Suppose I have a simple map, example-map:
(def example-map {"s" {"f" "g"}
"m" {"r" "q"}})
I can use clojure.data.json/write-str to JSON-ify this map as such:
(clojure.data.json/write-str example-map) =>
"{\"s\":{\"f\":\"g\"},\"m\":{\"r\":\"q\"}}"
I'd like to conditionally place some of the values into lists according to the value of their keys.
write-str provides an optional :key-fn, which applies some function to key value pairs. For example, the desired function might specify that all values associated with entries that match "s" are placed in lists.
(clojure.data.json/write-str example-map :key-function desired-function) =>
"{\"s\":[{\"f\":\"g\"}],\"m\":{\"r\":\"q\"}}"
Does anyone know how to specify such a key function that checks for membership of a key in a set and places the values associated with members into an array rendered in the output JSON?
Like your previous question, this is not a job for the JSON parser. You don't need to rely on write-time features of your JSON library to adjust the shape of your JSON maps. Instead, you have a fully functional Turing complete language at your disposal: Clojure! If the maps don't already look the way you want them to be output, then write a function that takes one Clojure map as input and produces a different one as output; then ask your JSON library to write the output map, without any special rules for fiddling with the output.
Now, as it happens this particular JSON library does provide an option named value-fn (not key-function as you claim) to let you modify a value in a map based on its key. So you could use that, in which case you simply need to write a function with a signature like:
(fn [k v]
(...compute new value...))
There are many ways you could write such a function, but they are all entirely divorced from your JSON parser. If you need help writing it, mention some specific things you need help with, so you can get a clear explanation for the part of the process that is actually giving you trouble.
Related
In Python it is common to marshal objects from JSON. I am seeking similar functionality in Prolog, either swi-prolog or scryer.
For instance, if we have JSON stating
{'predicate':
{'mortal(X)', ':-', 'human(X)'}
}
I'm hoping to find something like load_predicates(j) and have that data immediately consulted. A version of json.dumps() and loads() would also be extremely useful.
EDIT: For clarity, this will allow interoperability with client applications which will be collecting rules from users. That application is probably not in Prolog, but something like React.js.
I agree with the commenters that it would be easier to convert the JSON data to a .pl file in the proper format first and then load that.
However, you can load the predicates from JSON directly, convert them to a representation that Prolog understands, and use assertz to add them to the knowledge base.
If indeed the data contains all the syntax needed for a predicate (as is the case in the example data in the question) then converting the representation is fairly simple as you just need to concatenate the elements of the list into a string and then create a term out of the string. Note that this assumption skips step 2 in the first comment by Guy Coder.
Note that the Prolog JSON library is rather strict in which format it accepts: only double quotes are valid as string delimiters, and lists with singleton values (i.e., not key-value pairs) need to use the notation [a,b,c] instead of {a,b,c}. So first the example data needs to be rewritten:
{"predicate":
["mortal(X)", ":-", "human(X)"]
}
Then you can load it in SWI-Prolog. Minimal working example:
:- use_module(library(http/json)).
% example fact for testing
human(aristotle).
load_predicate(J) :-
% open the file
open(J, read, JSONstream, []),
% parse the JSON data
json_read(JSONstream, json(L)),
% check for an occurrence of the predicate key with value L2
member(predicate=L2, L),
% concatenate the list into a string
atomics_to_string(L2, S),
% create a term from the string
term_string(T, S),
% add to knowledge base
assertz(T).
Example run:
?- consult('mwe.pl').
true.
?- load_predicate('example_predicate.json').
true.
?- mortal(X).
X = aristotle.
Detailed explanation:
The predicate json_read stores the data in the following form:
json([predicate=['mortal(X)', :-, 'human(X)']])
This is a list inside a json term with one element for each key-value pair. The element has the syntax key=value. In the call to json_read you can already strip the json() term and store the list directly in the variable L.
Then member/2 is used to search for the compound term predicate=L2. If you have more than one predicate in the JSON file then you should turn this into a foreach or in a recursive call to process all predicates in the list.
Since the list L2 already contains a syntactically well-formed Prolog predicate it can just be concatenated, turned into a term using term_string/2 and asserted. Note that in case the predicate is not yet in the required format, you can construct a predicate out of the various pieces using built-in predicate manipulation functionality, see https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/doc_for?object=copy_predicate_clauses/2 for some pointers.
I am using Azure Data Factory. I'm trying to use a String variable to lookup a Key in a JSON array and retrieve its Value. I can't seem to figure out how to do this in ADF.
Details:
I have defined a Pipeline Parameter named "obj", type "Object" and content:
{"values":{"key1":"value1","key2":"value2"}}
Parameter definition
I need to use this pipeline to find a value named "key1" and return it as "value1"; "key2" and return it as "value2"... and so on. I'm planning to use my "obj" as a dictionary, to accomplish this.
Technically speaking, If i want to find the value for key2, I can use the code below, and it will be returned "value2":
#pipeline().parameters.obj.values.key2
What i can't figure out is how to do it using a variable (instead of hardcoded "key2").
