I need to maintain the width of an element as a percentage of its height. So as the height changes, the width is updated.
The opposite is achievable by using a % value for padding-top, but padding-left as a percentage will be a percentage of the width of an object, not its height.
So with markup like this:
<div class="box">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
I'd like to use something like this:
.box {
position: absolute;
margin-top: 50%;
bottom: 0;
}
.inner {
padding-left: 200%;
}
To ensure the box's aspect ratio is maintained according to it's height. The height is fluid because of it's % margin - as the window's height changes, the box's height will too.
I know how to achieve this with JavaScript, just wondering if there's a clean CSS-only solution?
You can use an image that has the desired proportions as to help with proportional sizing (images can be scaled proportionally by setting one dimension to some value and other to auto). The image does not have to be visible, but it must occupy space.
.box {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
height: 50%;
}
.size-helper {
display: block;
width: auto;
height: 100%;
}
.inner {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
background: rgba(255, 255, 153, .8);
}
<div class="box">
<img class="size-helper" src="//dummyimage.com/200x100/999/000" width="200" height="100">
<div class="inner">
1. box has fluid height<br>
2. img has 2:1 aspect ratio, 100% height, auto width, static position<br>
2.1 it thus maintains width = 200% of height<br>
2.2 it defines the dimensions of the box<br>
3. inner expands as much as box
</div>
</div>
In the above example, box, inner and helper are all same size.
You can use vh units for both height and width of your element so they both change according to the viewport height.
vh
1/100th of the height of the viewport. (MDN)
DEMO
.box {
position: absolute;
height:50vh;
width:100vh;
bottom: 0;
background:teal;
}
<div class="box"></div>
There is another, more efficient way to achieve constant aspect ratio according to height.
You can place an empty svg so you dont have to load an external image.
HTML code:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
height="100"
width="200"
class='placeholder-svg'
/>
CSS code:
.placeholder-svg {
width: auto;
height: 100%;
}
Change width/height to achieve desired aspect ratio.
Keep in mind, the svg might overflow.
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg is just a namespace. It doesn't load anything.
If you change placeholder-svg class to:
.placeholder-svg {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
then height is adjusted according to width.
Demo 1 Width is adjusted according to height and 2:1 aspect ratio.
Demo 2 same as above, but you can resize easily (uses React)
The CSS trick you wrote, works pretty well to keep ratio width / height on an element.
It is based on the padding property that, when its value is in percent, is proportional to parent width, even for padding-top and padding-bottom.
There is no CSS property that could set an horizontal sizing proportionally to the parent height.
So I think there is no clean CSS solution.
As of 2021 there is a property called aspect-ratio.
Most browsers support it
div {
border: 1px solid;
margin: 8px;
}
.box {
width: 100px;
min-height: 100px;
resize: horizontal;
overflow: auto;
}
.inner1 {
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
}
.inner2 {
aspect-ratio: 3/1;
}
<div class="box">
<div class="inner1"></div>
<div class="inner2"></div>
</div>
Run this snippet and resize the outer div manually to see the inner divs behavior
I can't find a pure CSS solution. Here's a solution using CSS Element Queries JavaScript library.
var aspectRatio = 16/9;
var element = document.querySelector('.center');
function update() {
element.style.width = (element.clientHeight * aspectRatio) + 'px';
}
new ResizeSensor(element, update);
update();
CodePen demo!
Related
I am trying to set a <div> to a certain percentage height in CSS, but it just remains the same size as the content inside it. When I remove the HTML 5 <!DOCTYTPE html> however, it works, the <div> taking up the whole page as desired. I want the page to validate, so what should I do?
I have this CSS on the <div>, which has an ID of page:
#page {
padding: 10px;
background-color: white;
height: 90% !important;
}
I am trying to set a div to a certain percentage height in CSS
Percentage of what?
To set a percentage height, its parent element(*) must have an explicit height. This is fairly self-evident, in that if you leave height as auto, the block will take the height of its content... but if the content itself has a height expressed in terms of percentage of the parent you've made yourself a little Catch 22. The browser gives up and just uses the content height.
