I have several images in my scene, I managed to make the zoom and pan work but the problem is, All of the images are zooming in at the same time. The scripts are place on each gameobject. I used gameobject for the images.
You need apply a filter so you just appli the transformations to one game object, since every one of them are GameObjects I recommend use raycast to sellect an object and then activate his Zoom.cs script just for this object.
I sugest to use just one Zoom.cs in the scene instead of every object having his own copy, then change your function to work with one game object as a paremeter and, when you touch your game object then that object will be the one to suffer the transformation.
If you doesn't want to implement a raycast or change your function at all, then you could set all the images inside a matrix, or use an index system, the central image, or the index you designed, will be the one to suffer the transformations. so you can scroll betwen your gaery and be sure that just the image that you designate in your matrix/index will be the choosen one. The trouble here is that you need to fully control the scroll animation so no one of the images will be in a wrong place like in between two index.
Related
Hi all I want to ask something. I've made a game with Flash CC and createJS. it's a Drag and drop game (3 object for drag, and 3 object for drop) and a lot of vector movieclip object. But when I run it in mobile, the game looks like have a performance issues. I've read some article that talk about caching the object. But I'm really dont know anything about cache and don't know how to use it on an object like movieclip. Do you have any explanation or solution or maybe a tutorial how to use cache function? Thank you very much.
From the docs:
Draws the display object into a new canvas, which is then used for subsequent draws. For complex content that does not change frequently (ex. a Container with many children that do not move, or a complex vector Shape), this can provide for much faster rendering because the content does not need to be re-rendered each tick. The cached display object can be moved, rotated, faded, etc freely, however if its content changes, you must manually update the cache by calling updateCache() or cache() again. You must specify the cache area via the x, y, w, and h parameters. This defines the rectangle that will be rendered and cached using this display object's coordinates.
http://createjs.com/Docs/EaselJS/classes/DisplayObject.html#method_cache
So, you don't want to cache a playing MovieClip (you would have to update the cache every frame, which is slow). However, you could cache elements in the MC that are just being transformed.
For example, an animation of a walking character, with complex vector shapes for the arms, legs, head, and body that are being transformed (scaled, rotated, translated) to create the walk animation. You wouldn't cache the character MC, but you could cache the body parts themselves.
I have a pygame screen with multiple tree like objects which grows with each update. I also have to draw random circle which appear and disappear with each update.
I am not able to make the circles alone to disappear. If I try to redraw I loose the slowly incrementing tree structure also. Any help
Using sprite groups (http://www.pygame.org/docs/ref/sprite.html#pygame.sprite.Group) you can put all the tree like objects into a sprite group designated for trees. Then at the end of the game loop you could blit the background onto the screen and call "tree_group.draw(screen)" to draw all your tree sprites wherever they may be on the screen. With that in place, you can simply draw a random circle wherever you'd like without worrying about taking corrective measures and trying to fix where the circle was drawn previously. Using sprite groups makes updating in game loops a breeze as well. Just call "tree_group.update(args)" and every object in the group will update with the arguments passed in.
Before I go making major change in my ongoing game project, I just want to hear from others if anyone has found any issues with getObjectsUnderPoint() function of the DisplayObject?
Update:
Not just the performance issue but any other limitations of using it (like it doesn't detect certain type of UIelements (just as example))
I will have three layers in my application (which an Isometric game)
Background -- This is just a background which stays in the bottom, has nothing to do with game
Middle Layer -- This is the playable area, Here all my game elements will be placed on this layer
Top Layer -- This is one dummy transparent layer covers entire playable area which interrupts all the mouse events. This is where I want to use the getObjectsUnderPoint()
So, player wants to click on the element, the top layer will interrupt the mouseevent and then check if there is something placed or just a plain background and take appropriate action like, notify the underneath object.
This really doesn't require to be done this way because I could simply add moues events for all those items placed on the map directly but because I would be using getObjectsUnderPoint() anyway to check if there is anything beneath the item.
If anyone can explain how this function works then it would be little easy for me to make a decision.
There was one annoying problem though. I don't know if they fixed it or not. At least it was there in 10.1 times.
