I have a problem with Firefox on a really specific graphic implementation.
I think you may understand the problem just by testing this fiddle: on firefox you'll see the problem, on any other browser you'll see the expected result (including IE9).
Design I need:
PNG illustration
I have a main block (dashed border) with a fixed width.
There is 2 lines, one above the other, within the main block. The 2 lines must be align on the right of the main block
Each line contains 2 children. The left ones have a dynamic text (gray background), the right ones are optionnals (blue background). The above right one contains an icon (orange) with a fixed width, the bellow right one is a dynamic temperature (with one decimal maximum).
Blocks are separated by a fixed 5px margin.
Texts and icon must be vertically centered.
In any case, the 2 lines need to have the same width: the smaller one takes the width of the bigger one.
If one line (or both) becomes too large for the main block, the left text (gray background) automatically linebreak.
HTML Code:
<div class="main-wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class="content upper">
<div class="right-block"><!-- This block is optionnal -->
<div class="icon"></div>
</div>
<div class="left-block">
<div class="vertically-centered">
<p>
Some dynamic text
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="content lower">
<div class="right-block"><!-- This block is optionnal -->
<div class="vertically-centered">
<span>
21,5°
</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="left-block">
<div class="vertically-centered">
<p>
Some other dynamic text
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS Code:
/* utilities */
.vertically-centered {
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.vertically-centered > * {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
}
/* custom styles */
.container {
display: inline-block;
float: right;
max-width: 100%;
}
.content {
width: 100%;
margin: 5px 0px;
height: 85px;
}
.right-block, .left-block {
height: 100%;
}
.right-block {
float: right;
font-size: 42px;
margin-left: 5px;
background-color: lightblue;
}
.left-block {
font-size: 25px;
line-height: 25px;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 0 20px;
text-align: left;
background-color: lightgray;
}
.upper .right-block {
width: 85px;
}
.lower .right-block {
padding: 0 15px;
}
.icon {
position: relative;
top: 20%;
left: 20%;
width: 60%;
height: 60%;
background-color: orange;
}
What I already tried:
Put a display: inline-block on the .left-block div, as suggested here, but it doesn't satisfy the need to have the same width on both lines.
Put a display: inline-block on the .content div; makes the line 100% width on other browsers, and create a big right gap within the .left-block on firefox.
Use white-space: nowrap on the .left-block; didn't help.
Make the .left-block div floating (right or left), but it doesn't work if the text is too large for the main container
And a lot of other things but not a single one compatible with all the browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, IE9+, Edge)...
A precision although I don't think it will change anything: it is responsive.
I'm trying something with flexbox but... IE9... If anybody has a suggestion.
You can use the CSS word-break property to allow line breaks in the middle of long words:
.content {
width: 100%;
margin: 5px 0px;
height: 85px;
word-break: break-all;
}
I found out a solution with flexbox!
I added a display: flex to the .content div with flex-direction: row-reserve to keep the order of the element and still be able to use float: right for IE9.
In addition, there is a flex: auto property on .left-block divs to take as much space as possible (Note: IE11 needs flex-basis to be set to be able to calculate the space wanted by the flex-grow property. That's why I used auto instead of 0 on the flex property. See details)
The completed CSS code
.content {
width: 100%;
margin: 5px 0px;
height: 85px;
display: flex; /* Initialize flexbox */
flex-direction: row-reverse; /* keep the order of the element */
border: 1px dashed gray;
}
.left-block {
font-size: 25px;
line-height: 25px;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 0 20px;
text-align: left;
background-color: lightgray;
flex: auto; /* the text blocks take all the available space */
}
Here's the fiddle with the correction. Sometimes IE9 takes 2 lines of text instead of 1 (the text is 2px larger that the container, I don't know why...) but atleast it's readable!
Related
For a web application, I'm to position an animated emoji along with some text in a div. These elements are to remain separated in a fully responsive way. Behold:
I'm using flex to accomplish this. That ensures that even if the screen size becomes extremely small, separation is still kept by stacking these one on top of the other.
To accomplish it, the whole outer div is wrapped in:
.act{
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
background-color: #E1F5FE;
padding: 10px;
border-radius: 10px;
align-items: center;
}
Next, the animated image inside the div is wrapped in:
.anim {
flex: 1 1;
min-width: 64px;
text-align: center;
}
.anim > img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
max-width: 50px;
}
Lastly, the text along with the image is wrapped in:
.txt {
flex: 1 1 180px;
text-align: center;
}
Did you notice the tear drops on the emoji? Those are separate from the image, and are to be animated in html5.
