I can't seem to use the batcher to copy an activity to notifications. I read from the docs
that there is a 100 limit to the TO field for copying activities, so i tried out using the batcher. but it does'nt seem to work. did I miss out something on the docs or on my code? if so, how do I get over the 100 limit?
$evtConvMention = array();
$evtConvMention[] = "event:{$event->id}";
$evtConvMention[] = "notification:1";
$evtConvMention[] = "notification:2";
$batcher = FeedManager::getClient()->batcher();
$batcher->addToMany([
"actor" => "App\User:{$user->id}",
"verb" => "eventpost",
"object" => "App\EventConversation:{$post->id}",
"foreign_id" => "App\EventConversation:{$post->id}"
], $evtConvMention);
The addToMany() call will have a similar limit. While I look into the PHP library a little more, it might be easier to use the To field in the activity payload itself.
$feed = FeedManager::getClient()->feed("event", $event->id);
$now = new \DateTime("now", new \DateTimeZone('Pacific/Nauru'));
$data = [
"actor" => "App\User:{$user->id}",
"verb" => "eventpost",
"object" => "App\EventConversation:{$post->id}",
"foreign_id" => "App\EventConversation:{$post->id}",
"time" => $now
];
$feed->addActivity($data);
We also HIGHLY recommend sending your own foreign_id and time fields in the payload as well (I've added an idea for the $now value in the code above, otherwise every feed will get its own unique record, which are a limited resource on your account.
If you have more than 100 notification feeds to write this into, it might be better to have the notification feeds for those users 'follow' the event feed. Then you don't need to use the to field at all.
Related
I just set up Google Drive API Change Notifications, specifying the folderId of a certain shared folder that I have on My Drives. It sends notifications if I change the folder name, but doesn't send notifications if I add files.
I set up the channel successfully, as upon issuing these PHP commands
$client = new Google_Client();
$client->setApplicationName('Some Name');
$client->setAuthConfig( __DIR__ . '/service_account.json');
$client->setScopes(Google_Service_Drive::DRIVE);
$client->fetchAccessTokenWithAssertion();
$token = $client->getAccessToken();
$service = new Google\Service\Drive($client);
$httpclient = new \GuzzleHttp\Client();
$folderid = $someid;
$body = [
'kind' => "api#channel",
'id' => uniqid(),
'type' => 'web_hook',
'resourceId' => $folderid,
'resourceUri' => 'https://www.googleapis.com/drive/v3/files/'.$folderid,
'address' => 'myendpoint'
];
$apiendpoint = 'https://www.googleapis.com/drive/v3/files/' . $folderid . '/watch';
$result = $httpclient->post($apiendpoint, [
'headers' => ['Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'Authorization' => "Bearer {$token['access_token']}"],
'body' => json_encode($body),
"http_errors" => false]);
I see a successful return, and my channel immediately sends a sync message to my endpoint, where I have this
function myendpoint (WP_REST_Request $request) {
$headers= getallheaders();
write_log('in google drive webhook with headers '.print_r($headers, true));
$body = $request->get_body();
write_log('in google drive webhook with body '.print_r($body, true));
global $wpdb;
return http_response_code(200);
}
Via my logging, I see
[07-Nov-2021 12:52:35 UTC] in google drive webhook with headers Array
(
[Host] => courses-test.com
[User-Agent] => APIs-Google; (+https://developers.google.com/webmasters/APIs-Google.html)
[Content-Length] => 0
[Accept] => */*
[Accept-Encoding] => gzip, deflate, br
[X-Forwarded-For] => 66.102.8.121
[X-Forwarded-Proto] => https
[X-Goog-Channel-Expiration] => Sun, 07 Nov 2021 13:51:26 GMT
[X-Goog-Channel-Id] => 6187cbc82a08e
[X-Goog-Message-Number] => 1
[X-Goog-Resource-Id] => resid
[X-Goog-Resource-State] => sync
[X-Goog-Resource-Uri] => https://www.googleapis.com/drive/v3/files/folderid?acknowledgeAbuse=false&supportsAllDrives=false&supportsTeamDrives=false&alt=json
[X-Original-Host] => mydomain
)
I read here
https://developers.google.com/drive/api/v3/push
where it says
"To indicate success, you can return any of the following status codes: 200, 201, 202, 204, or 102."
and hence I am returning return http_response_code(200);
and also read here
https://developers.google.com/drive/api/v3/reference/files/watch
and I don't see anything obvious going on here.
