking for empty URI PATH. The result is a segmentation fault. The fix is more than easy. Will be fixed in the next few days and included in the next release (1.4.0).