To clear things out: I have a for-loop and, inside it, i have just a copy activity: for-each contents
The purpose of the copy activity is to copy the file named item().name, but save it in ADLS as whatever item().name translates to, according to "obj"
This is how the for-loop could be built, using Python: python-for-loop
In ADF, I tried a lot of things (using concat, replace...), but none worked. The simpliest woult be this:
#pipeline().parameters.obj.values.item().name
but it throws the following error:
{"code":"BadRequest","message":"ErrorCode=InvalidTemplate, ErrorMessage=Unable to parse expression 'pipeline().parameters.obj.values.item().name'","target":"pipeline/name_of_the_pipeline/runid/run_id","details":null,"error":null}
So, can you please give any ideas how to define my expression?
I feel this must be really obvious, but I'm not getting there.....
Thanks.
Hello fellow Pythonista!
The solution in ADF is actually to reference just as you would in Python by enclosing the 'variable' in square brackets.
I created a pipeline with a parameter obj like yours
and, as a demo, the pipeline has a single Set Variable activity that got the value for key2 into a variable.
This is documented but you need X-ray vision to spot it here.
Based on your comments, this is the output of a Filter activity. The Filter activity's output is an object that contains an array named value, so you need to iterate over the "output.value":
Inside the ForEach you reference the name of the item using "item().name":
EDIT BASED ON MORE INFORMATION:
The task is to now take the #item().name value and use it as a dynamic property name against a JSON array. This is a bit of a challenge given the limited nature of the Pipeline Expression Language (PEL). Array elements in PEL can only be referenced by their index value, so to do this kind of complex lookup you will need to loop over the array and do some string parsing. Since you are already inside a FOR loop, and nested FOR loops are not supported, you will need to execute another pipeline to handle this process AND the Copy activity. Warning: this gets ugly, but works.
Child Pipeline
Define a pipeline with two parameters, one for the values array and one for the item().name:
When you execute the child pipeline, pass #pipeline.parameters.obj.values as "valuesArray" and #item().name as "keyValue".
You will need several string parsing operations, so create some string variables in the Pipeline:
In the Child Pipeline, add a ForEach activity. Check the Sequential box and set the Items to the valuesArray parameter:
Inside the ForEach, start by cleaning up the current item and storing it as a variable to make it a little easier to consume.
Parse the object key out of the variable [this is where it starts to get a little ugly]:
Add an IF condition to test the value of the current key to the keyValue parameter:
Add an activity to the TRUE condition that parses the value into a variable [gets really ugly here]:
Meanwhile, back at the Pipeline
At this point, after the ForEach, you will have a variable (IterationValue) that contains the correct value from your original array:
Now that you have this value, you can use that variable as a DataSet parameter in the Copy activity.
I got an anonymous array which I want to deserialize, here the example of the first array object
[
{ "time":"08:55:54",
"date":"2016-05-27",
"timestamp":1464332154807,
"level":3,
"message":"registerResourcePath ('', '/sap/bc/ui5_ui5/ui2/ushell/resources/')",
"details":"","component":"sap.ui.ModuleSystem"},
{"time":"08:55:54","date":"2016-05-27","timestamp":1464332154808,"level":3,"message":"URL prefixes set to:","details":"","component":"sap.ui.ModuleSystem"},
{"time":"08:55:54","date":"2016-05-27","timestamp":1464332154808,"level":3,"message":" (default) : /sap/bc/ui5_ui5/ui2/ushell/resources/","details":"","component":"sap.ui.ModuleSystem"}
]
I tried deserializing using CL_TREX_JSON_SERIALIZER, but it is corrupt and does not work with my JSON, here is why
Then I tried /UI2/CL_JSON, but it needs a "structure" that perfectly fits the object given by the JSON Object. "Structure" means in my case an internal table of objects with the attributes time, date, timestamp, level, messageanddetails. And there was the problem: it does not properly handle references and uses class description to describe the field assigned to the field-symbol. Since I can not have a list of objects but only a list of references to objects that solution also doesn't works.
As a third attempt I tried with the CALL TRANSFORMATION as described by Horst Keller, but with this method I was not able to read in an anonymous array, and here is why
My major points:
I do not want to change the JSON, since that is what I get from sap.ui.log
I prefere to use built-in functionality and not a thirdparty framework
Your problem comes out not from the anonymity of array, but from the awkwardness of SAP JSON (De)serializer, which doesn't respect double quotes, which enclose JSON attributes. The issue is thoroughly described in this answer.
If you don't want to change your JSON on-the-fly, the only way you have is to change CL_TREX_JSON_DESERIALIZER class like this.
/UI5/CL_JSON_PARSER parses JSONs with unknown format.
Note that it's got "for internal use" written on it so many times that you probably should take it seriously and clone its code to fixate it.
So I've read that you cannot expect a default order when requesting json. I've seen this in action making a call to a little api that I built, that will return a jumbled, random order of elements each time I make a different call.
How does a site like ticketfly's api ( call it here http://www.ticketfly.com/api/events/upcoming.json?venueId=57 ) always ensure that the json returned is in a specific order?
