I have the following HTML structure:
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="some-id"></div>
"this is some texxt"
<div id="some-id-2"></div>
</div>
How can I remove the text with CSS?
Can't think of a very good way to do so, but
#wrapper {
font-size:0;
}
Would work.
Notice, that if the other two divs have text anywhere inside them, you will need to redefine new font-size for them, since it will be overwritten.
Not sure if this will work on every browser, but you should give it a shot.
#wrapper {
text-indent: 100%;
white-space: nowrap;
overflow: hidden;
}
It is accessible, and has much better performance than changing the font size.
More here - Replacing the -9999 font
Its not sexy - but it works - and I am assuming that you want the two divs, but not the text in the middle. If you can only affect the content with CSS (and not javascript / jquery) - then you could try the following. Force the background of the second div to be white and move it up by 1em using position relative / top -1em. That way it will cover over the offending text.
As I said - not sexy and I do NOT recommend using this - far better to find a way of actually modifying the content of the #wrapper div.
#some-id-2{
background:white;
display:block;
position:relative;
top:-1em}
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="some-id">text content 1</div>
"this is some texxt"
<div id="some-id-2">text content 2</div>
</div>
I recommended you to use jQuery code to remove the text definitely from the client side, because may be you will have some issues with some browsers.
If you decide to use jQuery you can place the following code in your page:
$(document).ready(function(){
var divContent = $("#wrapper").find("div");
$("#wrapper").html(divContent);
});
if the wrapper div can contain more HTML tags for example:
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="some-id">aaaa</div>
"this is some texxt"
<div id="some-id-2">bbbb</div>
<p>Hello world</p>
</div>
You can combine HTML tags in the find jQuery function by separate them by comma:
$(document).ready(function(){
var divContent = $("#wrapper").find("div,p");
$("#wrapper").html(divContent);
});
This is more save and clean
Related
I am in the process of making my own website, and I am making it out of pure HTML. I encountered in the making of the page, as I will describe below.
Here's my code for reference :-
<head>
<style>
img {
display: block;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
</style>
<style>
.sideDiv {
border: 1px outset black;
background-color: white;
text-align: center;
width: 120;
height: 400;
}
</style>
<style>
.mainDiv {
border: 1px outset black;
background-color: white;
text-align: left;
width: 400;
height: 300;
}
</style>
<img src="AyushLogo.png" alt="logo" height="9.2%" width="9.2%" style="float:left">
<br>
<a><button>About Me</button></a>
<a><button>Games</button></a>
<a><button>My Blog</button></a> <br><br>
<hr>
</head>
<body>
<div class="sideDiv">
</div>
<div class="mainDiv">
<p>Hi,<br>My name is Ayush Bhatt.<br><br>I love to code and remake old games. You can view some of my games by clicking on the 'Games' button on the top bar.</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The output looks like this :-
I wanted the tag with the "mainDiv" properties to appear at the side of the one with the "sideDiv" properties, but it just doesn't want to.
PS : I want to use only HTML as long as possible
An important thing about <div> tags is that they are known as "block-level" elements, which in particular means that they always start on a new line and take up the full width available, regardless. With this in mind,
writing
<div class="sideDiv"></div>
<div class="mainDiv">
...
</div>
should result in a div with class sideDiv and width as defined in the class, and then a new div with class mainDiv started on a new line, as block-level elements do by default, though note that this is simultaneously also because the div with class sideDiv takes up the remaining width on the page as a block-level element (though its content width is as described in the class, it being a block-level element is a bit like it "reserving" the rest of the width even though its content only uses the amount defined), so the next element (block level or inline) can only start on at least the next line.
If you want to circumvent this behavior, there are many ways to do it. One is by using an external tool like bootstrap, as pointed out by another answer, but my favorite is to simply use flex box. This can be done for your code in this way
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row;">
<div class="sideDiv"></div>
<div class="mainDiv">
...
</div>
</div>
A method that directly overwrites the block-level property would be to set the style display: inline-block; for both divs, to prevent either from starting on a new line or taking up the whole available width by default. (Just one isn't enough, if you only set it on the first one, the second still starts on a new line by default, and if you only set it for the second one, the first still takes up all available width by default). However, this causes the element to be treated completely as an inline element besides the fact that block-level height and width can be applied, and can be strange/difficult to maneuver as a result. It is often easier to just use a flex box. Code for this would be
<div class="sideDiv" style="display: inline-block;"></div>
<div class="mainDiv" style="display: inline-block;">
...
</div>
However, note that <p> is also a block-level element, so directly substituting in your original code in the mainDiv div would still cause it to skip a line before displaying. Again, it is usually easier, more modern, and better looking to just use a flex box.
