For some of the fields in my webpage they can alternate between being readonly or not readonly. Currently they all have an ng-readonly attribute with a function call like this:
ng-readonly="isReadOnly(field)"
The function isReadOnly does some logic to determine whether it will return true/false.
However I am unsure if this is dynamic, eg. at some points in time isReadOnly can return a different boolean for the same field argument.
Related
I'm using the PowerMockito and Mockito libraries. In mocking a method I need to declare a return value only if the method input, which is of the type JsonObject, satisfies some conditions. For example, for all inputs that the value for the key query equals to queryValue, return the declared value.
I ended in the following code where I can check the input in the then method which is good but the problem is I think for JsonObjects where the condition does not satisfy, it will return a null value as I must return a value for the then method.
final String queryValue = "some values";
PowerMockito.when(instance.myMethod(Mockito.any(JsonObject.class)))
.then(ans -> {
JsonObject input = ans.getArgument(0);
if (queryValue.equals(graphQlQuery.getString("query")))
return resultValue;
else
return null;
});
So I was wondering is there any way to specify such a condition on inputs when a method is being called?
Thanks
You need to use a different argument matcher than any. Mockito Documentation has examples that show how to match different arguments.
In your example, you don't need something complicated:
.when(instance.myMethod(ArgumentMatchers.argThat(
(JsonObject input) -> queryValue.equals(input.getString("query"))
)))
.thenReturn(resultValue)
the problem is I think for JsonObjects where the condition does not satisfy, it will return a null value as I must return a value for the then method.
Just to avoid any misunderstanding: If you use the code above, the mock still returns a default value (null) for the calls that are not matched by any stubs.
What is different with this code is that you can add other stubs with different matchers, that handle different cases (when the argument is not "query"). In your original code, you had to handle all calls in the same place.
The problem is Razor (MVC 5) renders out HiddenFor and Hidden helper incorrectly.
I have a view model like this:
public class MyViewModel
{
public bool BoolValueInsideViewModel { get; set; }
public MyViewModel()
{
BoolValueInsideViewModel = false;
}
}
and controller is simple as:
model = new MyViewModel();
model.BoolValueInsideViewModel = false;
return PartialView("_MyView", model);
Second line is just to be sure value is set to false.
View looks like this:
#model MyViewModel
#Html.Hidden("BoolValueInsideViewModel", false)
#Html.Hidden("BoolValueNotInViewModel", false)
But on browser I get this:
<input data-val="true" data-val-required="The BoolValueInsideViewModel field is required." id="BoolValueInsideViewModel" name="BoolValueInsideViewModel" type="hidden" value="true">
<input id="BoolValueNotInViewModel" name="BoolValueNotInViewModel" type="hidden" value="False">
Note that I have like 15 other view models and controller methods in same controller works fine with same code (I use HiddenFor with strongly typed values normaly, here I changed to Hidden to show that it does not work even with hard coded value in view).
Putting a break point on view, shows model is actually has BoolValueInsideViewModel equal to false, but result on browser is different. Also I get the result via JQuery post callback, so I checked raw string returning from AJAX function and the value there is also "True" instead of false.
What I tried:
Clean up project and rebuild!
Renaming property
Renaming view model, even renaming file containing view model
Renaming view
I know! It looks stupid and the most simplest thing on ASP.NET MVC, but I spent half a day on it. Other view models and partial views render correctly.
The weird thing is I don't have any data annotation on view model, but why it includes data validation attributes on the HTML element?
For me, it was because my url had a query parameter with the same name as the viewmodel property. It seems the model binder is overriding the model value with that in the query string.
I've confirmed this by changing and removing the query string parameter and values, and get consistent results.
For example,
let's say the query string param is: showMore=False
you have a model property of the same name, set to True.
check the value of Model.showMore will be True
check the value of the #HiddenFor(m => m.showMore), it will be False
change the query string param to showMore=True, check the value of #HiddenFor(m => m.showMore), it will be True
remove the query string param showMore, check the value of #HiddenFor(m => m.showMore), it will be True
Conclusion: the query string parameter value overrides the model value. Not sure if that is by design or a bug.
I have a main view using several partial Views.
Each of these partials use a different model and have post action.
My problem is I need one property from my main view's model to be used in one of my partials.
The partial view which I need to pass this property view is the last stage in the process.
The application reaches a partial view that contains a switch statement , based on the status on the item being queried, decides which partial will be rendered.
I have the property passing that far and even have it included in the Renderaction for the partial but I don't know how to retrieve it in the controller, PartialViewResult.
