MySQL reorder row id by date - mysql

SELECT time
FROM posts
ORDER BY time ASC;
This will order my posts for me in a list. I would like to reorder the table itself making sure that there are no missing table ids. Thus, if I delete column 2, I can reorder so that row 3 will become row 2.
How can I do this? Reorder a table by its date column so there is always an increment of 1, no non-existing rows.

Disclaimer: I don't really know why you would need to do it, but if you do, here is just one of many ways, fairly independent of the engine or the server version.
Setup:
CREATE TABLE t (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`time` time DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
INSERT INTO t (`time`) VALUES ('13:00:00'),('08:00:00'),('02:00:00');
DELETE FROM t WHERE id = 2;
Initial condition:
SELECT * FROM t ORDER BY `time`;
+----+----------+
| id | time |
+----+----------+
| 3 | 02:00:00 |
| 1 | 13:00:00 |
+----+----------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Action:
CREATE TRIGGER tr AFTER UPDATE ON t FOR EACH ROW SET #id:=#id+1;
ALTER TABLE t ADD COLUMN new_id INT NOT NULL AFTER id;
SET #id=1;
UPDATE t SET new_id=#id ORDER BY time;
DROP TRIGGER tr;
Result:
SELECT * FROM t ORDER BY `time`;
+----+--------+----------+
| id | new_id | time |
+----+--------+----------+
| 3 | 1 | 02:00:00 |
| 1 | 2 | 13:00:00 |
+----+--------+----------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Cleanup:
Further you can do whatever is more suitable for your case (whatever is faster and less blocking, depending on other conditions). You can update the existing id column and then drop the extra one:
UPDATE t SET id=new_id;
ALTER TABLE t DROP new_id;
SELECT * FROM t ORDER BY `time`;
+----+----------+
| id | time |
+----+----------+
| 1 | 02:00:00 |
| 2 | 13:00:00 |
+----+----------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Or you can drop the existing id column and promote new_id to the primary key.
Comments:
A natural variation of the same approach would be to wrap it into a stored procedure. It's basically the same, but requires a bit more text. The benefit of it is that you could keep the procedure for the next time you need it.
Assuming you have a unique index on id, a temporary column new_id is needed in a general case, because if you start updating id directly, you can get a unique key violation. It shouldn't happen if your id is already ordered properly, and you are only removing gaps.

Related

Restrict insertion based on a count

So, I need to safely restrict the insertion of entries in a table based on the count of other entries in that same table. Say we have the following table:
resource:(id, foreign_key)
I need to create up to a number of entries based on the foreign key. So, as soon as I reach a count, let's say 100 for our example, I want to restrict creating more entries.
The obvious answer would be something like that:
count the entries with the specified foreign key.
if count < limit insert the new entry
And in fact, that's what I have been using. The thing is, this approach is not fail-proof since between 1 and 2 there might occur another insertion. I considered the possibility of using transactions but (unless I'm completely misunderstanding transactions) this has the same issue:
start transaction
insert the new entry
if entries have exceeded the limit, rollback. otherwise commit
Now, say we already have 99/100 entries and two transactions run at the same time. They both will commit since they don't see each-other's entries.
Short of actually creating the entry and then delete it if it's invalid (which feels kindof messy in my mind) I can't think of a way to solve this issue. Any ideas?
edit: upon request I'm providing sample data:
table1
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Extra |
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+----------------+
| id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | auto_increment |
| limit | int(10) unsigned | NO | MUL | |
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+----------------+
table2
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Extra |
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+----------------+
| id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | auto_increment |
| foreign_id | int(10) unsigned | NO | MUL | |
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+----------------+
and some sample data:
table1
+----+----------+
| id | limit |
+----+----------+
| 1 | 5 |
+----+----------+
table2
+----+---------------+
| id | foreign_id |
+----+---------------+
| 1 | 1 |
+----+---------------+
| 2 | 1 |
+----+---------------+
| 3 | 1 |
+----+---------------+
| 4 | 1 |
+----+---------------+
At this point, let's say that two users attempt to create table2 entries. The first one will have to be accepted and the 2nd rejected.
With the first approach, if both users go through step 1 (counting the old entries) and then through step 2 (insert the new entry) both entries will be created.
With the second approach, if both of them run at the same time, they both will count 4 slots before themselves and commit instead of one of them rollbacking.
Halo Mate, a Stored Procedure similar to this structure may help you
UPDATE
DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS sp_insert_record;
DELIMITER //
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_insert_record(
IN insert_value1 INT(9),
IN chosen_id INT(9)
)
BEGIN
SELECT id, `limit`
INTO #id, #limit
FROM table1
WHERE id = chosen_id;
START TRANSACTION;
INSERT INTO table2 (id, foreign_id)
VALUES (insert_value1, chosen_id);
SELECT COUNT(id)
INTO #count
FROM table2
WHERE foreign_id = #id;
IF #count <= #limit THEN
COMMIT;
ELSE
ROLLBACK;
END IF;
END//
DELIMITER ;
By using a Stored Procedure, you can also add any validation or process based on your requirements.
Hope this can be of help, cheers!

