How to manage multiple-level nesting route in react-router v4? - react-router

I think the new way to nest children route in react-router v4 is difficult to read/maintain/reuse, do I using the wrong way?
V2 is clear, but code in V4 is expand(many match.url), below.
{/* v2 */}
<Route path='/:bizType'>
<Route path=':module'>
<Route path='demo1' component={Demo1} />
</Route>
</Route>
{/* v4 */}
<Route path='/:bizType' component={({match})=>{
return <Route path={`${match.url}/:module`} component={({match})=>{
return <div>
<Route path={`${match.url}/demo1`} component={Demo1} />
</div>
}} />
}}>
</Route>

your V4 way is awesome and I'll use it in my app. but I prefer to use external pure component.

Related

react-router-dom switch not rendering components after dynamic path

I`ve been following an e-commerce tutorial and building on top of it. Im new to React and React Router Dom.
I've set a dynamic path for individual product pages, and now i' trying to add some new paths i.e. contact, about, etc.. If I add the new paths above the dynamic path they are rendered properly, but if I place the routes under the one with the dynamic path, for example the /hello, they won't render. Is this normal behaviour??
<Router>
<div>
<Navbar totalItems={cart.total_items} />
<Switch>
<Route exact path="/">
<Home products={products} handleAddToCart={handleAddToCart} fetchProduct={fetchProduct} />
</Route>
<Route exact path="/checkout">
<Checkout cart={cart} order={order} handleCaptureCheckout={handleCaptureCheckout} error={errorMessage} refreshCart={refreshCart} />
</Route>
<Route exact path="/cart">
<Cart
cart={cart}
handleUpdateCartQuantity={handleUpdateCartQuantity}
handleRemoveFromCart={handleRemoveFromCart}
handleEmptyCart={handleEmptyCart}
/>
</Route>
<Route exact path="/contact">
<Contact />
</Route>
<Route exact path="/:id">
<Details product={product} handleAddToCart={handleAddToCart} />
</Route>
<Route exact path="/hello">
<h1>Hello World</h1>
</Route>
</Switch>
</div>
<Router>
Yes, this behavior is completely normal, and expected. Recall that the Switch component "Renders the first child <Route> or <Redirect> that matches the location." This means that in the Switch component path order and specificity matter!
A path "/hello" is more specific than "/:id", so depending on route order may or may not be matched first. Or in other words, "/hello" can always be matched to "/:id", but not always the other way around.
You should always order the routes from more specific paths to less specific paths, and if done correctly there should be a near zero need for the exact prop.
"/hello" is more specific than "/:id" which is more specific than "/".
<Switch>
<Route path="/checkout">
<Checkout ... />
</Route>
<Route path="/cart">
<Cart ... />
</Route>
<Route path="/contact">
<Contact />
</Route>
<Route path="/hello">
<h1>Hello World</h1>
</Route>
<Route path="/:id">
<Details ... />
</Route>
<Route path="/">
<Home ... />
</Route>
</Switch>
If you had a nested "/contact/add" route for example, this is more specific than "/contact" and should be listed higher/before in the Switch.
Try removing the exact from the Route.
<Route exact path="/:id">
to:
<Route path="/:id">