So the parent of the div must have an explicit height property. Whilst that height can also be a percentage if you want, that just moves the problem up to the next level.
If you want to make the div height a percentage of the viewport height, every ancestor of the div, including <html> and <body>, have to have height: 100%, so there is a chain of explicit percentage heights down to the div.
(*: or, if the div is positioned, the ‘containing block’, which is the nearest ancestor to also be positioned.)
Alternatively, all modern browsers and IE>=9 support new CSS units relative to viewport height (vh) and viewport width (vw):
div {
height:100vh;
}
See here for more info.
You need to set the height on the <html> and <body> elements as well; otherwise, they will only be large enough to fit the content. For example:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<title>Example of 100% width and height</title>
<style>
html, body { height: 100%; margin: 0; }
div { height: 100%; width: 100%; background: red; }
</style>
<div></div>
bobince's answer will let you know in which cases "height: XX%;" will or won't work.
If you want to create an element with a set ratio (height: % of it's own width), use the aspect-ratio property. Make sure height is not explicitly set on the element for it to work. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/aspect-ratio
.square {
width: 100%;
height: unset;
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
}
Historically, the best way to do this was to set the height using padding-bottom. Example for square:
<div class="square-container">
<div class="square-content">
<!-- put your content in here -->
</div>
</div>
.square-container { /* any display: block; element */
position: relative;
height: 0;
padding-bottom: 100%; /* of parent width */
}
.square-content {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
The square container will just be made of padding, and the content will expand to fill the container. Long article from 2009 on this subject: http://alistapart.com/article/creating-intrinsic-ratios-for-video
In order to use percentage(%), you must define the % of its parent element. If you use body{height: 100%} it will not work because its parent have no percentage in height. In that case in order to work that body height you must add this in html{height:100%}
In other cases to get rid of that defining parent percentage you can use
body{height:100vh}
vh stands for viewport height
You can use 100vw / 100vh. CSS3 gives us viewport-relative units. 100vw means 100% of the viewport width. 100vh; 100% of the height.
<div style="display:flex; justify-content: space-between;background-color: lightyellow; width:100%; height:85vh">
<div style="width:70%; height: 100%; border: 2px dashed red"></div>
<div style="width:30%; height: 100%; border: 2px dashed red"></div>
</div>
Sometimes, you may want to conditionally set the height of a div, such as when the entire content is less than the height of the screen. Setting all parent elements to 100% will cut off content when it is longer than the screen size.
So, the way to get around this is to set the min-height:
Continue to let the parent elements automatically adjust their height
Then in your main div, subtract the pixel sizes of the header and footer div from 100vh (viewport units). In css, something like:
min-height: calc(100vh - 246px);
100vh is full length of the screen, minus the surrounding divs.
By setting min-height and not height, content longer than screen will continue to flow, instead of getting cut off.
With new CSS sizing properties you can get away with not setting exact height on parent. The new block-size and inline-size properties can be used like this:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<style>
#parent {
border: 1px dotted gray;
height: auto; /* auto values */
width: auto;
}
#wrapper {
background-color: violet;
writing-mode: vertical-lr;
block-size: 30%;
inline-size: 70%;
}
#child {
background-color: wheat;
writing-mode: horizontal-tb;
width: 30%; /* set to 100% if you don't want to expose wrapper */
height: 70%; /* none of the parent has exact height set */
}
</style>
<body>
<div id=parent>
<div id=wrapper>
<div id=child>Lorem ipsum dollar...</div>
Resize the browser window in full page mode. I think the values are relative to viewport height and width.
For more info refer: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/
Almost all browsers support it: https://caniuse.com/?search=inline-size
I am trying to set a <div> to a certain percentage height in CSS, but it just remains the same size as the content inside it. When I remove the HTML 5 <!DOCTYTPE html> however, it works, the <div> taking up the whole page as desired. I want the page to validate, so what should I do?
