Passing parameters to package.json scripts [duplicate] - json

The scripts portion of my package.json currently looks like this:
"scripts": {
"start": "node ./script.js server"
}
...which means I can run npm start to start the server. So far so good.
However, I would like to be able to run something like npm start 8080 and have the argument(s) passed to script.js (e.g. npm start 8080 => node ./script.js server 8080). Is this possible?

npm 2 and newer
It's possible to pass args to npm run since npm 2 (2014). The syntax is as follows:
npm run <command> [-- <args>]
Note the -- separator, used to separate the params passed to npm command itself, and the params passed to your script.
With the example package.json:
"scripts": {
"grunt": "grunt",
"server": "node server.js"
}
here's how to pass the params to those scripts:
npm run grunt -- task:target // invokes `grunt task:target`
npm run server -- --port=1337 // invokes `node server.js --port=1337`
Note: If your param does not start with - or --, then having an explicit -- separator is not needed; but it's better to do it anyway for clarity.
npm run grunt task:target // invokes `grunt task:target`
Note below the difference in behavior (test.js has console.log(process.argv)): the params which start with - or -- are passed to npm and not to the script, and are silently swallowed there.
$ npm run test foobar
['C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node.exe', 'C:\\git\\myrepo\\test.js', 'foobar']
$ npm run test -foobar
['C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node.exe', 'C:\\git\\myrepo\\test.js']
$ npm run test --foobar
['C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node.exe', 'C:\\git\\myrepo\\test.js']
$ npm run test -- foobar
['C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node.exe', 'C:\\git\\myrepo\\test.js', 'foobar']
$ npm run test -- -foobar
['C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node.exe', 'C:\\git\\myrepo\\test.js', '-foobar']
$ npm run test -- --foobar
['C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node.exe', 'C:\\git\\myrepo\\test.js', '--foobar']
The difference is clearer when you use a param actually used by npm:
$ npm test --help // this is disguised `npm --help test`
npm test [-- <args>]
aliases: tst, t
To get the parameter value, see this question. For reading named parameters, it's probably best to use a parsing library like yargs or minimist; nodejs exposes process.argv globally, containing command line parameter values, but this is a low-level API (whitespace-separated array of strings, as provided by the operating system to the node executable).

You asked to be able to run something like npm start 8080. This is possible without needing to modify script.js or configuration files as follows.
For example, in your "scripts" JSON value, include--
"start": "node ./script.js server $PORT"
And then from the command-line:
$ PORT=8080 npm start
I have confirmed that this works using bash and npm 1.4.23. Note that this work-around does not require GitHub npm issue #3494 to be resolved.

You could also do that:
In package.json:
"scripts": {
"cool": "./cool.js"
}
In cool.js:
console.log({ myVar: process.env.npm_config_myVar });
In CLI:
npm --myVar=something run-script cool
Should output:
{ myVar: 'something' }
Update: Using npm 3.10.3, it appears that it lowercases the process.env.npm_config_ variables? I'm also using better-npm-run, so I'm not sure if this is vanilla default behavior or not, but this answer is working. Instead of process.env.npm_config_myVar, try process.env.npm_config_myvar

jakub.g's answer is correct, however an example using grunt seems a bit complex.
So my simpler answer:
- Sending a command line argument to an npm script
Syntax for sending command line arguments to an npm script:
npm run [command] [-- <args>]
Imagine we have an npm start task in our package.json to kick off webpack dev server:
"scripts": {
"start": "webpack-dev-server --port 5000"
},
We run this from the command line with npm start
Now if we want to pass in a port to the npm script:
"scripts": {
"start": "webpack-dev-server --port process.env.port || 8080"
},
running this and passing the port e.g. 5000 via command line would be as follows:
npm start --port:5000
- Using package.json config:
As mentioned by jakub.g, you can alternatively set params in the config of your package.json
"config": {
"myPort": "5000"
}
"scripts": {
"start": "webpack-dev-server --port process.env.npm_package_config_myPort || 8080"
},
npm start will use the port specified in your config, or alternatively you can override it
npm config set myPackage:myPort 3000
- Setting a param in your npm script
An example of reading a variable set in your npm script. In this example NODE_ENV
"scripts": {
"start:prod": "NODE_ENV=prod node server.js",
"start:dev": "NODE_ENV=dev node server.js"
},
read NODE_ENV in server.js either prod or dev
var env = process.env.NODE_ENV || 'prod'
if(env === 'dev'){
var app = require("./serverDev.js");
} else {
var app = require("./serverProd.js");
}

