In a very large nested json structure I'm trying to find all of the paths that end in a key.
ex:
{
"A": {
"A1": {
"foo": {
"_": "_"
}
},
"A2": {
"_": "_"
}
},
"B": {
"B1": {}
},
"foo": {
"_": "_"
}
}
would print something along the lines of:
["A","A1","foo"], ["foo"]
Unfortunately I don't know at what level of nesting the keys will appear, so I haven't been able to figure it out with a simple select. I've gotten close with jq '[paths] | .[] | select(contains(["foo"]))', but the output contains all the permutations of any tree that contains foo.
output: ["A", "A1", "foo"]["A", "A1", "foo", "_"]["foo"][ "foo", "_"]
Bonus points if I could keep the original data structure format but simply filter out all paths that don't contain the key (in this case the sub trees under "foo" wouldn't need to be hidden).
With your input:
$ jq -c 'paths | select(.[-1] == "foo")'
["A","A1","foo"]
["foo"]
Bonus points:
(1) If your jq has tostream:
$ jq 'fromstream(tostream| select(.[0]|index("foo")))'
Or better yet, since your input is large, you can use the streaming parser (jq -n --stream) with this filter:
fromstream( inputs|select( (.[0]|index("foo"))))
(2) Whether or not your jq has tostream:
. as $in
| reduce (paths(scalars) | select(index("foo"))) as $p
(null; setpath($p; $in|getpath($p)))
In all three cases, the output is:
{
"A": {
"A1": {
"foo": {
"_": "_"
}
}
},
"foo": {
"_": "_"
}
}
I had the same fundamental problem.
With (yaml) input like:
developer:
android:
members:
- alice
- bob
oncall:
- bob
hr:
members:
- charlie
- doug
this:
is:
really:
deep:
nesting:
members:
- example deep nesting
I wanted to find all arbitrarily nested groups and get their members.
Using this:
yq . | # convert yaml to json using python-yq
jq '
. as $input | # Save the input for later
. | paths | # Get the list of paths
select(.[-1] | tostring | test("^(members|oncall|priv)$"; "ix")) | # Only find paths which end with members, oncall, and priv
. as $path | # save each path in the $path variable
( $input | getpath($path) ) as $members | # Get the value of each path from the original input
{
"key": ( $path | join("-") ), # The key is the join of all path keys
"value": $members # The value is the list of members
}
' |
jq -s 'from_entries' | # collect kv pairs into a full object using slurp
yq --sort-keys -y . # Convert back to yaml using python-yq
I get output like this:
developer-android-members:
- alice
- bob
developer-android-oncall:
- bob
hr-members:
- charlie
- doug
this-is-really-deep-nesting-members:
- example deep nesting
Related
Using jq I can extract the data in this simple way as follows:
find . -name '*.jsonl' | xargs -I {} jq '[.data.Item_A_Foo.value, .data.Item_A_Bar.value] | #tsv' >> foobar.tsv
find . -name '*.jsonl' | xargs -I {} jq '[.data.Item_B_Foo.value, .data.Item_B_Bar.value] | #tsv' >> foobar.tsv
find . -name '*.jsonl' | xargs -I {} jq '[.data.Item_B_Foo.value, .data.Item_B_Bar.value] | #tsv' >> foobar.tsv
...
# and so on
But this seems pretty wasteful. Is there a more advanced way to use JQ, and perhaps:
Filter for .data.Item_*_Foo.value, .data.Item_*_Bar.value
OR chain these rows in a single jq expression (reasonably readable, compact)
# Here is a made up JSON file that can motivate this question.
# Imagine there are 100,000 of these and they are larger.
{
"data":
{
"Item_A_Foo": {
"adj": "wild",
"adv": "unruly",
"value": "unknown"
},
"Item_A_Bar": {
"adj": "rotund",
"quality": "mighty",
"value": "swing"
},
"Item_B_Foo": {
"adj": "nice",
"adv": "heroically",
"value": "medium"
},
... etc. for many Foo's and Bar's of A, B, C, ..., Z types
"Not_an_Item": {
"value": "doesn't matter"
}
}
And the goal is:
unknown, swing # data.Item_A_Foo.value, data.Item_A_Bar.value
medium, hit # data.Item_B_Foo.value, data.Item_B_Bar.value
whatever, etc. # data.Item_C_Foo.value, data.Item_C_Bar.value
The details of your requirements are unclear, but you could proceed along the lines suggested by this jq filter:
.data
| (keys_unsorted|map(select(test("^Item_[^_]*_Foo$")))) as $foos
| ($foos | map(sub("_Foo$"; "_Bar"))) as $bars
| [ .[$foos[]].value, .[$bars[]].value]
| #tsv
The idea is to determine dynamically which keys to select.