I have this CSS on the <div>, which has an ID of page:
#page {
padding: 10px;
background-color: white;
height: 90% !important;
}
I am trying to set a div to a certain percentage height in CSS
Percentage of what?
To set a percentage height, its parent element(*) must have an explicit height. This is fairly self-evident, in that if you leave height as auto, the block will take the height of its content... but if the content itself has a height expressed in terms of percentage of the parent you've made yourself a little Catch 22. The browser gives up and just uses the content height.
So the parent of the div must have an explicit height property. Whilst that height can also be a percentage if you want, that just moves the problem up to the next level.
If you want to make the div height a percentage of the viewport height, every ancestor of the div, including <html> and <body>, have to have height: 100%, so there is a chain of explicit percentage heights down to the div.
(*: or, if the div is positioned, the ‘containing block’, which is the nearest ancestor to also be positioned.)
Alternatively, all modern browsers and IE>=9 support new CSS units relative to viewport height (vh) and viewport width (vw):
div {
height:100vh;
}
See here for more info.
You need to set the height on the <html> and <body> elements as well; otherwise, they will only be large enough to fit the content. For example:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<title>Example of 100% width and height</title>
<style>
html, body { height: 100%; margin: 0; }
div { height: 100%; width: 100%; background: red; }
</style>
<div></div>
bobince's answer will let you know in which cases "height: XX%;" will or won't work.
If you want to create an element with a set ratio (height: % of it's own width), use the aspect-ratio property. Make sure height is not explicitly set on the element for it to work. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/aspect-ratio
.square {
width: 100%;
height: unset;
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
}
Historically, the best way to do this was to set the height using padding-bottom. Example for square:
<div class="square-container">
<div class="square-content">
<!-- put your content in here -->
</div>
</div>
.square-container { /* any display: block; element */
position: relative;
height: 0;
padding-bottom: 100%; /* of parent width */
}
.square-content {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
The square container will just be made of padding, and the content will expand to fill the container. Long article from 2009 on this subject: http://alistapart.com/article/creating-intrinsic-ratios-for-video
In order to use percentage(%), you must define the % of its parent element. If you use body{height: 100%} it will not work because its parent have no percentage in height. In that case in order to work that body height you must add this in html{height:100%}
In other cases to get rid of that defining parent percentage you can use
body{height:100vh}
vh stands for viewport height
You can use 100vw / 100vh. CSS3 gives us viewport-relative units. 100vw means 100% of the viewport width. 100vh; 100% of the height.
<div style="display:flex; justify-content: space-between;background-color: lightyellow; width:100%; height:85vh">
<div style="width:70%; height: 100%; border: 2px dashed red"></div>
<div style="width:30%; height: 100%; border: 2px dashed red"></div>
</div>
Sometimes, you may want to conditionally set the height of a div, such as when the entire content is less than the height of the screen. Setting all parent elements to 100% will cut off content when it is longer than the screen size.
So, the way to get around this is to set the min-height:
Continue to let the parent elements automatically adjust their height
Then in your main div, subtract the pixel sizes of the header and footer div from 100vh (viewport units). In css, something like:
min-height: calc(100vh - 246px);
100vh is full length of the screen, minus the surrounding divs.
By setting min-height and not height, content longer than screen will continue to flow, instead of getting cut off.
With new CSS sizing properties you can get away with not setting exact height on parent. The new block-size and inline-size properties can be used like this:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<style>
#parent {
border: 1px dotted gray;
height: auto; /* auto values */
width: auto;
}
#wrapper {
background-color: violet;
writing-mode: vertical-lr;
block-size: 30%;
inline-size: 70%;
}
#child {
background-color: wheat;
writing-mode: horizontal-tb;
width: 30%; /* set to 100% if you don't want to expose wrapper */
height: 70%; /* none of the parent has exact height set */
}
</style>
<body>
<div id=parent>
<div id=wrapper>
<div id=child>Lorem ipsum dollar...</div>
Resize the browser window in full page mode. I think the values are relative to viewport height and width.