As of npm 2.x, you can pass args into run-scripts by separating with --
Terminal
npm run-script start -- --foo=3
Package.json
"start": "node ./index.js"
Index.js
console.log('process.argv', process.argv);

I had been using this one-liner in the past, and after a bit of time away from Node.js had to try and rediscover it recently. Similar to the solution mentioned by #francoisrv, it utilizes the npm_config_* variables.
Create the following minimal package.json file:
{
"name": "argument",
"version": "1.0.0",
"scripts": {
"argument": "echo \"The value of --foo is '${npm_config_foo}'\""
}
}
Run the following command:
npm run argument --foo=bar
Observe the following output:
The value of --foo is 'bar'
All of this is nicely documented in the npm official documentation:
https://docs.npmjs.com/using-npm/config
Note: The Environment Variables heading explains that variables inside scripts do behave differently to what is defined in the documentation. This is true when it comes to case sensitivity, as well whether the argument is defined with a space or equals sign.
Note: If you are using an argument with hyphens, these will be replaced with underscores in the corresponding environment variable. For example, npm run example --foo-bar=baz would correspond to ${npm_config_foo_bar}.
Note: For non-WSL Windows users, see #Doctor Blue's comments below... TL;DR replace ${npm_config_foo} with %npm_config_foo%.

Use process.argv in your code then just provide a trailing $* to your scripts value entry.
As an example try it with a simple script which just logs the provided arguments to standard out echoargs.js:
console.log('arguments: ' + process.argv.slice(2));
package.json:
"scripts": {
"start": "node echoargs.js $*"
}
Examples:
> npm start 1 2 3
arguments: 1,2,3
process.argv[0] is the executable (node), process.argv[1] is your script.
Tested with npm v5.3.0 and node v8.4.0

Most of the answers above cover just passing the arguments into your NodeJS script, called by npm. My solution is for general use.
Just wrap the npm script with a shell interpreter (e.g. sh) call and pass the arguments as usual. The only exception is that the first argument number is 0.
For example, you want to add the npm script someprogram --env=<argument_1>, where someprogram just prints the value of the env argument:
package.json
"scripts": {
"command": "sh -c 'someprogram --env=$0'"
}
When you run it:
% npm run -s command my-environment
my-environment

If you want to pass arguments to the middle of an npm script, as opposed to just having them appended to the end, then inline environment variables seem to work nicely:
"scripts": {
"dev": "BABEL_ARGS=-w npm run build && cd lib/server && nodemon index.js",
"start": "npm run build && node lib/server/index.js",
"build": "mkdir -p lib && babel $BABEL_ARGS -s inline --stage 0 src -d lib",
},
Here, npm run dev passes the -w watch flag to babel, but npm run start just runs a regular build once.

For PowerShell users on Windows
The accepted answer did not work for me with npm 6.14. Neither adding no -- nor including it once does work. However, putting -- twice or putting "--" once before the arguments does the trick. Example:
npm run <my_script> -- -- <my arguments like --this>
Suspected reason
Like in bash, -- instructs PowerShell to treat all following arguments as literal strings, and not options (E.g see this answer). The issues seems to be that the command is interpreted one time more than expected, loosing the '--'. For instance, by doing
npm run <my_script> -- --option value
npm will run
<my_script> value
However, doing
npm run <my_script> "--" --option value
results in
<my_script> "--option" "value"
which works fine.

This doesn't really answer your question but you could always use environment variables instead:
"scripts": {
"start": "PORT=3000 node server.js"
}
Then in your server.js file:
var port = process.env.PORT || 3000;

I've found this question while I was trying to solve my issue with running sequelize seed:generate cli command:
node_modules/.bin/sequelize seed:generate --name=user
Let me get to the point. I wanted to have a short script command in my package.json file and to provide --name argument at the same time
The answer came after some experiments. Here is my command in package.json
"scripts: {
"seed:generate":"NODE_ENV=development node_modules/.bin/sequelize seed:generate"
}
... and here is an example of running it in terminal to generate a seed file for a user
> yarn seed:generate --name=user
> npm run seed:generate -- --name=user
FYI
yarn -v
1.6.0
npm -v
5.6.0