Here
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/crawling/apis-user-agent?visit_id=637718909398077288-2640249237&rd=1
there is this remark
"Avoid unnecessary retry requests by ensuring that your application is well-designed and responds promptly to notification messages (within seconds)."
Now, when I first set up the channel, my endpoint returns right away, so that would seem to negate the above point.
Also, after I get channel set up, I also run these lines
$optParams = array(
'pageSize' => 10,
'fields' => 'nextPageToken, files(id, name)'
);
$results = $service->files->listFiles($optParams);
and indeed see a listing of files.
So I truly at a loss. When I go into the folder, whose folderId I specified to set up the watch channel, and add a file, or edit a file, I don't receive any notifications. The folder in question is shared, but as I understand, sharing only becomes an issue when dealing with shared drives, which is not my case.
And I read here,
https://developers.google.com/drive/api/v3/push#understanding-drive-api-notification-events
that watching for files being added should indeed work on a file watch, when the file is a folder, since add is one of the events for a resource, and it applies to Files.
**Update:
Ok, I seem to have things working, but not based on an add event. The only thing I changed, is that instead of using Guzzle to make the POST, as I show above, I use this
$channel->setId(uniqid());
$channel->setAddress($body['address']);
$channel->setType('web_hook');
$test = $service->files->watch($folderid, $channel);
Maybe adding some of those extra params in the $body like kind, resourceId, was messing things up when I was using POST via Guzzle. Or now that I know resourceId is not same as folderid, maybe that threw a flag on google's end so that a limited number of notifications were being sent. In any case, just using id', address and type seems to be the way to go, which I think is in the Google Drive Push docs. Just that in those docs, also mention of adding those other params in the request, like 'resourceId'. I suspect if I redo using Guzzle, but specify correct resourceId, or just leave it out and use id', address and type, that it would work.
So now, I get this sort of header in my endpoint when I add a file:
(
[Host] => courses-test.com
[User-Agent] => APIs-Google; (+https://developers.google.com/webmasters/APIs-Google.html)
[Content-Length] => 0
[Accept] => */*
[Accept-Encoding] => gzip, deflate, br
[X-Forwarded-For] => someip
[X-Forwarded-Proto] => https
[X-Goog-Changed] => children
[X-Goog-Channel-Expiration] => Mon, 08 Nov 2021 09:46:10 GMT
[X-Goog-Channel-Id] => chanid
[X-Goog-Message-Number] => num
[X-Goog-Resource-Id] => someid
[X-Goog-Resource-State] => update
[X-Goog-Resource-Uri] => https://www.googleapis.com/drive/v3/files/folderid?acknowledgeAbuse=false&supportsAllDrives=false&supportsTeamDrives=false&alt=json
[X-Original-Host] => mydomain
)
So I can detect [X-Goog-Changed] as being children and just keep track of my current uploaded files and see what the new file is. Or maybe using the fields query string somehow I can directly get the new file id?
Still seems odd that getting info about a new file is such a pain. Maybe it is easier in Google Cloud API and Google wants more people signing up for Cloud. In fact that add event only seems to apply to Cloud buckets.
In short: When watching a folder with files().watch() it is currently not possible to receive notifications about new files added to this folder
There are several workarounds that you can find along with explanations in answers to similar questions:
Use changes().watch():
https://stackoverflow.com/a/26551651/11599789 and https://stackoverflow.com/a/67787626/11599789
Pass the folderId to the token:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/33896300/11599789
Make copy of all file's metadata and query for changes:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/18151189/11599789
Also: There is a relevant feature request on Google's Issue Tracker.
It has been closed due to inactivity, but it is worth "starring" and commenting on it to increase visibility.