For more info refer: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/
Almost all browsers support it: https://caniuse.com/?search=inline-size
Using CSS I would like to restrict 1 dimension to never exceed a factor of the other.
For example this pseudocode:
max-height: (width * 0.75)px;
Would ensure that the height of the element never exceeds 75% of it's width, but it may be smaller.
Is something like this possible, or am I out of luck?
Edit: Please note that I'm not looking to make the height exactly 75% of the width, but rather I am looking to make sure it doesn't exceed 75%
If the element takes the entire viewport width. You can do something like:
.class {
max-height: 75vw;
}
You can't set the ratio, but there's always padding-bottom!
div {
width: 100%;
padding-bottom: 75%;
}
This code will set div to 4:3 ratio
For 16:9 ratio use padding-bottom: 56.25%
An edit after re-read
What if I suggest using a div inside a div?
<div class="a">
<div class="b">
</div>
</div>
<style>
.a{
width:100%;
padding-bottom: 75%;
background-color: red;
position: relative;
}
.b{
width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
background-color: white;
position: absolute;
overflow: hidden;
}
</style>
Put the content inside div.b and it will never exceed the 75%
CSS does not allow setting a property based on other's value, you would need to use another approach, such as javascript, for this.
Here's a jQuery example:
var $elem = $('#elem');
$elem.css('max-height', $elem.width() * 0.75 );
Check out this question: Height equal to dynamic width (CSS fluid layout)
Specifically #Kristijan's answer. You will need to adjust the bottom padding.
.some_element {
position: relative;
width: 20%;
height: 0;
padding-bottom: 20%;
}
How can I scale a div to fit inside the browser view port but preserve the aspect ratio of the div. How can I do this using CSS and/or JQuery?
Thanks!
You don't need javascript for this. You can use pure CSS.
A padding-top percentage is interpreted relative to the containing block width. Combine it with position: absolute on a child element, and you can put pretty much anything in a box that retains its aspect ratio.
HTML:
<div class="aspectwrapper">
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.aspectwrapper {
display: inline-block; /* shrink to fit */
width: 100%; /* whatever width you like */
position: relative; /* so .content can use position: absolute */
}
.aspectwrapper::after {
padding-top: 56.25%; /* percentage of containing block _width_ */
display: block;
content: '';
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0; bottom: 0; right: 0; left: 0; /* follow the parent's edges */
outline: thin dashed green; /* just so you can see the box */
}
The display: inline-block leaves a little extra space below the bottom edge of the .aspectwrapper box, so another element below it won't run flush against it. Using display: block will get rid of it.
Thanks to this post for the tip!
Another approach relies on the fact that browsers respect an image's aspect ratio when you resize only its width or height. (I'll let google generate a 16x9 transparent image for demonstration purposes, but in practice you would use your own static image.)
HTML:
<div class="aspectwrapper">
<img class="aspectspacer" src="http://chart.googleapis.com/chart?cht=p3&chs=160x90" />
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.aspectwrapper {
width: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.aspectspacer {
width: 100%; /* let the enlarged image height push .aspectwrapper's bottom edge */
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0; bottom: 0; right: 0; left: 0;
outline: thin dashed green;
}
Thanks to Geoff for the tip on how to structure the math and logic. Here's my jQuery implementation, which I'm using to size a lightbox so it fills the window:
var height = originalHeight;
var width = originalWidth;
aspect = width / height;
if($(window).height() < $(window).width()) {
var resizedHeight = $(window).height();
var resizedWidth = resizedHeight * aspect;
}
else { // screen width is smaller than height (mobile, etc)
var resizedWidth = $(window).width();
var resizedHeight = resizedWidth / aspect;
}
This is working well for me right now across laptop and mobile screen sizes.
I have a different pure HTML/CSS approach which does not rely on padding or absolute positioning. Instead it uses em units and relies on the CSS min() function plus a little bit of math.
Imagine that we want a viewport div with 16:9 aspect ratio which always fits the browser window and is centered in the axis with excess space. Here's how we can accomplish that:
HTML
<body>
<div class="viewport">
<p>
This should be a 16:9 viewport that fits the window.