SQL: What would happen if, hypothetically, an out of place number was added to the unique identifier column?

Lets think of it this way, say I have a table called "names" in MYSQL like so:
id| name
1 | Bob
2 | Sally
3 | Anne
Where "id" is a unique identifier for the table, and auto-increments with every addition of a row.
Say I somehow managed to throw in a row with an id that is completely out of place in the order, like so:
id| name
1 | Bob
2 | Sally
3 | Anne
20| John
Would the rows following the random row continue from the new id 20? (e.g next row added has id 21), or would they still continue from id 3? (e.g next row added has id 4)
Has this happened in SQl before?
They will continue with 21, which prohibits duplicates. Otherwise you would have a problem when you reach 19 and the next inserted row should become 20, which is already there.
By the way it is not complicated to insert such a row. Just provide a specific value on INSERT instead of leaving out the auto-increment column or handing over NULL.
Unless you set the next-autoincrement value manually, MySQL does everything to assure that one does not run into conflicts. So if you insert a big value, it saves this+1 as next autoincrement value.
To see what the next auto increment for mysql table will be, use
SHOW TABLE STATUS LIKE 'tablename';
There you will have Auto_increment column which says what is the next auto increment value. For the sake of test and curiosity I have conducted the following test:
I have created the table as follows:
CREATE TABLE `test` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`num` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
Then I have conducted following queries:
INSERT INTO `test` (`id`,`num`) VALUES (NULL,1);
INSERT INTO `test` (`id`,`num`) VALUES (NULL,2);
INSERT INTO `test` (`id`,`num`) VALUES (NULL,3);
INSERT INTO `test` (`id`,`num`) VALUES (50,4);
INSERT INTO `test` (`id`,`num`) VALUES (NULL,5);
Output is as follows:
mysql> select * from `test`;
+----+------+
| id | num |
+----+------+
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 |
| 50 | 4 |
| 51 | 5 |
+----+------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Which means, that after you insert your custom value, Auto_increment also gets incremented. Then I have executed one more query:
INSERT INTO `test` (`id`,`num`) VALUES (100,6);
And after that status is as follows
mysql> SHOW TABLE STATUS LIKE 'test';
+------+--------+---------+------------+------+----------------+-------------+-----------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------+-------------+------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+---------+
| Name | Engine | Version | Row_format | Rows | Avg_row_length | Data_length | Max_data_length | Index_length | Data_free | Auto_increment | Create_time | Update_time | Check_time | Collation | Checksum | Create_options | Comment |
+------+--------+---------+------------+------+----------------+-------------+-----------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------+-------------+------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+---------+
| test | InnoDB | 10 | Compact | 6 | 2730 | 16384 | 0 | 0 | 8388608 | 101 | 2014-02-26 22:12:32 | NULL | NULL | latin1_swedish_ci | NULL | | |
+------+--------+---------+------------+------+----------------+-------------+-----------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------+-------------+------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+---------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
You can see that next auto increment value is going to be 101, which means that MySQL automatically adjusts to the inserted values.
Let me know what you think.

Create mysql unique key based on three columns and a specific value

I have a table with a unique index across two columns user_id and country_id
I have added a new column deleted_at so I can delete rows whilst keeping the data.
I would now like to update the unique key so that it is based on user_id, country_id and where deleted_at IS NULL. Is this possible, if so how?
+----+---------+------------+------------+
+ id | user_id | country_id | deleted_at |
+----+---------+------------+------------+
+ 2 | 3 | 1 | NULL |
+ 3 | 3 | 1 | 2012-10-16 |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 2012-10-15 |
+----+---------+------------+------------+
Using the above as reference, rows could not be added because of id 2, however if row 2 was not set a new row could be created.
Modifying your table mytable should do the trick:
alter table mytable drop index user_country;
alter table mytable add
unique index user_country_deleted (user_id, country_id, deleted_at);
Edit: I was too quick. According to CREATE INDEX Syntax this works only for BDB storage.

MySQL query to reorder field values?

