Situation
I work with Ubuntu 14.04. I am building GNU Octave 4.2.1 from source with GNU 6.3.0. This version of Octave is quite new, but I see the issue arising also when trying to compile older Octave releases (down to 3.8.1).
I configure the build of Octave with
${sourcedir}/configure --prefix=/opt/octave/4.2.1 \
--with-java-homedir=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java \
--with-java-libdir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/server
Issue
The compilation is successful but the undesired warning shows up
configure: WARNING: ARPACK library found, but does not seem to work properly; disabling eigs function
I would rather like to have the eigs() function in place.
Information
I have built ARPACK-ng myself with the same compiler. All tests in the test suite (make check) are passed. The environment variables LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH point to the ARPACK library directory as intended. The configure file of Octave recognizes that location correctly, as seen before.
Besides, I get the same message if I compile Octave in another computer where ARPACK is installed natively (libarpack2 and libarpack2-dev version 3.1.5-2). It does not change a thing if I also install the related extra libraries libarpack++2c2a and libarpack++2-dev using the package repository. So the issue appears to be independent of the origin of the ARPACK files.
The part of the configure.ac file of Octave that throws this error is
### Check for ARPACK library.
save_LIBS="$LIBS"
LIBS="$LAPACK_LIBS $BLAS_LIBS $FLIBS $LIBS"
OCTAVE_CHECK_LIB([arpack], ARPACK,
[ARPACK not found. The eigs function will be disabled.],
[],
[dseupd],
[Fortran 77], [don't use the ARPACK library, disable eigs function],
[warn_arpack=
OCTAVE_CHECK_LIB_ARPACK_OK(
[AC_DEFINE(HAVE_ARPACK, 1, [Define to 1 if ARPACK is available.])],
[warn_arpack="ARPACK library found, but does not seem to work properly; disabling eigs function"])])
LIBS="$save_LIBS"
The farthest I go in tracing back the issue is that the subroutine OCTAVE_CHECK_LIB_ARPACK_OK issuing the warning lives in the file ${octave_source}/m4/acinclude.m4. It is written in m4 language, which I don't know
Question
Is it possible to understand why ARPACK 'does not seem to work properly'?
Is there any workaround for this?
Is this a false alarm or a bug?
Related
I've started a CUDA application in the new CLion 2020.1 version. Although I can compile and run it, I am not able to debug it, not even the host code. Specifically, debug does not stop at breakpoints, even though I am running the debug build. I'm not encountering this issue with running a regular C project in CLion 2020.1. I don't receive any error message of any kind. Here is my CMakeLists.txt file:
# Setup the CUDA compiler
set(CMAKE_CUDA_COMPILER /usr/local/cuda-10.2/bin/nvcc)
# Setup the host compiler
set(CMAKE_CUDA_HOST_COMPILER /usr/bin/g++-8)
# CMAKE minimum required version
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.16)
project(PageRank_GPU CUDA)
set(CMAKE_CUDA_STANDARD 14)
add_executable(PageRank_GPU main.cu graph.cu graph.cuh vertex.cuh error.cuh parser.cu parser.cuh)
set_target_properties(
PageRank_GPU
PROPERTIES
CUDA_SEPARABLE_COMPILATION ON)
Reporting that the issue has disappeared after playing around in the project settings a bit. Specifically, under Build, Execution, Deployment then Toolchain, I set the C and C++ compilers to gcc-8 and g++-8 respectively (even though I am specifying the compiler in the CMakeLists.txt file) and under CMake, I set the toolchain to "Default" (the one I just modified) instead of "Use Default". After doing that, the debugger stops at breakpoints and I am able to step through my code. I don't understand what happened because, even after reverting the changes, I cannot make the problem re-appear.
I want to install FEATool on Octave 4.2.2. Therefore, I went through these steps:
Downloading it.
Trying pkg install FEATool-Multiphysic.tar.gz in Octave command-line interface.
Octave returns this error:
COPYING file missing.
Neither GitHub nor FEATool provides any installation file for Octave or instructions about doing it.
Therefore, the question is:
How to install FEATool on Octave (Ubuntu 18.04)?
Following a quick preliminary check, it seems that the FEATool is no longer available or compatible with Octave since FEATool v1.10.
While there was no explicit announcement for this either on their blog or changelogs, according to the main author of the software (as elicited below), this seems to relate to overhead involved in supporting Octave on top of Matlab. Furthermore, as the company seems to have effectively chosen (for their own good reasons, I'm sure) to intentionally follow a direction that explicitly breaks Octave functionality, it cannot be expected to work on this platform even as unsupported software. Therefore the answer to your question is that "no you can no longer install this tool on octave (ubuntu or otherwise)".