I can't figure out how to ensure those tear drops stay precisely around the eyes of the emoji. I have tried using a z-index alongwith position:absolute (e.g. see the following):
<div class="anim">
<div class="tear" style="z-index:2;position:absolute;margin-top: 30px;margin-left: 110px;"></div>
<div class="tear" style="z-index:2;position:absolute;margin-top: 30px;margin-left: 84px;"></div>
<img src="sad.png">
</div>
This isn't responsive at all.
Moreover, If I try usingposition:relative, that makes it impossible to overlap the tear shape over the emoji, regardless of what z-index I set.
Please help me fix this situation. Ideally, I want to stick to using flex because otherwise, it's perfect for my needs.
Note: Answers to a similar SO question don't help since I've already included what they're suggesting.
To accomplish that you need a wrapper around the image and text, that take the size of the image.
Here is a sample code, where I added an extra wrapper, image, around the anim, and then made the anim display as inline block.
Here the image wrapper become the flex item instead, and will allow the anim to behave and be sized as the image, and create the boundaries you need to be able to place the eyes at a fixed position on top the image.
Stack snippet
.act {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
background-color: #E1F5FE;
padding: 10px;
border-radius: 10px;
align-items: center;
}
.image {
flex: 1 1;
min-width: 64px;
text-align: center;
}
.anim {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
.anim>img {
width: 100%;
max-width: 50px;
}
.txt {
flex: 1 1 180px;
text-align: center;
}
.tear {
position:absolute;
top: 10px;
left: 30px;
width: 10px;
height: 10px;
background: blue;
}
.tear:first-child {
left: 10px;"
}
<div class="act">
<div class="image">
<div class="anim">
<div class="tear"></div>
<div class="tear"></div>
<img src="http://placehold.it/150">
</div>
</div>
<div class="txt">
Some text
</div>
</div>
This is my code but I want the text to only have background color behind it, and not stretch across the entire screen? Any ideas?
.section_title {
background-color: orange;
text-align: center;
margin: 0px auto;
}
HTML is
<div class="col-md-12">
<div class="section_title">
<h2>Choose a Pack to Print</h2>
</div>
</div>
An option is adding display: inline-block; to the CSS of the text element.
One problem I found with display: inline-block; is it clears floats incorrectly. Instead, I use width: fit-content;
.highlight {
background: yellow;
padding: 0.5em;
width: fit-content;
}
<h1 class="highlight">Highlight for text only!</h1>
<h1 class="highlight">Highlight me too!</h1>
There's a few ways to do this, but probably the best way is to make the h2 inline or inline-block.
Using inline-block will allow you to set width/height.
.section-title {
text-align: center;
}
.section-title h2 {
display: inline-block;
}
The other way to do this is to set a width on the h2 and set the margin to auto;
.section-title h2 {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
width: 50%; /* for example */
}
If you want all your headings to be a set width, I'd choose the second one (allowing for text to wrap). If you want the box to be flexible and hug the contents, I'd use the first.
I have a container div which has children anchored to the bottom. The problem is that when the div's overflow scrollbar appears, the bottom margin of the last child gets hidden.
Please see http://jsfiddle.net/TxEAP/3/. At first, there's a correct margin underneath the 1 div. Clicking "append one" so that the scrollbar eventually appears makes the last div not have a bottom margin anymore. Opening DevTools shows that the margin of that last child is there, but it is outside of the container's viewport, even when scrolling completely to the bottom.
How can this be solved? It would suffice to get this working in Google Chrome.
HTML:
<div class="main">
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<!-- several of these .item divs -->
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.main {
height: 200px;
overflow-y: scroll;
position: relative;
border: 1px solid black;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
.item {
padding: 20px;
margin: 15px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
Here's my final solution using flexbox. It's supported well enough on Chrome despite all -webkit- prefixes. Basically, the idea is to have a dummy element that, in case of no overflow, fills up the space of the container starting from the top (so that the real children are anchored to the bottom); in case of overflow, it is hidden automatically because of height: 0. It does not suffer from the margin issue, and it does not collapse margins.
http://jsfiddle.net/mCYLm/1/
HTML:
<div class="main">
<div class="gap-filler"></div>
<div class="item">foo</div>
<!-- more `div.item`s -->
</div>
CSS:
div.main {
display: -webkit-box;
-webkit-box-orient: vertical;
height: 200px;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
div.main div.gap-filler {
-webkit-box-flex: 1;
height: 0;
}
div.main div.item {
border: 1px solid black;
margin: 20px;
padding: 20px;
}
Edit: This was a solution without flexbox, but it had selection issues.
A solution that eventually worked was the following: http://jsfiddle.net/TxEAP/7/. This appends hidden "content" which makes Chrome not hide the margin of the last .item div.
.container:after {
content: "";
font-size: 0;
display: block;
height: 1px;
}
Edit: The following only works if display: inline-block is possible.