I am attempting to parse a JSON structure to extract a dependency path, for use in an automation script.
The structure of this JSON is extracted to a format like this:
[
{
"Id": "abc",
"Dependencies": [
]
},
{
"Id": "def",
"Dependencies": [
"abc"
]
},
{
"Id": "ghi",
"Dependencies": [
"def"
]
}
]
Note: Lots of other irrelevant fields removed.
The plan is to be able to pass into my JQ command the Id of one of these and get back out a list.
Eg:
Input: abc
Expected Output: []
Input: def
Expected Output: ["abc"]
Input: ghi
Expected Output: ["abc", "def"]
Currently have a jq script like this (https://jqplay.org/s/NAhuXNYXXO):
jq
'. as $original | .[] |
select(.Id == "INPUTVARIABLE") |
[.Dependencies[]] as $level1Dep | [$original[] | select( [ .Id == $level1Dep[] ] | any )] as $level1Full | $level1Full[] |
[.Dependencies[]] as $level2Dep | [$original[] | select ( [ .Id == $level2Dep[] ] | any )] as $level2Full |
[$level1Dep[], $level2Dep[]]'
Input: abc
Output: empty
Input: def
Output: ["abc"]
Input: ghi
Output: ["def","abc"]
Great! However, as you can see this is not particularly scale-able and will only handle two dependency levels (https://jqplay.org/s/Zs0xIvJ2Zn), and also falls apart horribly when there are multiple dependencies on an item (https://jqplay.org/s/eB9zHQSH2r).
Is there a way of constructing this within JQ or do I need to move out to a different language?
I know that the data cannot have circular dependencies, it is pulled from a database that enforces this.
It's trivial then. Reduce your input JSON down to an object where each Id and corresponding Dependencies array are paired, and walk through it aggregating dependencies using a recursive function.
def deps($depdb; $id):
def _deps($id): $depdb[$id] // empty
| . + map(_deps(.)[]);
_deps($id);
deps(map({(.Id): .Dependencies}) | add; $fid)
Invocation:
jq -c --arg fid 'ghi' -f prog.jq file
Online demo - arbitrary dependency levels
Online demo - multiple dependencies per Id
Here's a short program that handles circular dependencies efficiently and illustrates how a subfunction can be defined after the creation of a local variable (here, $next) for efficiency:
def dependents($x):
(map( {(.Id): .Dependencies}) | add) as $next
# Input: array of dependents computed so far
# Output: array of all dependents
| def tc($x):
($next[$x] - .) as $new
| if $new == [] then .
else (. + $new | unique)
# avoid calling unique again:
| . + ([tc($new[])[]] - .)
end ;
[] | tc($x);
dependents($start)
Usage
With the given input and an invocation such as
jq --arg start START -f program.jq input.json
the output for various values of START is:
START output
abc []
def ["abc"]
ghi ["def", "abc"]
If the output must be sorted, then simply add a call to sort.
How might one use jq-1.5-1-a5b5cbe to join a filtered set of arrays from STDIN to a set of objects which contains no common fields, assuming that all elements will be in predictable order?
Standard Input (pre-slurpfile; generated by multiple GETs):
{"ref":"objA","arr":["alpha"]}
{"ref":"objB","arr":["bravo"]}
Existing File:
[{"name":"foo"},{"name":"bar"}]
Desired Output:
[{"name":"foo","arr":["alpha"]},{"name":"bar","arr":["bravo"]}]
Current Bash:
$ multiGET | jq --slurpfile stdin /dev/stdin '.[].arr = $stdin[].arr' file
[
{
"name": "foo",
"arr": [
"alpha"
]
},
{
"name": "bar",
"arr": [
"alpha"
]
}
]
[
{
"name": "foo",
"arr": [
"bravo"
]
},
{
"name": "bar",
"arr": [
"bravo"
]
}
]
Sidenote: I wasn't sure when to use pretty/compact JSON in this question; please comment with your opinion on best practice.
Get jq to read file before stdin, so that the first entity in file will be . and you can get everything else using inputs.
