With the help of jq i would like to select all addresses of nodes that have at least one required=true in their attribute list. The result list should have unique items.
Here is my Json:
{
"nodes": [
{
"address":"127.0.0.1",
"attributes": [
{
"id":"abc",
"required":true
},
{
"id":"def",
"required":true
},
{
"id":"ghi",
"required":false
}
]
},
{
"address":"127.0.0.2",
"attributes": [
{
"id":"abc",
"required":false
},
{
"id":"def",
"required":false
}
]
}
]
}
I first tried with:
jq '.nodes[] | select(.attributes[].required == true) | .address'
This produces:
"127.0.0.1"
"127.0.0.1"
So it gets the address for every required=true field it finds in the attributes section. How to make the result list unique? There is also a unique keyword in jq, but I couldn't figure out how this could help me.
Using unique is safe but it does require sorting, which may not be necessary. In your particular case, for example, the repetition is an artifact of the jq query. Consider using any instead (or as well), as it more precisely captures the intention ("at least one"), as well as having "short-circuit" semantics (i.e., it stops searching once the condition is true):
$ jq '.nodes[]
| select( any(.attributes[]; .required == true))
| .address' input.json
Output:
"127.0.0.1"
You can always add unique if necessary.
Related
This works to search for tactics that equal "impact". However, it will only pull the objects themselves.
jq '.techniques[] | select(.tactic == "impact")'
Is there no way to use select while walking through json with something like jq '. | select(.techniques[].tactic == "impact")'? I'm guessing the issue is that something like that, even if it works, still does not explicitly say to leave the previous items as well.
It is not viable to manually rebuild the parent.
input
{
"viewMode": 0,
"hideDisabled": false,
"techniques": [
{
"name": "john",
"tactic": "reconnaissance"
},
{
"name": "jane",
"tactic": "impact"
},
{
"name": "jill",
"tactic": "execution"
}
],
"karma": "yes"
}
desired output
{
"viewMode": 0,
"hideDisabled": false,
"techniques": [
{
"name": "jane",
"tactic": "impact"
}
],
"karma": "yes"
}
If this is so remedial that it warrants no response, I'll figure it out and update. It seems like the most basic thing. I'll also be doing a !=, which also works fine normally, but doesn't capture the entire body.
I have tried using variables to do it, which get me close;
jq '{techniques: [.techniques[] | select(.tactic == "impact")]} as $a| $a' test.json
However, trying to add a key "techniques" to that array ruins my ability to use it;
jq '{techniques: [.techniques[] | select(.tactic == "impact")]} as $a| $a + [.]' test.json
jq: error (at test.json:19): object ({"technique...) and array ([{"viewMode...) cannot be added
|= is your friend, e.g.
.techniques |= map(select(.tactic == "impact"))
Given the following input JSON:
{
"version": 2,
"models": [
{
"name": "first_table",
"tests": [
{
"dbt_utils.equal_rowcount": {
"compare_model": null
}
}
]
},
{
"name": "second_table",
"tests": [
{
"dbt_utils.equal_rowcount": {
"compare_model": null
}
}
]
}
]
}
How would I, using jq, replace the null (i.e., the value of "compare_model") with the value from the "name" key? Note that the key-value pairs in question here are not at the same level in the hierarchy: the former is nested in an object in an array, and it is this array that is at the same level as the latter.
For example, the output file should read:
{
"version": 2,
"models": [
{
"name": "first_table",
"tests": [
{
"dbt_utils.equal_rowcount": {
"compare_model": "first_table"
}
}
]
},
{
"name": "second_table",
"tests": [
{
"dbt_utils.equal_rowcount": {
"compare_model": "second_table"
}
}
]
}
]
}
FWIW, this is an intermediate step in some YAML (via yq, the Python wrapper variety of jq as opposed to the go variant) wrangling I'm doing on DBT config files.
(Bonus points if you can wrap the replacement text with parentheses and/or prefix it without breaking out of jq. :D If not, no worries -- this step I can do with another program.)
Needless to say, but your help is very much appreciated!
The key to a simple solution is to use |=, e.g.
.models |=
map(.name as $name
| (.tests[]."dbt_utils.equal_rowcount".compare_model =
$name))
To wrap the replacement value in parentheses, just add them:
.models |=
map("(\(.name))" as $name
| (.tests[]."dbt_utils.equal_rowcount".compare_model =
$name))
If you want the replacement to be conditional on the existing value being null, you could perhaps (depending on the exact requirements) use //=.
Using //= and walk
Here's another take on the problem:
.models
|= map("(\(.name))" as $name
| walk(if type=="object" and has("compare_model")
then .compare_model //= $name
else . end))
That the fields are not at the same level doesn't really matter here.
.models[] |= (.tests[]."dbt_utils.equal_rowcount".compare_model = "(\(.name))")
Online demo
I have a file containing the following structure and unknown number of results:
{
"results": [
[
{
"field": "AccountID",
"value": "5177497"
},
{
"field": "Requests",
"value": "50900"
}
],
[
{
"field": "AccountID",
"value": "pro"
},
{
"field": "Requests",
"value": "251"
}
]
],
"statistics": {
"Matched": 51498,
"Scanned": 8673577,
"ScannedByte": 2.72400814E10
},
"status": "HOLD"
}
{
"results": [
[
{
"field": "AccountID",
"value": "5577497"
},
{
"field": "Requests",
"value": "51900"
}
],
"statistics": {
"Matched": 51498,
"Scanned": 8673577,
"ScannedByte": 2.72400814E10
},
"status": "HOLD"
}
There are multiple such results which are indexed as an array with the results folder. They are not seperated by a comma.
