I have a large object, full of WKT information from a GIS system. I'm looping over the data and mapping it into layers, then pushing those layers onto the map. This is working fine and I'm getting the right data showing up.
for (var j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
var dataLayer = new Microsoft.Maps.Layer($scope.thing);
for (var i = 0; i < bArray.length; i++) {
if (bArray[i].count == $scope.thing) {
dataLayer.add(new Microsoft.Maps.WellKnownText.read(bArray[i].wkt);
dataLayer.item = bArray[i].count;
}
}
Microsoft.Maps.Events.addHandler(dataLayer, "click", polylineClicked);
$scope.map.layers.insert(dataLayer);
$scope.map.layers[j].setVisible(false);
$scope.thing++;
}
The data in each layer breaks down into different categories, stored in the field "item", and I show those categories in a side legend.
My question is how do I find "item" for each segment on the map? When I view the map object I can see the layers, when I go into the layers I can see the primitives, but when I enter the primitive, they all have the same category in "item", instead of what they should have.
How do I find "item" for each segment?
Thanks
Docmur
First off, use the metadata property of the layer to store custom info, otherwise you risk overwriting one of the internal properties of the layer class. For example: dataLayer.metadata = { item: "custom data" };
That said, your item property is on the dataLayer, not on the individual primitives. It also looks like you are adding the same value to it over an over again on the inner loop so you will end up with a lot of values that are the same. Can you provide more details on what you want to achieve as there likely is a much cleaner way to do this.
Related
I'm using Flash AS3 trying to display random questions from an xml list on stage. When the user clicks an option it should move on to another question but the one they got should be removed from the list so it will not come back.
I have the randomize part okay but can't figure out how to remove the question from the list.
Here is the section I have.
function randomizeQuestion():void {
var numOfQuestions:Number = xmlData.item.length();
var shuffledNumbers:Array = new Array(randomAns.length);
var randomPos:Number = 0;
//Randomizes selected question
currentQuestion = int(Math.random() * numOfQuestions);
//Randomizes answer numbers
for (var i:int = 0; i < shuffledNumbers.length; i++)
{
randomPos = int(Math.random() * randomAns.length);
shuffledNumbers[i] = randomAns.splice(randomPos, 1)[0];
}
randomAns = shuffledNumbers;
correctAns = xmlData.item[currentQuestion].children().(hasOwnProperty("#correct"));
}
Try to get index:
correctAnsIndex = xmlData.item[currentQuestion].children().(hasOwnProperty("#correct")).childIndex();
or if more elements, to get first one:
correctAnsIndex = xmlData.item[currentQuestion].children().(hasOwnProperty("#correct"))[0].childIndex();
then use delete where appropriate, like here:
delete xmlData.item[correctAnsIndex];
I would add another array to your code in which you can store all the questions that are eligible. As a question gets asked, remove it from that array. So you'll have one array of allQuestions and another array of eligibleQuestions. allQuestions can just be a comprehensive list. Then, push all the questions you want to go through into the eligibleQuestions array. As the questions get answered, splice them from the array.
It would be good to also share an example of your XML file that you're loading, but let's use the example below.
<data>
<item>
<question></question>
<option1></option1>
<option2></option2>
</item>
<item>
<question></question>
<option1></option1>
<option2></option2>
</item>
</data>
Based on the code you have, I assume your function is being called each time you want to randomize a question.
Now what you'd want to do is create an array that holds the number of <item> tags you have outside of this function so that you can remove values from it whenever you want.
You can create this var numOfQuestions:Array = new Array(); as a global variable and then initialize it using a loop before you enter the randomizeQuestions() function.
for(var i = 0; i < xmlData['item'].length(); i++)
{
numOfQuestions.push(i);
}
Basically this array will serve as a method of calling a specific item and removing it from the program without altering the actual XML file in any way.
Then whenever you wish to remove an element you use
numOfQuestions.splice(numOfQuestions.indexOf(valueToBeRemoved), 1);
This will search the array for the element you wish to remove and then remove it from the array.
