I am trying to create a full screen slider with a footer on the bottom. Making the slider full screen is easy, but adding a "footer" to it doesn't seem to be (for me). For instance the slider will have a photo and the div below it will have details about the photo, which all should be shown as the "landing page" without scrolling at all, on all devices.
My brain is telling me to create a wrapper container that is 100vh to fill 100% of the views height, and then create the footer - for this example - at a set height of 150px and then have the slider fill the remaining difference left over in the wrapper container, which in theory seems to be right, but I just can't seem to figure out how to actually do it without using scripting. I'm ok with scripts, just wondering if there is a pure css way of doing what I am trying to accomplish.
In this specific example I've tried absolute positioning on the footer div with bottom 0 to hug to the bottom of the main wrapper, which works, sort of (wonky on mobile especially iPhone due to the bottom navigational bar), but naturally due to the way position absolute seems to work, setting 100% height on the slider div will ignore the footer div and set its height to 100% of the wrapper container.
Is it possible to set bottom: 0, yet have the slider div to not overlap the absolute positioned footer div?
Is there a better way to do this all together using pure css? Have I lost my mind?
Here is a diagram of what I am trying to accomplish
Original Code before suggestions
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>test page</title>
<meta name="description" content="test page">
<meta name="author" content="Test">
<style>
body {
margin: 0px;
}
.page-wrapper {
height: 100vh;
background-color: red;
}
.slider {
height: 100%;
background-color: blue;
}
.slider-footer {
height: 150px;
background-color: green;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="page-wrapper">
<div class="slider">
</div>
<div class="slider-footer">
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
UPDATE / EDIT
Additionally, as suggested below, calc(100vh -150px) on the .slider works better. It works perfectly well on the desktop, but when pulled up on my iPhone, not so much.
Updated Style Code
<style>
body {
margin: 0px;
}
.page-wrapper {
height: 100vh;
max-height: 100vh;
background-color: red;
}
.slider {
background-color: blue;
height: calc(100vh - 150px);
max-height: calc(100vh - 150px);
}
.slider-footer {
height: 150px;
background-color: green;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
}
</style>
The iPhone seems to be automatically adjusting the view because of the lower navigation buttons of safari on the device. It looks like it stretches the .page-wrapper down further than it should. I tried to prevent this by adding a max-height: 100vh to the .page-wrapper, but that didn't seem to do anything at all
Here is what the page looks like on the iPhone
Things look perfectly fine, just the way they should...
Until you scroll down
Thats when things get a little weird...
It seems like, on safari on iPhone at least, 100vh is taking into account the bottom navigation bar, yet the absolute positioning of the slider.footer is ignoring it and setting it self to the top of safari's bottom navigation bar. I get why apple would do that, because the navigation bar is always there by default until you scroll down, but it is clearly causing an issue with what I am trying to accomplish...
Am I correct to think this is an iPhone / Safari problem, or are my html/css skills just that far off?
I'd do something like:
.slider {
height: calc(100vh - 150px);
}
Hope this helps :)
You could try this:
body {
margin: 0px;
margin-bottom: 150px;
}
Another approach would be:
.page-wrapper { position: relative }
.slider {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 150px;
}
Hope this (finally) helps :)
Related
Our mobile web application has sticky bottom navigation like the one you often find in iOS applications, and after Safari 10.3 release on landscape only it is possible to scroll sticky navigation (footer) off the screen. Even though it is position: fixed and set bottom: 0 it also wasn't possible on older Safari versions.
Styles for sticky nav / footer are following:
footer {
position: fixed;
height: 50px;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
background: rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.7);
}
DEMO to try on phone
In portrait mode it is always visible:
In landscape mode you can scroll it off screen for the size of top address bar:
Has anyone come across such issue? I would appreciate any help to make footer stay on the screen. Thanks
There is nothing you can do about it. Safari's landscape mode makes the container with your content going off the screen. This is not detectable and therefore not to solve. I tried to illustrate what happens:
The blue bar = Safari's navigation bar
The yellow bar = Your app's navigation bar
Instead of shrinking the container's height, Safari lets it go off the screen.