Finally I found a solution. If all .items have display: inline-block except the first one, then the margin does not get hidden.
http://jsfiddle.net/TxEAP/5/
.item:not(:first-child) {
display: inline-block;
/* attempt at getting `width: auto` like `display: block` has */
width: -webkit-calc(100% - 2 * 15px);
box-sizing: border-box;
}
If you just move the overflow-y: scroll; from .main. to .container class then the margin is preserved. The only drawback is for less than 3 items (for the given container height) you get a small scrollbar placeholder, instead of a full height one.
Removing max-height:100% on the container seems to fix it for my test in Chrome 21.
Moving the properties so that the overflow is on the container, preserves the margin/padding for an element added to the end that results in the scrollbar appearing.
.main {
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
I have a <div id="content">, which contains <div id="sub-navigation> and <div id="main container">, which themselves are inline-blocks. I would like to be able to make the main container fill the rest of the available page width. Is that possible?
I need columns-strip to expand or shrink based on the number and width of column elements. If the width of the columns-strip exceeds the width of the main container, then a horizontal scroll bar should appear.
* {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
font-size: 10pt;
white-space: normal;
}
#wrapper {
margin: 0px 20px;
background-color: red;
}
#header {
margin: 25px 10px 10px 10px;
height: 50px;
background-color: purple;
color: white;
}
#content {
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
font-size: 0pt;
white-space: nowrap;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: white;
}
#sub-navigation {
width: 200px;
height: 150px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
background-color: forestgreen;
color: white;
}
#main-container {
padding: 10px;
display: inline-block;
overflow: auto;
background-color: yellow;
}
#columns-strip {
padding: 10px;
font-size: 0pt;
white-space: nowrap;
background-color: mediumturquoise;
}
.posts-column {
margin: 0px;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
overflow: auto;
}
#footer {
margin: 10px 10px 25px 10px;
height: 50px;
background-color: navy;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content">
<div id="sub-navigation"></div>
<div id="main-container">
<div id="columns-strip">
<div class="posts-column" style="background-color: lightgray;"></div>
<div class="posts-column" style="background-color: darkgray;"></div>
<div class="posts-column" style="background-color: gray;"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
You have to remove the inline-block styles and float the #sub-navigation div. inline-block is not suited for what you are trying to achieve. When you add no display styles, the div element will be the default value which is block, block elements take up all the available space by default. By floating the #sub-navigation element you make it only take up the space required for its contents.
#sub-navigation {
width: 200px;
height: 150px;
float : left;
vertical-align: top;
background-color: forestgreen;
color: white;
}
#main-container {
padding: 10px;
overflow: auto;
background-color: yellow;
}
make sure to add a clear: left element after the #main-container
That's not how inline-blocks are supposed to be used. Best thing to do here is make your navigation box float:left and leave the default display value alone.
If your header, footer and wrapper have specific widths, then yes, you can have your main-container fill the available space. But if you're not specifying widths in your CSS, then you need to determine how big your main-container CAN be based on the rendered width of the containing element (wrapper). The only way to determine that width after the page loads is with javascript. If you want your site to have a dynamic width but still have your content (sub-navigation and main-container) fill the screen, you would either need to use javascript or percentages, and percentages can get ugly when you start looking at varying resolutions of monitors, laptops, etc...
Ever heard of flex box model!!
It is made just for that.
Note in flexbox model all child elements act as flex box model you cant opt out certain things. Which mean if page has navigation and under it content div + side div. You can't make top navigation out of it. Which has implications. So solution is to have all things only that need flex box in one div.
How can I achieve the following structure without using tables or JavaScript? The white borders represent edges of divs and aren't relevant to the question.
The size of the area in the middle is going to vary, but it will have exact pixel values and the whole structure should scale according to those values. To simplify it, I'd need a way to set "100% - n px" width to the top-middle and bottom-middle divs.
I'd appreciate a clean cross-browser solution, but in case it's not possible, CSS hacks will do.
Here's a bonus. Another structure I've been struggling with and end up using tables or JavaScript. It's slightly different, but introduces new problems. I've been mainly using it in jQuery-based windowing system, but I'd like to keep the layout out of the script and only control the size of one element (the middle one).
New way I've just stumbled upon: css calc():
.calculated-width {
width: -webkit-calc(100% - 100px);
width: -moz-calc(100% - 100px);
width: calc(100% - 100px);
}
Source: css width 100% minus 100px
You can use nested elements and padding to get a left and right edge on the toolbar. The default width of a div element is auto, which means that it uses the available width. You can then add padding to the element and it still keeps within the available width.
Here is an example that you can use for putting images as left and right rounded corners, and a center image that repeats between them.
