how to enable hybrid mode for graphhopper 0.9 version. in the config file, what all we need to enable/disable/change
my intention is to use traffic data using the link
graphhopper-traffic-data-integration
i am not able make it work, when i feed the data using curl, i get below error
{
"message" : "Not found"
}
i tried changing the prepare.ch.weightings=hybrid but i get error
now web. JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx1000m -Xms1000m -server
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: weighting null not supported
at com.graphhopper.GraphHopper.createWeighting(GraphHopper.java:908)
at com.graphhopper.GraphHopper.initCHAlgoFactoryDecorator(GraphHopper.java:798)
at com.graphhopper.GraphHopper.load(GraphHopper.java:738)
at com.graphhopper.GraphHopper.importOrLoad(GraphHopper.java:617)
at com.graphhopper.http.GraphHopperModule$3.start(GraphHopperModule.java:182)
at com.graphhopper.http.GHServer.start(GHServer.java:118)
at com.graphhopper.http.GHServer.start(GHServer.java:62)
at com.graphhopper.http.GHServer.main(GHServer.java:57)
If using the hybrid mode you can disable the speed mode:
prepare.ch.weightings=no
and set the default fastest weighting for hybrid:
prepare.lm.weightings=fastest
See the documentation
Related
I'm using pulumi azure native for infrastructure as code. I need to create an Azure Web App (based on an App Service Plan) and add some app settings (and connection strings) throughout the code, e.g., Application Insights instrumentation key, Blob Storage account name, etc.
I figured out that there is a method, WebAppApplicationSettings, that can update web app settings:
from pulumi_azure_native import web
web_app = web.WebApp(
'my-web-app-test123',
...
)
web.WebAppApplicationSettings(
'myappsetting',
name=web_app.name,
resource_group='my-resource-group',
properties={'mySetting': 123456},
opts=ResourceOptions(depends_on=[web_app])
)
It turns out that WebAppApplicationSettings replaces the entire app settings with the value given in the properties parameter, which is not what I need. I need to append a new setting to the existing settings.
So, I tried this:
Fetch the existing settings from web app using list_web_app_application_settings_output
Add the new settings the existing settings
Update the app settings using WebAppApplicationSettings
from pulumi_azure_native import web
app = web.WebApp(
'my-web-app-test123',
...
)
current_apps_settings = web.list_web_app_application_settings_output(
name=web_app.name,
resource_group_name='my-resource-group',
opts=ResourceOptions(depends_on=[web_app])
).properties
my_new_setting = {'mySetting': 123456}
new_app_settings = Output.all(current=current_apps_settings).apply(
lambda args: my_new_setting.update(args['current'])
)
web.WebAppApplicationSettings(
'myappsetting',
name=app.name,
resource_group='my-resource-group',
properties=new_app_settings,
opts=ResourceOptions(depends_on=[web_app])
)
However, this doesn't work either and throws the following error during pulumi up:
Exception: invoke of azure-native:web:listWebAppApplicationSettings failed: invocation of azure-native:web:listWebAppApplicationSettings returned an error: request failed /subscriptions/--------------/reso
urceGroups/pulumi-temp2/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/my-web-app-test123/config/appsettings/list: autorest/azure: Service returned an error. Status=404 Code="ResourceNotFound" Message="The Resource 'Microsoft.Web/sites/my-web-app-test123' under resource group 'pulumi-temp2' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix"
error: an unhandled error occurred: Program exited with non-zero exit code: 1
Is there way that I can add a new app setting to Azure Web App using pulumi without changing/removing the existing settings?
Here's a suboptimal workaround: App Configuration and Enable Azure Function Dynamic Configuration.
And as far as I can tell it comes with some drawbacks:
cold start time may increase
additional costs
care must be taken to avoid redundant calls (costly)
additional boilerplate code needed for every function app
Maybe there's a better way, I mean I hope there is, I just haven't found it yet either.
