I have been reading the documentation for last 2 days. I'm new to feathersjs.
First issue: any link related to feathersjs is not accessible. Such as this.
Giving the following error:
This page isn’t working
legacy.docs.feathersjs.com redirected you too many times.
Hence I'm unable to traceback to similar types or any types of previously asked threads.
Second issue: It's a great framework to start with Real-time applications. But not all real time application just require alone DB access, their might be access required to something like Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure etc. In my case it's the same and it's more like problem with setting up routes.
I have executed the following commands:
feathers generate app
feathers generate service (service name: upload, REST, DB: Mongoose)
feathers generate authentication (username and password)
I have the setup with me, ready but how do I add another custom service?
The granularity of the service starts in the following way (Use case only for upload):
Conventional way of doing it >> router.post('/upload', (req, res, next) =>{});
Assume, I'm sending a file using data form, and some extra param like { storage: "s3"} in the req.
Postman --> POST (Only) to /upload ---> Process request (isStorageExistsInRequest?) --> Then perform the actual upload respectively to the specific Storage in Req and log the details in local db as well --> Send Response (Success or Failure)
Another thread on stack overflow where you have answered with this:
app.use('/Category/ExclusiveContents/:categoryId', {
create(data, params) {
// do complex stuff here
params.categoryId // the id of the category
data // -> additional data from the POST request
}
});
The solution can viewed in this way as well, since featherjs supports micro service approach, It would be great to have sub-routes like:
/upload_s3 -- uploads to s3
/upload_azure -- uploads to azure and so on.
/upload -- main route which is exposed to users. User requests, process request, call the respective sub-route. (Authentication and Auth to be included as well)
How to solve these types of problems using existing setup of feathersjs?
1) This is a deployment issue, Netlify is looking into it. The current documentation is not on the legacy domain though, what you are looking for can be found at docs.feathersjs.com/api/databases/querying.html.
2) A custom service can be added by running feathers generate service and choosing the custom service option. The functionality can then be implemented in src/services/<service-name>/<service-name>.class.js according to the service interface. For file uploads, an example on how to customize the parameters for feathers-blob (which is used in the file uploading guide) can be found in this issue.
Related
I'm using pulumi azure native for infrastructure as code. I need to create an Azure Web App (based on an App Service Plan) and add some app settings (and connection strings) throughout the code, e.g., Application Insights instrumentation key, Blob Storage account name, etc.
I figured out that there is a method, WebAppApplicationSettings, that can update web app settings:
from pulumi_azure_native import web
web_app = web.WebApp(
'my-web-app-test123',
...
)
web.WebAppApplicationSettings(
'myappsetting',
name=web_app.name,
resource_group='my-resource-group',
properties={'mySetting': 123456},
opts=ResourceOptions(depends_on=[web_app])
)
It turns out that WebAppApplicationSettings replaces the entire app settings with the value given in the properties parameter, which is not what I need. I need to append a new setting to the existing settings.
So, I tried this:
Fetch the existing settings from web app using list_web_app_application_settings_output
Add the new settings the existing settings
Update the app settings using WebAppApplicationSettings
from pulumi_azure_native import web
app = web.WebApp(
'my-web-app-test123',
...
)
current_apps_settings = web.list_web_app_application_settings_output(
name=web_app.name,
resource_group_name='my-resource-group',
opts=ResourceOptions(depends_on=[web_app])
).properties
my_new_setting = {'mySetting': 123456}
new_app_settings = Output.all(current=current_apps_settings).apply(
lambda args: my_new_setting.update(args['current'])
)
web.WebAppApplicationSettings(
'myappsetting',
name=app.name,
resource_group='my-resource-group',
properties=new_app_settings,
opts=ResourceOptions(depends_on=[web_app])
)
However, this doesn't work either and throws the following error during pulumi up:
Exception: invoke of azure-native:web:listWebAppApplicationSettings failed: invocation of azure-native:web:listWebAppApplicationSettings returned an error: request failed /subscriptions/--------------/reso
urceGroups/pulumi-temp2/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/my-web-app-test123/config/appsettings/list: autorest/azure: Service returned an error. Status=404 Code="ResourceNotFound" Message="The Resource 'Microsoft.Web/sites/my-web-app-test123' under resource group 'pulumi-temp2' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix"
error: an unhandled error occurred: Program exited with non-zero exit code: 1
Is there way that I can add a new app setting to Azure Web App using pulumi without changing/removing the existing settings?