If you have a container and you scaled it container.getObjectsUnderPoint will return wrong result. All the time. So everywhere where I needed getObjectsUnderPoint I had to call it from stage to get proper result.
It's an incomplete function. It returns graphical objects under the mouse, NOT all potential mouse targets for event or interaction purposes. It actually requires complex logic to examine the array returned by getObjectsUnderPoint to determine the mouse target, because the appropriate target (the one Flash would choose if you actually clicked that point) may not be in the list.
First you'd have to examine the object array in reverse, since the items are ordered back to front. You'd have to examine each object's entire parent chain, looking for a parent with mouseChildren = false that would cause it to intercept the event and become the target. Whether or not such an object is found, this final object you arrive at must have its mouseEnabled property set to true, otherwise you must skip it and move on to the next object in the array, which would be, for example, the next sprite or shape behind the one you initially checked. While going through the list, you must notice when the parent changes, at which point you need to assume that all children of that common parent had their mouseEnabled property set to false, in which case the parent would become the next candidate. This is actually extremely complicated, because you're working backwards in a bottom-up approach with an incomplete set of objects that was generated from the top-down.
To get actual potential mouse event targets, consistent with the default dispatching logic... it is actually easier to start from the stage in a top-down manner and walk backwards through the display hierarchy in a depth-first search, checking mouseChildren to determine whether you need to step into children, and checking mouseEnabled if it's to be a target, otherwise stepping into the container's children and repeating the process from back to front again. This is much more accurate, complete, and staightforward. The only problem is you have to code it yourself.
Im looking for an easy to use method of assigning drag behavior to multiple objects (images, shapes etc) in canvas. Does anyone have a good way or know of any libraries for dragging objects around? Thanks
Creating your own mouse events takes a little work - ideally you should either create or use some kind of mini-library. I'm thinking of creating something like this in the near future. Anyway, I created a drag and drop demo on jsFiddle showing how to drag images - you can view it here.
You can create draggable images like this:
var myImage = new DragImage(sourcePath, x, y);
Let me know if you have any questions about this. Hope it helps.
EDIT
There was a bug when dragging multiple images. Here is a new version.
Another thing you might want to check out is easeljs it sort of in the style of AS3... mouseEvents dragging etc...
The HTML Canvas—unlike SVG or HTML—uses a non-retained (or immediate) graphics API. This means that when you draw something (like an image) to the canvas no knowledge of that thing remains. The only thing left is pixels on the canvas, blended with all the previous pixels. You can't really drag a subset of pixels; for one thing, the pixels that were 'under' them are gone. What you would have to do is:
Track the mousedown event and see if it's in the 'right' location for dragging. (You'll have to keep track of what images/objects are where and perform mouse hit detection.)
As the user drags the mouse, redraw the entire canvas from scratch, drawing the image in a new location each time based on the offset between the current mouse location and the initial mousedown location.
Some alternatives that I might suggest:
SVG
Pure HTML
Multiple layered canvases, and drag one transparent canvas over another.
The HTML Canvas is good for a lot of things. User interaction with "elements" that appear to be distinct (but are not) is not one of those things.
Update: Here are some examples showing dragging on the canvas:
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/dragdrop/dd-region.html
http://www.redsquirrel.com/dave/work/interactivecanvas/
http://langexplr.blogspot.com/2008/11/using-canvas-html-element.html
None of these have created a separate library for tracking your shapes for you, however.
KineticJS is one such Javascript Library that u can use exclusively for animations
Heres the Link html5canvastutorials
Canvas and jCanvas
You're definitely gonna want to check out jCanvas. It's a super clean wrapper for Canvas, which kicks open a lot of doors without adding code complexity. It makes things like this a breeze.
For example, here's a little sandbox of something close to what you're after, with dragging and redrawing built right in:
Drawing an Arrow Between Two Elements.
I ventured down the road of doing everything with DIVs and jQuery but it always fell short on interactivity and quality.
Hope that helps others, like me.