This is more a workaround than a real solution. However position: fixed has been a problem for mobile devices for years and the best way to overcome this problem is to use position: sticky.
sticky behaves like position: relative within its parent, until a
given offset threshold is met in the viewport.
From: Stick your landings! position: sticky lands in WebKit
However position: sticky is not fully supported yet, so I would suggest to use also:
position: sticky; /* currently in development for MS Edge */
position: -webkit-sticky;
position: -moz-sticky;
position: -o-sticky;
See status here for MS Edge sticky support status (thank you Frits)
html,
body {
height: 200%;
}
body {
background-image: linear-gradient(180deg, #ededed 0px, #ededed 9px, #000000 9px, #000000 10px);
background-size: 100% 10px;
}
footer {
position: sticky; /* currently in development for MS Edge */
position: -webkit-sticky;
position: -moz-sticky;
position: -o-sticky;
height: 50px;
top: 80%;
background: rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.7);
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width">
<title>JS Bin</title>
</head>
<body>
<footer>
</footer>
</body>
</html>
There is another way of creating a fixed element at the bottom of the page:
Set the <body> element (or whatever wraps your header, content and footer) to display: flex; height: 100vh. Then you take the footer and set it to margin-top: auto.
HTML:
<body>
<header>
</header>
<main>
<main>
<footer>
</footer>
</body>
CSS:
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
main {
flex: 1;
}
A different solution with the same markup would be to use CSS Grid:
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
height: 100%;
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: auto 1fr auto;
}
In order to get the best of both worlds you can wrap the CSS Grid styles in an #supports(display: grid){} wrapper. If Grid is supported the browser will take that and otherwise will fallback to Flexbox.
The best thing using this technique is that you won't run into overlapping contents, into zooming-issues and it is fully responsive from the get-go.
There is an article on CSS Tricks about the subject: https://css-tricks.com/couple-takes-sticky-footer/
Try this on the fixed position element in your css:
transform:translate3d(0px, 0, 0);
-webkit-transform:translate3d(0px, 0, 0);
Something that does happen on the switch to landscape mode, and the switch to and from safari's 'minimal UI' is a window resize event. You can check the getBoundingClientRect().bottom of the fixed element to see if it is greater than window.innerHeight (This means the fixed element is off of the bottom of the window). If so, you can set the css property bottom of the fixed element to element.getBoundingClientRect().bottom - window.innerHeight. This will maintain to position of the fixed element. It appears to be a little jank to the user, but this is better than the element going off of the bottom of the screen.
I had the same problem and I fixed it in a way that my tester is happy.
Not a perfect solution but doing its job.
Add an empty element with some padding or margin.
const _userAgent = navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();
if (_userAgent.indexOf('safari') != -1) {
if (_userAgent.indexOf('chrome') == -1) {
$('.myelem').append('<div class="my-5"></div>');
}
}
Problem: When you make a certain div's position fixed (often used as a side bar, or side menu kind of stuff), and if you continue scrolling down, the div overlaps with the footer.
body {
margin: 0;
}
#header {
width: 100%;
height: 290px;
background-color: #07CB6F;
}
#body {
width: 100%;
height: 3450px;
background-color: #2FA3F7;
}
#body_inner {
width: 1280px;
height: 3450px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#side_menu {
width: 220px;
height: 270px;
position: fixed;
background-color: #ffffff;
}
#footer {
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
background-color: #FF00AB;
}
<div id="header">
</div>
<div id="body">
<div id="body_inner">
<div id="side_menu"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
</div>
I did not use any jquery this time. With the codes given above, since the #side_menu is set as height: 270px, it seems to be okay with the overlapping, however, it still overlaps with the footer if you zoom up the browser (and sometimes depending on the types of browsers and computers).