Here's a suboptimal workaround: App Configuration and Enable Azure Function Dynamic Configuration.
And as far as I can tell it comes with some drawbacks:
cold start time may increase
additional costs
care must be taken to avoid redundant calls (costly)
additional boilerplate code needed for every function app
Maybe there's a better way, I mean I hope there is, I just haven't found it yet either.
After some searching and reaching out to pulumi-azure-native people, I found an answer:
Azure REST API doesn't currently support this feature, i.e., updating a single Web App setting apart from the others. So, there isn't such a feature in pulumi-azure-native as well.
As a workaround, I stored (kept) all the app settings I needed to be added, updated, or removed in a dictionary throughout my Python script, and then I passed them to the web.WebAppApplicationSettings class at the end of the script so that they will be applied all at once to the Web App resource. This is how I solved my problem.
I would like to serve a Next.js app in europe using Firebase Hosting & Functions capabilities.
I do understand from the doc that:
If you are using HTTP functions to serve dynamic content for Firebase
Hosting, you must use us-central1
and that
Firebase Hosting supports Cloud Functions in us-central1 only
It's pretty clear: you must use us-central. But my main target is Europe..
I've read the following on the Cloud Functions locations guide:
For HTTP and callable functions, we recommend that you first set your
function to the destination region, or closest to where most expected
customers are located, and then alter your original function to
redirect its HTTP request to the new function (they can have the same
name). [Solution 1] If clients of your HTTP function support
redirects, you can simply change your original function to return an
HTTP redirect status (301) along with the URL of your new function.
[Solution 2] If your clients do not handle redirects well, you can
proxy the request from the original function to the new function by
initiating a new request from the original function to the new
function. The final step is to ensure that all clients are calling the
new function.
I've highlighted what seems to be two solutions to my initial problem:
Solution 1
Have a us-central1 function that send a 301 redirection to https://europe-west1-[myProject].cloudfunctions.net/[myEuropeanFunction]
Have a europe-west1 function that does the job (in my case, serve the Next.js app)
Happily using Firestore located in europe-west1
This would only work if clients of the HTTP function support redirects. In my case, it's fine: all browsers support redirection.
exports.nextServer = functions
.https
.onRequest((req, res) => {
res.set('location', 'https://europe-west1-<my-project>.cloudfunctions.net/nextServerEurope');
res.status(301).send()
});
exports.nextServerEurope = functions
.region('europe-west1')
.https
.onRequest((req, res) => {
return server.prepare().then(() => nextjsHandle(req, res));
});
The issue with that solution is that the URL changes in the browser to https://europe-west1-.cloudfunctions.net/nextServerEurope :-/
Solution 2
Have a us-central1 function that initiate a new/proxy request to the europe-west1 function
Have the same europe-west1 function that does the job (in my case, serve the Next.js app)
Still happily using Firestore located in europe-west1
By proxy request (as suggested in the guide), it would mean using a lib like axios I suppose. I know there are some libraries to perform proxy request available for node as well.
However, with that solution, the first issue I can think of is the unnecessary delay introcuded by passing by the us endpoint:
client -> us endpoint -> eu endpoint -> do stuff -> us endpoint -> client
Billing wise, I'm wondering what would be the impact..
I know that two services from different regions calling each others can increase the latency and the billing (egress).
With the first solution, there's no egress traffic as it's only a redirection to the european endpoint. But the redirection itself is not a valid solution in my case.
It's unclear for me what would be the additional billing cost with the second solution (beside the latency cost): is the traffic for the proxy request from us to eu going to be expensive?
To wrap-up:
The solution 1 is easy but leads to a non-transparent redirection
The solution 2 seems ok but it requires extra http request which leads to extra-latency (and potentially extra billing)
In the end, both solutions doesn't seem quite okay.
Therefore my question:
How do you serve in Europe dynamic content using Firebase Hosting and Functions?
