I have query below:
SELECT t.t_id
, t.usr_idx
, t.t_is_for
, t.tg_ids
, t.created_time
, t.allow_reply
, u.usr_name
, u.usr_avatar
, u.show_profile
, IF(u.usr_timeline != '',CONCAT('https://s3.amazonaws.com/tuurnts3thumbnail/',u.usr_timeline),'') as usr_timeline
, u.node_userid
, t.t_time
FROM tuu_tuurnt t
JOIN tuu_user u
ON t.usr_idx = u.usr_idx
AND u.usr_state = 1
LEFT
JOIN tuu_post p
ON t.t_id = p.t_id
AND p.usr_idx = 44756
LEFT
JOIN tuu_friend f
ON f.frd_my_idx = 44756
AND f.frd_your_idx = t.usr_idx
LEFT
JOIN tuu_friend fl
ON fl.frd_your_idx = 44756
AND fl.frd_my_idx = t.usr_idx
WHERE t.status = 0
AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT b.tuu_b_by_usr_idx
FROM tuu_blocked as b
WHERE b.tuu_b_usr_idx = 44756
AND t.usr_idx = b.tuu_b_by_usr_idx
)
GROUP
BY t.t_id
ORDER
BY t.t_time DESC
, t.t_id DESC
LIMIT 0,30;
It takes almost 7-8 second to give result but when I remove order by t.t_time and t.t_id then it runs within 1 sec max.
Is there anything I am doing wrong?
Without an index, MySQL must begin with the first row and then read through the entire table to find the relevant rows. The larger the table, the more this costs. See How MySQL Uses Indexes for details. See also this topic about using indexes and aliases together.
Related
I created this query and it only takes rows until date 23.11.2020 doesn't take more then 2-3 hundred rows.
SELECT a.datum
, a.cas
, a.domaci
, a.hoste
, a.stream
, b.name
, b.color2
, c.jmeno
, d.firstname as first1
, d.lastname as last1
, e.firstname as first2
, e.lastname as last2
FROM zapasy a
JOIN projekt b
ON b.id = a.projekt
JOIN televize c
ON c.id = a.televize
JOIN tipuser d
ON d.id = a.komentator1
JOIN tipuser e
ON e.id = a.komentator2
JOIN projekt_role f
ON f.userid = $uid
ORDER
BY datum DESC
, cas ASC
, domaci asc
, projekt asc
, stream ASC
Is there some kind of limit in SQL that just won't show me some rows if I use too many JOINS ?
Without knowing your data we can't diagnose this. But these aren't too many joins at all.
Suggestion: Remove your joins, one at a time, and look at the results. If, at any stage, you will get the rows that you are now missing, then you can try to find out why that particular join filtered them out.
I have tow tables, first table related to forms and second table relate to adviser.each adviser can add comment for a form.
I tried select some column of two tables. It was works i have last subject of second table (adviser table ) in my result .but i need first subject of second table(adviser table ) .
#DQL
SELECT
f.name,
f.title,
f.conditionResultFinal,
f.conditionResult,
f.formCode,
f.dateInsert,
f.id,
(a.idFormRequestProject),
a.subject as subjectAdvisor
FROM AdminBundle:FormRequestProject f
JOIN AdminBundle:Advisor a
WHERE a.idFormRequestProject = f.id
AND (f.conditionResultFinal = 0 OR f.conditionResult = 0)
AND f.displayStatus = 1
GROUP BY f.id
ORDER by a.id,f.id DESC
Finally i solve this problem .i deleted GROUP By .and add new where ...
SELECT f.name,f.title,f.conditionResultFinal,
f.conditionResult ,
f.formCode,f.dateInsert ,
f.id,(a.idFormRequestProject),
a.subject as subjectAdvisor
FROM AdminBundle:FormRequestProject f
Left JOIN AdminBundle:Advisor a WHERE f.id = a.idFormRequestProject AND a.id =
(SELECT Max (aa.id) FROM AdminBundle:Advisor aa WHERE a.idFormRequestProject =
aa.idFormRequestProject ORDER by aa.id ASC ) AND
(f.conditionResultFinal = 0 OR f.conditionResult = 0 ) AND f.displayStatus =1
ORDER by f.id DESC
Here is my query:
SELECT DISTINCT `post_data`. * , pv.`seller_id` , pv.`islimited` , pv.`isquantity` , pv.`isslider`, `price`.`original_price` , `price`.`discount_percentage` , `timelimit`.`start_date` , `timelimit`.`expire_date` , `quantity`.`in_stock`, `currency`.`currency_symbol`, `seller`.`directory`, `post_to_cat`.`cat_id`, count(`sales`.`sales_id`) as sale FROM `post_view` AS pv
INNER JOIN `post_data` ON pv.`post_id` = `post_data`.`post_id` AND pv.`status` = 1
INNER JOIN `price` ON pv.`post_id` = `price`.`post_id`
INNER JOIN `currency` ON `price`.`currency_id` = `currency`.`currency_id`
INNER JOIN `seller` ON pv.`seller_id` = `seller`.`seller_id`
INNER JOIN `post_to_cat` ON `post_to_cat`.`cat_id` = 1 AND `post_to_cat`.`post_id` = `post_data`.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `timelimit` ON ( CASE WHEN pv.`islimited` = 1 THEN `timelimit`.`post_id` ELSE -1 END ) = pv.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `quantity` ON ( CASE WHEN pv.`isquantity` = 1 THEN `quantity`.`post_id` ELSE -1 END ) = pv.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `sales` ON `sales`.`post_id` = pv.`post_id` AND `sales`.`status` = 1
WHERE pv.`status` = 1
ORDER BY pv.`post_id` DESC LIMIT 1
The ORDER BY DESC is not working, it just returns the first row from the table, but I want to get the highest post_id value row. What is the mistake I am making?