I would like to know why it happens, and how can it be solved (or prevented).
Thanks in advance :)
Here's a fiddle with the solution
https://jsfiddle.net/stc0ogy2/1/
you need to start using the z-index, it works like the photoshop layers though the z-index will not work without the position so you have to add a position like absolute, relative and so on.
UPDATE
As #AndreiGheorghiu mentioned you should use some javascript for a better solution, choose one of the libraries from the list he gave you.
UPDATE 2
I found this easy-to-use library that I believe will help you with the fixed side menu, it's called tether. Hope it helps.
Your footer is looking to take up 100% of the width space at the bottom and a side bar that wants to take up 220px of the width. On a small screen your menu and footer are fighting for space because its not mathematically possible for one item to take up 100% of space and another item to sit next to it.
You won't notice a problem full screen on most desktops because your menu is too heightwise to be noticeable.
Ideally when declaring your width for the menu and footer you want to use calc() to enable resizing without causing overlap.
https://jsfiddle.net/nu8av25m/ a quick example I put together to demonstrate how it works.
<body>
<div class="navigation">menu</div>
<div class="main">main body</div>
<footer>footer</div>
</body>
.navigation {
Width:50px;
Height:100%;
Background-color: red;
Float:left
}
.main{
Width: calc(100% - 200px);
Height: calc(100% - 100px);
Background-color: blue;
Right:0;
}
Footer{
Width: calc(100% - 100px);
Height: 50px;
Background-color:green;
Bottom: 0
}
I am building a website to host an online gameserver list for the game Crysis Wars, and have just found out that it's by far easier just to develop the design in Adobe Fireworks, and add the relevant code after.
The current web page that I am designing has a signin box at the center of the page, and it works beautifully.
That is, until we change the size of the browser window.
This is the web page as it normally looks:
It is displayed correctly, but here's the screenshot of when the browser window was resized:
As can be seen, this is an issue with the page, since visitors will have different screen resolutions, and this problem could easily re-occur.
My question is, how can I force these two CSS objects to maintain their position, and never overlap?
This is troublesome since the signin box centers itself on the web page.
The web page can be viewed at crysis-or.eu (please don't berate me for developing on a live website).
HTML Code:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<html>
<head>
<title>Server Portal | Login</title>
<link href="./css/main.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
<div class="navbar">
</div>
<div class="loginui">
</div>
</body>
</html>
CSS:
body {
width:100%;
margin-left:-0px;
background-color:07080A;
}
body > .loginui {
width:400px;
height:400px;
position: absolute;
top:0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
margin: auto;
background:url("http://crysis-or.eu/img/login_b_bg.png") repeat-x;
}
body > .navbar {
width:500px;
height:100px;
position: absolute;
margin-top:50px;
margin-left:100px;
background:url("http://crysis-or.eu/img/navbar.png") repeat-x;
}
I would recommend the following:
Put the nav bar and the login window in separate wrapper-divs that prevent them from overlapping. You can change your HTML to:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<html>
<head>
<title>Server Portal | Login</title>
<link href="./css/main.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
<header id="top-bar">
<div class="navbar">
</div>
</header>
<section id="main">
<div class="loginui">
</div>
</section>
</body>
</html>
Header and Section act just like Div, the only difference is their semantic significance.
Because the .top-bar and .loginui are no longer direct children of the body, your selectors won't work anymore. Change the CSS selectors to just .top-bar and .loginui instead of body > .top-bar and body > .loginui.