I have table like this:
===============
| rank | name |
===============
| 3 | john |
| 6 | bob |
| 10 | alex |
| 11 | brad |
| 12 | matt |
| 34 | luke |
| 145 | ben |
===============
(this table is an example. In reality my table consists of ~5000 rows of data).
Is there a query to reorder the rank values starting from 1 and going up so it ends up like this:
===============
| rank | name |
===============
| 1 | john |
| 2 | bob |
| 3 | alex |
| 4 | brad |
| 5 | matt |
| 6 | luke |
| 7 | ben |
===============
It would be preferable to do this in 1 or 2 queries, not 1 query for each row since my table has 5000+ rows.
EDIT: Sorry I wasn't clear. I am trying to UPDATE the values in the database.
This is a little crude but will work in a pinch.
First order your table correctly just incase
ALTER TABLE tablename ORDER BY rank
Then drop the column
ALTER TABLE tablename DROP rank
Then add it again, with auto increment
ALTER TABLE tablename ADD COLUMN rank INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT FIRST
The auto increment will take care of numbering them in order, plus you don't have to loop through each row.
Here is the solution I came up with for this problem:
1.Create a temporary table without any keys
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tempTable (
id INT(11) NOT NULL
)
COLLATE='latin1_swedish_ci'
ENGINE=MyISAM
ROW_FORMAT=DEFAULT;
2.Populate the temporary table with data from the original table, ordered by rank
INSERT INTO tempTable SELECT id FROM myTable ORDER BY rank;
3.Add auto-incrementing rank column, giving all rows a unique rank, counting up from 1
ALTER TABLE tempTable
ADD COLUMN `rank` INT(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`rank`);
4.Update the original table with a join to the temp table, overriding the original ranks
UPDATE myTable
INNER JOIN tempTable
ON myTable.id = tempTable.id
SET myTable.rank = tempTable.rank;
5.Drop the temp table
DROP TABLE tempTable;
An alternative to a strict MySQL solution would be to loop through the rows with a scripting language. Not a great idea if you have a large table, but could be acceptable if this is a one time fix.
In PHP
$db = mysql_connect('localhost', 'user', 'password');
mysql_select_db('database', $db);
$result = mysql_query("SELECT rank
FROM myTable
ORDER BY rank");
$i = 1;
while ($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result)) {
mysql_query("UPDATE myTable
SET rank = " . $i++ . "
WHERE rank = " . $row['rank']);
}
Note that this will only work if rank is unique and you traverse in an order.
set #a:=(select max(id) from mytable)+1;
update mytable set id=(#a:=#a+1)
order by id;
set #a := 0;
update mytable set id=(#a:=#a+1)
order by id;
simple way, work for me. easy way.

MYSQL Table creation with default value(expression) to a column

I have a Table Employee(id,name,dept_name).I want the id will alphanumeric [dddddaaaaa] with first 5 digit will be auto increment id and rest 4 char will be the first 4 char of employee name.
For example , for the first employee name=John Todd ,the auto incremented part of the Id will be 00001. And so the Id will be 00001JOHN.
Is it possible to set a default expression to the column Id=(concat(autoincrement,substring(name,4)).
I was also thinking if I Can create a trigger on after insert Employee and the trigger will update the Employee.Id. But MySql does not allow to update the same table from trigger for which trigger got fired.
Please Help.
What about a schema like
CREATE TABLE employee
(
employeeid INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
firstname varchar(255)
);
CREATE INDEX part_of_firstname ON employee (firstname(4));
That'll let you perform lookups fairly quickly using your natural primary key, while giving you an artificial primary key and not forcing to denormalize.
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM EMPLOYEE WHERE EMPLOYEEID = 1 AND FIRSTNAME LIKE 'john%';
+----+-------------+----------+-------+---------------------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+----------+-------+---------------------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | employee | const | PRIMARY,part_of_firstname | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | |
+----+-------------+----------+-------+---------------------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
Of course since the 0001 part of the primary key is unique enough to identify the user you need not query the name at all.
If you insist on precalculating this should work
CREATE TABLE employee
(
employeeid INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
specialid VARCHAR(255),
firstname VARCHAR(255)
);
CREATE INDEX employee_specialid ON employee (firstname(4));
DELIMITER ;;
CREATE TRIGGER employeeid_trigger BEFORE insert ON employee
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
SET new.specialid = CONCAT(LPAD((SELECT AUTO_INCREMENT FROM information_schema.TABLES WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = DATABASE() AND TABLE_NAME = 'employee'), 4, '0'), SUBSTRING(new.firstname, 1, 4));
END
;;
DELIMITER ;
Testing it:
mysql> insert into employee (firstname) values ('johnathan');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.04 sec)
mysql> insert into employee (firstname) values ('johnathan');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
mysql> insert into employee (firstname) values ('johnathan');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
mysql> select * from employee;
+------------+-----------+-----------+
| employeeid | specialid | firstname |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
| 1 | 0001john | johnathan |
| 2 | 0002john | johnathan |
| 3 | 0003john | johnathan |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
3 rows in set (0.00 sec)
This is kind of a hack, and information_schema won't be available on some DBs where permissions aren't under your control.
You could try concatenating it in your select statement instead of storing an auto increment column and an id column,
SELECT CONCAT(id, substring(name,4) FROM tbl_employee
That way you wouldn't need triggers