Mysql query like number greater than x - mysql

I have a field for comments used to store the title of the item sold on the site as well as the bid number (bid_id). Unfortunately, the bid_id is not stored on its own in that table.
I want to query items that have a number (the bid_id) greater than 4,000 for example.
So, what I have is:
select * from mysql_table_name where comment like '< 4000'
I know this won't work, but I need something similar that works.
Thanks a lot!

Just get your bid_id column cleaned up. Then index is.
create table `prior`
( id int auto_increment primary key,
comments text not null
);
insert `prior` (comments) values ('asdfasdf adfas d d 93827363'),('mouse cat 12345678');
alter table `prior` add column bid_id int; -- add a nullable int column
select * from `prior`; -- bid_id is null atm btw
update `prior` set bid_id=right(comments,8); -- this will auto-cast to an int
select * from `prior`;
+----+-----------------------------+----------+
| id | comments | bid_id |
+----+-----------------------------+----------+
| 1 | asdfasdf adfas d d 93827363 | 93827363 |
| 2 | mouse cat 12345678 | 12345678 |
+----+-----------------------------+----------+
Create the index:
CREATE INDEX `idxBidId` ON `prior` (bid_id); -- or unique index

select * from mysql_table_name where substring(comment,start,length, signed integer) < 4000
This will work, but I suggest create new column and put the bid value in it then compare.
To update value in new column you can use
update table set newcol = substring(comment,start,length)
Hope this will help

There is nothing ready that works like that.
You could write a custom function or loadable UDF, but it would be a significant work, with significant impact on the database. Then you could run WHERE GET_BID_ID(comment) < 4000.
What you can do more easily is devise some way of extracting the bid_id using available string functions.
For example if the bid_id is always in the last ten characters, you can extract those, and replace all characters that are not digits with nil. What is left is the bid_id, and that you can compare.
Of course you need a complex expression with LENGTH(), SUBSTRING(), and REPLACE(). If the bid_id is between easily recognizable delimiters, then perhaps SUBSTRING_INDEX() is more your friend.
But better still... add an INTEGER column, initialize it to null, then store there the extracted bid_id. Or zero if you're positive there's no bid_id. Having data stored in mixed contexts is evil (and a known SQL antipattern to boot). Once you have the column available, you can select every few seconds a small number of items with new_bid_id still NULL and subject those to extraction, thereby gradually amending the database without overloading the system.
In practice
This is the same approach one would use with more complicated cases. We start by checking what we have (this is a test table)
SELECT commento FROM arti LIMIT 3;
+-----------------------------------------+
| commento |
+-----------------------------------------+
| This is the first comment 100 200 42500 |
| Another 7 Q 32768 |
| And yet another 200 15 55332 |
+-----------------------------------------+
So we need the last characters:
SELECT SUBSTRING(commento, LENGTH(commento)-5) FROM arti LIMIT 3;
+-----------------------------------------+
| SUBSTRING(commento, LENGTH(commento)-5) |
+-----------------------------------------+
| 42500 |
| 32768 |
| 55332 |
+-----------------------------------------+
This looks good but it is not; there's an extra space left before the ID. So 5 doesn't work, SUBSTRING is 1-based. No matter; we just use 4.
...and we're done.
mysql> SELECT commento FROM arti WHERE SUBSTRING(commento, LENGTH(commento)-4) < 40000;
+-------------------+
| commento |
+-------------------+
| Another 7 Q 32768 |
+-------------------+
mysql> SELECT commento FROM arti WHERE SUBSTRING(commento, LENGTH(commento)-4) BETWEEN 35000 AND 55000;
+-----------------------------------------+
| commento |
+-----------------------------------------+
| This is the first comment 100 200 42500 |
+-----------------------------------------+
The problem is if you have a number not of the same length (e.g. 300 and 131072). Then you need to take a slice large enough for the larger number, and if the number is short, you will get maybe "1 5 300" in your slice. That's where SUBSTRING_INDEX comes to the rescue: by capturing seven characters, from " 131072" to "1 5 300", the ID will always be in the last space separated token of the slice.
IN THIS LAST CASE, when numbers are not of the same length, you will find a problem. The extracted IDs are not numbers at all - to MySQL, they are strings. Which means that they are compared in lexicographic, not numerical, order; and "17534" is considered smaller than "202", just like "Alice" comes before "Bob". To overcome this you need to cast the string as unsigned integer, which further slows down the operations.
WHERE CAST( SUBSTRING(...) AS UNSIGNED) < 4000

