I've made a script that every few hours adds a new row to a Google Apps spreadsheet.
This is the function I've made to find the first empty row:
function getFirstEmptyRow() {
var spr = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var cell = spr.getRange('a1');
var ct = 0;
while ( cell.offset(ct, 0).getValue() != "" ) {
ct++;
}
return (ct);
}
It works fine, but when reaching about 100 rows, it gets really slow, even ten seconds.
I'm worried that when reaching thousands of rows, it will be too slow, maybe going in timeout or worse.
Is there a better way?
This question has now had more than 12K views - so it's time for an update, as the performance characteristics of New Sheets are different than when Serge ran his initial tests.
Good news: performance is much better across the board!
Fastest:
As in the first test, reading the sheet's data just once, then operating on the array, gave a huge performance benefit. Interestingly, Don's original function performed much better than the modified version that Serge tested. (It appears that while is faster than for, which isn't logical.)
The average execution time on the sample data is just 38ms, down from the previous 168ms.
// Don's array approach - checks first column only
// With added stopping condition & correct result.
// From answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/9102463/1677912
function getFirstEmptyRowByColumnArray() {
var spr = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var column = spr.getRange('A:A');
var values = column.getValues(); // get all data in one call
var ct = 0;
while ( values[ct] && values[ct][0] != "" ) {
ct++;
}
return (ct+1);
}
Test results:
Here are the results, summarized over 50 iterations in a spreadsheet with 100 rows x 3 columns (filled with Serge's test function).
The function names match the code in the script below.
"First empty row"
The original ask was to find the first empty row. None of the previous scripts actually deliver on that. Many check just one column, which means that they can give false positive results. Others only find the first row that follows all data, meaning that empty rows in non-contiguous data get missed.
Here's a function that does meet the spec. It was included in the tests, and while slower than the lightning-fast single-column checker, it came in at a respectable 68ms, a 50% premium for a correct answer!
/**
* Mogsdad's "whole row" checker.
*/
function getFirstEmptyRowWholeRow() {
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
var range = sheet.getDataRange();
var values = range.getValues();
var row = 0;
for (var row=0; row<values.length; row++) {
if (!values[row].join("")) break;
}
return (row+1);
}
Complete script:
If you want to repeat the tests, or add your own function to the mix as a comparison, just take the whole script and use it in a spreadsheet.
/**
* Set up a menu option for ease of use.
*/
function onOpen() {
var menuEntries = [ {name: "Fill sheet", functionName: "fillSheet"},
{name: "test getFirstEmptyRow", functionName: "testTime"}
];
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
sh.addMenu("run tests",menuEntries);
}
/**
* Test an array of functions, timing execution of each over multiple iterations.
* Produce stats from the collected data, and present in a "Results" sheet.
*/
function testTime() {
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
ss.getSheets()[0].activate();
var iterations = parseInt(Browser.inputBox("Enter # of iterations, min 2:")) || 2;
var functions = ["getFirstEmptyRowByOffset", "getFirstEmptyRowByColumnArray", "getFirstEmptyRowByCell","getFirstEmptyRowUsingArray", "getFirstEmptyRowWholeRow"]
var results = [["Iteration"].concat(functions)];
for (var i=1; i<=iterations; i++) {
var row = [i];
for (var fn=0; fn<functions.length; fn++) {
var starttime = new Date().getTime();
eval(functions[fn]+"()");
var endtime = new Date().getTime();
row.push(endtime-starttime);
}
results.push(row);
}
Browser.msgBox('Test complete - see Results sheet');
var resultSheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActive().getSheetByName("Results");
if (!resultSheet) {
resultSheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActive().insertSheet("Results");
}
else {
resultSheet.activate();
resultSheet.clearContents();
}
resultSheet.getRange(1, 1, results.length, results[0].length).setValues(results);
// Add statistical calculations
var row = results.length+1;
var rangeA1 = "B2:B"+results.length;
resultSheet.getRange(row, 1, 3, 1).setValues([["Avg"],["Stddev"],["Trimmed\nMean"]]);
var formulas = resultSheet.getRange(row, 2, 3, 1);
formulas.setFormulas(
[[ "=AVERAGE("+rangeA1+")" ],
[ "=STDEV("+rangeA1+")" ],
[ "=AVERAGEIFS("+rangeA1+","+rangeA1+',"<"&B$'+row+"+3*B$"+(row+1)+","+rangeA1+',">"&B$'+row+"-3*B$"+(row+1)+")" ]]);
formulas.setNumberFormat("##########.");
for (var col=3; col<=results[0].length;col++) {
formulas.copyTo(resultSheet.getRange(row, col))
}
// Format for readability
for (var col=1;col<=results[0].length;col++) {
resultSheet.autoResizeColumn(col)
}
}
// Omiod's original function. Checks first column only
// Modified to give correct result.