is there a way to set a default route with React-Router v6

I just can't find a way to set a default route with react-router v6
Is it because it's not good programming anymore?
Can somebody tell me why?
Thanks in advance
Rafael
If I understand your question about a "default" route correctly then I am interpreting this as one of the following:
Use an index route:
You can wrap a set of routes in a layout route and specify an index route:
<Routes>
<Route path="/*">
<Route index element={<ComponentA />} />
<Route path="pathB" element={<ComponentB />} />
<Route path="pathC" element={<ComponentC />} />
</Route>
</Routes>
The index route is the route that will be matched and rendered when the path exactly matches the root parent route's path.
Redirect to a "default" route if no other routes match:
You can also render a redirect to the route you consider to be the "default" route.
<Routes>
<Route path="/pathA" element={<ComponentA />} />
<Route path="/pathB" element={<ComponentB />} />
<Route path="/pathC" element={<ComponentC />} />
<Route path="*" element={<Navigate to="/pathA" replace />} />
</Routes>
TLDR;
use <Route index element={<Navigate to="/dashboard" />} />
index: default computed route.
<Navigate to="whatever you want"/>: is used to navigate to a another already declared path.
LR;
I found an easy way to redirect to a default component using index & Navigate combined.
In my situation I had used React Router V6.6.2 with:
createBrowserRouter(
createRoutesFromElements(...))
The routes look like this
/* All imports go here */
const router = createBrowserRouter(
createRoutesFromElements(
<Route element={<AuthLayout />}>
<Route element={<RrotectedLayout />}>
<Route path="/" element={<MainLayout />}>
<Route index element={<Navigate to="/dashboard" />} />
<Route path="dashboard" element={<Dashboard />} />
<Route path="projects" element={<Projects />} />
<Route path="users" element={<Users />} />
<Route path="notifications" element={<Notification />} />
<Route path="settings" element={<Settings />} />
<Route
path="*"
element={<Navigate to="/dashboard" replace={true} />}
/>
</Route>
</Route>
<Route path="/signup" element={<Signup />} />
<Route path="/login" element={<Login />} />
</Route>,
),
{},
)
export default function App() {
return (
<>
<RouterProvider router={router} />
</>
)
}
Now when you access your application, React router will figure out which index your application needs to point to, and since your index contains a Navigation to a specific path, you'll be redirect to that path by default. you don't need to specify a specific component (element) in this situation because you don't wanna loose the link to it.
I actually found the answer here but I just wanna share my solution if it helps someone with theirs.
You can set path='*' to make a default route. The index route deals a parent route ("/") but doesn't deal with routes which should otherwise return a 404 status.
if (!token) {
// This router will handle my public routes. Anything else is going to redirect to AuthPage without losing the previous route typed.
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Routes>
{/* Auth */}
<Route path="/">
<Route exact path="recover" element={<UnknownPage />} />
// Default route
<Route path="*" element={<AuthPage setToken={setToken} />} />
</Route>
</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>
);
}
// This router is inside my application. Only logged users will get here.
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Routes>
{/* My base page is just some fixed structure like Header, Sidebar and Footer. For this problem you can ignore it. */}
{/* BasePage */}
<Route path="/*" element={<BasePage logout={logout} />}>
{/* This is my specific users route */ }
{/* Users */}
<Route path="users">
<Route path="" element={<UsersPage />} />
<Route path=":id" element={<UserInfoPage />} />
</Route>
{/* Anything else is going to show this page. Even random words like: http:localhost:3000/anything-asdvasd */}
{/* Default Route */}
<Route path="*" element={<UnknownPage />} />
</Route>
</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>
);
Using parent routes like I used in my users routes makes it easier to scope your default routes.
If you are using createBrowserRouter you can set the default route in following way.
As per docs component loads children of parent. So
const router = createBrowserRouter([
{
path: "/",
element: <App />,
children: [
{
path: "/",
element: <Home />,
},
{
path: "/home",
element: <Home />,
},
],
},
],);
If you are using createBrowserRouter you can set the default route in following way.
const router = createBrowserRouter([
{
path: "/",
element: <RootLayout />,
children: [
{ index: true, element: <Navigate to="/calculation" replace /> },
{ path: "calculation", element: <Calculation /> },
{ path: "calendar", element: <Calendar /> },
{ path: "profile", element: <Profile /> },
],
},
]);

Conditional rendering with React Router

I'd like to render some routes with a nav at the top, while rendering other routes (like a sign-up / sign-in page) without any nav.
For the setup with the nav, I have:
const App = () => (
<Router>
<div>
<Nav />
<div>
<Route exact path="/" component={Home} />
<Route path="/account" component={Account} />
<Route path="/news" component={News} />
</div>
<Footer />
</div>
</Router>
);
I'm trying to find the best way of handling this with React Router (seems like it would have to handled with some type of conditional maybe? - "if my current route matches any one of these routes, then render like so else render this.").
Thanks!
You have at least two possibilities:
Use Route "path" property to test the route and render the component. Path property accepts path.to.regexp expressions.
Wrap your component with withRouter method and inside Nav test if the route matches and render null otherwise.
First answer:
const App = () => (
<Router>
<div>
<Route path="/(?!signin|signup)" component={Nav}/>
<div>
<Route exact path="/" component={Home} />
<Route path="/account" component={Account} />
<Route path="/news" component={News} />
</div>
<Footer />
</div>
</Router>
);
Second answer:
import { withRouter } from 'react-router'
const NavWithRouter = withRouter(Nav);
const App = () => (
<Router>
<div>
<NavWithRouter/>
<div>
<Route exact path="/" component={Home} />
<Route path="/account" component={Account} />
<Route path="/news" component={News} />
</div>
<Footer />
</div>
</Router>
);
<Route
path={`foo/(A|B|C)`}
component={() => (<Baz {...props}/>)}
/>
Where A,B,C are the different routes like foo/A.
I usually use two different Layout pages. And within the Layout pages, have a router for the content.
My code will look like this:
<Router>
<Route path="/login" component={AuthLayout} />
<Route path="/logout" component={AuthLayout} />
<Route path="/some/path" component={Layout} />
</Router>
Within each Layout, there will be the usual header / footer / navbars and then another set of routes.
<div className="auth-layout">
<header className="auth-layout__header"></header>
<main className="auth-layout__content">
<Switch>
<Route path="/login" component={Login} />
<Route path="/logout" component={Logout} />
</Switch>
</main>
</div>
In this way, I have a direct mapping from requirements to code. In my code, there are much more differences between the two layouts.
Just use a prop for this & inside the children your are able to conditional render the nav.
<Route exact path="/" render={() => <Home hasNav={false} />}

