Good day! Making a website on Cakephp 3. Got a question. How can I insert column in a table from a controller? Thank you!
You can write raw SQL using an instance of your connection.
use Cake\Datasource\ConnectionManager;
// In your controller
$sql = "ALTER table `schema`.`table` ADD COLUMN `field` VARCHAR(45);";
$connection = ConnectionManager::get('default');
$connection->execute($sql);
I'm not sure why you would want to do this, you may want to reconsider your reasoning.
There is also the schema system which provides useful methods for reading/dropping/creating schemes -you would lose all of the data in that table though (or need to create a really slow method that stores all the data in memory and adds it back after dropping/creating).
Finish this tutorial please before start with cake 3
Cake 3 tutorial
Related
Is there any way to detect when an ALTER TABLE statement is executed in MySQL? For example, if the following statement were executed on some_table, is there any way to detect that the column name changed from column_name_a to column_name_b and log it in another table in the DB?
ALTER TABLE `some_table`
CHANGE COLUMN `column_name_a` `column_name_b` VARCHAR(255) NULL DEFAULT NULL;
Thanks.
To my knowledge it is unfortunately not possible to put triggers on the INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables, since they are strictly spoken views and triggers can't be made to work on views. If triggers would be possible on the INFORMATION SCHEMA, then you could have a trigger on updates of the INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS table to identify name changes.
However, what you can do is one of the following things:
option 1) Maintain a real table with all column names. Then create a function that checks for a discrepancy between the INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS table abd your table. If there is one, you know the name has changed. You need to copy over the new name to your column name table and do whatever else you wanted to do upon name change.
The function to check for discrepancies then must be run periodically via the mysql scheduler in order to detect name changes as quickly as possible. Note that this is not a real time solution. There will be a lag between the ÀLTER TABLE command and its detection. If this is unacceptable in your scenario you need to go with
option 2) Do not call ÀLTER TABLE directly, but wrap it in a function. Within this function you can also call other functions to achieve what you need to achieve. If may be worth while to formulate the needed steps in a higher programming language that you use to drive your application. If this is not possible, you will be limited to the possibilities that are offered in functions/procedures in the mysql environment.
Sorry to not have a simpler way of doing this for you.
I have a table CLIENT with client_id as auto increment.
Now i need to populate other tables SERVICE, COSTUMERS and STOCK at same time.
Problem is that i need to enter the newly generated client_id from CLIENT in other tables too.
Right now what i am doing:
I insert a row in CLIENT table.
Fetch MAX(client_id) from that table.
Put it into others.
Here i am worried about consistency as it all depends on guess that MAX(client_id) would be recently generated one. Is there any other way to do so without putting consistency at risk ??
Help Please
You may achieve it using
mysql_insert_id()
It will return the AUTO INCREMENT value in the last query. If last query doesn't generate an auto-increment value, it will return 0.
For further information, consider to take a look at Php.net manual.
EDIT:
As you mentioned, Mysql is deprecated and to use Mysqli or PDO will be more secure.
Mysqli
Procedural style: mysqli_insert_id ( mysqli $link )
Object oriented style: $mysqli->insert_id
PDO
$PDO->lastInsertId()
I have a table with 120 columns. I need to set up audit trail which would log any column if it was changed. As it is now, I guess I have to set up a trigger with condition something like this for every column:
IF(NEW.columnName != OLD.columnName)
THEN //log the old value
This would need to be done 120 times... While I would have accepted this approach 20 years ago, today I refuse to believe it's impossible to automate such a simple procedure finding changed columns automatically.
This is what I discovered so far:
Neither NEW nor OLD is a table, it's a sort of a language construct, therefor you can't do "SELECT NOW.*" or something similar.
Dynamic SQL is not allowed in triggers (this could have solved the problem).
Procedures using dynamic SQL are not allowed in triggers (seriously, Oracle, it looks like you have worked really hard to disable this feature no matter what).
I was thinking to use BEFORE and AFTER triggers in conjunction with temporary tables and variables which would have possibly solved the problem, however yet again dynamic SQL would be required. I feel like I hit a dead end.
Is there a solution to this at all?
A side question: would this be possible in PostgreSQL?
UPDATE: I found 2 potential solutions however neither of them look clear enough to me:
using EVENTS as a workaround to use triggers in conjunction with dynamic SQL workaround. I have to admit, I don't quite get this, does this mean that EVENT fires every second no matter what?
This article says that it is possible to use dynamic SQL inside trigger as long as temporary table is used with it. That is still using dynamic SQL, so I don't quite understand.
interesting, I was facing the same problem couple of years ago with implementing dynamic trigger-based audit log. The solution I came up with was to simply generate the SQL trigger code which then can be (automatically) applied to replace old trigger definitions. If memory serves, I created few SQL templates which were processed by a PHP script which in turn was outputting complete trigger definitions based on "SELECT COLUMN_NAME FROM information_schema.COLUMNS WHERE ..." Yes, the trigger code was huge, but it worked! Hope that helps a little =)
i did this for one of the projects by creating a shadow table. if you are not dealing with millions of updates, this might work
when the user logs in, SET #user_id = { logged in user id }
create a trigger on the table before update to copy the row to be modified to a shadow table with the same structure ( note that you cannot have a primary key in the shadow table nor unique keys )
add additional columns to the shadow table ( modified_by, modified_on )
create a small php script to show the diff between columns - this way you dont touvh the existing php code base
if you are dealing with lots of updates and want to keep the shadow table small, a cron can be written to parse the shadow table and identify which column changed and only store this info to another table
I am working with Hibernate 3.6.4 and MySQL.