Note: This approach modifies your package.json on the fly, use it if you have no alternative.
I had to pass command line arguments to my scripts which were something like:
"scripts": {
"start": "npm run build && npm run watch",
"watch": "concurrently \"npm run watch-ts\" \"npm run watch-node\"",
...
}
So, this means I start my app with npm run start.
Now if I want to pass some arguments, I would start with maybe:
npm run start -- --config=someConfig
What this does is: npm run build && npm run watch -- --config=someConfig. Problem with this is, it always appends the arguments to the end of the script. This means all the chained scripts don't get these arguments(Args maybe or may not be required by all, but that's a different story.). Further when the linked scripts are called then those scripts won't get the passed arguments. i.e. The watch script won't get the passed arguments.
The production usage of my app is as an .exe, so passing the arguments in the exe works fine but if want to do this during development, it gets problamatic.
I couldn't find any proper way to achieve this, so this is what I have tried.
I have created a javascript file: start-script.js at the parent level of the application, I have a "default.package.json" and instead of maintaining "package.json", I maintain "default.package.json". The purpose of start-script.json is to read default.package.json, extract the scripts and look for npm run scriptname then append the passed arguments to these scripts. After this, it will create a new package.json and copy the data from default.package.json with modified scripts and then call npm run start.
const fs = require('fs');
const { spawn } = require('child_process');
// open default.package.json
const defaultPackage = fs.readFileSync('./default.package.json');
try {
const packageOb = JSON.parse(defaultPackage);
// loop over the scripts present in this object, edit them with flags
if ('scripts' in packageOb && process.argv.length > 2) {
const passedFlags = ` -- ${process.argv.slice(2).join(' ')}`;
// assuming the script names have words, : or -, modify the regex if required.
const regexPattern = /(npm run [\w:-]*)/g;
const scriptsWithFlags = Object.entries(packageOb.scripts).reduce((acc, [key, value]) => {
const patternMatches = value.match(regexPattern);
// loop over all the matched strings and attach the desired flags.
if (patternMatches) {
for (let eachMatchedPattern of patternMatches) {
const startIndex = value.indexOf(eachMatchedPattern);
const endIndex = startIndex + eachMatchedPattern.length;
// save the string which doen't fall in this matched pattern range.
value = value.slice(0, startIndex) + eachMatchedPattern + passedFlags + value.slice(endIndex);
}
}
acc[key] = value;
return acc;
}, {});
packageOb.scripts = scriptsWithFlags;
}
const modifiedJSON = JSON.stringify(packageOb, null, 4);
fs.writeFileSync('./package.json', modifiedJSON);
// now run your npm start script
let cmd = 'npm';
// check if this works in your OS
if (process.platform === 'win32') {
cmd = 'npm.cmd'; // https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/3675
}
spawn(cmd, ['run', 'start'], { stdio: 'inherit' });
} catch(e) {
console.log('Error while parsing default.package.json', e);
}
Now, instead of doing npm run start, I do node start-script.js --c=somethis --r=somethingElse
The initial run looks fine, but haven't tested thoroughly. Use it, if you like for you app development.

I find it's possible to just pass variables exactly as you would to Node.js:
// index.js
console.log(process.env.TEST_ENV_VAR)
// package.json
...
"scripts": { "start": "node index.js" },
...
TEST_ENV_VAR=hello npm start
Prints out "hello"

Separate your arguments using -- from the script and add all the required arguments, we can later access them by index.
npm run start -- myemail#gmail.com 100
You can get params in node using
const params = process.argv.slice(2);
console.log(params);
Output
['myemail#gmail.com', '100']

From what I see, people use package.json scripts when they would like to run script in simpler way. For example, to use nodemon that installed in local node_modules, we can't call nodemon directly from the cli, but we can call it by using ./node_modules/nodemon/nodemon.js. So, to simplify this long typing, we can put this...
...
scripts: {
'start': 'nodemon app.js'
}
...
... then call npm start to use 'nodemon' which has app.js as the first argument.
What I'm trying to say, if you just want to start your server with the node command, I don't think you need to use scripts. Typing npm start or node app.js has the same effort.
But if you do want to use nodemon, and want to pass a dynamic argument, don't use script either. Try to use symlink instead.
For example using migration with sequelize. I create a symlink...
ln -s node_modules/sequelize/bin/sequelize sequelize
... And I can pass any arguement when I call it ...
./sequlize -h /* show help */
./sequelize -m /* upgrade migration */
./sequelize -m -u /* downgrade migration */
etc...
At this point, using symlink is the best way I could figure out, but I don't really think it's the best practice.
I also hope for your opinion to my answer.

