I have two MySQL statements (see below), I would like to combine them together so if they both result in a 1 then the end result will be 1. I'm not sure how to construct this and was hoping for some help.
select count(*)
from monitor
where name='job_starttime' and value < ( UNIX_TIMESTAMP( ) -600)
select count(*)
from monitor
where name='job_active' and value = 0
So for example I would like when both statements are true to result in a value of 1, if 1 or none are true it results in a 0.
Related
We are using MySQL 8 as our java application DB.
We have a query with the following format:
select
id,
group_concat(NAME ORDER BY ID separator ',,') AS Code,
CASE
WHEN MAX(p.VARIABLEfactor) = 1 THEN MAX(i.factor) ELSE MAX(p.factor) END AS factor
from MA_TABLE
join TABLE_P p on (...)
join TABLE_I i on (...)
group by id
The query worked very fine in our development environments until deploy with client where the factor column is getting null.
We have run the same query in the client environment from MySQL Workbench and we can see that the factor column is getting well populated.
After some debugging,we changed :
CASE
WHEN MAX(p.VARIABLEfactor) = 1 THEN MAX(i.factor) ELSE MAX(p.factor) END AS factor
to
MAX(
WHEN p.VARIABLEfactor = 1 THEN i.factor ELSE p.factor END ) AS factor,
and the query worked correctly.
Any help here please?
From your explanation I gather that you don't understand the difference of your two case expressions. But they are very different. Let's look at an example for one ID:
ID
VARIABLEfactor
i.factor
p.factor
100
0
null
10
100
1
null
20
Your expression
CASE WHEN MAX(p.VARIABLEfactor) = 1 THEN MAX(i.factor) ELSE MAX(p.factor) END
looks at the maximum VARIABLEfactor, which is 1, so the THEN case applies and the maximum i.factor is returned. This is null, as all i.factor are null.
Your expression
MAX(WHEN p.VARIABLEfactor = 1 THEN i.factor ELSE p.factor END)
looks at each row's VARIABLEfactor. For the first row this is 0, so the ELSE case applies and p.factor 10 is used. For the second row the VARIABLEfactor is 1, so its i.factor null gets used. Of these you take the maximum, which is 10.
To recap: The first expression is just a CASE expression on the aggregation results. It returns null here. The second expression is a conditional aggregation. It returns 10 for the sample data.
I've the following data.
What I need like below
I need to minus order by 1 with 2.
Example : (1-2) and I've display the result in order by 3.
If the branch having order_by as 1 - display as it is.
Using MySQL, how can I get this result?
You can get this result with a UNION query. The first part selects all rows from your table, the second uses a self-join to find branches which have order_by values of both 1 and 2, and subtracts their due values to get the new due value:
SELECT *
FROM data
UNION ALL
SELECT 3, d1.branch, d1.due - d2.due
FROM data d1
JOIN data d2 ON d2.branch = d1.branch AND d2.order_by = 2
WHERE d1.order_by = 1
ORDER BY branch, order_by
Demo on dbfiddle
I've got some troubles about SQL request :
I have a table like this table data image
I would like to create a view from this table to get :
Time_A : SUM of a column (total_time_taken) WHERE column (is_radiant)=1
Time_B : SUM of the same column (total_time_taken) WHERE column (is_radiant)=0
Time_AB : SUM of the column (total_time_taken) WHERE column (is_radiant)=0 OR (is_radiant)=1
SELECT
SUM(`matchpickban_radiant`.`total_time_taken`) AS `draft_time_radiant`,
SUM(`matchpickban_dire`.`total_time_taken`) AS `draft_time_radiant`
FROM
(`matchpickban` AS `matchpickban_radiant`
JOIN `matchpickban` AS `matchpickban_dire` ON ((`matchpickban_dire`.`idmatchpickban` = `matchpickban_radiant`.`idmatchpickban`)))
WHERE
`matchpickban_radiant`.`is_radiant` = 1
AND `matchpickban_dire`.`is_radiant` = 0
Actually I can run this request without syntax error but the result is NULL cause no data can be equal to 0 AND equal to 1 in the same time, obviously...