The HTML:
<div class="Header">
<div>
<div>This is the dynamic center area</div>
</div>
</div>
The CSS:
.Header {
background: url(left.gif) no-repeat;
padding-left: 30px;
}
.Header div {
background: url(right.gif) top right no-repeat;
padding-right: 30px;
}
.Header div div {
background: url(center.gif) repeat-x;
padding: 0;
height: 30px;
}
While Guffa's answer works in many situations, in some cases you may not want the left and/or right pieces of padding to be the parent of the center div. In these cases, you can use a block formatting context on the center and float the padding divs left and right. Here's the code
The HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
<div class="center"></div>
</div>
The CSS:
.container {
width: 100px;
height: 20px;
}
.left, .right {
width: 20px;
height: 100%;
float: left;
background: black;
}
.right {
float: right;
}
.center {
overflow: auto;
height: 100%;
background: blue;
}
I feel that this element hierarchy is more natural when compared to nested nested divs, and better represents what's on the page. Because of this, borders, padding, and margin can be applied normally to all elements (ie: this 'naturality' goes beyond style and has ramifications).
Note that this only works on divs and other elements that share its 'fill 100% of the width by default' property. Inputs, tables, and possibly others will require you to wrap them in a container div and add a little more css to restore this quality. If you're unlucky enough to be in that situation, contact me and I'll dig up the css.
jsfiddle here: jsfiddle.net/RgdeQ
Enjoy!
You can make use of Flexbox layout. You need to set flex: 1 on the element that needs to have dynamic width or height for flex-direction: row and column respectively.
Dynamic width:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-width">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-width">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-width">
3
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
}
.fixed-width {
width: 200px; /* Fixed width or flex-basis: 200px */
}
.flexible-width {
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width i.e. flex-grow: 1 and flex-shrink: 1*/
}
Output:
.container {
display: flex;
width: 100%;
color: #fff;
font-family: Roboto;
}
.fixed-width {
background: #9BCB3C;
width: 200px; /* Fixed width */
text-align: center;
}
.flexible-width {
background: #88BEF5;
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width */
text-align: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-width">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-width">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-width">
3
</div>
</div>
Dynamic height:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-height">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-height">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">
3
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
}
.fixed-height {
height: 200px; /* Fixed height or flex-basis: 200px */
}
.flexible-height {
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining height i.e. flex-grow: 1 and flex-shrink: 1*/
}
Output:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100vh;
color: #fff;
font-family: Roboto;
}
.fixed-height {
background: #9BCB3C;
height: 50px; /* Fixed height or flex-basis: 100px */
text-align: center;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
.flexible-height {
background: #88BEF5;
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width */
text-align: center;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-height">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-height">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">
3
</div>
</div>
The usual way to do it is as outlined by Guffa, nested elements. It's a bit sad having to add extra markup to get the hooks you need for this, but in practice a wrapper div here or there isn't going to hurt anyone.
If you must do it without extra elements (eg. when you don't have control of the page markup), you can use box-sizing, which has pretty decent but not complete or simple browser support. Likely more fun than having to rely on scripting though.
Maybe I'm being dumb, but isn't table the obvious solution here?
<div class="parent">
<div class="fixed">
<div class="stretchToFit">
</div>
.parent{ display: table; width 100%; }
.fixed { display: table-cell; width: 150px; }
.stretchToFit{ display: table-cell; vertical-align: top}
Another way that I've figured out in chrome is even simpler, but man is it a hack!
.fixed{
float: left
}
.stretchToFit{
display: table-cell;
width: 1%;
}
This alone should fill the rest of the line horizontally, as table-cells do. However, you get some strange issues with it going over 100% of its parent, setting the width to a percent value fixes it though.
We can achieve this using flex-box very easily.
If we have three elements like Header, MiddleContainer and Footer. And we want to give some fixed height to Header and Footer. then we can write like this:
For React/RN(defaults are 'display' as flex and 'flexDirection' as column), in web css we'll have to specify the body container or container containing these as display: 'flex', flex-direction: 'column' like below:
container-containing-these-elements: {
display: flex,
flex-direction: column
}
header: {
height: 40,
},
middle-container: {
flex: 1, // this will take the rest of the space available.
},
footer: {
height: 100,
}
what if your wrapping div was 100% and you used padding for a pixel amount, then if the padding # needs to be dynamic, you can easily use jQuery to modify your padding amount when your events fire.
I had a similar issue where I wanted a banner across the top of the screen that had one image on the left and a repeating image on the right to the edge of the screen. I ended up resolving it like so:
CSS:
.banner_left {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 131px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url("left_image.jpg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.banner_right {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 131px;
right: 0px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url("right_repeating_image.jpg");
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: top left;
}
The key was the right tag. I'm basically specifying that I want it to repeat from 131px in from the left to 0px from the right.
In some contexts, you can leverage margin settings to effectively specify "100% width minus N pixels". See the accepted answer to this question.