$ multiGET | jq -c '. as $objects
| [ foreach (inputs | {arr}) as $x (-1; .+1;
. as $i | $objects[$i] + $x
) ]' file -
[{"name":"foo","arr":["alpha"]},{"name":"bar","arr":["bravo"]}]
"Slurping" (whether using -s or --slurpfile) is sometimes necessary but rarely desirable, because of the memory requirements. So here's a solution that takes advantage of the fact that your multiGET produces a stream:
multiGET | jq -n --argjson objects '[{"name":"foo"},{"name":"bar"}]' '
$objects
| [foreach inputs as $in (-1; .+1;
. as $ix
| $objects[$ix] + ($in | del(.ref)))]
'
Here's a functional approach that might be appropriate if your stream was in fact already packaged as an array:
multiGET | jq -s --argjson objects '[{"name":"foo"},{"name":"bar"}]' '
[$objects, map(del(.ref))]
| transpose
| map(add)
'
If the $objects array is in a file or too big for the command line, I'd suggest using --argfile, even though it is technically deprecated.
If the $objects array is in a file, and if you want to avoid --argfile, you could still avoid slurping, e.g. by using the fact that unless -n is used, jq will automatically read one JSON entity from stdin:
(echo '[{"name":"foo"},{"name":"bar"}]';
multiGET) | jq '
. as $objects
| [foreach inputs as $in (-1; .+1;
. as $ix | $objects[$ix] + $in | del(.ref))]
'
I am trying to create JSON from scratch using bash.
The final structure needs to be like:
{
"hosts": {
"a_hostname" : {
"ips" : [
1,
2,
3
]
},
{...}
}
}
First I'm creating an input file with the format:
hostname ["1.1.1.1","2.2.2.2"]
host-name2 ["3.3.3.3","4.4.4.4"]
This is being created by:
for host in $( ansible -i hosts all --list-hosts ) ; \
do echo -n "${host} " ; \
ansible -i hosts $host -m setup | sed '1c {' | jq -r -c '.ansible_facts.ansible_all_ipv4_addresses' ; \
done > hosts.txt
The key point here is that the IP list/array, is coming from a JSON file and being extracted by jq. This extraction outputs an already valid / quoted JSON array, but as a string in a txt file.
Next I'm using jq to parse the whole text file into the desired JSON:
jq -Rn '
{ "hosts": [inputs |
split("\\s+"; "g") |
select(length > 0 and .[0] != "") |
{(.[0]):
{ips:.[1]}
}
] | add }
' < ~/hosts.txt
This is almost correct, everything except for the IPs value which is treated as a string and quoted leading to:
{
"hosts": {
"hostname1": {
"ips": "[\"1.1.1.1\",\"2.2.2.2\"]"
},
"host-name2": {
"ips": "[\"3.3.3.3\",\"4.4.4.4\"]"
}
}
}
I'm now stuck at this final hurdle - how to insert the IPs without causing them to be quoted again.
Edit - quoting solved by using {ips: .[1] | fromjson }} instead of {ips:.[1]}.
However this was completely negated by #CharlesDuffy's help suggesting converting to TSV.
Original Q body:
So far I've got to
jq -n {hosts:{}} | \
for host in $( ansible -i hosts all --list-hosts ) ; \
do jq ".hosts += {$host:{}}" | \
jq ".hosts.$host += {ips:[1,2,3]}" ; \
done ;
([1,2,3] is actually coming from a subshell but including it seemed unnecessary as that part works, and made it harder to read)
This sort of works, but there seems to be 2 problems.
1) Final output only has a single host in it containg data from the first host in the list (this persists even if the second problem is bypassed):
{
"hosts": {
"host_1": {
"ips": [
1,
2,
3
]
}
}
}
2) One of the hostnames has a - in it, which causes syntax and compiler errors from jq. I'm stuck going around quote hell trying to get it to be interpreted but also quoted. Help!
Thanks for any input.
Let's say your input format is:
host_1 1 2 3
host_2 2 3 4
host-with-dashes 3 4 5
host-with-no-addresses
...re: edit specifying a different format: Add #tsv onto the JQ command producing the existing format to generate this one instead.
If you want to transform that to the format in question, it might look like:
jq -Rn '
{ "hosts": [inputs |
split("\\s+"; "g") |
select(length > 0 and .[0] != "") |
{(.[0]): .[1:]}
] | add
}' <input.txt
Which yields as output:
{
"hosts": {
"host_1": [
"1",
"2",
"3"
],
"host_2": [
"2",
"3",
"4"
],
"host-with-dashes": [
"3",
"4",
"5"
],
"host-with-no-addresses": []
}
}
I receive the following input file:
input.json:
[
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:00:00","VALUE":10,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:15:00","VALUE":18,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:30:00","VALUE":160,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"bbb_0021122","time_CET":"00:00:00","VALUE":null,"FLAG":"?"},
{"ID":"bbb_0021122","time_CET":"00:15:00","VALUE":null,"FLAG":"?"},
{"ID":"bbb_0021122","time_CET":"00:30:00","VALUE":22,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"ccc_0021122","time_CET":"00:00:00","VALUE":null,"FLAG":"?"},
{"ID":"ccc_0021122","time_CET":"00:15:00","VALUE":null,"FLAG":"?"},
{"ID":"ccc_0021122","time_CET":"00:30:00","VALUE":20,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"ddd_122455","time_CET":"00:00:00","VALUE":null,"FLAG":"?"},
{"ID":"ddd_122455","time_CET":"00:15:00","VALUE":null,"FLAG":"?"},
{"ID":"ddd_122455","time_CET":"00:30:00","VALUE":null,"FLAG":"?"},
]
As you can see there are some valid values (FLAG: 0) and some invalid values (FLAG: "?").