I know there is an approved answer already, but I kinda like this JSON approach.
npm start '{"PROJECT_NAME_STR":"my amazing stuff", "CRAZY_ARR":[0,7,"hungry"], "MAGICAL_NUMBER_INT": 42, "THING_BOO":true}';
Usually I have like 1 var I need, such as a project name, so I find this quick n' simple.
Also I often have something like this in my package.json
"scripts": {
"start": "NODE_ENV=development node local.js"
}
And being greedy I want "all of it", NODE_ENV and the CMD line arg stuff.
You simply access these things like so in your file (in my case local.js)
console.log(process.env.NODE_ENV, starter_obj.CRAZY_ARR, starter_obj.PROJECT_NAME_STR, starter_obj.MAGICAL_NUMBER_INT, starter_obj.THING_BOO);
You just need to have this bit above it (I'm running v10.16.0 btw)
var starter_obj = JSON.parse(JSON.parse(process.env.npm_config_argv).remain[0]);
Anyhoo, question already answered. Thought I'd share, as I use this method a lot.

I settled for something like this, look at the test-watch script:
"scripts": {
"dev": "tsc-watch --onSuccess \"node ./dist/server.js\"",
"test": "tsc && cross-env NODE_OPTIONS=--experimental-vm-modules NODE_NO_WARNINGS=1 jest",
"test-watch": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS=--experimental-vm-modules NODE_NO_WARNINGS=1 tsc-watch --onSuccess",
},
You invoke the test-watch script like this:
// Run all tests with odata in their name
npm run test-watch "jest odata"

npm run script_target -- < argument > Basically this is the way of passing the command line arguments but it will work only in case of when script have only one command running like I am running a command i.e. npm run start -- 4200
"script":{
"start" : "ng serve --port="
}
This will run for passing command line parameters but what if we run more then one command together like npm run build c:/workspace/file
"script":{
"build" : "copy c:/file <arg> && ng build"
}
but it will interpreter like this while running copy c:/file && ng build c:/work space/file
and we are expected something like this
copy c:/file c:/work space/file && ng build
Note :- so command line parameter only work ad expected in case of only one command in a script.
I read some answers above in which some of them are writing that you can access the command line parameter using $ symbol but this will not gonna work

Try cross-env NPM package.
Easy to use. Easy to install. Cross all platform.
Example:
set arguments for command
// package.json
"scripts": {
“test”: “node test.js”,
“test-with-env-arg”: “cross-env YourEnvVarName=strValue yarn test,
}
get arguments from process.env
// test.js
const getCommandLineArg = Boolean(process.env.YourEnvVarName === 'true') // Attention: value of process.env.* is String type, not number || boolean

i had the same issue when i need to deploy to different environments
here is the package.json pre and post the updates.
scripts:
{"deploy-sit": "sls deploy --config resources-sit.yml",
"deploy-uat": "sls deploy --config resources-uat.yml",
"deploy-dev": "sls deploy --config resources-dev.yml"}
but here is the correct method to adopt the environment variables rather than repeating ourselves
scripts:{"deploy-env": "sls deploy --config resources-$ENV_VAR.yml"}
finally you can deploy by running
ENV_VAR=dev npm run deploy-env