Edit: Added the detail about block-level elements taking up all available width, and fixed the incorrect initial method that changed the display property to overwrite the block-level property by setting display: inline;. This can work, but it will ignore the heights and widths of the <div>s.
try using bootstrap , it deals with layout perfectly , here is an example :
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-6">
this is the left section
</div>
<div class="col-md-6">
this is the right section
</div>
</div>
</div>
for more details check :
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.0/layout/grid/
NOTE : you will need to include bootstrap and jQuery libs , check for online tutorial to start using bootstrap
I have HTML structure as shown below. I want to relocate the position of divs such that 'calc' div should move to 'region-content' div and should appear on the right end. Is it possible to achieve this using css? Can any one provide me some references to work on this using css, etc.
<div class='region-content'>
<form id='responseform'>
<div class='content '>
<div class ='formulation '>
<div class='qtext '>
<div class='calc '></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</form>
</div>
You cannot achieve the change in DOM structure with CSS. So, calc div can't be moved to region-content div. You need to do some javascript work for that.
However, styling it to appear where you want should be possible. Please provide your css code, if possible a jsfiddle, if this part is still troubling you.
You may try this.
.region-content { position: relative; }
.calc { position: absolute; top: 0; right: 0; }
Other then this you will also need to change parameter for width to make this possible. Since you just posted html structure and not content within it including respective css, this is how I can guess the solution for you.
I want to know if possible, how to aling on a same line the containing 'Quality Analyst', 'Celestica Sdn Bhd' and 'MYR 2xxx' without changing HTML
html :
<div class="colMiddle resume-detail-item-middle">
<div class="pageRow resume-detail-position long-text-word">Quality Analyst</div>
<div class="pageRow resume-company-location long-text-word">Celestica (AMS) Sdn. Bhd.</div>
<div class="pageRow resume-detail-item-inner resume-margin">
<div class="resume-detail-item-inner-left resume-summary-heading resume-label">Monthly Salary</div>
<div class="resume-detail-item-inner-middle resume-summary-heading">MYR 2,515</div>
... missing html
In a more clearer way :
<div class="outter-containement">
<div class="inner-content-1">inner-content-1</div>
<div class="inner-content-2">inner-content-2</div>
<div class="inner-content-3">
<div class="sub-inner-content-3-1">sub-inner-content-3-1</div>
<div class="sub-inner-content-3-2">sub-inner-content-3-2</div>
</div>
</div>
How can i align on a single line inner-content-1, inner-content-2 and sub-inner-content-3-2
http://jsfiddle.net/K58S2/14/
I would recommend changing the HTML like so: http://jsfiddle.net/K58S2/11/
However you said without changing the HTML, so here is a CSS answer: http://jsfiddle.net/K58S2/7/
.resume-detail-position, .resume-company-location{
float:left;
width:auto;
clear:none;
margin-right:7px;
}
.resume-company-location{
margin-top:1px;
}
You can use display:inline; to each div that's needs to be in line.
A better bet would be throw them in spans, like so:
<span> CONTENT </span>
<span> CONTENT </span>
<span> CONTENT </span>
However, if you insist on aligning divs, something like this would suffice:
<style type="text/css">
.example { float:left; }
</style>
<div class="example"> CONTENT </div>
<div class="example"> CONTENT </div>
<div class="example"> CONTENT </div>
The way i undersood your question, you will have to add a margin-right: to the outter container, the same width reserved of the container for 'MYR 2xxx'. Then, position:absolute; right:0; your container for 'MYR 2xxx', it will fit in.
For making your dividers aligned on a row, you will have to study your css and re-design it, because actually, your dividers take 100% width and clear:both; so you will have to manage all this because even if you attempt to float:left the containers, it won't work.
So, a short answer, yes you can do it with only .css. But be prepared for tricky css re-writing/overwriting.
An other aproach would be javascript, by removing your 'MYR 2xxx' container and replacing it in the normal flow, after 'Celestica Sdn Bhd'. For that approach, study jquery .detatch(), .append(), .appendTo() and insertAfter().
It would look like jsFiddled here :
$('.resume-detail-item-inner-middle.resume-summary-heading').insertAfter($('.pageRow.resume-company-location.long-text-word') );
But still you will have to rework your css.
Try adding the style property display:inline-block; to all three classes
For example:
.colMiddle {
display: inline-block;
}
I have a html page which looks like the following:
I want to display some text on the left pane, but the problem is that the text should be inside the oval shaped area only. How do I achieve this? Note that the oval shaped image is the background image, however if required, I can also use a <img> tag for it if it would help. One lame way is to use <p> tags with padding, but that is not an efficient way, so kindly suggest some good methods.