Firebase Hosting only supports Cloud Functions in Us-Central as you mentioned and as stated in the Firebase Hosting Official Documentation.
I have created a Feature Request in Public Issue Tracker to support other regions when using Firebase Hosting with Cloud Functions. Please note, there is no ETA when this will be implemented.
So as #Doug Stevenson suggest, you can use Firebase Hosting with Cloud Run instead to serve your Dynamic Content.
Just to update. As of August 2022.
Finally, latency issue can be solved easily for now.
Firebase Hosting rewrites to CF3 are able to be done to any CF3
region, not just us-central1.
Reference: Feature Request Ticket
I have a RESTful Web API that is running properly as I can test it with Fiddler. I see calls going through, I see responses coming back.
I am developing a tablet application that needs to use the Web API in order to fetch data or make updates in the repository.
My calls do not return and there is not a single trace in the Fiddler to show that my calls even reach the server.
The first call I need to make is to login. The URI would be this:
http://localhost:53060/api/user
This call would normally return some information about the user (such as group membership, level of authorization and so on). The Web API uses Windows Authentication, so the repository is able to resolve all these fields based on the credentials passed in. As I said, in Fiddler I see the three calls made to the URI as the authentication is negotiated between the caller and the server. The third call returns with a JSON object that contains all information generated from the repository as expected.
Now, moving to my client I have the following:
var webApiClient = new HttpClient(new HttpClientHandler()
{
UseDefaultCredentials = true
})
{
BaseAddress = new Uri("http://localhost:53060/")
};
webApiClient.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Add(new MediaTypeWithQualityHeaderValue("application/json"));
HttpResponseMessage response = await webApiClient.GetAsync("api/user");
var userLoginInfo = await response.Content.ReadAsAsync<UserLoginInformation>();
My call to "GetAsync" never returns and, like I said, I see no trace of it in Fiddler.
Any idea of what I'm doing wrong?
Changing the URL where the Web API was exposed seemed to have fixed the problem. Thanks to #Nkosi for the suggestion.
For anyone stumbling onto this question and asking themselves how to change the URL of the Web API, there are two ways. If the simulator is running on the same machine with the Web API, the change has to be made in the "applicationhost.config" file for IIS Express. You can locate this file by right-clicking on the IIS Express icon in the Notification Area (the bottom right corner) and selecting show all websites. Highlight the desired Web API and it will show where the application host configuration file is located. In there, one needs to locate the following section:
<bindings>
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="*:53060:localhost" />
</bindings>
and replace the "localhost" name with the IP address of the machine where the Web API is running.
However, this approach will not work once you start testing your tablet app with a real device. IIS Express must be coerced into exposing the Web API to the outside world. I found an excellent node.js package that can help with that. It is called IISExpress-proxy.
I'm building an application that stores files into the FIWARE Object Storage. I don't quite understand what is the correct way of storing files into the storage.
The code python code snippet below taken from the Object Storage - User and Programmers Guide shows 2 ways of doing it:
def store_text(token, auth, container_name, object_name, object_text):
headers = {"X-Auth-Token": token}
# 1. version
#body = '{"mimetype":"text/plain", "metadata":{}, "value" : "' + object_text + '"}'
# 2. version
body = object_text
url = auth + "/" + container_name + "/" + object_name
return swift_request('PUT', url, headers, body)
The 1. version confuses me, because when I first looked at the only Node.js module (repo: fiware-object-storage) that works with Object Storage, it seemed to use 1. version. As the module was making calls to the old (v.1.1) API version instead of the presumably newest (v.2.0), referencing to the python example, not sure if that is an outdated version of doing it or not.
As I played more with the module, realised it didn't work and the code for it was a total mess. So I forked the project and quickly understood that I will need rewrite it form the ground up, taking the above mention python example from the usage guide as an reference. Link to my repo.
As of writing this the only methods that aren't implement is the object storage (PUT) and object fetching (GET).
Had some addition questions about the Object Storage which I sent to fiware-lab-help#lists.fiware.org, but haven't heard anything back so asking them here.
Haven't got much experience with writing API libraries. Should I need to worry about auth token expiring? I presume it is not needed to make a new authentication, every time we interact with storage. The authentication should happen once when server is starting-up (we create a instance) and it internally keeps it. Should I implement some kind of mechanism that refreshes the token?