The header needs a specified height, and needs its position to be either 'relative' or 'absolute'. An absolutely positioned child element will be positioned absolutely to whatever the closest parent is that is also absolute, or explicitly relative. The background color is for illustration purposes only, and would be removed for production.
header {
position: relative;
height: 200px;
background-color: red;
}
You want the section to fill as much as it can, so it will need absolute positioning. The trick here, the thing that will fix your problem, is adding a min-height attribute to prevent the section from becoming smaller than its contents, thus allowing overlap.
section {
position: absolute;
top: 200px;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
min-height: 400px;
background-color: blue;
}
That should work for you. The one problem with this solution is that the login window will be centered with respect to its container, rather than the whole window. It will be 100 pixels lower (one half of the header height) than it is with your current design. In order to fix that, if that's important to you, you would need to use a different method of vertically centering it. Put the top as 50%, then use a negative top margin to compensate for half the height plus half of the height of the header, too. Because it has a fixed height, that's easy: (400px + 200px) / 2 = 300px.
.loginui {
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 0;
right; 0;
margin: -300px auto 0;
background: url('path/to/login_b_bg.png');
}
If you add this, it will create a scrollbar when trying to resize the browser instead of laying the elements on top of eachother
body
{
width:100%;
min-width: 950px; //ADD THIS. It sets the minimum browser width before creating a scroll bar.
min-height: 550px; // This does the same thing for a vertical scroll bar.
margin-left:-0px;
background-color:07080A;
overflow-y: scroll; // vertical scroll bar
overflow-x: scroll; //horizontal scroll bar
}
EDIT: ---------------------------------
After looking at your site and playing around a bit, your min-width is not an important factor, just the min height, if you set the values like this, the menus will never overlap.
body
{
width:100%;
height: 100%;
min-height: 750px; // Stops the menus from touching eachother vertically, but they can still line up in the x-direction.
margin-left:-0px;
background-color:07080A;
overflow-y: scroll; // vertical scroll bar
}
I'm trying to "flank" a centered div with some design elements that are absolutely positioned outside the main div's width. I'm getting a scroll bar due to the element on the right, but not the element on the left (IE6/7/8, Chrome, Firefox). How can I get rid of that horizontal scrollbar?
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
html, body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
body { text-align: center; }
.wrapper {
margin: 0 auto;
position: relative;
width: 960px;
z-index: 0;
}
.main {
background: #900;
height: 700px;
}
.right, .left {
position: absolute;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
}
.right {
background: #090;
top: 0px;
left: 960px;
z-index: 1;
}
.left {
background: #009;
top: 0px;
left: -100px;
z-index: 1;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="main"></div>
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
This works in IE6-9, FF3.6, Safari 5, and Chrome 5. Didn't seem to matter what doctype I threw at it(none, xhtml 1 transitional, html5). Hope this helps, that was an interesting problem.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
html,
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
text-align: center;
}
body {
overflow: auto;
}
#container {
min-width: 960px;
zoom: 1; /*For ie6*/
position: relative; /*For ie6/7*/
overflow: hidden;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#main {
background: #cea;
width: 960px;
margin: 0 auto;
height: 700px;
position: relative;
top: 0;
}
#right,
#left {
position: absolute;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
top: 0;
z-index: 100;
}
#right {
background: #797;
right: -100px;
}
#left {
background: #590;
left: -100px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="main">
<div id="left">left</div>
<div id="right">right</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Throwing an overflow-x: hidden on the body tag would work in anything that's not IE6/7... but for those two browsers, you'll need to also add overflow-x: hidden to the html tag.
So use what you have now with this adjustment:
html, body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
*overflow-x: hidden;
}
body { text-align: center; overflow-x: hidden; }
Note that the reason the "*" hack is used in the html, body declaration is because IE8 is unconventional. If you don't use it, IE8 will lose vertical scrollbars as well, not just horizontal. I don't know why. But that solution should be fine.
I was having a similar issue to this and was completely tearing my hair out as I found the solution above didn't quite work for me. I overcome this by creating a div outside of my main container div and using min-width and max-width to come up with a solution.
#boxescontainer {
position: relative;
max-width: 1100px;
min-width: 980px;
}
#boxes {
max-width: 1100px;
min-width: 900px;
height: 142px;
background:url(../grfx/square.png) no-repeat;
background-position: center;
z-index: 100;
}
I found however that I also needed to make the square.png image the size of the div so I made it as a transparent png at 1100px. This was my solution to the problem and hopefully it might help someone else.