Related

Why npm run serve is throwing ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Error message "error:0308010C:digital envelope routines::unsupported"
(50 answers)
Closed 12 months ago.
I'm having an issue with a Webpack build process that suddenly broke, resulting in the following error...
<s> [webpack.Progress] 10% building 0/1 entries 0/0 dependencies 0/0 modules
node:internal/crypto/hash:67
this[kHandle] = new _Hash(algorithm, xofLen);
^
Error: error:0308010C:digital envelope routines::unsupported
at new Hash (node:internal/crypto/hash:67:19)
at Object.createHash (node:crypto:130:10)
at BulkUpdateDecorator.hashFactory (/app/node_modules/webpack/lib/util/createHash.js:155:18)
at BulkUpdateDecorator.update (/app/node_modules/webpack/lib/util/createHash.js:46:50)
at OriginalSource.updateHash (/app/node_modules/webpack-sources/lib/OriginalSource.js:131:8)
at NormalModule._initBuildHash (/app/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:888:17)
at handleParseResult (/app/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:954:10)
at /app/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:1048:4
at processResult (/app/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:763:11)
at /app/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:827:5 {
opensslErrorStack: [ 'error:03000086:digital envelope routines::initialization error' ],
library: 'digital envelope routines',
reason: 'unsupported',
code: 'ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED'
}
command terminated with exit code 1
I've tried googling ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED webpack which yielded almost no useful results, but it did highlight an issue using MD4 as provided by OpenSSL (which is apparently deprecated?) to generate hashes.
The webpack.config.js code is as follows:
const path = require('path');
const webpack = require('webpack');
/*
* SplitChunksPlugin is enabled by default and replaced
* deprecated CommonsChunkPlugin. It automatically identifies modules which
* should be splitted of chunk by heuristics using module duplication count and
* module category (i. e. node_modules). And splits the chunks…
*
* It is safe to remove "splitChunks" from the generated configuration
* and was added as an educational example.
*
* https://webpack.js.org/plugins/split-chunks-plugin/
*
*/
/*
* We've enabled TerserPlugin for you! This minifies your app
* in order to load faster and run less javascript.
*
* https://github.com/webpack-contrib/terser-webpack-plugin
*
*/
const TerserPlugin = require('terser-webpack-plugin');
module.exports = {
mode: 'development',
entry: './src/js/scripts.js',
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'js'),
filename: 'scripts.js'
},
devtool: 'source-map',
plugins: [new webpack.ProgressPlugin()],
module: {
rules: []
},
optimization: {
minimizer: [new TerserPlugin()],
splitChunks: {
cacheGroups: {
vendors: {
priority: -10,
test: /[\\/]node_modules[\\/]/
}
},
chunks: 'async',
minChunks: 1,
minSize: 30000,
name: 'true'
}
}
};
How do I change the hashing algorithm used by Webpack to something else?
I was able to fix it via:
export NODE_OPTIONS=--openssl-legacy-provider
sachaw's comment to Node.js v17.0.0 - Error starting project in development mode #30078
But they say they fixed it: ijjk's comment to Node.js v17.0.0 - Error starting project in development mode #30078:
Hi, this has been updated in v11.1.3-canary.89 of Next.js, please update and give it a try!
For me, it worked only with the annotation above.
I also want to point out that npm run start works with -openssl-legacy-provider, but npm run dev won't.
It seems that there is a patch:
Node.js 17: digital envelope routines::unsupported #14532
I personally downgraded to 16-alpine.
I had this problem too. I'd accidentally been running on the latest Node.js (17.0 at time of writing), not the LTS version (14.18) which I'd meant to install. Downgrading my Node.js install to the LTS version fixed the problem for me.
There is a hashing algorithm that comes with Webpack v5.54.0+ that does not rely on OpenSSL.
To use this hash function that relies on a npm-provided dependency instead of an operating system-provided dependency, modify the webpack.config.cjs output key to include the hashFunction: "xxhash64" option.
module.exports = {
output: {
hashFunction: "xxhash64"
}
};
Ryan Brownell's answer is the ideal solution if you are using Webpack v5.54.0+.
If you're using an older version of Webpack, you can still solve this by changing the hash function to one that is not deprecated. (It defaults to the ancient md4, which OpenSSL has removed support for, which is the root cause of the error.) The supported algorithms are any supported by crypto.createHash. For example, to use SHA-256:
module.exports = {
output: {
hashFunction: "sha256"
}
};
Finally, if you are unable to change the Webpack configuration (e.g., if it's a transitive dependency which is running Webpack), you can enable OpenSSL's legacy provider to temporarily enable MD4 during the Webpack build. This is a last resort. Create a file openssl.cnf with this content…
openssl_conf = openssl_init
[openssl_init]
providers = provider_sect
[provider_sect]
default = default_sect
legacy = legacy_sect
[default_sect]
activate = 1
[legacy_sect]
activate = 1
…and then set the environment variable OPENSSL_CONF to the path to that file when running Webpack.
It is not my answer really, but I found this workaround /hack/ to fix my problem Code Check in for a GitHub project... see the bug comments here.
I ran into ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED after updating with npm install.
I added the following to node_modules\react-scripts\config\webpack.config.js
const crypto = require("crypto");
const crypto_orig_createHash = crypto.createHash;
crypto.createHash = algorithm => crypto_orig_createHash(algorithm == "md4" ? "sha256" : algorithm);
I tried Ryan Brownell's solution and ended up with a different error, but this worked...
This error is mentioned in the release notes for Node.js 17.0.0, with a suggested workaround:
If you hit an ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED error in your application with Node.js 17, it’s likely that your application or a module you’re using is attempting to use an algorithm or key size which is no longer allowed by default with OpenSSL 3.0. A command-line option, --openssl-legacy-provider, has been added to revert to the legacy provider as a temporary workaround for these tightened restrictions.
I ran into this issue using Laravel Mix (Webpack) and was able to fix it within file package.json by adding in the NODE_OPTIONS=--openssl-legacy-provider (referenced in Jan's answer) to the beginning of the script:
package.json:
{
"private": true,
"scripts": {
"production": "cross-env NODE_ENV=production NODE_OPTIONS=--openssl-legacy-provider node_modules/webpack/bin/webpack.js --progress --hide-modules --config=node_modules/laravel-mix/setup/webpack.config.js"
},
"dependencies": {
...
}
}
Try upgrading your Webpack version to 5.62.2.
I faced the same challenge, but you just need to downgrade Node.js to version 16.13 and everything works well. Download LTS, not the current on Downloads.
I had the same problem with my Vue.js project and I solved it.
macOS and Linux
You should have installed NVM (Node Version Manager). If you never had before, just run this command in your terminal:
curl -o- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nvm-sh/nvm/v0.39.0/install.sh | bash
Open your project
Open the terminal in your project
Run the command nvm install 16.13.0 or any older version
After the installation is completed, run nvm use 16.13.0
I faced the same problem in a project I developed with Next.js. For the solution, I ran the project as follows and I solved the problem.
cross-env NODE_OPTIONS='--openssl-legacy-provider' next dev
This means that you have the latest Node.js version. If you are using it for Docker then you need to change the image from
FROM node
to
FROM node:14