Nested Routes in React Router v4

I'm trying to set up some nested routes to add a common layout. Check the code out:
<Router>
<Route component={Layout}>
<div>
<Route path='/abc' component={ABC} />
<Route path='/xyz' component={XYZ} />
</div>
</Route>
</Router>
While this works perfectly fine, I still get the warning:
Warning: You should not use <Route component> and <Route children> in the same
route; will be ignored
CESCO's answer renders first the component AppShell then one of the components inside Switch. But these components are NOT going to render inside AppShell, they will NOT be children of AppShell.
In v4 to wrap components you don't put anymore your Routes inside another Route, you put your Routes directly inside a component.
I.E : for the wrapper instead of <Route component={Layout}> you directly use <Layout>.
Full code :
<Router>
<Layout>
<Route path='/abc' component={ABC} />
<Route path='/xyz' component={XYZ} />
</Layout>
</Router>
The change is probably explained by the idea to make React Router v4 to be pure
React so you only use React elements like with any other React element.
EDIT : I removed the Switch component as it's not useful here. See when it's useful here.
You need to use the switch component to nesting to work nice. Also, see this question
// main app
<div>
// not setting a path prop, makes this always render
<Route component={AppShell}/>
<Switch>
<Route exact path="/" component={Login}/>
<Route path="/dashboard" component={AsyncDashboard(userAgent)}/>
<Route component={NoMatch}/>
</Switch>
</div>
And version-4 components do not take children, instead, you should use the render prop.
<Router>
<Route render={(props)=>{
return <div>Whatever</div>}>
</Route>
</Router>
Try:
<Router>
<Layout>
<Route path='/abc' component={ABC} />
<Route path='/xyz' component={XYZ} />
</Layout>
</Router>
If you do not want Layout to run at loaded. Use this method:
<div className="container">
<Route path="/main" component={ChatList}/>
<Switch>
<Route exact path="/" component={Start} />
<Route path="/main/single" component={SingleChat} />
<Route path="/main/group" component={GroupChat} />
<Route path="/login" component={Login} />
</Switch>
</div>
Whenever history changes, componentWillReceiveProps in the ChatList will run.
You can also try this :
<Route exact path="/Home"
render={props=>(
<div>
<Layout/>
<Archive/>
</div>
)}
/>

Adding deep Links using react-router

Using the below Route configuration -
<Router history={hashHistory}>
<Route name="Home" path="/" component={BaseLayout}>
<Route name="Gateways" path="/gateways" component={DashboardLayout}>
<Route name="Login" path="/login" component={Login}/>
<Route name=":id" path="/gateways/:id">
<IndexRoute name="Dashboard" component={ViewGateWay}/>
<Route name="Access Points" path="/accesspoints" component={AccessPoints}>
<Route name=":id" path="/:id" component={ViewAccessPoint}/>
</Route>
<Route name="Devices" path="/devices" component={Devices}>
<Route name=":id" path="/:id" component={ViewDevice}/>
</Route>
</Route>
<IndexRoute component={Gateways} />
</Route>
<IndexRedirect to="Login" />
</Route>
</Router>
Using name in the Route for breadcrumbs. Have a side menu which have links to /gateways/:id, /gateways/:id/devices, /gateways/:id/accesspoints, further the last two have links to individual devices and access points using Link as /gateways/:id/devices/:id and /gateways/:id/accesspoints/:id. When I am giving the link in the side menu as
<Link to="/gateways/${this.props.params.id}/accesspoints">Access Points</Link>
OR
<Link to="/accesspoints">Access Points</Link>
I am not getting the correct page. Same goes with the devices link. I am trying to achieve the below API's along with breadcrumb.
home/gateways/GW_ID1/dashboard
home/gateways/GW_ID1/accesspoints
home/gateways/GW_ID1/accesspoints/GW_AP1
home/gateways/GW_ID1/devices
home/gateways/GW_ID1/devices/GW_DV1
What is the correct way to Link ? Not using any handler.
After a bit of brainstorming, came up with a solution what I wanted to achieve
<Route name=":gid" path="/gateways/:gid">
<Route name="Dashboard" path="/gateways/:gid/dashboard" component={ViewGateWay}/>
<Route name="Access Points" path="/gateways/:gid/accesspoints" component={AccessPoints}>
<Route name=":apid" path="/gateways/:gid/accesspoints/:apid" component={ViewAccessPoint}/>
</Route>
<Route name="Devices" path="/gateways/:gid/devices" component={Devices}>
<Route name=":did" path="/gateways/:gid/devices/:did" component={ViewDevice}/>
</Route>
</Route>