</p>
</div>
</body>
CSS
body {
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background-color: white;
font-size: min(1vw, 1.778vh);
}
div.viewport {
width: 100em;
height: 56.25em;
background-color: lightblue;
}
div.viewport > p {
font-size: 3em;
text-align: center;
}
You can experiment with this in a sample JSFiddle here.
The secret sauce is in the body font-size. It should be set to min(1vw, Avh), where A is the aspect ratio you want the div to have, i.e. width / height. In the example above we're using 1.778, which is approximately 16 / 9.
In CSS, em units are based on the font-size of the element, which is inherited from parent element if not explicitly set. For your viewport div, set the width to 100em (NOT rem) and the height to Iem, where I is the inverse of the aspect ratio expressed as a percentage, i.e. 100 / A or 100 * height / width. In the example above we're using 56.25, which is 100 * 9 / 16.
One bonus of this approach is that all of your nested elements may also use em units so that they always scale precisely with the size of the viewport. You can see this used on the p element in the example.
Note that as an alternative to the above, you may set the font-size on your html element and use rem units everywhere. CSS rem units are similar to em units but always relative to the root element's font-size.
Javascipt:
//Responsive Scaling
let outer = document.getElementById('outer'),
wrapper = document.getElementById('wrap'),
maxWidth = outer.clientWidth,
maxHeight = outer.clientHeight;
window.addEventListener("resize", resize);
resize();
function resize(){
let scale,
width = window.innerWidth,
height = window.innerHeight,
isMax = width >= maxWidth && height >= maxHeight;
scale = Math.min(width/maxWidth, height/maxHeight);
outer.style.transform = isMax?'':'scale(' + scale + ')';
wrapper.style.width = isMax?'':maxWidth * scale;
wrapper.style.height = isMax?'':maxHeight * scale;
}
HTML:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="outer">
{{ fixed content here }}
</div>
</div>
Styling:
/* Responsive Scaling */
#wrap {
position: relative;
width: 1024px;
height: 590px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#outer {
position: relative;
width: 1024px;
height: 590px;
transform-origin: 0% 0%;
overflow: hidden;
}
This is possible with JQuery and a bit of maths.
Use JQuery to get the view ports width and height as well as the divs current dimensions.
$(document).width();
Calculate the divs current aspect ratio. eg width/height
You need a bit of logic to determine whether to set the width or height first, then use the initial ratio to calculate the other side.
jQuery has a plugin that grows an object until one of it's sides reaches a certain px-value. Coupling this will the viewport's height, you could expand any element to that size: jQuery MaxSide.
Is it possible to implement the following logic usic HTML and CSS?
width: 100%;
height: 30% of width;
What I want to implement:
If I decrease the width, the height will also decrease proportionally.
Padding %
This can be achieved by giving the element height:0 and padding-bottom:30%.
In all browsers, when padding is specified in %, it's calculated relative to the parent element's width. This can be a very useful feature for Responsive Design.
JSFiddle Demo
In the demo, the blue box at the top of the page is a single div. The height is responsive, and it can contain a variable amount of inline content without increasing the height. It tested fine in IE7/8/9/10, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and Opera.
.content {
width: 100%;
height: 0;
padding-bottom: 30%;
}
...
<div class="content"></div>
Padding % and absolute position
If there are any problems with using a 0-height element, the demo also has a green box that's implemented using a wrapper element and absolute position. Not sure if there are any advantages to this approach.
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
padding-bottom: 30%;
}
.wrapper .content {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
...
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
This is now possible on modern browsers with vw and vh units:
width: 100vw;
height: 30vw; /* 30% of width */
Browser support: http://caniuse.com/#feat=viewport-units
Yeah!
Also with JQuery, you could do:
$(window).ready(function () {
var ratio = 3 / 10, $div = $('#my_proportional_div');
$div.height($div.width() * ratio);
$(window).bind('resize', function() { $div.height($div.width() * ratio); });
});
because the Padding % solution suggested doesn't work with max/min-width and max-min height.