On a side note I also had an image on the left side in which I used absolute positioning which didn't have the same scrollbar issue as the right side. Apparently the right and left side do take on different properties from what research I did regarding this matter.
In regards to people using overflow-x:hidden I would have to disagree with this method mainly because you are taking away the users ability to horizontal scroll completely. If your website is designed to be viewed the a 1024px resolution then people who are on an 800px resolution won't be able to see half of your website if you take away the ability to horizontally scroll.
Your body is not set to relative.
Not knowing what you'd like to do with this, I would perhaps set a background image on the body instead.
You're getting a scrollbar only when the viewport's thinner than the main plus that right box, right? (Don't think that was clear to some people.) This is expected browser behavior for content overflow.
Depending on what you want to happen (why do you want it to disappear in this circumstance, if you do?), you could set overflow:hidden on .wrapper. That would always hide it--if you're looking to dynamically display it on some other event, that'll work.
If I'm not mistaken, though, you just don't want it to show when their viewport's only 960px wide. AFAIR you can't do that without some js/jQuery. My suggestion would actually be--especially if you don't want to mess with javascript--if you want this content to be visible at all, accept the scrollbar at narrow widths. It might irk you as a designer, but most people won't notice it, and those who do can still access your content--which is a win, right?
Wrap all the elements in a div, make that div position relative and overflow hidden. It solves this problem every time. :D
If the page language is left-to-right, then the left non-fitting elements don't cause a scrollbar.
Try this:
<html dir="rtl">...</html>
This will change the text direction of the page to Right-To-Left, and now the left div will cause a scrollbar, not the right one.
You can do the same with direction:rtl css property.
If you want your page render to be independent from text direction then you can arrange page elements differently to avoid this.
Old question I know, but may help someone else out. The below expands on James response but works in IE6/7/8/9, FF and Webkit. Yes it uses evil expressions but you can put that in a IE6 specific stylesheet.
#bodyInner {
width: 100%;
min-width: 960px;
overflow: hidden;
width:expression(((document.compatMode && document.compatMode=='CSS1Compat') ? document.documentElement.clientWidth : document.body.clientWidth) > 980 ? "100%" : (((document.compatMode && document.compatMode=='CSS1Compat') ? document.documentElement.clientWidth : document.body.clientWidth) #LT# 980 ? "960px" : "97.5%"));
}
I needed a solution like this too - thanks to all who suggested the 100%-wide wrapper with overlow-x hidden. However, I don't think you have to add the extra #bodyInner div - I've successfully tested it applying the width and overflow attributes directly to body in Safari, Opera, Firefox, Chrome, and IE8.
I have a solution that doesn't work in IE7/IE6, but seems to be fine everywhere else.
Create wrapper (#bodyInner) around everything inside your <body> tag.
Apply this CSS rule:
#bodyInner {
width:100%;
overflow:hidden;
min-width:960px;
}
Too bad you can't just apply this on the <body> element.
I have my markup like this (for argument's sake)
<div id="content"></div>
<div id="layout"></div>
<div id="layout2"></<div>
Then I use this CSS
#content {
width: 800px;
height: 600px;
margin: 0 auto;
} /* place this attached to the top of the page */
#sidebar,
#sidebar2 {
display: block;
width: 139px;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
background: url(../images/layout/pretty.png) repeat-y;
}
#sidebar {
left: 50%;
margin-left: -700px;
} /* at this point, it appears to the left, and does not trigger scrolling when the window is resized.. it just slides off to the left */
#sidebar2 {
right: 50%;
margin-right: -700px;
} /* now, when you resize, the scrollbar appears as if the content stretches from #sidebar to #sidebar2 */
Is there a reliable way to do this? My only other option is to have a large background image, thats say 1200px wide with my repeating design on the left and right.. but this seems cumbersome if I could get this to work.