How can I make Jelastic start PM2 to launch an 'npm' command instead of a file?

I'm using a Jelastic Node.js PM2 environment and I want my app to be started with something like the following:
pm2 start npm --name "app name" -- start
(my server is not a JS file).
The command runs fine if I use a Jelastic 'npm' environment, but I'd rather have the benefits of PM2.
I tried setting various APP_FILE (start, npm start, a pm2 config file path), Entry Points and PROCESS_MANAGER_FILE, without success. I usually get this error:
Node ID : 53209
-----------------------
result 1 Failed to start
Stopping nodejs server[ OK ] Starting nodejs server [FAILED]
The comment from #Jelastic worked! Indeed using a PM2 'ecosystem file' works in Jelastic.
Set APP_FILE (or possibly PROCESS_MANAGER_FILE) to ecosystem.config.js (This is relative to ROOT_DIR)
The content of this file should look something like this:
module.exports = {
apps: [
{
script: "yarn",
args: "--cwd myserver1 start",
name: "myserver1",
},
// You can use this setup to start multiple processes too.
{
script: "yarn",
args: "--cwd myserver2 start",
name: "myserver2",
},
],
};
--cwd tells yarn to switch the Current Working Directory. If you use npm, you can use --prefix instead.
Read more about PM2 ecoystem files: https://pm2.keymetrics.io/docs/usage/application-declaration/

Packer HCL2 config file support

In https://packer.io/guides/hcl/from-json-v1/, it says
Note: Starting from version 1.5.0 Packer can read HCL2 files.
And my packer is packer_1.5.5_linux_amd64.zip which is suppose to be able to read HCL2 files. However, when I tried it, I got
$ packer build -only=docker hcl-example
Failed to parse template: Error parsing JSON: invalid character '#' looking for beginning of value
At line 1, column 1 (offset 1):
1: #
^
==> Builds finished but no artifacts were created.
$ packer build -h
Usage: packer build [options] TEMPLATE
Will execute multiple builds in parallel as defined in the template.
The various artifacts created by the template will be outputted.
Options:
-color=false Disable color output. (Default: color)
-debug Debug mode enabled for builds.
-except=foo,bar,baz Run all builds and post-procesors other than these.
-only=foo,bar,baz Build only the specified builds.
-force Force a build to continue if artifacts exist, deletes existing artifacts.
-machine-readable Produce machine-readable output.
-on-error=[cleanup|abort|ask] If the build fails do: clean up (default), abort, or ask.
-parallel=false Disable parallelization. (Default: true)
-parallel-builds=1 Number of builds to run in parallel. 0 means no limit (Default: 0)
-timestamp-ui Enable prefixing of each ui output with an RFC3339 timestamp.
-var 'key=value' Variable for templates, can be used multiple times.
-var-file=path JSON file containing user variables. [ Note that even in HCL mode this expects file to contain JSON, a fix is comming soon ]
and I don't see any switches from above to switch to HCL2 mode.
What I'm missing here?
$ packer version
Packer v1.5.5
$ cat hcl-example
# the source block is what was defined in the builders section and represents a
# reusable way to start a machine. You build your images from that source.source
"amazon-ebs" "example" {
ami_name = "packer-test"
region = "us-east-1"
instance_type = "t2.micro"
}
[UPDATE:]
To address Matt's comment/concern, I've changed the content of hcl-example to the whole list in https://packer.io/guides/hcl/from-json-v1/, and
mv hcl-example hcl-example.hcl
$ packer validate hcl-example.hcl
Failed to parse template: Error parsing JSON: invalid character '#' looking for beginning of value
At line 1, column 1 (offset 1):
1: #
^
Named it with .pkr.hcl extension solved the problem.