EDIT: HTML:
<div id="leftStage" class="rounded-corners">
<div id="questionDisp" align="center">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
#leftStage {
position: relative;
width: 34%;
height:86%;
float: left;
}
#questionDisp {
display:none;
}
JS: (When the appropriate function is called: )
$("#questionDisp").fadeIn(1000);
$("#questionDisp").html(quesArr.q1); //data read from xml
EDIT: What I need is a div or something above the oval background, & the text should fit in it. I am getting the text from an xml file, so it is not that I have a fixed text size to be displayed
There's actually a pure CSS/XHTML code generator on csstextwrap that does exactly what you want.
EDIT:
The concept here is to float <div>'s on either side of your text so that your content is forced to "flow" in between them. By setting the width of your floated <div>'s, you can create a wide variety of cascading "stencils."
See concept illustrated here: fiddle
If it is background-image then use the position:absolute with proper margins (top and left), and set the width less than that the oval background-image. Then display property 'block'.
Maybe you could try the jQuery plugin Text Fill
also see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/688362/753676
I removed my answer since only the left float worked.
If you paste this code: it'll show you exactly how it works. I did a border-radius instead of creating a circle png.
<div style="width:250px;height:230px; border-radius:125px;background:#efefef;padding-top:20px; text-align:center">
The code for my<br /> fix isn't pretty but it should<br />work It's not automatic, but it<br /> does the job that you need it<br /> to do.
</div>
You have not shared any HTML, The working code is with some assumption
The HTML is,
<div id="main">
<div class="text">This is text</div>
</div>
Where div with classtext is the text container.
The CSS for same will be,
#main{
background-image:url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/bw2HK.png');
height:563px;
width:691px;
}
#main .text{
color:#FF0000;
width:240px;
text-align:center;
top:100px;
border:1px solid;
float:left;
position:absolute;
}
Here .text is the class that represent the text styling. The main part is position:absolute;. This will set the text div position to absolute. Now you can move the div above image div using top and left styles.
Please do review working example here
P.S. The border, color and other styles can be changed as per your need.
I have a question about a problem, of which I originally thought, that it would be fairly simple to solve. But apparently it is not - at least not with only CSS.
This is the basic situation:
<div id="wrapper" style="height:90%;width:410px;background:#aaaaaa;">
<div id="top" style="margin:5px;width:400px;background:#ffffff;">
</div>
<div id="content" style="margin:5px;width:400px;background:#ffffff;">
</div>
</div>
I have a wrapper div that fills up 90% of the screen height and two inner divs. The first div "top" contains some varying elements. The second div "content" should fill out the remaining space of the wrapper div.
So far, I haven't found a way to set the div "content" to fill up the remaining space - even if I would know the exact height of the div "top" as I only know the relative height of the wrapper div.
Thus, I would be happy to learn of a method to either the div "content" to fill up the remaining space or how to mix relative and absolute sizes (i.e. height:100%-100px).
There is currently no cross-browser solution to achieve what you're trying with div elements and CSS. You can however get the behavior you want with the tried and true method of using a table instead.
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#wrapper {
height:90%;width:410px;background:#aaaaaa;border-spacing:5px;
}
#wrapper td {
padding:0;vertical-align:top;
}
#top {
background:#ffffff;
}
#content {
height:100%;background:#ffffff;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table id="wrapper" role="presentation">
<tr>
<td id="top">Top</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="content">Content</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
EDIT:
It appears I stirred a nest of hornets with my answer. There seems to be a near-religious following of people who say using tables for layout is bad. In many cases that is absolutely true, however there are situations where a table will do what CSS cannot. This is one of those situations, where a CSS alternative is on the horizon, but most browsers do not support it yet. It is up to the site designer to decide whether he wants to have a layout with cross-browser functionality now, or use a pure CSS layout with its limitations that may become easier to maintain in the future.
Your HTML code is really wrong:
don't use comma's after attributes
don't use inline CSS, put all CSS in a stylesheet and load the stylesheet in your HTML page
CSS syntax is: propertie: value; example: width: 10px; not: width=10px
To use 100% - 100px you can use CSS3 calc, but this feature has less browser support. You can use JS to make a sort of calc function.
There is no cross-browser way to get the content div to fill all available space with CSS, but it is fairly easy to make things look as if it did:
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#wrapper {
width:400px;height:90%;border-style:none solid;border-color:#aaaaaa;border-width:5px;background:#ffffff;
}
#top {
border-bottom: 5px solid #aaaaaa;
}
#content {
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="top">
Top
</div>
<div id="content">
Content
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
This should be sufficient for most situations, unless you want to use something like an onmouseover handler on the content.