// question https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6882104
function getFirstEmptyRowByOffset() {
var spr = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var cell = spr.getRange('a1');
var ct = 0;
while ( cell.offset(ct, 0).getValue() != "" ) {
ct++;
}
return (ct+1);
}
// Don's array approach - checks first column only.
// With added stopping condition & correct result.
// From answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/9102463/1677912
function getFirstEmptyRowByColumnArray() {
var spr = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var column = spr.getRange('A:A');
var values = column.getValues(); // get all data in one call
var ct = 0;
while ( values[ct] && values[ct][0] != "" ) {
ct++;
}
return (ct+1);
}
// Serge's getFirstEmptyRow, adapted from Omiod's, but
// using getCell instead of offset. Checks first column only.
// Modified to give correct result.
// From answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/18319032/1677912
function getFirstEmptyRowByCell() {
var spr = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var ran = spr.getRange('A:A');
var arr = [];
for (var i=1; i<=ran.getLastRow(); i++){
if(!ran.getCell(i,1).getValue()){
break;
}
}
return i;
}
// Serges's adaptation of Don's array answer. Checks first column only.
// Modified to give correct result.
// From answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/18319032/1677912
function getFirstEmptyRowUsingArray() {
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var ss = sh.getActiveSheet();
var data = ss.getDataRange().getValues();
for(var n=0; n<data.length ; n++){
if(data[n][0]==''){n++;break}
}
return n+1;
}
/**
* Mogsdad's "whole row" checker.
*/
function getFirstEmptyRowWholeRow() {
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
var range = sheet.getDataRange();
var values = range.getValues();
var row = 0;
for (var row=0; row<values.length; row++) {
if (!values[row].join("")) break;
}
return (row+1);
}
function fillSheet(){
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var ss = sh.getActiveSheet();
for(var r=1;r<1000;++r){
ss.appendRow(['filling values',r,'not important']);
}
}
// Function to test the value returned by each contender.
// Use fillSheet() first, then blank out random rows and
// compare results in debugger.
function compareResults() {
var a = getFirstEmptyRowByOffset(),
b = getFirstEmptyRowByColumnArray(),
c = getFirstEmptyRowByCell(),
d = getFirstEmptyRowUsingArray(),
e = getFirstEmptyRowWholeRow(),
f = getFirstEmptyRowWholeRow2();
debugger;
}
The Google Apps Script blog had a post on optimizing spreadsheet operations that talked about batching reads and writes that could really speed things up. I tried your code on a spreadsheet with 100 rows, and it took about seven seconds. By using Range.getValues(), the batch version takes one second.
function getFirstEmptyRow() {
var spr = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var column = spr.getRange('A:A');
var values = column.getValues(); // get all data in one call
var ct = 0;
while ( values[ct][0] != "" ) {
ct++;
}
return (ct);
}
If the spreadsheet gets big enough, you might need to grab the data in chunks of 100 or 1000 rows instead of grabbing the entire column.
It's already there as the getLastRow method on the Sheet.
var firstEmptyRow = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getLastRow() + 1;
Ref https://developers.google.com/apps-script/class_sheet#getLastRow
Seeing this old post with 5k views I first checked the 'best answer' and was quite surprised by its content... this was a very slow process indeed ! then I felt better when I saw Don Kirkby's answer, the array approach is indeed much more efficient !
But how much more efficient ?
