I am using bootstrap and I was wondering what would be a clean way to give a background to my container.
I am using the bootstrap class container, not container-fluid. Bootstrap doc clearly states that I shouldn't nest containers, so what is the alternative to achieve this goal ? If I set a background to my container the left and right margins are still white, I want to colour that space as well, but I also want my content to be aligned the way the container is aligned, not the way the container-fluid is aligned. Any suggestions ? My current solution is nesting a container inside container-fluid and remove the padding from the first one, but I want to make a better solution that doesn't go against the bootstrap documentation.
Thanks in advance !
EDIT
Here is for example what I had
<div class="container-fluid my-class">
<div class="container">
Some rows and columns here
</div>
</div>
and then I override bootstrap's padding in css
.container-fluid {
padding-left: 0;
padding-right: 0;
}
.my-class {
background: red;
}
But, like I said, this is the bad way to do it.
Bootstrap doc clearly states that I shouldn't nest containers under other containers so just nest your container div under a new class div say, container-bg and add the background-image to that div like this:
HTML:
<div class="container-bg">
<div class="container">
<!-- your content -->
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.container-bg {
background: xxx;
}
If you want to set the background for the whole page, then set it on body.
If you want to set it for a section of the page, then wrap that section in an appropriate element (such as div or section), add a class, id or some other way to target it with a selector … just not one that uses a class provided by Bootstrap.
For Boostrap V4.0 and later
If you want to use boostrap colors as background, you can use these colors for the background, like below example
<div class="container bg-dark">
<!-- your content -->
</div>
Related
Is there a way to create a .col on a bootstrap page so that it goes all the way to the edge of it's container?
I would like the image in the example (which is in a .col-xs-12 inside a .row inside a .container) to use up all the space up until the edge of the container. I can solve this with pure JS resizing it as needed but I would prefer to solve this using pure CSS approach (if possible). As it is now I have tried several different variants of negative margins and relative positioning but all end up with it either not being perfectly aligned to the edge or messes something else up as well.
Here is a base example of how the page is coded: https://www.bootply.com/wVw5jnKa35
Here if you want to achieve your requirement than you can add custom class in your col-xs-12 class
Like this
HTML
<div class="col-xs-12 no-pad">
<img class="FullWidth" src="http://calendar.volego.ru/img/users/wallpapers/20160215081029217.jpg">
</div>
CSS
.no-pad {
padding: 0;
}
You don't need to define and use a custom class for this purpose.
simply, At line 8, change:
<div class="col-xs-12">
to
<div>
I'm new to CSS-frameworks.
Normally I start my markup within the body by adding a div with the class "wrap". The purpose of that, is to get the content horizontally centered. And for having a top-, bottom-margin.
Now with Foundation I would like to keep that approach. But I'm not sure where to put the "wrap"-div.
That's what I got currently:
.wrap {
margin: 10px auto;
}
<div class="wrap">
<div class="row">
<div class="small-12 columns">
<div class="callout">
<h1>Lorem Ipsum</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Demo with Foundation added on CodePen: http://codepen.io/mizech/pen/LWBOvQ
I mean: It works but I'm not sure if I do it right.
Shall I keep it the way it is? Or should I put the "wrap"-div somewhere else?
Should I perhaps leave the "wrap"-div at all (when using Foundation) and doing something else instead?
You don't need a wrap div. Foundation has a maximum width set on the .row so anything inside it will conform to that grid. If you need you can add a class with vertical margins or padding to that row. If you need a full width row you just add the class .expanded to it.
i want to create a responsive webpage with twitter bootstrap. I have a picture which should be a certain width and a bar with a background color which should have the same width and both should be aligned on the left and right side.
As Bootstrap uses padding-left:-15px; padding-right:-15px; I have this effect:
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/thsgC
This confuses me. How can I align both rows with Bootstrap accordingly without overwriting bootstraps own css classes .row and .col-xs-12
Thanks.