Related

MySQL/MariaDB find one or more numbers in list, matching lottery numbers with past results

I have a MariaDB table with an archive of past lottery results, imagine EuroMillions or Powerball lotteries.
For example on EuroMillions numbers go from 1 to 50 and then the extra balls from 1 to 12, each result is 5 numbers form the main pool and 2 from the extra pool. So my historic results table could look like this:
Lottery Results table
(other columns like id, date, draw number, etc) | main_numbers | extra_numbers | (timestamp columns)
... | 1,2,3,4,5 | 1,2 | ...
... | 3,12,34,35,45 | 5,11 | ...
... | 4,15,34,39,45 | 10,11 | ...
... | 7,11,25,28,44 | 10,12 | ...
(you get the idea, I have thousands of records...)
So I could select main_numbers and get result "3,12,34,35,45" for that second example row. And for the extra_numbers I would get "5,11".
What I want is to given a set of numbers for main and extra to see if they match any of my results, finding any number of numbers (numbered lottery balls).
So for example if I SELECT to find main_numbers "5,9,22,34,45" with extra_numbers "2,11" I would get (from my extracted example) two records:
... | 3,12,34,35,45 | 5,11 | ...
... | 4,15,34,39,45 | 10,11 | ...
Matching two main numbers and one extra number, in this case finding lottery prizes in the results table. Makes sense?
I'm using MariaDB and I'm a bit lost on how to proceed, I tried WHERE IN, FIELD_IN_SET, etc.
Is there a way to perform a SELECT to find results in only one statement or do I have to pick all records and then iterate elsewhere, php for example?
My aim would be to have it in one statement, so I could just send the numbers and get the matching records... Possible?
I hope this makes sense.
Many thanks for your answers.
Consider the following.
For simplicity, let's say that a lottery comprises 3 main balls, and two bonus balls:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS lottery_results;
CREATE TABLE lottery_results
(draw_id INT NOT NULL
,ball_no INT NOT NULL
,ball_val INT NOT NULL
,PRIMARY KEY(draw_id,ball_no)
);
INSERT INTO lottery_results VALUES
(1,1,22),
(1,2,35),
(1,3,62),
(1,4,27),
(1,5,17),
(2,1,18),
(2,2,33),
(2,3,49),
(2,4, 4),
(2,5,35);
And we want to find all results where 34, 35, or 36 were drawn as a main number...
SELECT draw_id
FROM lottery_results
WHERE ball_no <=3
AND ball_val IN(34,35,36);
+---------+
| draw_id |
+---------+
| 1 |
+---------+
Thanks Strawberry,
I found a solution if I have all numbers in distinct columns, but could I find if they are in the same column in CSV?
So if I put my CSV in distinct columns for numbers (n_1...n_5) and extra numbers for the stars in (s_1, s_2) I can seek matched in those multiple columns.
This is using multiple columns:
To find matches numbers 1,2,3,4,5 with stars 1,2...
In EuroMillions you get a prize with 2 or more numbers and any star (one or two).
SELECT
main_numbers, extra_numbers,
((n_1 IN (1,2,3,4,5)) +
(n_2 IN (1,2,3,4,5)) +
(n_3 IN (1,2,3,4,5)) +
(n_4 IN (1,2,3,4,5)) +
(n_5 IN (1,2,3,4,5))) AS matched_numbers,
((s_1 IN (1,2)) +
(s_2 IN (1,2))) AS matched_stars,
created_at
FROM `lottery_results_archive`
HAVING matched_numbers >= 3 OR matched_numbers = 2 AND matched_stars > 0
ORDER BY matched_numbers DESC, matched_stars DESC, created_at DESC
Makes sense?
Thanks.

