How to clear session cookie ONLY on chrome development tools - google-chrome

For development/debug purpose, instead of disable chrome from reopening tab of previous session (and therefore retained session cookie), close chrome and reopen, or manually look for that session cookie in dev tool and delete it. I want to be able to delete session cookies ONLY on chrome without deleting other cookies (preferentially only the session cookie for site in current tab), technically simulate the browser has closed and reopen to the same page again.
is such function exist in dev tool or extension to do just that?

Since you need this clearing method specifically for one browser may I suggest the use of a bookmark script?
I wrote this little script that will prompt you for the cookie's name and then delete it. Create a new bookmark in Chrome and add the code below as the URL:
javascript:(function(){var cName=prompt("Enter the name of the cookie to delete.");if( typeof(cName) == 'undefined' ) return; document.cookie = cName +"=;domain="+ (document.location.host).replace('http://', '').replace('www','') + ";path=/;expires=Thu, 01 Jan 2001 00:00:00 GMT";})()
Do note that while the script works immediately upon clicking it, if the cookies tab was your active console tab while running the script you will need to switch to another tab and return to the cookies tab to see the visual representation of the cookie being deleted.
If you intend to use this script to delete one specific cookie in one specific environment you can hard-code the cookie name and location, thus minimizing the required code even further and removing the user interaction element. And as an added bonus if you have a Google account this bookmark will carry over to any device you have that is connected to it.

Related

How to pass the cookies to third party when samesite=strict which is the default behavior after google chrome version 91

I have a web application and we are calling a third party to process some data. Once it's done, the third party will redirect back to my application (It's a post redirection). To keep the session, we are using cookies. After the google chrome update, where the default values for samesite=Lax, I've updated our cookies to pass as samesite=None; Secure to overcome this issue. Now after google chrome version 91, this implementation is not working and I'm getting a session expiry issue. Can somebody help to fix this issue for google chrome version 91 and after? I'm using java
The best that we have been able to come up with is a client side meta refresh. When the third party posts back to our application, we have a page filter that will send it to a "refreshMeta" page similar to https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H76.html. This has to happen without calling .getSession() anywhere because that will cause a new session to be created. This causes the page to refresh in the browser and send all original cookies back to the server because its coming from the same domain and a new session wasnt created.
I will say this worked for a while but it looks like there was change in Tomcat that's preventing this approach from working like it did on earlier versions, which is why I'm back looking for another solution.

How do I get password fields to be autofilled without requiring user interaction?

If I inspect an <input type="password"/> from my Tampermonkey script and observe changes using a change handler for a password field that is filled by the Password Manager feature of Chrome, the value remains empty until I physically perform a real click in the page. I have tried in my script clicking in the page, but Chrome knows it’s not a real click. When I physically click in the page, the change event suddenly fires, the password field gets a value, and then my script reacts properly (due to having the change event). But I wrote this script to avoid having to interact with the page in the first place, so this defeats the point of my script.
Is there a way to get TamperMonkey to mark the page as having had the user interact with it (e.g., some hypothetical GM_setUserTouched() or GM_autoFillPasswords() API) so that the Password Manager feature actually fills the <input type="password"/> in without requiring me to click in the page?
Background
In Chrome, this behavior is documented in #352527 comment 15 where it is unexpected behavior to the reporter and #398805 where there is a case that Chrome fails to implement the behavior I don’t want. It is considered a feature that when autofill and Chrome’s built-in Password Manager fill out a form, password characters are displayed to the user in the password field, but the DOM HTMLInputElement.value is set to "". When the user interacts with the page, such as by clicking in it or pressing a key, Chrome modifies HTMLInputElement.value to contain the password and a change event is fired at the element. The cited reason for doing this is “security reasons” (e.g., if a website script was reading from the password element, it only would have a chance to do so if the user was looking at the page… so popunders or non-visible frames wouldn’t be able to do it or something? I’m not sure what this protects you from: once the user interacts with the page, all of the scripts would have access to the password anyway. And if bad scripts are being served from the same origin as the <input type="password"/>, the website itself has a security flaw, not Chrome…).
Greasemonkey historically has helper APIs and a #grant system to enable the userscript to work around issues like this. Edit: when creating the repro (below), I discovered that Firefox makes the autofill password available to the DOM without waiting for the user to interact with the window. Thus, Greasemonkey doesn’t need a GM_forceAutofill() API because Firefox doesn’t exhibit this Chrome quirk. As a result, Tampermonkey doesn’t have such an API.
Repro
Because people do not believe me when I describe the behavior exhibited by Chrome, I have prepared a repro. It takes some work to get Chrome into a state where it doesn’t think the user has interacted with the page yet, but you should be able to see what I see using these steps:
Open Chrome. I am using Chrome 61.0.3163.91 64-bit on Windows 10.
Navigate to https://fiddle.jshell.net/xqfynp3e/22/show/light/
Enter some bogus username and password and hit enter or click the button. Chrome should prompt you to save the password.
Save the password.
Open Developer tools.
Enter this into Console (to navigate to the page without accidentally interacting with it): window.location.href = 'https://fiddle.jshell.net/xqfynp3e/22/show/light/?1'
Run document.querySelector('input[type=password]').value in Console.
Observe that the form’s password appears to be filled in visually and yet reading the DOM element in Console yields "".
Click in the document.
Run document.querySelector('input[type=password]').value in Console again.
Observe that the form’s password hasn’t changed appearance and yet reading the DOM element in Console yields the bogus password you saved.
My question, restated: how can I get Tampermonkey to perform the “Click in the document” step? How do I tell Chrome’s password auto-filler that I interacted with the page without actually physically interacting with the page?
EDIT: I have found an alternative way to securely store passwords in Chrome and access them via userscripts by using the Credentials Web API’s silent mediation support: https://imgur.com/a/ts2W1
You cannot do this using Google's built-in password storage because, as you stated yourself, Chrome requires user interaction to enable such passwords -- as a security feature.
Specifically, Chrome requires an event with the isTrusted property set to true. Tampermonkey cannot work around this because even Chrome extensions are not able to set the isTrusted property.
See also, this related feature request from 2015.
One solution is to use a password manager that fills these fields without using Google's built-in storage.
There are many available, with varying degrees of cross-device, and cross-browser, support.
Or you can write your own Tampermonkey script to fill in these fields, irregardless of what Chrome has stored.
If you do write a Tampermonkey script, I recommend that you use a secure storage framework, don't hardcode login info into the script.