Now I got a file looking like this (one for each ID):
aaa.json:
[
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:00:00","VALUE":10,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:15:00","VALUE":null,"FLAG":"?"},
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:55:00","VALUE":45,"FLAG":"0"}
]
As you can see, object one is the same as in input.json but object two is invalid (FLAG: "?"). That's why object two has to be replaced by the correct object from input.json (with VALUE:18).
Objects can be identified by "time_CET" and "ID" element.
Additionally, there will be new objects in input.json, that have not been part of aaa.json etc. These objects should be added to the array, and valid objects from aaa.json should be kept.
In the end, aaa.json should look like this:
[
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:00:00","VALUE":10,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:15:00","VALUE":18,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:30:00","VALUE":160,"FLAG":"0"},
{"ID":"aaa_12301248","time_CET":"00:55:00","VALUE":45,"FLAG":"0"}
]
So, to summarize:
look for FLAG: "?" in aaa.json
replace this object with matching object from input.json using "ID"
and "time_CET" for mapping.
Keep exisiting valid objects and add objects from input.json that
did not exist in aaa.json before (this means only objects starting
with "aaa" in "ID" field)
repeat this for bbb.json, ccc.json and ddd.json
I am not sure if it's possible to get this done all at once with a command like this, because the output has to go to back to the correct id files (aaa, bbb ccc.json):
jq --argfile aaa aaa.json --argfile bbb bbb.json .... -f prog.jq input.json
The problem is, that the number after the identifier (aaa, bbb, ccc etc.) may change. So to make sure objects are added to the correct file/array, a statement like this would be required:
if (."ID"|contains("aaa")) then ....
Or is it better to run the program several times with different input parameters? I am not sure..
Thank you in advance!!
Here is one approach
#!/bin/bash
# usage: update.sh input.json aaa.json bbb.json....
# updates each of aaa.json bbb.json....
input_json="$1"
shift
for i in "$#"; do
jq -M --argfile input_json "$input_json" '
# functions to restrict input.json to keys of current xxx.json file
def prefix: input_filename | split(".")[0];
def selectprefix: select(.ID | startswith(prefix));
# functions to build and probe a lookup table
def pk: [.ID, .time_CET];
def lookup($t;$k): $t | getpath($k);
def lookup($t): lookup($t;pk);
def organize(s): reduce s as $r ({}; setpath($r|pk; $r));
# functions to identify objects in input.json missing from xxx.json
def pks: paths | select(length==2);
def missing($t1;$t2): [$t1|pks] - [$t2|pks] | .[];
def getmissing($t1;$t2): [ missing($t1;$t2) as $p | lookup($t1;$p)];
# main routine
organize(.[]) as $xxx
| organize($input_json[] | selectprefix) as $inp
| map(if .FLAG != "?" then . else . += lookup($inp) end)
| . + getmissing($inp;$xxx)
' "$i" | sponge "$i"
done
The script uses jq in a loop to read and update each aaa.json... file.
The filter creates temporary objects to facilitate looking up values by [ID,time_CET], updates any values in the aaa.json with a FLAG=="?" and finally adds any values from input.json that are missing in aaa.json.
The temporary lookup table for input.json uses input_filename so that only keys starting with a prefix matching the name of the currently processed file will be included.
Sample Run:
$ ./update.sh input.json aaa.json
aaa.json after run:
[
{
"ID": "aaa_12301248",
"time_CET": "00:00:00",
"VALUE": 10,
"FLAG": "0"
},
{
"ID": "aaa_12301248",
"time_CET": "00:15:00",
"VALUE": 18,
"FLAG": "0"
},
{
"ID": "aaa_12301248",
"time_CET": "00:55:00",
"VALUE": 45,
"FLAG": "0"
},
{
"ID": "aaa_12301248",
"time_CET": "00:30:00",
"VALUE": 160,
"FLAG": "0"
}
]