So I wrote this little test code on a spreadsheet with 1000 rows and here are the results : (not bad !... no need to tell which one is which...)
and here is the code I used :
function onOpen() {
var menuEntries = [ {name: "test method 1", functionName: "getFirstEmptyRow"},
{name: "test method 2 (array)", functionName: "getFirstEmptyRowUsingArray"}
];
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
sh.addMenu("run tests",menuEntries);
}
function getFirstEmptyRow() {
var time = new Date().getTime();
var spr = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var ran = spr.getRange('A:A');
for (var i= ran.getLastRow(); i>0; i--){
if(ran.getCell(i,1).getValue()){
break;
}
}
Browser.msgBox('lastRow = '+Number(i+1)+' duration = '+Number(new Date().getTime()-time)+' mS');
}
function getFirstEmptyRowUsingArray() {
var time = new Date().getTime();
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var ss = sh.getActiveSheet();
var data = ss.getDataRange().getValues();
for(var n =data.length ; n<0 ; n--){
if(data[n][0]!=''){n++;break}
}
Browser.msgBox('lastRow = '+n+' duration = '+Number(new Date().getTime()-time)+' mS');
}
function fillSheet(){
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var ss = sh.getActiveSheet();
for(var r=1;r<1000;++r){
ss.appendRow(['filling values',r,'not important']);
}
}
And the test spreadsheet to try it yourself :-)
EDIT :
Following Mogsdad's comment, I should mention that these function names are indeed a bad choice... It should have been something like getLastNonEmptyCellInColumnAWithPlentyOfSpaceBelow() which is not very elegant (is it ?) but more accurate and coherent with what it actually returns.
Comment :
Anyway, my point was to show the speed of execution of both approaches, and it obviously did it (didn't it ? ;-)
I know this is an old thread and there have been some very clever approaches here.
I use the script
var firstEmptyRow = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getLastRow() + 1;
if I need the first completely empty row.
If I need the first empty cell in a column I do the following.
My first row is usually a title row.
My 2nd row is a hidden row and each cell has the formula
=COUNTA(A3:A)
Where A is replaced with the column letter.
My script just reads this value. This updates pretty quickly compared to script approaches.
There is one time this does not work and that is when I allow empty cells to break up the column. I have not needed a fix for this yet, I suspect one may be derived from COUNTIF, or a combined function or one of the many other inbuilt ones.
EDIT: COUNTA does cope with blank cells within a range, so the concern about the "one time this does not work" is not really a concern. (This might be a new behavior with "new Sheets".)
And why don't use appendRow?
var spreadsheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
spreadsheet.appendRow(['this is in column A', 'column B']);
I have a similar issue. Right now it's a table with many hundreds of rows, and I'm expecting it to grow to many many thousands. (I haven't seen whether a Google spreadsheet will handle tens of thousands of rows, but I'll get there eventually.)
Here's what I'm doing.
Step forward through the column by hundreds, stop when I'm on an empty row.
Step backward through the column by tens, looking for the first non-empty row.
Step forward through the column by ones, looking for the first empty row.
Return the result.
This depends of course on having contiguous content. Can't have any random blank lines in there. Or at least, if you do, results will be sub-optimal. And you can tune the increments if you think it's important. These work for me, and I find that the difference in duration between steps of 50 and steps of 100 are negligible.
function lastValueRow() {
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var r = ss.getRange('A1:A');
// Step forwards by hundreds
for (var i = 0; r.getCell(i,1).getValue() > 1; i += 100) { }
// Step backwards by tens
for ( ; r.getCell(i,1).getValue() > 1; i -= 10) { }
// Step forwards by ones
for ( ; r.getCell(i,1).getValue() == 0; i--) { }
return i;
}
This is much faster than inspecting every cell from the top. And if you happen to have some other columns that extend your worksheet, it may be faster than inspecting every cell from the bottom, too.