I'm hoping for a straight-forward solution to do this, but so far I've been coming up empty...
I have a front end vue app/form that sends data back to my laravel backend - I have a controller that validates and saves the request (not looking for feedback on this architecture at the moment unless it actually solves the problem - that's a task for another day...)
I've added a json column called "custom_redeem_fields"
For context, it's to support more flexibility and accepts key/val pairs to use in another field called "custom_redeem_instructions" that has text with delimiters for each of the keys from "custom_redeem_fields", although, I'd prefer to keep from defining these keys statically because the whole point is to be able to add new keys at will. So custom_redeem_instructions will read something like "please visit {•URL•} and enter code {•CODE•}..." and those values will come from the custom_redeem_fields json field.
In the model, I have "custom_redeem_fields" in the fillable array, as well as set as castable to json.
protected $fillable = ['custom_redeem_fields'];
protected $casts = ['custom_redeem_fields' => 'json'];
In the controller, I have ~20 additional columns (not really relevant here, so I've only included two) so I'm trying not to call them out individually beyond their validation rules. The request typically sends one field at a time, so the user can update and save each field as they go. This was working appropriately for all the other fields I had before I added the "custom_redeem_fields.xxxx" to the mix.
$validatedData = $request->validate([
'title' => 'sometimes|required|max:255',
'text' => 'sometimes|required_unless:redeem_type,9|max:255',
'custom_redeem_fields.email' => 'sometimes|email',
'custom_redeem_fields.phone' => ['sometimes', new ValidPhone],
'custom_redeem_fields.code' => 'sometimes',
'custom_redeem_fields.url' => 'sometimes|url'
]);
$ticket = Ticket::find($id)
$ticket->update($validatedData);
Now, with the "custom_redeem_fields.xxxxx" this falls apart - the entire json object stored in "custom_redeem_fields" is overwritten with the most recent update, rather than just updating the key included in the validatedData array. So if I save:
[
"title" => "Monty Pythons Flying Circus"
"text" => "Monty Pythons Flying Circus is a British surreal sketch comedy series created by and starring the comedy group Monty Python, consisting of Graham Chapman, ..."
"custom_redeem_fields" => [
"email" => "bob#example.com",
"phone" => "503.555.5555",
"code" => "1xoicvjq",
"url" => "https://example.com/"
]
]
and then I send:
"custom_redeem_fields" => ["email" => "pat#example.com"]
the custom redeem fields returns:
"custom_redeem_fields" => ["email" => "pat#example.com"]
rather than:
"custom_redeem_fields" => ["email" => "pat#example.com", "phone" => "503.555.5555", "code" => "1xoicvjq", "url" => "https://example.com/"]
It seems that validation rules need json keys to be notated with dot syntax (custom_redeem_fields.url), and eloquent needs arrow syntax (custom_redeem_fields->url), but I'm not sure what's the most straightforward way to transition between the two, which seems very not-laravel, and the documentation is certainly lacking in this department...
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Wouldn't array_merge() solve your problem, it would overwrite values you provide with the second parameter. If you give it the already existing ones as the first, it would combine the two as you want.
$customRedeemInput = [...];
$model->custom_redeem_fields = array_merge($model->custom_redeem_fields, $customRedeemInput);
$model->save();
I'm currently learning on how API works and my mentor gave me a task to create submit the form using API and store the data on database with laravel and the task also require mandatory if logic on some field.
I have succeeded with the first task (storing data to the database ) and I'm having difficulties writing the mandatory if.