AS #Alex said in the comments you've got a LIMIT 1 at the end, you should probably bracket the last LEFT JOIN also for readability.
As #McAdam331 said we need data sample and sql fiddle to investigate what is wrong with you query. But at the moment I have some suggestions how to improve and debug your query.
First off all, what do I see the main and very left table in your query is post_view so all other tables should be LEFT JOIN if you want to get the max id. You should use INNER JOIN only if you think that other table could filter your main table somehow and order or result could be other table dependend. But in your case I see no reason to use INNER JOIN.
Second point is your very weird ON conditions:
LEFT JOIN `timelimit` ON ( CASE WHEN pv.`islimited` = 1 THEN `timelimit`.`post_id` ELSE -1 END ) = pv.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `quantity` ON ( CASE WHEN pv.`isquantity` = 1 THEN `quantity`.`post_id` ELSE -1 END ) = pv.`post_id`
I have converted them into another one
CASE WHEN pv.`islimited`=1 THEN `timelimit`.`start_date` ELSE NULL END as start_date ,
CASE WHEN pv.`islimited`=1 THEN `timelimit`.`expire_date` ELSE NULL END as expire_date,
CASE WHEN pv.`isquantity`=1 THEN `quantity`.`in_stock` ELSE NULL END as in_stock,
But I still don't like it. It seems very useless to me. And has no sense when I read CASE WHEN pv.islimited=1 THEN timelimit.start_date ELSE NULL END as start_date so if flag pv.islimited=0 you don't need start_date? Are you sure?
And the last thing I can suggest: try to use my or even your query. But add every table by step while debugging. So First query just:
SELECT
pv.`post_id`, pv.`seller_id` , pv.`islimited` , pv.`isquantity` ,
pv.`isslider`
FROM `post_view` AS pv
WHERE pv.`status` = 1
ORDER BY pv.`post_id` DESC
LIMIT 1
If it returns correct post_id add next table:
SELECT
pv.`post_id`, pv.`seller_id` , pv.`islimited` , pv.`isquantity` ,
pv.`isslider`,
`post_data`. *
FROM `post_view` AS pv
LEFT JOIN `post_data`
ON pv.`post_id` = `post_data`.`post_id`
WHERE pv.`status` = 1
AND `post_data`.`slug` = 'abc'
ORDER BY pv.`post_id` DESC
LIMIT 1
Check the result. And continue step by step.
Yes it takes time. But that is debugging process. It could be the fastest way to get that query done. :-)
SELECT `post_data`. * ,
pv.`post_id`, pv.`seller_id` , pv.`islimited` , pv.`isquantity` ,
pv.`isslider`, `price`.`original_price` , `price`.`discount_percentage` ,
CASE WHEN pv.`islimited`=1 THEN `timelimit`.`start_date` ELSE NULL END as start_date ,
CASE WHEN pv.`islimited`=1 THEN `timelimit`.`expire_date` ELSE NULL END as expire_date,
CASE WHEN pv.`isquantity`=1 THEN `quantity`.`in_stock` ELSE NULL END as in_stock,
`currency`.`currency_symbol`, `seller`.`directory`, `post_to_cat`.`cat_id`, count(`sales`.`sales_id`) as sale
FROM `post_view` AS pv
LEFT JOIN `post_data`
ON pv.`post_id` = `post_data`.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `price`
ON pv.`post_id` = `price`.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `currency`
ON `price`.`currency_id` = `currency`.`currency_id`
LEFT JOIN `seller`
ON pv.`seller_id` = `seller`.`seller_id`
LEFT JOIN `post_to_cat`
ON `post_to_cat`.`cat_id` = 1
AND `post_to_cat`.`post_id` = pv.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `timelimit`
ON `timelimit`.`post_id` = pv.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `quantity`
ON quantity`.`post_id` = pv.`post_id`
LEFT JOIN `sales`
ON `sales`.`post_id` = pv.`post_id`
AND `sales`.`status` = 1
WHERE pv.`status` = 1
AND `post_data`.`slug` = 'abc'
GROUP BY pv.`post_id`
ORDER BY pv.`post_id` DESC
LIMIT 1
EDIT 1 - last GROUP BY pv.post_id was added as per #McAdam331 notice about count() function without GROUP BY
I believe the issue here is mostly as a result of preforming aggregation (using the COUNT()) function, without any group by. Although, it seems like you don't necessarily need it because you want that count only for the post in question.