I tweaked the code ghoti supplied so that it searched for an empty cell. Comparing values did not work on a column with text (or I could not figure out how) instead I used isBlank(). Notice the value is negated with ! (in front of the variable r) when looking forward since you want i to increase until a blank is found. Working up the sheet by ten you want to stop decreasing i when you find a cell that is not blank (! removed). Then, back down the sheet by one to the first blank.
function findRow_() {
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
ss.setActiveSheet(ss.getSheetByName("DAT Tracking"));
var r = ss.getRange('C:C');
// Step forwards by hundreds
for (var i = 2; !r.getCell(i,1).isBlank(); i += 100) { }
// Step backwards by tens
for ( ; r.getCell(i,1).isBlank(); i -= 10) { }
// Step forwards by ones
for ( ; !r.getCell(i,1).isBlank(); i++) { }
return i;
Just my two cents, but I do this all the time. I just write the data to the TOP of the sheet. It's date reversed (latest on top), but I can still get it to do what I want. The code below has been storing data it scrapes from a realtor's site for the past three years.
var theSheet = SpreadsheetApp.openById(zSheetId).getSheetByName('Sheet1');
theSheet.insertRowBefore(1).getRange("A2:L2").setValues( [ zPriceData ] );
This chunk of the scraper function inserts a row above #2 and writes the data there. The first row is the header, so I don't touch that. I haven't timed it, but the only time I have an issue is when the site changes.
Indeed the getValues is a good option but you can use the .length function to get the last row.
function getFirstEmptyRow() {
var spr = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var array = spr.getDataRange().getValues();
ct = array.length + 1
return (ct);
}
Using indexOf is one of the ways to achieve this:
function firstEmptyRow() {
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var sh = ss.getActiveSheet();
var rangevalues = sh.getRange(1,1,sh.getLastRow(),1).getValues(); // Column A:A is taken
var dat = rangevalues.reduce(function (a,b){ return a.concat(b)},[]); //
2D array is reduced to 1D//
// Array.prototype.push.apply might be faster, but unable to get it to work//
var fner = 1+dat.indexOf('');//Get indexOf First empty row
return(fner);
}
I have gone through way too many of these implementations of last-row for a specific column. Many solutions work but are slow for large or multiple datasets. One of my use cases requires me to check the last row in specific columns across multiple spreadsheets. What I have found is that taking the whole column as a range and then iterating through it is too slow, and adding a few of these together makes the script sluggish.
My "hack" has been this formula:
=ROW(index(sheet!A2:A,max(row(sheet!A2:A)*(sheet!A2:A<>""))))-1
Example: Add this to Cell A1, to find the last row in column A. Can be added anywhere, just make sure to manage the "-1" at the end depending on which row the formula is placed. You can also place this is another col, rather than the one you're trying to count, and you don't need to manage the -1. You could also count FROM a starting Row, like "C16:C" - will count values C16 onwards
This formula is reliably giving me the last row, including blanks in the middle of the dataset
To use this value in my GS code, I am simply reading the cell value from A1. I understand that Google is clear that spreadsheet functions like read/write are heavy (time-consuming), but this is much faster than column count last-row methods in my experience (for large datasets)
To make this efficient, I am getting the last row in a col once, then saving it as a global variable and incrementing in my code to track which rows I should be updating. Reading the cell every-time your loop needs to make an update will be too inefficient. Read once, iterate the value, and the A1 cell formula (above) is "storing" the updated value for the next time your function runs
This also works if the data has filters turned on. Actual last row is maintained
Please let me know if this was helpful to you! If I encounter any issues I will comment on this answer.
combo of DON and Ghoti.
function getLastRowNumber(sheet, columnLabel) {
var columnLabel = sheet.getRange(`${columnLabel}:${columnLabel}`);
var values = columnLabel.getValues(); // get all data in one call
var ct = 0;
for (; values.length > ct && values[ct][0] != ""; ct += 100);
// Step backwards by tens
for ( ; ct > 0 && values[ct][0] == ""; ct -= 10);
// Step forwards by ones
for ( ; values.length > ct && values[ct][0] != ""; ct ++);
return ct;
}
I keep an extra "maintenance" sheet, on my spreadsheets, where I keep such data.
To get the next free row of a range I just examine the relevant cell. I can get the value instantly, because the work of finding the value happens when the data is changed.
The formula in the cell is usually something like :
=QUERY(someSheet!A10:H5010,
"select min(A) where A > " & A9 & " and B is null and D is null and H < 1")
The value in A9 can be set periodically to some row that is near "enough" to the end.
Caveat : I have never checked if this is viable for huge data sets.
Finally I got a single line solution for it.