After some searching and reaching out to pulumi-azure-native people, I found an answer:
Azure REST API doesn't currently support this feature, i.e., updating a single Web App setting apart from the others. So, there isn't such a feature in pulumi-azure-native as well.
As a workaround, I stored (kept) all the app settings I needed to be added, updated, or removed in a dictionary throughout my Python script, and then I passed them to the web.WebAppApplicationSettings class at the end of the script so that they will be applied all at once to the Web App resource. This is how I solved my problem.
I am using Red Hat's AMQ 6 on OpenShift and consuming messages via Red Hat's EAP. I'm using the AMQ JCA resource adapter 5.11.1.
I want to set jms.nonBlockingRedelivery=true.
I can't find this in any of the following docs:
Connection Configuration URI
Resource Adapter Properties
Activation Spec Properties
Can this be set via a URL query parameter?
When I set a wrong value like:
<config-property name="ServerUrl">tcp://localhost:61616?...&jms.nonBlockingRedelivery=WWWWWWW1
The log says:
org.apache.activemq.ra.ActiveMQEndpointWorker: Successfully established connection to broker...&jms.nonBlockingRedelivery=WWWWWWW1]
I would have expected a complaint e.g. "no boolean," "can't parse," etc.
Setting nonBlockingRedelivery via URL query parameter is supported. You can do so using the jms. prefix, e.g. jms.nonBlockingRedelivery=true.
The reason you don't see any exception is because the OpenWire JMS client ultimately uses Boolean.valueOf(String) to evaluate WWWWWWW1 which simply returns false.
I added this to the documentation.
I am doing a lookup operation Couchbase Java SDK 3.0.9 which looks like this:
// Set up
bucket = cluster.bucket("my_bucket")
collection = bucket.defaultCollection()
// Look up operation
val specs = listOf(LookupInSpecStandard.get("hash"))
collection.lookupIn(id, specs)
The error I get is BUCKET_NOT_AVAILABLE. Here are is the full message:
com.couchbase.client.core.error.UnambiguousTimeoutException: SubdocGetRequest, Reason: TIMEOUT {"cancelled":true,"completed":true,"coreId":"0xdb7f8e4800000003","idempotent":true,"reason":"TIMEOUT","requestId":608806,"requestType":"SubdocGetRequest","retried":39,"retryReasons":["BUCKET_NOT_AVAILABLE"],"service":{"bucket":"export","collection":"_default","documentId":"export:main","opaque":"0xcfefb","scope":"_default","type":"kv"},"timeoutMs":15000,"timings":{"totalMicros":15008977}}
The strange part is that this code hasn't been touched for months and the lookup broke out of a sudden. The CB cluster is working fine. Its version is
Enterprise Edition 6.5.1 build 6299.
Do you have any ideas what might have gone wrong?
Note that in Couchbase Java SDK 3.x, the Cluster::bucket method returns instantly, and continues opening a bucket in the background. So the first operation you perform - a lookupIn here - needs to wait for that resource opening to complete before it can proceed. It looks like it took a little longer to access the Couchbase bucket than usual and you got a timeout.
I recommend using the Bucket::waitUntilReady method after opening a bucket, to block until the resource opening is complete:
bucket = cluster.bucket("my_bucket")
bucket.waitUntilReady(Duration.ofMinutes(1));
This problem can occur because of firewall. You need to allow these ports.
Client-to-node
Unencrypted: 8091-8097, 9140 [3], 11210
Encrypted: 11207, 18091-18095, 18096, 18097
You can check more from below
https://docs.couchbase.com/server/current/install/install-ports.html#_footnotedef_2
In developing in Fi-Cloud's CEP I've been having an issue that has been happening repeatedly. As I'm trying to develop a definition to perform a task, CEP's server and Authoring Tool stop responding, although ssh is still responsive.
This issue happens as I develop. I'm using the AuthoringTool to alter the definition bit by bit and then I re-upload it to the server through the authoring tool's export feature.