Does the tenant id change? From the quote below is presume that getting a tenant I just a one time deal, then later you can use it in the config to make less authentication calls.
A valid token is required to access an object store. This section
describes how to get a valid token assuming an identity management
system compatible with OpenStack Keystone is being used. If the
username, password and tenant details are known, only step 3 is
required. source
During the authentication when fetching tenants how should I select the "right" one? For now i'm just taking the first one similar as the example code does.
Is it true that a object storage container belongs to only a single region?
Use only what you call version 2. Ignore your version 1. It is commented out in the example. It should be removed from the documentation.
(1) The token will be valid for some period of time. This could be an hour or a day, depending on the setup. This period of time should be specified in the token that is returned by the authentication service. The token needs to be periodically refreshed.
(2) The tenant id does not change.
(3) Typically only one tenant id is returned. It is possible, however, that you were assigned more than one id, in which case you have to pick which one you are currently using. Containers typically belong to a single tenant and are not shared between tenants.
(4) Containers are typically limited to a single region. This may change in the future when multi-region support for a container is added to Swift.
Solved my troubles and created the NPM module that works with the FIWARE Object Storage: https://github.com/renarsvilnis/fiware-object-storage-ge
I've a MySql database hosted in my web site, with a table named UsrLic
Where any one wants to buy my software must register and enter his/her Generated Machine Key (+ username, email ...etc).
So my question is:
I want to automate this process from my software, how this Process will be?
Should I connect and update my database directly from my software ( and this means I must save all my database connection parameters in it * my database username , password , server * and then use ADO or MyDac to connect to this database ? and if yes how secure is this process ?
or any other suggestions .
I recommend creating an API on your web site in PHP and calling the API from Delphi.
That way, the database is only available to your web server and not to the client application, ever. In fact, you should run your database on localhost or with a private IP so that only machines on the same physical network can reach it.
I have implemented this and am implementing it again as we speak.
PHP
Create a new file named register_config.php. In this file, setup your MySQL connection information.
Create a file named register.php. In this file, put your registration functions. From this file, include 'register_config.php'. You will pass parameters to the functions you create here, and they will do the reading and writing to your database.
Create a file named register_api.php. From this file, include 'register.php'. Here, you will process POST or GET variables that are sent from your client application, call functions in register.php, and return results back to the client, all via HTTP.
You will have to research connecting to and querying a MySQL database. The W3Schools tutorials will have you doing this very quickly.
For example:
Your Delphi program calls https://mysite/register_api.php with Post() and sends the following values:
name=Marcus
email=marcus#gmail.com
Here's how the beginning of register_api.php might look:
// Our actual database and registration functions are in this library
include 'register.php';
// These are the name value pairs sent via POST from the client
$name = $_POST['name'];
$email = $_POST['email'];
// Sanitize and validate the input here...
// Register them in the DB by calling my function in register.php
if registerBuyer($name, $email) {
// Let them know we succeeded
echo "OK";
} else {
// Let them know we failed
echo "ERROR";
}
Delphi
Use Indy's TIdHTTP component and its Post() or Get() method to post data to register_api.php on the website.
You will get the response back in text from your API.
Keep it simple.
Security
All validation should be done on the server (API). The server must be the gatekeeper.
Sanitize all input to the API from the user (the client) before you call any functions, especially queries.
If you are using shared web hosting, make sure that register.php and register_config.php are not world readable.
If you are passing sensitive information, and it sounds like you are, you should call the registration API function from Delphi over HTTPS. HTTPS provides end to end protection so that nobody can sniff the data being sent off the wire.
Simply hookup a TIdSSLIOHandlerSocketOpenSSL component to your TIdHTTP component, and you're good to go, minus any certificate verification.
Use the SSL component's OnVerifyPeer event to write your own certificate verification method. This is important. If you don't verify the server side certificate, other sites can impersonate you with DNS poisoning and collect the data from your users instead of you. Though this is important, don't let this hold you up since it requires a bit more understanding. Add this in a future version.
Why don't you use e.g. share*it? They also handle the buying process (i don't see how you would do this for yourself..) and let you create a reg key through a delphi app.