I'm confused, on my task paper I'm told to create one controller, one model and two endpoints (request-schedule and request-leaving) where each endpoint should have some parameters.
and for the request-leaving parameter, there are 10 parameters, 6 of them have this requirement like (mandatory if request type Request Day Off)
There are 3 requests typewritten on there
1. Request Day off
2. Request Schedule
3. Change Schedule
I'm a super newbie in programming, does anyone know how to solve this?
public function CreateReqSchedule(Request $request)
{
$reqschedule = new B777();
$reqschedule->reqtype = $request->input('reqtype');
$reqschedule->startdate = $request->input('startdate');
$reqschedule->enddate = $request->input('enddate');
$reqschedule->reason = $request->input('reason');
$reqschedule->route = $request->input('route');
$reqschedule->actualschedule = $request->input('actualschedule');
$reqschedule->changetoschedule = $request->input('changetoschedule');
$reqschedule->swapcrewid = $request->input('swapcrewid');
$reqschedule->swapcrewschedule = $request->input('swapcrewschedule');
$reqschedule->note = $request->input('note');
$reqschedule->save();
return response()->json($reqschedule);
}
code above is my only work, I'm feeling anxious, because I've googled it myself but I'm still stuck.
So you are talking about validations. you can put laravel validation into it like below
Use required validation for mandotory data and return response in json
// Making validation for fields
$validator = \Validator::make($request->all(), [
'fields1' => 'required',
'fields2' => 'required',
'fields3' => 'required',
]);
if ($validator->fails())
{
// return response on validaton fails
return response()->json(['status'=>400,'errors'=>$validator->errors()->all()]);
}
// If validation passes store your data in database
Any one know how to send error messages to database in laravel which generate from app/exceptions/handler.php ?
I need to send what error massages generated in report() method to database.
If you are interested doing this manually, you can do something as following.
Step 1 -
Create a model to store errors that has a DB structure as following.
class Error extends Model
{
protected $fillable = ['user_id' , 'code' , 'file' , 'line' , 'message' , 'trace' ];
}
Step 2
Locate the App/Exceptions/Handler.php file, include Auth, and the Error model you created. and replace the report function with the following code.
public function report(Exception $exception) {
// Checks if a user has logged in to the system, so the error will be recorded with the user id
$userId = 0;
if (Auth::user()) {
$userId = Auth::user()->id;
}
$data = array(
'user_id' => $userId,
'code' => $exception->getCode(),
'file' => $exception->getFile(),
'line' => $exception->getLine(),
'message' => $exception->getMessage(),
'trace' => $exception->getTraceAsString(),
);
Error::create($data);
parent::report($exception);
}
(I am demonstrating this using laravel 5.6)
Because Laravel uses Monolog for handling logging it seems that writing Monolog Handler would be the cleanest way.
I was able to find something that exists already, please have a look at monolog-mysql package. I did not use it, so I don't know whether it works and if it works well, but it's definitely good starting point.
I have started using Redbean PHP recently. So I am not much aware of how it deals things.
Until now I love how simple it is making things for me. But I have ran into quite an issue today. I need to store credit card numbers into a table. But as soon as I store the bean, the card number gets changed into a float(decimal) kind of value.
'1234123412341234' is getting stored as '1.234123412341234e15'
The datatype is 'double' created by redbean, but I gave as a string. This is kind of weird for me I am not much of an expert in either SQL or PHP. Is there a way to override how redbean creates table. So someone please help me. Am I missing something here. The following is my corresponding code and the framework used is Codeigniter.
Data Variable
$data = array(
'card_name' => 'Shiva Kumar Avula',
'card_no' => '1234123412341234',
'card_issuer' => 'Visa',
'card_cvv' => '123',
'card_exp_month' => 12,
'card_exp_year' => 2020
);
$card = $this->card_model->create_card($data, TRUE); // Making it primary
Model Function
public function create_card($data, $is_primary = FALSE)
{
$card = R::dispense('card');
$card->name = $data['card_name'];
$card->number = $data['card_no'];
$card->issuer = $data['card_issuer'];
$card->cvv = $data['card_cvv'];
$card->exp_month = $data['card_exp_month'];
$card->exp_year = $data['card_exp_year'];
$card->is_primary = $is_primary;
$card->is_verified = 0;
$card->ts_created = $this->ts_sql;
$card->ts_modified = $this->ts_sql;
$id = R::store($card);
}
Snapshot of my output in phpmyadmin,
Snapshot that shows the datatype,
You can set the beans meta property for number to string.
$card->setMeta("cast.number", "string");
This will save any values of $card->number as varchar.
See RedBean Internals for more information.