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var lastEmptyOnColumnB = sheet.getRange("B1:B"+sheet.getLastRow()).getValues().join(",").replace(/,,/g, '').split(",").length;
It works fine for me.
Here is a list of what the code should do:
Give a correct answer if there are no empty cells
Be fast
Return the correct row number - not the index number of the array
Get the correct row number of the empty cell even when other columns in the sheet tab have more rows with data
Have good variable names
Answer the original question
Avoid unnecessary data processing
Provide comment explanations for what the code does
Be generic enough to adapt to the readers conditions
This solution uses the array method some which will stop iterating the loop when the condition is true. This avoids wasting time spent looping through every element of the array, and yet uses an array method rather than a for or while loop.
The some method only returns true or false, but there is a way to capture the index number because the some method halts looping when the condition is true.
The index number is assigned to a variable in the scope outside of the array function. This does not slow down the processing.
Code:
function getFirstEmptyCellIn_A_Column(po) {
var foundEmptyCell,rng,sh,ss,values,x;
/*
po.sheetTabName - The name of the sheet tab to get
po.ssID - the file ID of the spreadsheet
po.getActive - boolean - true - get the active spreadsheet -
*/
/* Ive tested the code for speed using many different ways to do this and using array.some
is the fastest way - when array.some finds the first true statement it stops iterating -
*/
if (po.getActive || ! po.ssID) {
ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
} else {
ss = SpreadsheetApp.openById(po.ssID);
}
sh = ss.getSheetByName(po.sheetTabName);
rng = sh.getRange('A:A');//This is the fastest - Its faster than getting the last row and getting a
//specific range that goes only to the last row
values = rng.getValues(); // get all the data in the column - This is a 2D array
x = 0;//Set counter to zero - this is outside of the scope of the array function but still accessible to it
foundEmptyCell = values.some(function(e,i){
//Logger.log(i)
//Logger.log(e[0])
//Logger.log(e[0] == "")
x = i;//Set the value every time - its faster than first testing for a reason to set the value
return e[0] == "";//The first time that this is true it stops looping
});
//Logger.log('x + 1: ' + (x + 1))//x is the index of the value in the array - which is one less than the row number
//Logger.log('foundEmptyCell: ' + foundEmptyCell)
return foundEmptyCell ? x + 1 : false;
}
function testMycode() {
getFirstEmptyCellIn_A_Column({"sheetTabName":"Put Sheet tab name here","ssID":"Put your ss file ID here"})
}
this is my very first post on stackOverflow, I hope to meet all your netiquette needs, so please be nice to me.
considerations
I think the fastest way to find the first blank cell in a column (I couldn't run the performance checks, anyway) is to let the Google engine do sequential tasks itself; it is simply much more efficient. From a programmer's point of view, this translates into NOT using any kind of iteration/loops, i.e. FOR, WHILE, etc. (By the way, this is the same programming approach on database engines - any activity should NOT use loops to find information.)
the idea
Go all way DOWN and find the cell in last row of the Sheet (considering all columns),
from there, go UP find the first cell containing data in the specified column (selecting the column),
shift down one cell to find a free place.
The following function does this in just one command (neglecting the var declarations, here just to improve readability):
code
function lastCell() {
var workSheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getActiveSheet();
var lastRow = workSheet.getLastRow();
var columnToSearch = 1; //index of the column to search. 1 is 'A'.
workSheet.getRange(lastRow, columnToSearch).activateAsCurrentCell().
getNextDataCell(SpreadsheetApp.Direction.UP).activate();
workSheet.getCurrentCell().offset(1, 0).activate(); // shift one cell down to find a free cell
}
So this question seems to be beaten to death on the boards, but with all my reading and googling, I just can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.
I'm trying to adapt the code from this link
How to loop a google spreadsheet column values and set result in column B?