How to CAST a VARCHAR value to INT if the value is comma seperated

The MySQL database I am working with has a column with comma separated values similar to -
mysql> select * from performance;
+----+------------------+
| id | maximums |
+----+------------------+
| 1 | 10000RPM, 60KM/h |
| 2 | 5000RPM, 30KM/h |
| 3 | 25mph, 3000RPM |
| 4 | 200KM/h, 2000RPM |
+----+------------------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
I am trying to cast the numbers found in to their own INT columns.
mysql> select maximums,
CASE WHEN maximums like "%mph%" THEN CAST(SUBSTRING_INDEX(maximums, 'mph', 1) AS UNSIGNED) END AS mph_int,
CASE WHEN maximums like "%KM/h%" THEN CAST(SUBSTRING_INDEX(maximums, 'KM/h', 1) AS UNSIGNED) END AS kmh_int,
CASE WHEN maximums like "%RPM%" THEN CAST(SUBSTRING_INDEX(maximums, 'RPM', 1) AS UNSIGNED) END AS rpm_int
from performance;
+------------------+---------+---------+---------+
| maximums | mph_int | kmh_int | rpm_int |
+------------------+---------+---------+---------+
| 10000RPM, 60KM/h | NULL | 10000 | 10000 |
| 5000RPM, 30KM/h | NULL | 5000 | 5000 |
| 25mph, 3000RPM | 25 | NULL | 25 |
| 200KM/h, 2000RPM | NULL | 200 | 200 |
+------------------+---------+---------+---------+
4 rows in set, 4 warnings (0.00 sec)
I expect the output to show me the values as INTs in new columns, however am unsure how to achieve this.
Let's give this a whirl, using the good ol'-fashioned blunt instrument approach. I am guessing that you only need this to work once, to convert an old, poorly-designed schema into something more workable. Given that, I have made no effort at elegance or performance.
(If you are not using this to fix your data schema, you should, because the pain you are experiencing now is only the beginning.)
First, we need to split the maximums value into two pieces and process them separately. The first half is:
SUBSTRING_INDEX(`maximum`, ',', 1)
The second half is similar, but there is a stray space:
TRIM(SUBSTRING_INDEX(`maximum`, ',', -1))
From here on, let's just always trim, in case there is variation in the data. Now we need to see if the first section has 'mph' in it, and if so capture the value as you did in your question (this is essentially like your example but operating on only the first part of the maximum value):
IF(TRIM(SUBSTRING_INDEX(`maximum`, ',', 1)) LIKE '%mph', SUBSTRING_INDEX(TRIM(SUBSTRING_INDEX(`maximum`, ',', 1)), 'mph', 1), NULL)
Let's name that chunk of code "mph test on first half". The mph test on the second half is almost identical, just using -1 as the index. Finally, we need to put the non-null value (if either) into the column using COALESCE. Once we create all six variations of the test, we end up with the following:
SELECT
...
COALESCE([mph test on first half], [mph test on second half]) AS mph_int,
COALESCE([kph test on first half], [kph test on second half]) AS kph_int,
COALESCE([rpm test on first half], [rpm test on second half]) AS rpm_int
WHERE
...
Chances are you don't actually need to formally cast the string of digits into an integer; if you are inserting into a table with columns of those types, MySQL will cast the value for you.

