The basic problem is that default site/index is working for local host but not for shared host.I have looked into a lot of things but couldn't find the solution.Also other controllers like orders/index is working. Please help.
While using shared host it is important to check'urlManager'=>['rules'= array()]. Make sure you are following those rules.
Related
I've been searching for quite a while on many forums, how to serve static files referenced by HTML pages like href="/", when the frontend service isn't located at the root / of my host, using Nginx Ingress.
This question has been asked many times here, but briefly: I have a example.com/ host, and I need to expose a frontend service in a path like example.com/front1. This simply cannot work. The index.html returns perfectly, but then a href="/styles.css" hits the gateway asking for example.com/styles.css instead of example.com/front1/styles.css. And nginx just returns a 404.
The only "clean" solution I've found is to manage one subdomain for each frontend service, so it would request something like front1.example.com/styles.css. I'm afraid it might not be a great solution.
Some people do hacks like using sub filters annotations to replace href="/ strings with href="/front1/ for each file returned by that ingress and stuff like that, but this also falls short with dynamically javascript-generated pages and so on. And of course I can throw all my stuff in a S3 server, but think about it: If I have a cluster of many microfrontends and other third-party self-hosted frontend services (like signoz, which I have no control on the source code), it would be amazing if I could reference every service by its path like example.com/service-name/ and not worry about anything else.
I've been thinking of a possible solution in a lost comment of using nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/server-snippet to inject some njs logic to replace the base URL by the Referer header (http://example.com/front1) whenever it references a known service, but I have no idea of how to use njs, if it is even possible, let alone if it is a good solution.
Anyway, my question is, has anyone solved that problem and could point me in the right direction? It is for a friend
I have set up an S3 bucket to host static files.
When using the website endpoint (http://.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/): it forces me to set an index file. When the file isn't found, it throws an error instead of listing directory contents.
When using the s3 endpoint (.s3.amazonaws.com): I get an XML listing of the files, but I need an HTML listing that users can click the link to the file.
I have tried setting the permissions of all files and the bucket itself to "List" for "Everyone" in the AWS Console, but still no luck.
I have also tried some of the javascript alternatives, but they either don't work under the website url (that redirects to the index file) or just don't work at all. As a last resort, a collapsible javascript listing would be better than nothing, but I haven't found a good one.
Is this possible? If so, do I need to change permissions, ACL or something else?
I've created a simple bit of JS that creates a directory index in HTML style that you are looking for: https://github.com/rgrp/s3-bucket-listing
The README has specific instructions for handling Amazon S3 "website" buckets: https://github.com/rgrp/s3-bucket-listing#website-buckets
You can see a live example of the script in action on this s3 bucket (in website mode): http://data.openspending.org/
There is also this solution: https://github.com/caussourd/aws-s3-bucket-listing
Similar to https://github.com/rgrp/s3-bucket-listing but I couldn't make it work with Internet Explorer. So https://github.com/caussourd/aws-s3-bucket-listing works with IE and also add the possibility to order the files by names, size and date. On the downside, it doesn't follow folders: only the files at one level are displayed.
This might solve your problem. Security settings for Everyone group:
(you need the bucketexplorer.com software for this)
If you are sharing files of HTTP, you may or may not want people to be able to list the contents of a bucket (folder.) If you want the bucket contents to be listed when someone enters the bucket name (http://s3.amazonaws.com/bucket_name/), then edit the Access Control List and give the Everyone group the access level of Read (and do likewise with the contents of the bucket.) If you don’t want the bucket contents list-able but do want to share the file within it, disable Read access for the Everyone group for the bucket itself, and then enable Read access for the individual files within the bucket.
I created a much simpler solution. Just place the index.html file in root of your folder and it will do the job. No configuration required. https://github.com/prabhatsharma/s3-directorylisting
I had a similar problem and created a JavaScript-and-iframe solution that works pretty well for listing directories in S3 website files. You just have to drop a couple of .html files into the directory you want to list. You can find it here:
https://github.com/adam-p/s3-file-list-page
I found s3browser, which allowed me to set up a directory on the main web site that allowed browsing of the s3 bucket. It worked very well and was very easy to set up.
Using another approach base in pure JavaScript and AWS SDK JavaScript API. Not need PHP or other engine just pure web site (Apache or even IIS).
https://github.com/juvs/s3-bucket-browser
Not intent for deploy on your own bucket (for me, no make sense).
Using the new IAM Users from AWS you can provide more specific and secure access to your buckets. No need to publish your bucket to website and make all public.
If you want secure the access, you can use the conventional methods to authenticate users for your current web site.
Hope this help too!
i am developing the application using Angular 8. I am facing an issue on the deployment server. When i make a build and deploy it to the server. If i go through its index point then its working fine but if i refresh any route then its giving me 404 error. kindly suggest me the best solution.
I implemented the hash strategy too on my local and checked on iis windows its working fine but i need some other method so that url will not look ugly. In this strategy a hash always would be there in the url.
So please tell is there any other way to do it.. without showing # in url..
Please experts help me to fix this as like angular.io because on that if you refresh any route then its work good without hashing strategy...
I usually use hash strategy but, as I know it is possibile to configure your server (for example via .htaccess file) in order to configure your routing. I don't know how by the way.
I have a Django project that requires authentication, and the django.contrib.auth code has been working great so far. However, I'd like to edit the provided login page to say something like "MyProject administration" instead of "Django administration", and alter the colors in the CSS files a little bit. I'm having trouble finding where these files are located in the project.
Is there a way to edit the default files, or do I have to copy/rewrite all the functionality in my own files? I'd love to just tweak the defaults, if that's possible.
Yes! can directly modify the framework. the installation folder depends on what operating system you use and if you use virtualenv. you have to find this file in your pc and edit it: https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/contrib/admin/templates/admin/login.html
if you use virtualenv can found it in this directory "virtualenv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/contrib/admin/templates/admin"
I new to loop-back platform. I follow this tutorial loop-back official tutorial for third-party and this tutorial also a tutorial that i find.
What i want to do is to build a rest API using loop-back as one project and a client side using angular as another project then to wrap it for mobile. In this tutorials they are using loop-back passport for make the oath connection with Facebook.
now my questions are :
They save all the models involved in the authentication in the memory and not in the database. is it good approach? don't i need to save all the access-tokens, identities and credentials on the database ?
is there another tutorial that you can direct me to or you can explain me , where in loop-back i get the information return from Facebook after authentication because i want to save it in my user model ?
Thanks
1.) It's not recommended to save authentication-data in memory in production, you can easily change this in server/model-config.json (or model-config.production.json) with the variable "dataSource" for each model. So instead of "memory" change it to the name of your datasource.
2.) In the example you provided, the "customProfileToUser"-function seems like an excellent place to save eventual extra data to your own User-model.