PM2 start script with multiple arguments (serve)

I'm trying to run serve frontend/dist -l 4000 from PM2. This is supposed to serve a Vue app on port 4000.
In my ecosystem.config.js, I have:
{
name: 'parker-frontend',
max_restarts: 5,
script: 'serve',
args: 'frontend/dist -l 4000',
instances: 1,
},
But when I do pm2 start, in the logs I have the following message:
Exposing /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/parker/frontend/dist directory on port NaN
Whereas if I run the same command: serve frontend/dist -l 4000, it runs just fine on port 4000.
After running serve frontend/dist -l 5000 I got an error in the PM2 logs.
In it's call stack I've found:
at Object.<anonymous> (/usr/lib/node_modules/pm2/lib/API/Serve.js:242:4)
Notice the path: /usr/lib/node_modules/pm2/lib/API/Serve.js
There is another command that's called serve in pm2 itself that was ran instead of the correct one. This is not the npm i -g serve I installed before. This is due to how Node package resolution works - it prioritizes local modules first.
To use the globally installed version (the correct one), you need to specify the exact path to your global serve.
To find out the path - on Linux, you can just do:
$ which serve
/usr/local/bin/serve
Then put the path in your ecosystem.config.js script property.
Final working ecosystem.config.js:
{
name: 'parker-frontend',
script: '/usr/local/bin/serve', //pm2 has it's own 'serve' which doesn't work, make sure to use global
args: 'frontend/dist -l 5000',
instances: 1,
},
```

How can I pipe to a bash alias from an npm script?

I have an alias in my .bashrc for bunyan:
$ alias bsh
alias bsh='bunyan -o short'
This line runs fine in bash:
$ coffee src/index.coffee | bsh
But if I put the same thing in 'scripts'
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1",
"coffee":"coffee src/index.coffee | bsh"
},
And npm run coffee, it fails:
> coffee src/index.coffee | bsh
sh: bsh: command not found
events.js:141
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error: write EPIPE
at exports._errnoException (util.js:870:11)
at WriteWrap.afterWrite (net.js:769:14)
So at random I tried putting in || instead of | and it worked. I can't figure out why though. I don't have to escape pipe characters in JSON as far as I know.
However it doesn't actually pipe the output to the bsh alias.
The actual fix is to use "coffee":"coffee src/index.coffee | bunyan -o short" -- get rid of the alias completely.
How can I use a bash alias in an npm script?
You can create a function instead of an alias.
function bsh() {
bunyan -o short
}
export -f bsh
The export will make it available to children processes.
So I had a whole response typed up about using
. ~/.bash_aliases && coffee src/index.coffee | bsh
But it turns out that aliases are barely, if at all, supported in bash scripts. From what I have read, aliases are deprecated in favor of functions...
See this discussion for what convinced me to use functions instead of aliases. I tried for an hour or two to get aliases to work by testing with /bin/bash -c as well as npm run, with no luck. However, using a function as suggested by Diego worked immediately and without problems.
I am including this even though the question is already marked as answered in case someone as stubborn as me winds up here from google and decides to try to make aliases work instead of just using a function.
However, I did run into a problem specifically when trying to use this with npm scripts. Even with the export -f, my functions aren't recognized - I still had to manually include the bash_aliases file, and even then, I got an error about the -f option for export.
In order to actually get this working, I had to take out the function export line and manually include the bash_aliases file...