Lastly the randomizeQuestion function has to be modified.
currentQuestion = int(Math.random() * numOfQuestions.length); //since numOfQuestions is now an array instead of a Number
I've spent nearly 1 week to learn working with objects instead of arrays. I had thought it was easy to call them and created some objects and set their properties. However I can't access them now, I tried this:
function onBoxClick(event:MouseEvent):void {
var str:String = event.currentTarget.name;
trace(str);
str = str.substring(str.indexOf("_") + 1);
trace(getChildByName("copy_" + str)); // trying to trace an object by name
}
My question is if there's a practical way of dealing with objects, otherwise what's the purpose of using them.
Edit: Here's my function that I use to create movieclips and other things:
function addBoxes(isUpdate:Boolean):void {
var copyOne:Object = getReadOnlyValues();
copyOne.name = "copy_" + num;
// Set default mc1 settings
var settings1:Object = copyOne.mc1Settings;
for(var num2:String in settings1) {
copyOne.mc1[num2] = settings1[num2];
}
// Set default mc1text settings
var settings2:Object = copyOne.mc1TextSettings;
for(var num3:String in settings2) {
copyOne.mc1Text[num3] = settings2[num3];
}
copyOne.mc1.x = nextXpos;
copyOne.mc1.name = "captionBox_" + num;
addChild(copyOne.mc1);
copyOne.mc1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onCaptionClick);
copyOne.mc1Text.name = "captionBoxText_" + num;
copyOne.mc1.addChild(copyOne.mc1Text);
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
// Set default mc2 settings
var settings4:Object = copyOne.mc2Settings;
for(var num4:String in settings4) {
copyOne.mc2[num4] = settings4[num4];
}
// Set default mc2text settings
var settings5:Object = copyOne.mc2TextSettings;
for(var num5:String in settings5) {
copyOne.mc2Text[num5] = settings5[num5];
}
copyOne.mc2.x = nextXpos;
copyOne.mc2.y = copyOne.mc1.height;
copyOne.mc2.name = "box2_" + num;
addChild(copyOne.mc2);
copyOne.mc2Text.name = "box2BoxText_" + num;
copyOne.mc2.addChild(copyOne.mc2Text);
copyOne.mc2.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onBoxClick);
if (num / subunits is int) {
trace (num);
// createMc("normalBox", true);
}
nextXpos = nextXpos + copyOne.mc2.width;
// traceObj(copyOne);
// traceObj(getReadOnlyValues());
}
I called this function in a loop so I created many movieclips. Now I can't access objects' properties and their childen (e.g textfield).
Objects I have on stage: Movieclips and textfields
Where they come from: The function above
What I'm trying to do with them: Tracing movieclips and textfields (that are holded by objects) to change their children (textfield) text
What happens instead of what I expect: Trace code outputs undefined instead of giving me object type trace(getChildByName("copy_" + str)); // trying to trace an object by name
Is there a practical way of accessing an object whose name is "copy_1" and its property whose name is "box2_1" (movieclip)?
One problem I see is the "copyOne" object has been created within the scope of "addBoxes", so it will no longer exist outside of this function.
Another is you're trying to access an Object via getChildByName, which only addresses displayObjects of the displayObjectContainer you are calling from.
If you want to loosely keep track of variables with things like Objects or MovieClips (which are both dynamic-style objects that let you add properties to them as you wish), just use MovieClips to house your values. The movieClips, being on the stage, will be retained in memory until removed from the displayList (stage).
Also, check out the Dictionary, a sort of key/value based way of storing collections of objects.
Better yet, if you use strongly-typed custom objects (creating your own classes to extend MCs, and adding your own public or private methods and values), there are benefits such as using Vectors (fancy, fast arrays that are compatible with any Object type you choose).