So my question is, is there a way to position 2 divs which won't affect the browser's interpretation of the width of the page (i.e. as you resize narrower, or smaller resolution, the divs are just hidden out of the viewport?)
Thanks!
EDIT
Thanks for the answers guys, but none are able to give me quite what I want. What's important is these divs that appear outside must be relative to the #content div. They need to appear to the left and right side, and butt up against #content. However, once the browser window is resized to not accommodate them, they should disappear under the viewport. I'd rather not use overflow-x: hidden as I'd like people with small resolutions/windows to be able to scroll left and right to see all the content.
It is possible, because I've done it.
The trick was using negative margins on absolutely positioned divs. For some reason the browser does not attempt to provide scrolling for objects pulled out of the page in this manner.
You can also use overflow:hidden. This will begin cropping your divs contents as the div itself shrinks (make sure the div uses a percentage or auto width so it will actually shrink).
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Cropped sides (no scrollbars)</title>
<style>
div.decor {
border: 3px solid red;
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
width: 48%;
height: 500px;
top: 2%;
}
div.content {
width: 60%;
height: 300px;
margin: 100px auto;
padding: 10px;
background-color: #DDF;
opacity: 0.7;
position: relative; /*hmmm.. without this content goes behind decor regardless of z-index... why?*/
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="decor" style="right:50%"><img src="images/teacher.jpg" width=400 style="position:absolute;right:0px;"></div>
<div class="decor" style="left:50%"><img src="images/teacher.jpg" width=400></div>
<div class="content">lorem ipsum</div>
</body>
</html>
Demo: http://test.dev.arc.net.au/cropped_sides.html
Key points:
overflow:hidden on absolutely
positioned decor divs
right:0 on content of left decor div
(forces cropping from left side)
unpositioned content goes behind the
decor regardless of z-index, but I
don't know why. Simple workaround is
to use position relative on your
content wrapper.
Very simple with absolute positioning. You can absolutely position the background and assign it a lower z-index than the main content. Example of just the right side - background color added for clarity:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Absolute Test</title>
<style type="text/css">
#content {
position: relative;
width: 800px;
height: 600px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: blue;
z-index: 100;
} /* place this attached to the top of the page */
#layout2 {
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
right: 50px;
top: 100px;
background-color: yellow;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="content"></div>
<div id="layout"></div>
<div id="layout2"></<div>
</body>
</html>
Works with a picture as well:
#layout2 {
height: 600px;
width: 100px;
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
right: 50px;
top: 0;
background: url(right-side.gif) repeat-y;
The absolute positioning removes it from the flow, so the browser won't add the width of your background to the window size. Since your content is a fixed width, this will even work with IE6.
You can use JavaScript to make the extra divs visible when the browser window is wide enough to handle both. There's no way that I know of to have the browser ignore the div for layout without actually making it hidden.
Yes you can do this but only on the left side of the screen.
If you have any content on the right (outside of the viewport) the browser will add horizontal scroll bars. The only exception to this is if you turn off the scroll bars but this cannot be done only horizontally across all browsers.
Back to the left side idea... Elements positioned off the left side of the viewport do not cause a horizontal scrollbar. You can have a fixed width layout that is centered on the screen (auto margins on either side) then from within this area you can absolutely position a new column in the left space. If the browser viewport is narrow you won't see it, if it's wide it will be completely visible and usable. The only problem is if it's half-way in the middle - your left column will be chopped off - this could look a bit messy!
Another alternative is to detect the width of the viewport with JavaScript and only show the column if there is room?
Alternately, you could place the two "floating" divs in a container div set to the max width, and set the "overflow" to "hidden".
That's the easiest way!
ie. Something to this effect:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="left></div>
<div id="center"></div>
<div id="right"></div>
</div>
css:
#wrap{
width:800px;
overflow:hidden;
}