In the main view:
#{Html.RenderPartial("StatusForm", Model.HeadingDataModel.Status, new ViewDataDictionary { { "PurchaseOrderNumber", Model.AccordionModel.LtsSpecific.PurchaseOrderNumber } });}
PurchaseOrderNumber is what I'm after. The value gets passed to the next stage:
#{
var obj = ViewData["PurchaseOrderNumber"];
}
And within the same view:
Html.RenderAction("FinishedCalibrationForm", obj);
How can I retreive this in my controller ?? The following is not correct I know, but you get the idea.
public PartialViewResult FinishedCalibrationForm( string obj)
All help is appreciated.
Calling Html.RenderAction or Html.Action is largely the same as Url.Action. There's many different overloads, but essentially, the first parameter is the action name, the second parameter is going to be either the controller name or an anonymous object of route values, and the third parameter will be an anonymous object of route values if the second parameter was used for the controller name.
Anyways, whatever you pass in the route values will be used to find and call the associated action, which includes parameters for the action. So, for your example:
Html.RenderAction("FinishedCalibrationForm", new { obj = obj })
Would properly pass obj into your action method. As you have it now, it's going to interpret the value of obj as the controller name the action is within, which is obviously not correct.
I am trying to use an instance variable as a parameter value in a method, but it is giving me an error. "Parameter initializer is unknown or is not a compile-time constant"
I want to use a non-constant instance variable though, and I assume there has to be some way around this besides calling this method from another method. Here is the code I'm referring to:
public function attack(target:Fighter=this.target):void {
}
What about:
public function attack(target:Fighter):void
{
if(target == null)
target = this.target;
}
and to be honest maybe it's easier to name one of variables _target to avoid confusion. You can use target = _target; instead of this..
You cannot set an optional parameter that way. You can set optional parameters to a default value but not a reference. In this case if you want to keep it optional you could do something like this (or what #George Profenza suggested):
public function attack(target:Fighter=null):void {
target = target ? target : this.target;
}
I see that you marked a correct answer already, but I'll explain that since you are defaulting any null parameters to this.target you would benefit from using this solution so you don't have to pass null each time you call attack() i.e. - you can do attack() instead of attack(null).
In as3 there is a flexible way to change object instance, when calling it.
call or apply members of Function object can be called with specific first arg, and reference say us, that this first arg will be "this" pointer inside function. But i've found it wrong.
I'v write little test, listed below.
public class Test
{
private var name:String = "default";
public var test3:Function = test;
public var test2:Function = function()
{
trace(this.name);
}
public function Test(name:String)
{
this.name = name;
}
public function test():void
{
trace(this.name);
}
}
and tested it.
var tmp:Test = new Test("default");
tmp.test(); //out default
tmp.test.call(new Test("new")); //out default
tmp.test2(); //out default
tmp.test2.call(new Test("new2")); //out new2
tmp.test3(); //out default
tmp.test3.call(new Test("new3")); //out default
So, in anonymous function call we can get right output, but not in case of member function.
maybe it's becouse of ambiguous "this" pointer, that should reffer real object instance for correct work, maybe smth else. I dont now, and as3 reference didnt't describe smth about it.
Finally list of questions:
Why so? By me, it's very strange, and looks like undefined behaviour;
How i can achieve that functionality? How to deceive test function like anonymous one? Isn't it call methode target?
It isn't very important, but I'll be glad any good answer. Thanks!
P.S. sorry for my English.
//EDITED: added this statement to all "name" references. Nothing changes.
When invoking the [[Call]] property, the behavior is different for
different types of closures. A closure is an object that contains a
reference to a method, and the [[Call]] property acts differently
depending on whether it is a function, method, or class closure. A
function closure is one that is of a global method that isn't
associated with any instance of a class. A method closure contains an
instance method of a class, and will always remember its original
"this" value.
If the closure is a function closure, then the first argument passed
to [[Call]] is passed on to the method and gets used as the "this"
value. If the first argument is null or undefined, then the global
object will be used as the "this" value for the method.
If the closure is a method closure, then the first argument of
[[Call]] will be ignored, and the saved "this" value for the method
closure will be passed to the method as the first argument. A method
closure records what its original "this" value was and always uses
that instead of the first argument to [[Call]].
If the closure is a class closure, and there is 1 argument passed to
[[Call]] (in addition to the "this" argument), then the call is
treated as a type conversion, and the argument will be coerced to the
type represented by the closure.
http://learn.adobe.com/wiki/display/AVM2/2.4+Method+invocation+notes