I don't really know if I understood your question or not, but as #ozmachine said in his answer, you can not use getChildByName, instead I think that you can take a look on this, may be it can help :
var container:DisplayObjectContainer = this;
function getReadOnlyValues():Object {
return {
mc1: new box(),
mc1: {
name: 'mc1_',
alpha: 1,
x: 0,
y: 0,
width: 30,
height: 25
},
mc1Text: new TextField(),
mc1Text: {
text: 'test',
x: 0,
y: 0,
selectable: false,
multiline: false,
wordWrap: false
}
}
};
// create 5 objects
for(var i=0; i<5; i++){
container['copy_'+i] = getReadOnlyValues();
var obj:Object = getObjectByName('copy_'+i);
obj.mc1.alpha = 1;
obj.mc1.x = 0;
obj.mc1.y = 50 * i;
obj.mc1.width = 100;
obj.mc1.addChild(obj.mc1Text);
obj.mc1Text.text = 'test_' + i;
addChild(obj.mc1);
}
// get object by name
function getObjectByName(name:String):Object {
return container[name];
}
// change the text of the 4th button
stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, function(e:MouseEvent):void {
var obj:Object = getObjectByName('copy_3');
obj.mc1Text.text = 'new text';
})
Array and Object are both data structures.
Data means some form of information.
Data structure means some form of information being stored in a certain way.
Array and Object are two different ways to store information.
Arrays identify data with integer numbers.
An integer number to identify a single element of an array is called an index
Arrays are ideal to represent a list of similar things that belong to each other.
var names:Array = ["John", "Paul", "George", "Ringo"];
This often means that the elements of an array are of the same type, like in the example above.
But they don't have to:
var numbers:Array = [42, "twenty-five", "XIIV"];
For the above examples it's easy to answer the questions "What are the names of the four beatles?", "What different representations of numbers did you stumble upon during your trip through the historic town?". Other questions are harder or impossible to answer. "What Roman numerals did you stumble upon in the historic town?"
Objects identify data with names.
A name to identify a single element of an object is called a property
Objects are ideal to represent a list of dissimilar things that belong to each other.
var paula:Object = {age:37, name:"Paula", hairColor:0x123456};
This often means that the elements of an object are of different type, like in the example above.
But they don't have to:
var car:Object = {manufacturer:"Porsche", color:"red", sound:"wroooooom", soundOfDriver:"weeeeeeeeeeee"};
Considering this, let's take a look at your code and see how it applies.
The big picture is that you have a function addBoxes that you call multiple times. As one function should have one purpose, this function will do something similar every time it is executed. Uh-Oh: "similar". Whatever the result of this function is, it should go into an array. Each call to that function would be an element of the array. You can see this clearly on your use of "num" to identify whatever is happening in your current run of the function.
What data is present in your function?
copyOne
mc1
mc1Text
mc2
mc2Text
copyOne is a troublemaker here and what causes your confusion. It's trying to do everything at once and therefore you are not able to think clearly about when to use a Array and when Object. One would call it a god object. And that's not a good object to have around.
Your choice for variable names is very bad.
You choose super generic names like "mcX" only to later add a name property to it that describes what it truly is.
But even that doesn't hold true for whatever "Box2" is supposed to be.
Choose names so that it'S easy to understand what something in your code is.
It looks like you created all or parts of this structure jsut for this question and therefore lacked meaningful names.
I highly recommend that you do not learn by such made up projects. But from the real world.
I will therefore impose the following goal:
mc1 and mc1Text represent a caption
mc2 and mc2Text represent a content
With all this, I ask again:
What data is present in your function?
captionBox
captionText
contentBox
contentText
Both caption and content consist of a box and a text.
These are different things, so caption and content are each an object with properties "box" and "text"
One could think that due to this similarity, they both should go into an array.
But I beg to differ. A caption and a text are not the same thing. You deal with captions and texts differently. Walking on the streets you might catch a big caption in the news quickly, but not a lengthy text. That's why each of them should be a property of the object that's created in the function.
Here's somewhat of a conclusion:
var allBoxes:Array = []; // array to store the similar results of every function call
function createBoxes():void
{
var boxes:Object = {};
//the box consists of caption & content, both bying of the same type, but are containing different data
boxes.caption = {box:{}, text:{}}; //caption
boxes.content = {box:{}, text:{}}; //content
allBoxes.push(boxes);
}
This is it. That's how and why I would model your data with objects and arrays.
But it doesn't end here. My conclusion lacks a lot of the code you posted.
While the above is mostly language independent, the missing code is specific to Actionscript and not just on how to model data. It's as follows...
As3 is object oriented.
This is good, because the above conclusion has a lot of objects in it.
To define how some object is/does/moves/farts/etc, one creates classes.