Below is what I've adapted it to
function EquationIterationTest(){
var s = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var sht = s.getSheetByName('Heath, OH')
var drng = sht.getDataRange();
var rng = sht.getRange(13, 2, 111, 1)
//.getRange(13, 2, drng.getLastRow()-1, drng.getLastColumn())
var rngA = rng.getValues();//Array of input values
Logger.log(rngA);
for(var i = 0; i < rngA.length; i++) {
if(rngA[i][0] === 'subtotal'){
rng.offset(0,3).setFormula('=iferror(sum(filter(Invoices!$E:$E,Invoices!$F:$F=$B14,Invoices!$A:$A=$C$2)))');
}
else{
rng.offset(0,3).setValue('Dumb');
}
}
}
When I run this, rngA does get the first column of values (which in this instance starts at B13) however, it will not input the formula in the third column of values. Instead it moves right through the first if statement and executes the else statement. The only thing I can think is there's something wrong either with my if statement or my array.
I tried setting if(rngA[i][0] === 'subtotal') to if(rngA[i][1] === 'subtotal'), but that still returned "dumb" on every line.
Any help would be appreciated so I can stop being "dumb"!
Here's the link to my sheet.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cDkwWThXDTssH89gJX7W1zKzsW86oLXO-FPfAIJvc-g/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks
The problem is not in your if condition, although if you use three equal signs you are making a strict comparison, so subtotal in your case should start with capital letter.
That said, your problem is happening when you assign a value or formula to rng.offset(0,3), because the result of that expression is a range with the same size as rng but offset 3 columns to the right. You can verify this by using: Logger.log(rng.offset(0,3).getA1Notation());, thus whenever you assign a value or formula there you are assigning it to the whole offset rng. Not what you want right?
You should use offset() from a single cell in your case, not a whole range.
Your function could be simplified to something like the following:
function EquationIterationTest(){
var s = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var sht = s.getSheetByName('Heath, OH')
var rng = sht.getRange(13, 2, 111, 1)
for(var i = 1; i <= rng.getNumRows(); i++) {
var cell = rng.getCell(i,1);
if(cell.getValue() === 'Subtotal'){
cell.offset(0,3).setFormula(
'=iferror(sum(filter(Invoices!$E:$E,Invoices!$F:$F=$B14,Invoices!$A:$A=$C$2)))'
);
}
else{
cell.offset(0,3).setValue('Dummy');
}
}
}
So I want to make sure I put this here because while the answer above was previously correct, I figured out a much faster way to do it using arrays. This function checks against the data range for a value (in this case "Subtotal") and then appends the equation to rows that that do not contain that value. It is easy to make it compare against the value though by changing the operator from != to ==.
function NewIterationTest(){
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var activeSheet = ss.getActiveSheet();
var data = activeSheet.getRange(13, 2, 112, 1).getValues();
for (var i = 0; i < data.length; i++){
var rowData = data[i];
var checkData = data;
var row = checkData[i];
var colB = row[0];
if(colB != 'Subtotal'{
activeSheet.getRange(13 + i, 5).setFormula('=iferror(sum(filter(Invoices!$E:$E,Invoices!$F:$F=$B14,Invoices!$A:$A=$C$2)))');
}
}
}
However, if anyone could tell me how to also eliminate compare against whether or not a the text is bold, that would be helpful. Not sure it can be done though since it's pulling against the array.
If I have a list of data in cells A1:A150 (but the amount can vary), is there a way to push that into an array without looking at each cell individually to determine if it is empty? I exceed my execution time by doing this and I need a faster way to store the data and stop when it hits an empty cell.
Below is how I currently do it:
for (var i = 1; i < 500; i++) {
if(datasheet.getRange("A" + i).getValue() == ""){
break;
}
else{
addedlist_old.push(datasheet.getRange("A" + i).getValue())
}
If you're using only one column, I'd suggest:
// my2DArrayFromRng = sh.getRange("A2:A10").getValues();
var my2DArrayFromRng = [["A2"],["A3"],["A4"],["A5"],[],[],["A8"],["A9"],[]];
var a = my2DArrayFromRng.join().split(',').filter(Boolean);
The methods .join() and .split(',') together convert the 2D array to a plain array (["A2","A3","A4","A5",,,"A8","A9",]).
Then the method .filter(Boolean) strips the empty elements. The code above returns [A2, A3, A4, A5, A8, A9].
Try this:
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.openById(SHEET_ID).getSheetByName(SHEET_NAME);
var lastRow = sheet.getLastRow();
var data = sheet.getRange(1, 1, lastRow, 1).getValues(); //getRange(starting Row, starting column, number of rows, number of columns)
for(var i=0;i<(lastRow-1);i++)
{
Logger.log(data[0][i]);
}
the variable data stores all the cells of column A.