Also, I don't know if it's possible to make a JOIN the table to itself as I did (matchpickban JOIN matchpickban).
If syntax is correct I need to place my WHERE CONDITION away but don't know how, is it possible to replace it with 2 IF statement (IF is_radiant=0 SUM(...))
Thx for reading and helping me about this issue I got !
If you need more info about table or request I will give you all you need !
No need for a self-join or complex logic, you can just use conditional aggregation, which consists in using conditional expression within aggregate functions.
In MySQL, you could go:
select
sum(is_radiant * total_time_taken) time_a,
sum((1 - is_radiant) * total_time_taken) time_b,
sum(total_time_taken) time_ab
from matchpickban
where is_radiant in (0, 1)
This works because is_radiant is made of 0/1 values only - so this simplifies the logic. A more canonical way to phrase the conditional sums would be:
sum(case when is_radiant = 1 then total_time_taken else 0 end) time_a,
sum(case when is_radiant = 0 then total_time_taken else 0 end) time_b,
Suppose I have a table :
start_range end_range
1 4
4 8
I want the result to be true if it is greater than any of the value of start_range and less than any of the corresponding end_range.
Eg.
value 2 should return true , as 2>1 and 2<4
but value 4 should return false in this case as 4>1 but 4<4 becomes false, as well as 4>4 becomes false for the second case.
I cannot use the query
SELECT Sumthing
FROM XYZ
WHERE value> SOME(start_range) AND value < SOME(end_range)
The problem with the above query is let say value = 4.
Now 4> SOME(start_range) will become true as 4>1. AND
4< SOME(end_range) will also become true as 4<8.
But in actual the comparison should be like (((4>1)AND(4<4)) OR ((4>4)AND(4<8))) . It should return false.
One more thing , the above table is not persistent , I have been creating it in a subquery.Thats why i have been using SOME.
if still my question isn't clear, mention in comments.
Assuming that xyz is your table:
select (count(*) > 0) as HasMatch
from xyz
where value > start_range and value < end_range;
I'm not sure why you are using some.
EDIT:
It occurs to me that you want to use subqueries, and xyz is not the table in question. Perhaps this is what you want:
select xyz.*
from xyz
where exists (select 1
from (<your query here>) t
where xyz.value > t.start_range and xyz.value < t.end_range
);
you can do something like this
SELECT CASE WHEN start_range<value and end_range>value
THEN 'true'
ELSE 'false'
END here_name_to_this_column(optional)
FROM table_name
tutorial link
select (count(*) > 0) as HasMatch
from (select IF(start_range<value and end_range>value, true, false ) as value
from XYZ having value =1) as MatchTable
DEMO
Couldn't really explain my problem with words, but with an example I can show it clearly:
I have a table like this:
id num val flag
0 3 10 1
1 5 12 2
2 7 12 1
3 11 15 2
And I want to go through all the rows, and calculate the increase of the "num", and multiply that difference with the "val" value. And when I calculated all of these, I want to add these results together, but grouped based on the "flag" values.
This is the mathematical equation, that I want to run on the table:
Result_1 = (3-0)*10 + (7-3)*12
Result_2 = (5-0)*12 + (11-5)*15
78 = Result_1
150 = Result_2
Thank you.
Interesting question. Unfortunately MYSQL doesn't support recursive queries, so you'll need to be a little creative here. Something like this could work:
select flag,
sum(calc)
from (
select flag,
(num-if(#prevflag=flag,#prevnum,0))*val calc,
#prevnum:=num prevnum,
#prevflag:=flag prevflag
from yourtable
join (select #prevnum := 0, #prevflag := 0) t
order by flag
) t
group by flag
SQL Fiddle Demo