I have a table with unique constraints on four columns and 3 other columns. When the UI application create new instances of the corresponding Object it may create it with those four properties with values already in the table. the result, upon save, is, of course JDBC Exception of duplicate entry.
Is there a way to tell Hibernate to not insert new entry but update the rest of the three columns or upon each save I need to manually query the DB to see if exist and update accordingly?
Thanks.
The clean and database independent approach for this problem is to first check if such an instance exists and depending on that do an insert or update in your application logic.
That said, there might be a way to take advantage of the MySQL INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE feature documented here. In this case you must specify a custom SQL INSERT statement for your entity like described in this related question. But if this works depends on the way your entity IDs are generated to begin with. Take a look at this blog article concerning this issue.
Generally, you must deal with every aspect of the problem that Hibernate thinks a transient instance is persisted, when in fact a persistent instance is updated. This might be an issue with generated entity IDs, other generated entity values, entity versions, concurrency, expected insert/update row count, 2nd level and query cache, etc.
So, I think while this would be a nice thing to experiment with I would definitely not use this feature in a production application.
You must indeed explicitely get the entity with the four unique values, and then update it if it exists or create a new one if it does not. There is no way around that.
BTW, note that even with such a mechanism, you might end up with exceptions if two transactions get the entity concurrently, find that it doesn't exist, and both try to create a new one.
I need the sample program in Java for keeping the history of table if user inserted, updated and deleted on that table. Can anybody help in this?
Thanks in advance.
If you are working with Hibernate you can use Envers to solve this problem.
You have two options for this:
Let the database handle this automatically using triggers. I don't know what database you're using but all of them support triggers that you can use for this.
Write code in your program that does something similar when inserting, updating and deleting a user.
Personally, I prefer the first option. It probably requires less maintenance. There may be multiple places where you update a user, all those places need the code to update the other table. Besides, in the database you have more options for specifying required values and integrity constraints.
Well, we normally have our own history tables which (mostly) look like the original table. Since most of our tables already have the creation date, modification date and the respective users, all we need to do is copy the dataset from the live table to the history table with a creation date of now().
We're using Hibernate so this could be done in an interceptor, but there may be other options as well, e.g. some database trigger executing a script, etc.
How is this a Java question?
This should be moved in Database section.
You need to create a history table. Then create database triggers on the original table for "create or replace trigger before insert or update or delete on table for each row ...."
I think this can be achieved by creating a trigger in the sql-server.
you can create the TRIGGER as follows:
Syntax:
CREATE TRIGGER trigger_name
{BEFORE | AFTER } {INSERT | UPDATE |
DELETE } ON table_name FOR EACH ROW
triggered_statement
you'll have to create 2 triggers one for before the operation is performed and another after the operation is performed.
otherwise it can be achieved through code also but it would be a bit tedious for the code to handle in case of batch processes.
You should try using triggers. You can have a separate table (exact replica of your table of which you need to maintain history) .
This table will then be updated by trigger after every insert/update/delete on your main table.
Then you can write your java code to get these changes from the second history table.
I think you can use the redo log of your underlying database to keep track of the operation performed. Is there any particular reason to go for the program?
You could try creating say a List of the objects from the table (Assuming you have objects for the data). Which will allow you to loop through the list and compare to the current data in the table? You will then be able to see if any changes occurred.
You can even create another list with a object that contains an enumerator that gives you the action (DELETE, UPDATE, CREATE) along with the new data.
Haven't done this before, just a idea.
Like #Ashish mentioned, triggers can be used to insert into a seperate table - this is commonly referred as Audit-Trail table or audit log table.
Below are columns generally defined in such audit trail table : 'Action' (insert,update,delete) , tablename (table into which it was inserted/deleted/updated), key (primary key of that table on need basis) , timestamp (the time at which this action was done)
It is better to audit-log after the entire transaction is through. If not, in case of exception being passed back to code-side, seperate call to update audit tables will be needed. Hope this helps.
If you are talking about db tables you may use either triggers in db or add some extra code within your application - probably using aspects. If you are using JPA you may use entity listeners or perform some extra logic adding some aspect to your DAO object and apply specific aspect to all DAOs which perform CRUD on entities that needs to sustain historical data. If your DAO object is stateless bean you may use Interceptor to achive that in other case use java proxy functionality, cglib or other lib that may provide aspect functionality for you. If you are using Spring instead of EJB you may advise your DAOs within application context config file.
Triggers are not suggestable, when I stored my audit data in file else I didn't use the database...my suggestion is create table "AUDIT" and write java code with help of servlets and store the data in file or DB or another DB also ...