I don't want to create extension because they are limited.
I would like my code to execute on any page from the browser.
I have read that creating plugin is deprecated for security reason (NPAPI).
There is Emscripten that looks like executed only on server.
Is there a way to code and execute program from the computer to access and modify browser page content?
You can look TamperMonkey extension. That extension provide user made scripts and run.
Chome Web Store Tampermonkey
Related
I have a chrome extension. I have a lot of code in the content script.
Nowadays Google takes a lot of time to publish the extension. About 10-15 days due to covid etc.
I have the same extension on Firefox too where I load all remote code through script injection.
How can I do the same with the Chrome extension? When I try to load the remote script it gives me the following error.
This document requires 'TrustedScript' assignment.
I think Chrome became stricter with the release of version 83.
Also as per ChromeStore support, a wrapper that loads the code remotely is the way to go. But I can't find suitable documentation or a sample code. Questions found on Stackoverflow are about 4-5 years old at minimum.
Also, some of the guys are of opinion that the Chrome store will reject the extension if we inject remote script. But following image belongs to the submission extension UI of Chrome Developer Dashboard.
And you can clearly see that I is saying that does your app requires remote code.
Any help is highly appreciated.
I tried using very simple HTML to create several links to several batch files on my server that are intended to run when users click on the links. Using Chrome, every time I click on one of those files my browser displays the script itself (even though its a .bat) and doesn't actually run the script. Internet Explorer runs it every time, however all the users on the network use Chrome for web browsing.
Is there any way to force Chrome (preferably through HTML or VB or some other scripting on the page itself rather than change all of the users' browser settings) to run these batch files when the user clicks on the link?
The answers given so far - that it's "not possible" - are incorrect or outdated. Using Chrome Apps you can call executables (called "hosts") if they are registered with Chrome. Of course a Chrome App is a client application so you need to distribute it.
See https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/nativeMessaging#examples
HTML, JS on browser cannot run shell command, command line. You have to implement server script to execute your bat file then call it from HTML, JS via Ajax or direct link.
All of the examples I've seen show apps launching in their own windows. This may be great an all for chromebook/chrome os, but is there still an option to launch in a browser tab?
No, there is no way to do that. Chrome Packaged Apps are not supposed to run inside a browser. You can, however, open URLs in a browser tab using window.open. But you won't have control of that tab after you issue the command.
If you need some sort of integration/control between your Chrome Packaged App and the browser, you can create an extension and make a communication pipe between the extension and the app - as long as both are running, using the chrome.runtime.sendMessage API.
See this sample for a simple code that does exactly that (two apps and one extension exchanging messages directly, without any server component).
chrome.app.window.create will create a new Window for an App.
If you want window manipulation, you should switch to chrome.tabs API and look for an extension instead of an App.
Reference
chrome.tabs
chrome.app.window
I am building an extension for Chrome which gives the user a basic API. I would like for other developers to have the ability to add functions of their own to my API. For example, some developers offer a new "plugin" (which is only JavaScript code), and I want users to be able to download that plugin into their extension.
The main problem I'm facing is this:
How do you load new code into an extension permanently?
Ideally I would like to add code into the extension's JavaScript, but I have no way to write to the file; I am under the impression that I am restricted by JavaScript - is this true?
While I could perhaps load new code dynamically (by downloading some script), that code will only hold for the current run, and is not added permanently. Rather, it is gone once the user reloads the extension.
The only solution I can see so far is to create a login system where I save each user's downloaded plugins and give him the mandatory option to load them every time he opens the extension.
This method is very messy and impractical, because I don't want to make a user login every time. In fact, I would very much like to refrain from using any login system whatsoever.
What I desire is something similar to what the GreaseMonkey extension does, which is the ability to let users write scripts and allow other users to be able to download them.
I'm obviously looking to create an extension which is much smaller and simpler than GreaseMonkey, but something like GreaseMonkey is more or less what I am looking for.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
All of the "plugins" will be independent chrome extensions. You can then use Message Passing to send a message to every installed extension and the ones that are plugins should have code that goes something like:
if recieve "some identifying key"
then respond "information about this plugin"
Now your main extension knows what plugins are installed and can load their JS files using chrome-extension://[extensionID]/file.js".
That should get you started :)
I have begun using Google Chrome as a primary browser, but I miss my Evernote extension, which can clip a web page directly to the local Evernote application. Is it possible for me to write an extension in Chrome that can do this?
Yes it is possible, through NPAPI, but your local application should be prepared for external communication. Code running in an NPAPI plugin has the full permissions of the current user and is not sandboxed or shielded from malicious input by Google Chrome in any way.
All this is described here:
http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/npapi.html
To avoid the NPAPI way, another idea would be to communicate with a custom local http server binded to localhost and send requests to it.
Disclaimer: Never tried it but theoretically it should work.
I don't think chrome allows this, simply because it would be dangerous to let plugins have extended priviledges, they even run in an extra, low-rights thread and only communicate with chrome itself through pipes.