In Bootstrap the col-* class has padding on it. To get around it you can either override it (not recommended) or place the background coloured div inside another div:
<div class="col-xs-12">
<div class="navigation">color</div>
</div>
Like this http://codepen.io/anon/pen/ixcmg
Actually both rows are aligned correctly. The problem is in the first row, image element is child of col-xs-12 element while in second row, navigation class is on the same div element which has col-xs-12 element
try to put navigation class in child element of col-xs-12 like this
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">
<div class = "navigation">
color
</div>
</div>
</div>
also its not good practice to overwrite bootstrap's own classes, you can give extra class to the element which should be used to overwrite bootstrap css property values.
I am using bootstrap, the container is 915px width, I am running in mobile browser.
The problem is the div with background color is supposed to occupy the whole width, but there are some white margins.
how can i extend the div a few pixel in each side?
<div class="container">
<div class="" style="width:100%;height:90px;background-color:Red;margin-left:50px;">
</div>
</div>
Have you tried using a different container class from Bootstrap?
Perhaps "container-fluid" as described below and on the Bootstrap component page - http://getbootstrap.com/css/
Containers
Bootstrap requires a containing element to wrap site contents and house our grid system. You may choose one of two containers to use in your projects. Note that, due to padding and more, neither container is nestable.
Use .container for a responsive fixed width container.
<div class="container">
...
</div>
Use .container-fluid for a full width container, spanning the entire width of your viewport.
<div class="container-fluid">
...
</div>
You could also mix and match via Media Queries and JavaScript if you wanted to. For example on certain Media Query dimension triggers compensate for the style overrides you wish to be used.
Reference:
http://getbootstrap.com/css/
Try adding a negative margin
margin-left: -15px;
margin-right: -15px;
From what you've posted, it looks like the inner div is 100% of the container.
Either put the inner div outside of the container or make the container 100% width (there are other bootstrap containers for this).
You can try use .row:
<div class="container">
<div class="row" style="
width:100%;height:90px;background-color:Red;margin-left:50px;">
</div>
</div>
I'm working on a project using the framework Twitter Bootstrap 3.
My basic HTML layout is.
Sidebar
Main content
The sidebar element has 100% height and float: left so that the div classed main-content stays inline.
When I give the sidebar float left property and add a row classed div in main-content div.
The height of .row goes crazy. But instead of float: left if I use position: fixed to the sidebar then the .row height gets adjusted according to content inside the .row.
I did play with the web console in Chrome and noticed that there are two pseudo elements created on row :before and :after.
When I unchecked the css property of those pseudo classes the height of the .row is to the height of the child.
Why do I have this issue when I use float: left to the sidebar?
How can I overcome it?
Did google on this, and I found this. But it doesn't help me.
Also I've created a fiddle to demonstrate the strange behaviour of the .row classed div where it extends to almost to screen of the height but there's nothing present inside the .row element.
Someone help me to get this clarified and fixed.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT : Why the height of the .row div is 100% when I didn't define it's height?
I find your mark-up a bit odd considering you are working with Bootstrap. Why don't you make use of the Bootstrap functionality to create your sidebar and main content div? This way you also don't run into unwanted "100% height divs".
Have a look: http://jsfiddle.net/GeA7N/3/
<div class="page-container">
<div class="row">
<div class="sidebar col-xs-4">
</div>
<div class="main-content col-xs-8">
<div class="well custom-well"></div>
<div style="background: red">Content div that is not 100% height by default</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Have you tried using http://www.layoutit.com as a guide for a layout? You don't have to register to use it. Once you get the columns setup correctly you can go in and and set the height of the columns with the style attribute on the div. Hope this helps a little bit
Children inherit attributes from parents, unless otherwise specified.
So let's specify a height for row and it will no longer inherit.
All I am adding is a row height attribute to overwrite both the parent's height attribute.
.row {
background-color:blue;
height:50%;
}
JSFiddle Demo Blue is to show the row div. The grey is just the underlying background of the page.
EDIT : Why the height of the .row div is 100% when I didn't define
it's height?
Reason: The ::before and ::after pseudo-elements of the .row class have the style display:table; thereby causing your first row to fill as much remaining space as it can.
Solution: To avoid overriding the Bootstrap framework, simply encapsulate your .container class with another div which has the style display:flex;