How to auto-login website in chrome with saved password

Chrome is auto-filling the credentials, but not log me in until I click login. How to automate? (windows, non-google websites).
Using the Chrome Identity API you can have Chrome (on desktop and Android) automatically attempt to log in the user when they hit your page, even if their session has expired.
Following is a workflow diagram of how it works, but the details can be found in the Google Authentication API: Let the user automatically sign back in section:
It is not the browser's responsibility to auto-login to websites. This is the responsibility of the website you are accessing. The browser can remember form data and auto-fill for you, as can various extensions like LastPass.
However, in order to actually auto-login, you must first login to the website you are trying to access and enable the option they provide, often called 'Remember me?'. The website would typically use a cookie to store the credentials (securely with a hash + salt), and if the cookie still exists (not cleared from the browser or expired), and the hash of real password in database matches the one in the cookie, the website will auto-login.
You could force the browser to try and auto-login with extensions, which are essentially macros. You could try Auto Login or iMacros extensions for this. I would generally avoid this though.
Anyone else stumbling into this thread from a google search.... you can do this with autohotkey. If you browse to yourbankhere.com and chrome fills in the user/pass, you can have autohotkey perform a mousemove then a mouseclick to click the login button.

SharePoint authentication token/cookie persists when closing browser, but only in Chrome

SharePoint 2013 doesn't use Session cookies by default, but rather persistent cookies. Based on several articles, including this one, you can force SharePoint to use session cookies by the following PowerShell command. I ran this command in my SharePoint environment.
$sts = Get-SPSecurityTokenServiceConfig
$sts.UseSessionCookies = $true
$sts.Update()
My goal is to make a user re-authenticate when they close and re-open their browser. For both Forms Authenticated users and Windows Authenticated users, this works great in Firefox and IE. However, in Google Chrome, when I close/re-open the browser and navigate to my SharePoint site, it remembers the user that I was authenticated as before I closed my browser; which is baffling, considering this is supposed to be a Session cookie. This happens for both Forms Authenticated users, and Windows authenticated users.
FedAuth Session cookie, given by SharePoint, as seen in Chrome
Any ideas why Google Chrome (but not IE or FF) is "remembering" my credentials upon browser close/open?
SharePoint Version: 2013, on-premise.
Chrome Version: 42.0.2311.152
Other Notes:
WindowsTokenLifetime is set to it's default value, 10hrs
FormsTokenLifetime is set to 2 minutes
LogonTokenCacheExpirationWindow is set to 1 minute
Update:
I tried closing all identifiable Chrome.exe processes via Taskmgr, but the next time I opened my browser, it still remembered me. However, I restarted my computer, opened the browser, and it didn't remember me that time. I don't think this is a SharePoint issue, but rather a Chrome issue. My guess is that some Chrome process is staying alive somewhere, even though it appears to be closed, thus allowing the "Session" to remain open. Still investigating...
Apparently, when you let Chrome run in the background, the Session cookies aren't expired (even though you've closed the browser). Disabling background mode causes Chrome to forget your Session cookie, as it should.
Note: I'm curious if this a bug in Chrome. This behavior seems to go against what a Session cookie is.
a cookie that is erased when the user closes the Web browser. The session cookie is stored in temporary memory and is not retained after the browser is closed
Update:
According to Google, this is expected behavior (though I'd consider that notion debatable). Also, another SO user also came across the same issue.

chrome extension: open an website with different account in each tab

I have several accounts for a website and currently I want to write an extension that I can open all the accounts simultaneously in chrome, each tab for one account.
So that means I want each tab with a separate cookie system, is it doable? If so please suggest the API I should use, thanks!
Go to Chrome Preferences. There is a Users section where you can add users. Each new user will have its own cookie jar, so you can log in to a site as many different users at once. It makes new chrome windows, but it seems you cannot drag a tab onto a window of another user.
According to Chrome documentation, you can modify HTTP headers (including cookies) in the onBeforeSendHeaders event handler. So, you need to store new cookies for every account by means of the onHeadersReceived event handler, and then substitute them for every tab in outgoing requests.
There even exists an extension which seems doing almost the thing you want - Chrome Cookie Switcher.
Also I have found an answer that may be helpful for your task: Associate a custom user agent to a specific Google Chrome page/tab.
I really don't think Chrome allows extensions to do this. If I recall correctly, extensions can inspect and block requests, but they can't modify them, such as changing cookies on the fly for each tab.
I suggest you use the --user-data-dir command-line option of Chrome. It allows you to keep several separate profiles, each in its own directory, and then you only need to start chrome with the proper option:
# run this command to use the first profile
google-chrome --user-data-dir=/home/binchen/my_chrome_profiles/my_profile_1
# run this command to use the second profile
google-chrome --user-data-dir=/home/binchen/my_chrome_profiles/my_profile_2
...
Each profile will be in its own Chrome window, with its own cookie store, instead of its own tab, but it's easier than writing an extension.
Lastly, if the website you're mentioning is Google, you can keep several Google accounts open at the same time.