MySQL ORDER BY Alphanumeric values, first all integers, then all alphas

searched around awhile for a solution to this problem, but no answer yet.
Have a column of alphanumeric model ID numbers to populate an index in a certain order. Two different attempts with the order they produced:
ORDER BY Model_ID ASC
1278-8
211E
350-50
996
3800P
AP23
AP263
AP26M
JA042
ORDER BY CAST(Model_ID AS UNSIGNED), Model_ID
AP23
AP263
AP26M
JA042
211E
350-50
996
1278-8
3800P
However, I need to have it sorted like so, with all of the integer-starting numbers exhausted first:
211E
350-50
996
1278-8
3800P
AP23
AP263
AP26M
JA042
Help? Thanks
For the sample data, this will get the desired order:
ORDER BY Model_ID+0=0, Model_ID+0, Model_ID ASC
Let's unpack that a bit.
The expression Model_ID+0 evaluates Model_ID in a numeric context, by adding zero to it. Basically, MySQL gets whatever leading characters that can be converted to a number, and disregards the rest. For values that can't be interpreted as a number, MySQL returns 0.
The first expression checks if the numeric value is zero, so those will be sorted last. (MySQL returns numeric value of 1 for boolean TRUE, 0 for FALSE.)
The second expression gets the non-zero values sorted in numeric order.
NOTE: these expressions "work" for the sample data; the edge case is values that have leading zeros as the numeric value, e.g. '000ABC' will be sorted after all the other "numeric" values. And MySQL doesn't stop at just the integer portion, if there's a dot character, that can be interpreted as a decimal point.
You can see the values of the expressions (for testing), by including them in the SELECT list, e.g.
SELECT Model_ID+0=0, Model_ID+0, ...
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS my_table;
CREATE TABLE my_table (model_id VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY);
INSERT INTO my_table VALUES
('1278-8'),
('211E'),
('350-50'),
('996'),
('3800P'),
('AP23'),
('AP263'),
('AP26M'),
('JA042');
SELECT model_id FROM my_table ORDER BY model_id + 0 = 0,model_id + 0;
+----------+
| model_id |
+----------+
| 211E |
| 350-50 |
| 996 |
| 1278-8 |
| 3800P |
| AP23 |
| AP263 |
| AP26M |
| JA042 |
+----------+

Iterating through MySQL rows

I have a simple MySQL table made up of words and an associated number. The numbers are unique for each word. I want to find the first word whose index is larger than a given number. As an example:
-----------------------
| WORD: | F_INDEX: |
|---------------------|
| a | 5 |
| cat | 12 |
| bat | 4002 |
-----------------------
If I was given the number "9" I would want "cat" returned, as it is the first word whose index is larger than 9.
I know that I can get a full list of sorted rows by querying:
SELECT * FROM table_name ORDER BY f_index;
But would, instead, like to make a MySQL query that does this. (The confusion lies in the fact that I'm unsure as to how to keep track of the current row in my query). I know can loop with something like this:
CREATE PROCEDURE looper(desired_index INT)
BEGIN
DECLARE current_index int DEFAULT 0
// Loop here, setting current_index to whatever the next rows index is,
// then do a comparison to check it to our desired_index, breaking out
// if it is greater.
END;
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Try this:
SELECT t.word
, t.f_index
FROM table_name t
WHERE t.f_index > 9
ORDER
BY t.f_index
LIMIT 1
It is much more efficient to have the database return the row you need, than it is to pull a whole bunch of rows and figure out which one you need.
For best performance of this query, you will want an index ON table_name (f_index,word).
Why don't you just use MYSQL statement to retrieve the first item you found from f_index where the f_index is greater than the value your pass in.
For example :
select word from table_name
where f_index > desired_index
order by f_index
limit 1

MySQL Update Field with some prefix

i have table have prefixed with bok- and inv-
id | number
1 | bok-1
2 | inv-3
3 | bok-2
4 | inv-2
5 | inv-10
6 | bok-3
How can it sorted the field number prefixed with inv-?
Which in this case the result will be:
id | number
1 | bok-1
2 | inv-1
3 | bok-2
4 | inv-2
5 | inv-3
6 | bok-3
You could just use MySQL's SUBSTRING() function:
ORDER BY CAST(SUBSTRING(number, 5) AS SIGNED)
See it on sqlfiddle.
However, it would probably be better to store the prefix and integer parts in separate columns, if at all possible:
ALTER TABLE mytable
ADD COLUMN prefix ENUM('bok', 'inv'),
ADD COLUMN suffix INT;
UPDATE mytable SET
prefix = LEFT(number, 3),
suffix = SUBSTRING(number, 5);
ALTER TABLE mytable
DROP COLUMN number;
Basically you should redesign your database structure. Unfortunately no other options possible processing this efficiently since the database won't index on those dashes. So separate both in 2 fields is the most common practice. Otherwise you will run table scans on every order by clause.
Edit: In addition to the information from the discussion you had: https://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/13241/discussion-between-eggyal-and-gusdecool it is clear that this is a wrong design and the operation you are asking for should not be executed at all.
It would be both impossible to realize it without created a decent structure and to create a solution this way which would be legally ok.