I am trying to just print The "AccountID" sorted by "Requests" in ZSH using jq. I have tried flattening them and using:
jq -r '.results[][0] |.value ' filename
jq -r '.results[][1] |.value ' filename
To get the Account ID and Requests seperately and sorting them. I don't think bash has a dictionary that can be used. The problem lies in the file as the Field and value are not key value pair but are both pairs. Therefore extracting them using the above two lines into seperate arrays and sorting by the second array seems a bit too long. I was wondering if there is a way to combine both the operations.
The other way is to combine it all to a string and sort it in ascending order. Python would probably have the best solution but the code requires to be a zsh or bash script.
Solutions that use sed, jq or any other ZSH supported compilers are welcome. If there is a way to create a dictionary in bash, please do let me know.
The projectd output requirement is just the Account ID vs Request Number.
5577497 has 51900 requests
5177497 has 50900 requests
pro has 251 requests
If you don't mind learning a little jq, it will probably be best to write a small jq program to do what you want.
To get you started, consider the following jq program, which assumes your input is a stream of valid JSON objects with a "results" key similar to your sample:
[inputs | .results[] | map( { (.field) : .value} ) | add]
After making minor changes to your input so that it consists of valid JSON objects, an invocation of jq with the -n option produces an array of AccountID/Requests objects:
[
{
"AccountID": "5177497",
"Requests": "50900"
},
{
"AccountID": "pro",
"Requests": "251"
},
{
"AccountID": "5577497",
"Requests": "51900"
}
]
You could (for example) now use jq's group_by to group these objects by AccountID, and thereby produce the result you want.
jq -S '.results[] | map( { (.field) : .value} ) | add' query-results-aggregate \
| jq -s -c 'group_by(.number_of_requests) | .[]'
This does the trick. Thanks to peak for the guidance.
I have the following JSON
[
{
"name": "alpha"
},
{
"fields": [
{
"name": "beta_sub_1"
},
{
"name": "beta_sub_2"
}
],
"name": "beta"
},
{
"fields": [
{
"fields": [
{
"name": "gamma_sub_sub_1"
}
],
"name": "gamma_sub_1"
}
],
"name": "gamma"
}
]
and I would like to get the paths of "name" needed to get to each "name" values. Considering the above code, I would like the following result:
"alpha"
"beta.beta_sub_1"
"beta.beta_sub_2"
"beta"
"gamma.gamma_sub_1.gamma_sub_sub_1"
"gamma.gamma_sub_1"
"gamma"
I've been searching around but I couldn't get to this result. So far, I have this:
tostream as [$p,$v] | select($p[-1] == "name" and $v != null) | "\([$p[0,1]] | join(".")).\($v)"
but this gives me the path with the key name of the parents (and doesn't keep all the intermediary parents.
"0.name.alpha"
"1.fields.beta_sub_1"
"1.fields.beta_sub_2"
"1.name.beta"
"2.fields.gamma_sub_sub_1"
"2.fields.gamma_sub_1"
"2.name.gamma"
Any ideas?
P.S.: I've been searching for very detailed doc on jq but couldn't find anything good enough. If anyone has any recommendations, I'd appreciate.
The problem description does not seem to match the sample input and output, but the following jq program produces the required output:
def descend:
select( type == "object" and has("name") )
| if has("fields") then ([.name] + (.fields[] | descend)) else empty end,
[.name] ;
.[]
| descend
| join(".")
With your input, and using the -r command-line option, this produces:
alpha
beta.beta_sub_1
beta.beta_sub_2
beta
gamma.gamma_sub_1.gamma_sub_sub_1
gamma.gamma_sub_1
gamma
Resources
Apart from the jq manual, FAQ, and Cookbook, you might find the following helpful:
"jq Language Description"
"A Stream-Oriented Introduction to jq"
I have a hierarchically deep JSON object created by a scientific instrument, so the file is somewhat large (1.3MB) and not readily readable by people. I would like to get a list of keys, up to a certain depth, for the JSON object. For example, given an input object like this
{
"acquisition_parameters": {
"laser": {
"wavelength": {
"value": 632,
"units": "nm"
}
},
"date": "02/03/2525",
"camera": {}
},
"software": {
"repo": "github.com/username/repo",
"commit": "a7642f",
"branch": "develop"
},
"data": [{},{},{}]
}
I would like an output like such.
{
"acquisition_parameters": [
"laser",
"date",
"camera"
],
"software": [
"repo",
"commit",
"branch"
]
}
This is mainly for the purpose of being able to enumerate what is in a JSON object. After processing the JSON objects from the instrument begin to diverge: for example, some may have a field like .frame.cross_section.stats.fwhm, while others may have .sample.species, so it would be convenient to be able to interrogate the JSON object on the command line.
The following should do exactly what you want
jq '[(keys - ["data"])[] as $key | { ($key): .[$key] | keys }] | add'
This will give the following output, using the input you described above:
{
"acquisition_parameters": [
"camera",
"date",
"laser"
],
"software": [
"branch",
"commit",
"repo"
]
}
Given your purpose you might have an easier time using the paths builtin to list all the paths in the input and then truncate at the desired depth:
$ echo '{"a":{"b":{"c":{"d":true}}}}' | jq -c '[paths|.[0:2]]|unique'
[["a"],["a","b"]]
Here is another variation uing reduce and setpath which assumes you have a specific set of top-level keys you want to examine:
. as $v
| reduce ("acquisition_parameters", "software") as $k (
{}; setpath([$k]; $v[$k] | keys)
)