I am using aspose cells with java. I want know what data sources do smart markers support. I know java objects are one of them. What others can be given?
&=DataSource.FieldName
&=[Data Source].[Field Name]
You may set JAVA ResultSet, variable, variable arrays, custom class objects, etc. as data source for Smart Markers.
Note: I am working as Developer Evangelist at Aspose
Related
How do I view existing realtime collaboration data model? I call getRoot method:
var collaborative_model = rtpg.realtimeDoc.getModel().getRoot()
When I vew collaborative_model object in debug, I see cryptic properties only. Not sure if or how my model is saved.
Can I do some kind of variable dump of the model?
You can use https://gist.github.com/cowsrule/6348393 as a mostly plug-and-play dumper for the realtime API collaborative objects. As this relies on internals of the realtime API it will need to be updated (read: break) the next time they update the API.
To use, include on your webpage and set window.remoteDoc to be your realtime document.
To call, pass in the ID of the CollaborativeObject you are interested in inspecting.
The root is just a CollaborativeMap, so you can use the standard map methods to explore its values.
The relevant methods there for digging into the model are keys() and values().
A lot of these data model classes have obfuscated methods that are a part of the internal implementation. The best way to see what methods are publicly available is to look at the API reference.
I've been using Google Tools (library, templating) for almost a year... and I came to the point where a I have to connect the backend with all the templates i've been working on. The backend receives the data in JSON format.
Here's my problem. I want to submit a JSON that represents my object model in the backend and I know closure library offers this...
var json = goog.json.serialize(goog.dom.forms.getFormDataMap(form).toObject());
Problem is that the method getFormDataMap returns a goog.structs.Map which works like a hashMap... It means that all values of the form submitted are nested into arrays.
I was wondering if anyone has found a solution to this. I know that there is some library that does the trick like this one (https://github.com/maxatwork/form2js) but I can't believe that closure doesn't have anything to deal with this problem.
Thanks a lot !
why not access the data yourself and build the data structure you require, it is not like this will be a bottleneck of any sorts.
Recently came across the term JSONC in a YouTube API. I browsed the Web, but found nothing much about it. Can someone explain whether these two are the same or different?
There is also jsonc aka "JSON with comments", created by Microsoft and used by Visual Studio Code. The logic for it can be found here, alas without exhaustive specification (though I'd like to be proven wrong on this).
On top of that there is this project with an actual specification which is also called jsonc, but also does far more than just adding comments.
While there definitely is a use for these technologies, some critical thinking is advised. JSON containing comments is not JSON.
JSON-C seems to just be a variation of JSON mainly targeted at C development. I.e., from the open source docs, "JSON-C implements a reference counting object model that allows you to easily construct JSON objects in C, output them as JSON formatted strings and parse JSON formatted strings back into the C representation of JSON objects."ref^1
From the YouTube API perspective (specifically, version 2, not the new version 3), The JSON-C response is just a condensed version of the JSON response (removing "duplicate, irrelevant or easily calculated values").ref^2
Why would the JSON response have "duplicate, irrelevant or easily calculated values" values anyway? Because it is converting the original ATOM XML format directly to JSON in a loseless conversion. You can find out more details here.
However, I would suggest using version 3 of the YouTube Data API. It is much easier to use. =)
JSONC is an open-source, Javascript API created by Tomás Corral Casas for reducing the size of the amount of JSON data that is transported between clients and servers. It uses two different approaches to achieve this, JSONC.compress and JSONC.pack. More information can be found on the JSONC Github page:
https://github.com/tcorral/JSONC
I'm working on a custom control that will be fed by JSON content and I'm trying to find the best approach to produce and consume it.
Let say the JSON could be from:
Notes View (all documents)
Notes View (subset of documents based on a category or filter)
Notes Document Collection (from database.Search or database.FTSearch)
What I have on my mind is to define some Custom Properties where I can define:
URL that produces the JSON
Object
etc.
So far I'm considering:
REST Service control from ExtLib
XAgent that produces JSON
Domino URL ?ReadViewEntries and OutputFormat=JSON
Does anyone knows if the JSON object loaded in memory has a size limit?
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Definitely go for the REST Service control from the Extension Library, offers by far the best combination of flexibility vs performance vs development time.
Matt
What about creating the JSON in the view itself and then just read the column values? http://www.eknori.de/2011-07-23/formula-magic/
If you want to parse the json object using ssjs, you can fetch it using an URLConnection and put the resulting object into a repeat control using the eval statement.
I was so excited to use GWT Maps API that wrote a service which takes LatLng and LatLngBounds in its interface... Only to find out at runtime that those classes do not implement Serializable, probably because they are Javascript native objects.
What would be the best approach to work with location data types on the server side with GWT then? Are there any libraries which already provide serializable classes and conversion to/from LatLng & company? Or everybody just writes their own wrappers?
See if any of this code I wrote helps you out:
https://github.com/dartmanx/mapmaker/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jason/mapmaker/client/util/GoogleMapUtil.java
GWT provides the ability to create Custom Field Serializers for classes that don't implement Serializable (or IsSerializable). However, JavaScriptObject is an odd duck indeed and doesn't let you directly access any of its data members on the Java side. So, writing a serializer is going to be a challenge at best.
You may also wish to have a look at google's docs about what sorts of values can be returned:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsJSNI.html#passing-javascript