The following changes take place (for reasons out of the scope of this answer):
createBoxes (formerly known as addBoxes) calls the constructor of
a class "CaptionAndContent" that extends Sprite.
There's no more need to explicitely create an object "boxes" as the constructor does exactly that.
The caption and content will not have a property "box", because
they can be the box themselves. This is exactly how it's done in the
code of the question. The default settings are set in the constructors of their classes.
Here's reduced snippet of code that hopefully illustrates how the classes could look like.
Each class should be in its own file, with the necessary imports, package block and the additional functionality that you did not specify in your question.
public class CaptionAndContent extends Sprite
{
private var caption:Caption;
private var content:Content;
public function CaptionAndContent(captionText:String = "", contentText:String = "")
{
caption = new Caption(captionText);
addChild(caption);
content = new Content(contentText);
content.y = caption.height;
addChild(content);
}
}
public class ClickableBoxWithText extends Sprite
{
protected var textField:TextField;
public function ClickableBoxWithText(text:String = "")
{
textField = new TextField();
textField.text = text;
addChild(textField);
addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onClick);
}
protected function onClick(mouseEvent:MouseEvent):void
{
//override this in a sublclass
}
}
public class Caption extends ClickableBoxWithText
{
public function Caption(text:String = "")
{
super(text);
// apply all the default settings of caption here.
}
}
public class Content extends ClickableBoxWithText
{
public function Content(text:String = "")
{
super(text);
// apply all the default settings of content here.
}
}
Using them would look something like this:
var allBoxes:Array = []; // array to store the similar results of every function call
function createBoxes():void
{
var captionAndContent:CaptionAndContent = new CaptionAndContent("This is the caption...", "...for this content");
captionAndContent.x = nextXpos;
addChild(captionAndContent);
allBoxes.push(captionAndContent);
}
Last but not least, the identification problem in the click handler.
Your question already contains the answer:
event.currentTarget
That's the reference to the object that was clicked on.
In my code it would be
mouseEvent.currentTarget
This identifies the object already. It's pointless to look up one of its properties (its name for example) in order to search all the objects for that name, just to identify the same object that you already had to identify (without a name) in order to get the name.
You aren't identifying the objects by name anyway. What differs between the names and what supposedly makes them unique is a number at their end. As pointed out in this answer, this is what's called an index and the thing you are trying to identify with it should go into an array. In my example codes, this is allBoxes.
That's a pretty long winded statement.
I'm building a faceted search which implements WebAPI in .Net and utilizes Knockout on the front end. My search response includes two lists of objects, the Resources (object with data for presentation) and Resource Facets (array of strings).
\"ResourceFacets\": [\r\n \"Book\",\r\n \"Video\",\r\n \"DVD\",\r\n \"eBook\",\r\n \"Audio\"\r\n ]\r\n}"
My ViewModel contains both the facets and the resources along with a presentation object to handle a custom row count:
function ViewModel() {
this.facets = ko.observableArray(results.ResourceFacets);
this.resources = ko.observableArray(results.ResourceResults);
this.resourceRows = ko.computed(function() {
var rows = [],
rowIndex = 0,
itemsPerRow = 2;
var resourceList = this.resources();
for (var index = 0; index < resourceList.length; index++) {
if (!rows[rowIndex]) {
rows[rowIndex] = [];
}
rows[rowIndex].push(resourceList[index]);
if (rows[rowIndex].length == itemsPerRow) {
rowIndex++;
}
}
return rows;
});
};
This allowed me to create a dynamic list of checkboxes to handle the facets and also display the resource results. What I'm trying to do now is add a Select All checkbox which will, by default, select all the boxes. From other examples I've seen, my understanding is that I need an observable property, something like "Selected", on that ResourceFacet. I just feel like that is too much that the API needs to know about my presentation.
So my question is how can I avoid having to add a "selected" bool value to the ResourceFacets but still be able to select all checkboxes or deselect the "All" checkbox when a user deselects a facet?
You can keep the list of booleans necessary to track the selection on a separate member of your view model, in addition to facets and resources. Just create a new observableArray of booleans of the same size of facets and bind those values to the checkboxes.