Cell A1 is stored in data[0][0], cell A2 is stored in data[0][1], cell A3 is stored in data[0][2] and so on.
The getRange(starting Row, starting column, number of rows, number of columns) is a batch operation so it is much faster when you have a large dataset.
If you don't have empty cells in between it's actually pretty easy.
var lastRow = sheet.getLastRow();
var array = sheet.getRange('A1:A' + lastRow).getValues();
If you need to weed out empty entries after that, you can use a for statement, or to be faster, filter like an earlier answer shows.
var filteredArray = array.filter(function(n){ return n != '' });
The main difference between this answer and the one posted earlier that I mentioned is that getValues() will give you an array.
I've tested this and it works in google apps script, and it does not time out when I use the array, or even when I put in large amounts of data (I tested it with an array that has about 20-50 characters per entry and about 500 entries). Just make sure to define the var sheet or put in your own variable.
Try this:
It will allow you to select any column on the sheet.
var ui = SpreadsheetApp.getUi();
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
function onOpen() {
ui.createMenu('Sheet Functions')
.addItem('Get values from column', 'getVals')
.addToUi();
}
function getVals() {
var sheet = ss.getActiveSheet();
var getColumnLetter = ui.prompt('Select column..' , 'Enter the letter of the target column..', ui.ButtonSet.OK_CANCEL);
if(getColumnLetter.getSelectedButton() == ui.Button.CANCEL) {
return } else {
getColumnLetter = getColumnLetter.getResponseText().toUpperCase();
}
var columnNo = getColumnLetter.charCodeAt(0) - 64;
try { var data = sheet.getRange(1, columnNo, sheet.getMaxRows()).getValues().filter(String); } catch (e) { ui.alert('Invalid input please try again.', ui.ButtonSet.OK); return;}
/*
*
* Do what ever you need to do down here
*
*/
}
When I open a google sheet, I'd like all values within one specific column to be reset to 0 if its value is >0.
Please note that some cells contain no data, I wouldn't like to mess up with these cells as they should stay empty.
At the moment I'm really trying to build up an MVP so if I have to hardcode the value of the column within the formula it's OK.
I've made some research and tried to find relevant examples here, I've tweaked one snippet which works for one specific cell, now I'd like to learn how to automate the execution of this script so I don't have to hardcode each cell....
Here is the script I have
function onOpen() {
var doc = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var cell = doc.getRange("B4");
var value = cell.getValue();
if (value > 0) {
cell.setValue("0");
}
else {
cell.setValue("0");
}
}
I'd really appreciate if you could help me a bit with this one by either poiting me in the right direction or showing me a working example.
Thanks
This code works:
//function onOpen() {
function makeZero() {
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
var theSheet = ss.getSheetByName('Sheet 2');
var theLastRow = theSheet.getLastRow();
//Get all values from column A
var theColumnRng = theSheet.getRange(1, 1, theLastRow, 1);
//Get all the values from column A. The return from getValues()
//is a two dimensional array
var theColumnValues = theColumnRng.getValues();
var thisCellValue = "";
var i;
for (i=0;i<theColumnValues.length;i++) {
//Every inner array only has one element, therefore, index zero
thisCellValue = theColumnValues[i][0];
if (thisCellValue > 0) {
theColumnValues[i][0] = 0;
}; //No "else" condition needed. If not greater than zero, do nothing
};
//Reset the entire column's values all at once
theColumnRng.setValues(theColumnValues);
};
If you want to compare it with another column.
Please select sheet name, i (row ) number and col number accordingly (i,2) 2 is a col here. IF there is no col then put Val2=0 in your case. Also don't forget to edit the setValue also.
function ifelse_col_comparision(){
var ss= SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('Sheet1');
for(var i=2;i<ss.getLastRow();i++){
var val1=ss.getRange(i,2).getValue();
var val2=ss.getRange(i,3).getValue();
if(val2 >= val1){ss.getRange(i,4).setValue('Bigger or 0');}
else{ss.getRange(i,4).setValue('lower or -1');}
}
}
Please ask if you are looking for something else.