JP
As you create new objects whether they are windows, cards, shapes or images to be draggable, you can store them in an array of "objects currently not selected". When you click on them or select them or start dragging them you can remove them from the array of "objects not selected". This way you can control what can move in the event of a particular mousedown event or mousemove event by checking if it isn't selected. If it is selected it will not be in the "not selected" array and you can move the mouse pointer over other shapes while dragging shapes without them becoming dragged.
Creating arrays of objects you would like to drag also helps with hierarchy. Canvas draws the pixels belonging to the foremost object last. So if the objects are in an array you simply switch their instance as in element in the array say from objectArray[20] to objectArray[4] as you iterate through the array and draw the objects stored in the array elements you can change whether other objects are seen on top or behind other objects.
I am using the frames in the timeline of a .swf as pages in a flash app. The user can advance to the next page by clicking a button that takes her to the next frame. Similarly, it is possible to navigate to the previous frame/page as well.
Most of the content is placed on the stage (i.e. created by dragging an instance of a library symbol to the stage) but properties of those instances, such as .visible might be changed via actionscript. Also, some objects are loaded from external flash files and displayed programmatically with addChild / addChildAt.
The problem is, if I am on Frame N+1 and there is an object displayed on the stage programmatically (i.e. with addChild, not by having it placed on the stage) and navigate to Frame N where there is an object that is placed on the stage (i.e. dragged from the library),
then the instance of that object is undefined/null and throws an error if I try to set its properties (like .visible).
The error does not occur if I am moving to the NEXT frame, only if I am moving to the PREVIOUS one. Therefore I assume that some kind of initialization is not getting called while going one frame back.
I was also thinking that the objects would just not "live" to the next timeframe, that is, their value would be lost and re-initialized because of scope, but if there is no dynamically created object on the stage, I can navigate back and forth just fine.
Is there a way to ensure that the objects created on the stage do not disappear while navigating back to the previous frame?
The first, and more useful, part of the answer is this: timeline keyframes and scripts can give conflicting information about display objects - whether they should exist, where they should be, and so on. For example, when you add an item by playing into its frame, and then delete it with script, and then play into its frame again. When this happens, there's no unambiguously correct thing for Flash to do, so it tends to be unpredictable. I believe what generally happens is that once you fiddle with a given object via script, it's considered to no longer pay attention to the timeline - but your mileage will vary.
Having said that, the reason things are different when you play backwards is the second and more arcane part of the answer. Internally Flash functions differently when seeking forward and backwards on the timeline. Flash internally treats keyframes as changes to be applied in the forward direction, so as you play forward, it applies those changes in sequence. When you move backwards, however, from frame N+X to frame N, it doesn't scan through the intervening X frames reversing those changes - it jumps back to frame 1 and fast-forwards along to frame N. Normally, it amounts to the same thing and you don't need to worry about it, but when you get into the twitchy area where scripts and the timeline have a different idea of what should be on the stage, you're liable to see things behave differently depending on which way you jump (as you are now).
The super-short version is, for things to work predictably, try to ensure that any given object gets added, updated, and removed the same way - either all via script, or all via the timeline. When that seems impossible, fiddle with your content structure - usually, the best solution is to change your object into two nested ones, so that the things you want to do with script occur one level higher or lower than the things you want to do with the timeline.
I'm not sure I got your question right, but as3 does not instantiate elements on the timeline as soon as you gotoAndSomething, but later that frame.
That is, you can't
this.gotoAndPlay(10)
this.elementOnTimelineFrame10.DoSomething()
without errors.
I remember using this chunk of code in the past to work around this problem. It uses the Stage.Invalidate() function to wait for an Event.RENDER before trying to access and children, more info (although vague as hell) is here
private function init():void
{
stage.addEventListener(Event.RENDER, stage_renderHandler);
}
private function stage_renderHandler(evt:Event):void
{
// Run your code here
updateChildren();
}
private function enterFrameHandler(evt:Event):void
{
// triggers the RENDER event
stage.invalidate();
}
This also might me very costly (performance wise). I would strongly advise against dynamically adding/removing objects to an existing timeline, is there any way in which you can place an empty Sprite above the timeline animation and use that for all your dynamic content?
Hope this helps