The event ids always first, etc.
Thanks for shedding some light on the situation.
If you are in control of the endpoint API then you can hardcode the order in which you render the properties. Though I have to ask why exactly do you need the JSON properties in a particular order? You will finally be accessing the properties via there property names so the order in which they appear in the JSON should not ideally matter.
EDIT : Since your bosses insist on this (what can one say now?):
You can try and see if any of the following suits your needs:
Try hardcoding the display order in the view's representation. This means you will need to echo/print each property name explicitly in the view script. In PHP it could be something like echo $variable_representing_json["id"]; and so forth. Note that with this approach you needn't change the original JSON representation.
If you want the original JSON representation to be changed then depending on how you are doing the process it varies in difficulty:
If it's string concatenation that you are using to represent the json then hard-code the order in which the json properties get concatenated in the string.
In some languages the display order of properties is actually a representation of the order in which the properties were defined. In simple words if $var is an empty json representation then you should define $var["id"] = {some_val} first to display it first.
If you are using a framework for processing the JSON data it may have its own quirks irrespective of how you define your representation. In such cases you will have to try and see if you can work around the issue or if it gives any helper methods.
JSON appears to be a nice way to represent a complex data structure in plain text. If we think of this complex data structure as analogous to an OOP object - an instance of a class - then is there a commonly used JSON-like format that represents the class itself (just the data part - forget methods)? Can JSON itself be used for this?
To put it another way, if JSON encodes name-value pairs, what should I use if I want to encode only the names?
The reason I want this is that I am designing a protocol to use with jQuery (to which I am a complete novice by the way). The client will communicate to the server the structure of the JSON object it wants back, and the server will return a JSON object of that structure with the values added.
The key point is that it is the client that is in full control of what data fields (name-value pairs) the server returns. It's a bit different from all the examples of jQuery that I've found so far on the web where the client makes a request (which usually includes a very limited set of parameters, if any) and the server makes the decision as to what fields to return in the JSON reply.
(Obviously, what the client asks for must be congruent with the server's data model; if the server has an array of widgets each with its own price, the client can't ask for an array of prices each with its own widget.)
This must be a common problem, and I don't want to reinvent the wheel. I want to adopt a solution that is already in common use across the web.
Edit
I just found JSON Schema. This is not what I am looking for. It contains way more than I need.
Edit
I'm looking more for a 'this is how it is usually done' answer, rather than a 'you could try…' answer. (I can invent dozens of possible answers myself.)
To encode only names within JSON, you could use a key/value pair where the key is either the class name or just a key named 'values' - with the value being an array of strings that are the names to be returned by the server. For example:
{ 'class_name' : [ "name1", "name2", "name3" ] }
The server can then either detect the class name from the key used and return the supplied values for the names in the array if the class supports it or ignore if it does not.
I'm looking more for a 'this is how it is usually done' answer
There is no single "correct" way to do what you want. Many people have their implementation. It depends on various factors -- what you want to do, where you want to do, how efficiently you want it to do?
For simple structures I would prefer and suggest the answer given by #dbr9979.
For nested structures, you can have nested arrays. Something like:
{
"nestedfield1": {
"nestedfield11":["nestedfield111", "nestedfield112"],
"nestedfield12":["nestedfield121", "nestedfield122"],
"__SIMPLE_FIELDS__": ["simplefield13", "simplefield14"]
}
}
The point is, if the key is __SIMPLE_FIELDS__, the value is an array of simple fields (string, numbers etc..), else the key stands for the key in the object.
For something more complex, what I would suggest is you have predefined structures, that both the server and the client know of. This is particularly useful when you have to make multiple identical requests. Assign some unique number for each of them. Something like:
1 => <the structure above>
2 => ["simplefield1", "simplefield2" ..]
3 => etc .. etc
The server stores the above structure and the relevant number in the database or something. And now, as it may be obvious by now, client sends across the id of the required structure, and the server responds in the appropriate fashion.
I think what you meant by this:
the client that is in full control of what data fields (name-value pairs) the server returns.
is like the difference between SELECT * FROM Bags and SELECT color, price FROM Bag in SQL. Am I interpreting you correctly?
You could query with:
{
'resource': 'Bag',
'field_names': ['color', 'price']
}
which will return the response:
{
'status': 'success',
'result': [
{'color': 'red', 'price': 50},
{'color': 'blue', 'price': 45},
]
}
most likely though, you may not actually need your request to be a JSON object; I've seen implementations where the field names is taken from the query string, like http://foo.com/bag?fields=color,price
I was looking for Partial Response.
RESTful API Design: can your API give developers just the information they need? explains it all and gives examples from LinkedIn, Facebook, and Google. Google and Facebook both have similar approaches. Here's how Lie Ryan's example would look using Google's approach:
url?fields=status,result(color,price)
Since Google and Facebook are behind this, I would not be surprised to see this become a de facto standard.
In my case I am likely to run into a length limitation on the URL and so have to use POST instead, but this is an excellent starting point for me.