Evidence that this software is no longer available for, or compatible with Octave:
Mentions to Octave in the documentation from v1.8 have now disappeared and are exclusive to Matlab (with extra effort towards Matlab backwards compatibily)
The .tar.gz package is no longer an Octave-compatible package.
The main code relies on .p files, which obfuscate the code and are unsupported in Octave
Past releases and source code have disappeared and are no longer available for download, both from sourceforge, official website, and github. Therefore it is not possible to download the octave-compatible v1.8 of the tool either.
I have attempted to install Psychtoolbox for Octave on Windows 10, per the installation instructions. Before the installation completes, I get this warning:
Screen() failed to work for some reason:
Check the troubleshooting instructions on our Wiki (Download section
and FAQ section, maybe also the Bugs section).
You may need to delete (or rename) the following DLL files in your Octave-4.4.1 installations
bin folder to make this work, then restart Octave:
C:\Octave\4.4.1\bin\libglib-2.0.0.dll
C:\Octave\4.4.1\bin\libgmodule-2.0.0.dll
C:\Octave\4.4.1\bin\opengl32.dll
Once you manage to fix the problem (simply type 'AssertOpenGL' to verify
that stuff works now), you do not need to run the installation routine again,
but can start working immediately.
I had already deleted the named DLL files, which I confirmed. I then ran AssertOpenGL and received this error:
Last Error: could not find library or dependencies: D:\Coding\PTB\Psychtoolbox\PsychBasic\Octave4WindowsFiles64\Screen.mex
Simply calling Screen directly gives this error:
error: library open failed: D:\Coding\PTB\Psychtoolbox\PsychBasic\Octave4WindowsFiles64\Screen.mex
However, the directory containing Screen.mex is at the very top of my path:
Octave's search path contains the following directories:
.
D:\Coding\PTB\Psychtoolbox\PsychBasic\Octave4WindowsFiles64
D:\Coding\PTB\Psychtoolbox
<etc>
As such, the solution to this similar question is of no use. What might I be able to do to correctly configure PTB on Octave?
What version of gstreamer are you using? I had a similar problem recently and fixed it by installing gstreamer 1.14.4. The latest version of gstreamer will not work, nor will versions earlier than 1.14.4.
I have installed Octave 3.6.1 along with packages including "signal 1.1.2" but when i run a simple example of "sigmoid_train" function an error appears "sigmoid_train function is undefined".
Can any body tell me what is the problem?
The problem is that you didn't load the signal package. When you type pkg list you can find which ones are loaded by an asterisk in front of their names. Load a package with pkg load signal.
Having to load a packages is that thing that many users coming from Matlab find strange but if you compare with other languages, such as Python, Perl, or C++, would you expect them to import, use, or #include every libraries available in the system by default? See Octave's FAQ for more details.
If you want a package to be loaded automatically by default, the recommended action is to add the line pkg load signal to your ~/.octaverc file.
Finally, you have just started with Octave, you should had installed Octave 3.8.1.
I use ActiveStates TCL version 8.6.0.0 for Windows x64.
In a script I call:
package require tcom
Tcom is included in the installation but I get the following error:
couldn't load libary "C:/TCL/lib/tcom/tcom.dll": Invalid argument while executing
"load C:/TCL/lib/tcom/tcom.dll"
("package ifneeded tcom 3.9" script)
invoked from within
"package require tcom"
Does anyone understand whats actually missing? C:/TCL/lib/tcom/tcom.dll is installed on my system, so what is the "invalid argument" ?
This appears to be a 32-bit/64-bit issue. You can't mix different bit-sizes within the same process† and you may well have installed a 64-bit build of ActiveTcl 8.6.0.0 under the belief that matching the size of the build and the system architecture is a good idea. Alas, this is not the case. ActiveTcl 8.6.0.0 for 64-bit Windows, for commercial reasons‡, requires an extra product key to access their 64-bit builds of external packages. But you've got the package installed anyway (perhaps from a previous installation of ActiveTcl?) and that appears to be a 32-bit build.
The misleading error from using the wrong size of binary library build is unfortunate (a relatively minor bug stemming from the subtle differences between Windows and POSIX and how Tcl handles the mapping between the two) but I'd bet that's it.
The easiest fix is to:
Uninstall all copies of ActiveTcl that you've got installed, then
Ensure that your C:\Tcl directory really is deleted, and then
Install the 32-bit build of ActiveTcl 8.6.0.0 (which works just fine on Win64-based systems like 64-bit Windows 7 and Windows 8). Once you've done that, you
Use teacup update to get a full set of packages installed and you should get Tcom working.
†Except on ARM with extra trickiness, which doesn't apply here.
‡I'm not going to try to justify them; it's their decision, not mine.