Another solution is to create the objects necessary to bind the checkboxes on the fly, based on results.ResourceFacets, keeping your API clean. For example:
var realModel = [];
for (var i = 0; i < results.ResourceFacets; i++) {
realModel.push({ name: results.ResourceFacets[i], chkBoxVal: ko.observable(false) });
}
this.facets = ko.observableArray(realModel);
i have a class (TheList.as). in which i have an array "Data" and it has a couple of values. Then i have a loop through which i am creating a scrollable list which uses the values from "Data" array. [I am trying make a unit converter]
Then i have another class "Units.as". In that class i have created three instances of "TheList". A main list ("myList"), and to sublists "ListFrom" and "ListTo". They are using values from "Data" array. Now i have text field whose value changes to whatever item is clicked. When i click "Angle" in the main list, i want the sublists to get populated with ("Degree", "Radian" etc)..
Here is what i tried
if(myList._TextLabel.text == "Angle")
{
ListFrom.Data = ["Degree", "Radian"];
}
But nothing happens, i do not get any error either. When i do this in an "ENTER_FRAME" event and trace (ListFrom.Data), i can see that the values change, but they do not get assigned to the list items in the list. I would really appreciate the help. Thanks!
Here are complete Classes for understanding the situation better(the code is pretty messy, as i am a newbie to OOP)
TheList.as: http://pastebin.com/FLy5QV9i
Units.as : http://pastebin.com/z2CcHZzC
where you call ListFrom.Data = ["Degree","Radian"], make sure when the data changed, the renders in the ListFrom have been set new data. for example, you may use MyRender in ListFrom for show, you should debug in the set data method in MyRender.
you should call the code below after you call ListFrom.Data = ["Degree","Radian"];
for (var i:int = 0; i < Data.legnth;i++) {
var render:MyRender = ListFrom[i] as MyRender;
if (render) {
render.data = Data[i];
} else {
var render:MyRender = new MyRender();
render.data = Data[i];
ListFrom.addChild(render);
}
}
You can use event listeners, singleton classes or reference one class to another, depending on the style you want. All are equally valid and fast / efficient.
I was trying to make a similar thing with the game SameGame (ie. the block above the removed blocks fall downward). Before trying this with an Array that contains MovieClips, this code worked (tried it with int values). With MovieClips on the array, it seems not working the same way.
With int values, example:
popUp(0, 4): Before: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10; After: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10
But with MovieClips:
popUp(0, 4): Before: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10; After; 1,2,3,4
// Assume the numbers are movieclips XD
Basically, it strips everything else, rather than just the said block >_<
Here's the whole method. Basically, two extra arrays juggle the values above the soon-to-be removed value, remove the value, then re-stack it to the original array.
What could be wrong with this? And am I doing the right thing for what I really wanted to emulate?
function popUp(col:uint, row:uint)
{
var tempStack:Array = new Array();
var extraStack:Array = new Array();
tempStack = IndexArray[col];
removeChild(tempStack[0]);
for(var ctr:uint = tempStack.length-(row+1); ctr > 0; ctr--)
{
removeChild(tempStack[ctr]);
extraStack.push(tempStack.pop());
trace(extraStack);
}
tempStack.pop();
for(ctr = extraStack.length; ctr > 0; ctr--)
{
tempStack.push(extraStack.pop());
//addChild(tempStack[ctr]);
}
IndexArray[col] = tempStack;
}
PS: If it's not too much to ask, are there free step-by-step guides on making a SameGame in AS3 (I fear I might not be doing things right)? Thanks in advance =)
I think you just want to remove an element and have everything after that index shift down a place to fill what you removed. There's an inbuilt function for this called splice(start:uint, length:uint);
Parameters:
start - the index to start removing elements from
length - the amount of elements to remove
var ar:Array = ["hello","there","sir"];
ar.splice(1, 1);
ar is now -> ["hello", "sir"];
As per question:
Here's an example with different types of elements:
var ar:Array = [new MovieClip(), "some string", new Sprite(), 8];
ar.splice(2, 1);
trace(ar); // [object MovieClip], some string, 8
And further example to display the indexes being changed:
trace(ar[2]); // was [object Sprite], is now 8