To reinitiate the proton with the new definition each time I alter it, I use Google's Postman with this single operation:
-PUT (url:http://{ip}:8080/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/instances/ProtonOnWebServer)
header: 'Content-Type' : 'application/json'; body : {"action": "ChangeDefinitions","definitions-url" : "/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/definitions/Definition_Name"}
At the same time, I'm logged in with three ssh intances, one to monitor the files being created on /opt/tomcat10/sample/ and other things, and the other two to 'tail -f ' log files the definition writes to, as events are processed: one log for events recieved and another log for events detected by the EPAgent.
I'm iterating through these procedures over and over as I'm developing and eventualy CEP server and the Authoring Tool stop responding.
By "tailing" tomcat's log file (# tail -f /opt/tomcat10/logs/catalina.out) I can see that, when under these circumstances, if I attemp a:
-GET (url: http://{ip}:8080/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/instances/ProtonOnWebServer)
I get no response back and tomcat logs the following response:
11452100 [http-bio-8080-exec-167] ERROR org.apache.wink.server.internal.RequestProcessor - An unhandled exception occurred which will be propagated to the container.
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
Exception in thread "http-bio-8080-exec-167" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
Ssh is still responsive and I can look at tomcat's log this way.
To get over this and continue, I exit ssh connections and restart CEP's instance in the Fi-Cloud.
Is the procedure I'm using to re-upload and re-run the definition inapropriate? Should I take a different approach to developing?
When you update a definition that the CEP is already working with, and you want the CEP engine to work with the updated definition, you need to:
Export the definition using the authoring tool export (as you did)
Stop the engine run, using REST PUT
PUT //host:8080/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/instances/ProtonOnWebServer
{"action":"ChangeState","state":"stop"}
Start the engine, using REST PUT
PUT //host:8080/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/instances/ProtonOnWebServer
{"action":"ChangeState","state":"start"}
You don't need to activate the "ChangeDefinitions" action, since it is the same definition name that the engine is already working with.
Activating "ChangeDefinitions" action, only influences the next run of the CEP, and has no influence on the current run.
This answer your question about how you should update a CEP definition.
Hope it will solve your issue.
I was wondering if Wirecloud offers complete support for object storage with FI-WARE Testbed instead of Fi-lab. I have successfully integrated Wirecloud with Testbed and have developed a set of widgets that are able to upload/download files to specific containers in Fi-lab with success. However, the same widgets do not seem to work in Fi-lab, as i get an error 500 when trying to retrieve the auth tokens (also with the well known object-storage-test widget) containing the following response:
SyntaxError: Unexpected token
at Object.parse (native)
at create (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/controllers/Token.js:343:25)
at callbacks (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:164:37)
at param (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:138:11)
at pass (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:145:5)
at Router._dispatch (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:173:5)
at Object.router (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:33:10)
at next (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/node_modules/connect/lib/proto.js:195:15)
at Object.handle (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/server.js:31:5)
at next (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/node_modules/connect/lib/proto.js:195:15)
I noticed that the token provided in the beggining (to start the transaction) is
token: Object
id: "%fiware_token%"
Any idea regarding what might have gone wrong?
The WireCloud instance available at FI-WARE's testbed is always the latest stable version while the FI-LAB instance is currently outdated, we're working on updating it as soon as possible. One of the things that changes between those versions is the Object Storage API, so sorry for the inconvenience as you will not be able to use widgets/operators using the Object Storage in both environments.
Anyway, the response you were obtaining seems to indicate the object storage instance you are accessing is not working properly, so you will need to send an email to one of the available mail lists for getting help (fiware-testbed-help or fiware-lab-help) telling what is happening to you (remember to include your account information as there are several object storage nodes and ones can be up and the others down).
Regarding the strange request body:
"token": {
id: "%fiware_token%"
}
This behaviour is normal, as the WireCloud client code has no direct access to the IdM token of the user. It's the WireCloud's proxy which replaces the %fiware_token% pattern with the correct value.