If you're trying to gather all of that information for a single post, I would adjust your WHERE clause to have a condition to only gather that information for the post with the largest ID.
Instead of ordering by ID and limiting by 1, use a subquery to get the largest id, like this:
...
WHERE pv.status = 1 AND post_data.slug = 'abc' AND pv.post_id = (SELECT MAX(post_id) FROM post_view);
In relation to the answer I accepted for this post, SQL Group By and Limit issue, I need to figure out how to create that query using SQLAlchemy. For reference, the query I need to run is:
SELECT t.id, t.creation_time, c.id, c.creation_time
FROM (SELECT id, creation_time
FROM thread
ORDER BY creation_time DESC
LIMIT 5
) t
LEFT OUTER JOIN comment c ON c.thread_id = t.id
WHERE 3 >= (SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM comment c2
WHERE c.thread_id = c2.thread_id
AND c.creation_time <= c2.creation_time
)
I have the first half of the query, but I am struggling with the syntax for the WHERE clause and how to combine it with the JOIN. Any one have any suggestions?
Thanks!
EDIT: First attempt seems to mess up around the .filter() call:
c = aliased(Comment)
c2 = aliased(Comment)
subq = db.session.query(Thread.id).filter_by(topic_id=122098).order_by(Thread.creation_time.desc()).limit(2).offset(2).subquery('t')
subq2 = db.session.query(func.count(1).label("count")).filter(c.id==c2.id).subquery('z')
q = db.session.query(subq.c.id, c.id).outerjoin(c, c.thread_id==subq.c.id).filter(3 >= subq2.c.count)
this generates the following SQL:
SELECT t.id AS t_id, comment_1.id AS comment_1_id
FROM (SELECT count(1) AS count
FROM comment AS comment_1, comment AS comment_2
WHERE comment_1.id = comment_2.id) AS z, (SELECT thread.id AS id
FROM thread
WHERE thread.topic_id = :topic_id ORDER BY thread.creation_time DESC
LIMIT 2 OFFSET 2) AS t LEFT OUTER JOIN comment AS comment_1 ON comment_1.thread_id = t.id
WHERE z.count <= 3
Notice the sub-query ordering is incorrect, and subq2 somehow is selecting from comment twice. Manually fixing that gives the right results, I am just unsure of how to get SQLAlchemy to get it right.
Try this:
c = db.aliased(Comment, name='c')
c2 = db.aliased(Comment, name='c2')
sq = (db.session
.query(Thread.id, Thread.creation_time)
.order_by(Thread.creation_time.desc())
.limit(5)
).subquery(name='t')
sq2 = (
db.session.query(db.func.count(1))
.select_from(c2)
.filter(c.thread_id == c2.thread_id)
.filter(c.creation_time <= c2.creation_time)
.correlate(c)
.as_scalar()
)
q = (db.session
.query(
sq.c.id, sq.c.creation_time,
c.id, c.creation_time,
)
.outerjoin(c, c.thread_id == sq.c.id)
.filter(3 >= sq2)
)
cI'm seeking some help with my left join with a limit.
What i'm trying to do is to loop through my users and check in another table if there's problems connected to the user.
But currently I'm getting all kinds of weird results and it does not LIMIT the result for each user and it also lists column status_link_missing = 0 even though i have told the sub query to only list status_link_missing = 1
So I'm stuck for now, help is much appreciated!
SELECT
a.user_id AS settings_userid
, a.contact_interval
, b.user_id
, b.notify_user
, b.status_host_down
, b.status_link_missing
, b.status_relnofollow
FROM `link_exchange_settings` a
LEFT JOIN link_exchange_links b
ON b.id
= ( SELECT c.id
FROM link_exchange_links AS c
WHERE
b.user_id = a.user_id
AND c.notify_user = 1
AND c.status_link_missing = 1
LIMIT 1
)
WHERE a.allow_contact = 1
LIMIT 10
Edit
I switched SELECT b.id to c.id now and LIMIT works but now it only works for the first user
Try this change (no reference to b in the subquery):
SELECT
a.user_id AS settings_userid
, a.contact_interval
, b.user_id
, b.notify_user
, b.status_host_down
, b.status_link_missing
, b.status_relnofollow
FROM `link_exchange_settings` a
LEFT JOIN link_exchange_links b
ON b.id
= ( SELECT c.id -- changed
FROM link_exchange_links AS c
WHERE
c.user_id = a.user_id -- changed
AND c.notify_user = 1
AND c.status_link_missing = 1
-- ORDER BY c.something -- optional, recommended addition
LIMIT 1
)
WHERE a.allow_contact = 1
-- ORDER BY a.something_else -- optional, recommended addition
LIMIT 10 ;
It's also good to have ORDER BY when you use LIMIT. Unless you want indeterminate results.
You are using "c.status_link_missing = 1" in sub-query but if you will use it in WHERE clause with "AND" you will get your desired results.
In fact you have to decide and use appropriate condition in WHERE clause of main query instead of LEFT JOIN sub-query.