First of all, I'm not really good with CSS but I'm trying to make the <img> height equals the width of it using only CSS.
I'm also using bootstrap as shown below, so the width of each column is responsive.
#import 'https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.7/css/bootstrap.min.css';
.album .album_photo .photo_link img {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="album">
<div class="col-xs-3">
<div class="album_photo">
<a href="#" class="photo_link">
<img src="someurl" />
</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-3">
<div class="album_photo">
<a href="#" class="photo_link">
<img src="someurl" />
</a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
This is how it looks like right now:
and this is what I'm trying to achieve:
Take a look at this pen, you'll know how to do that using padding-bottom trick:
Code pen
.album_photo {
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
Consider using image as background in conjunction with background-size: cover.
I like this method. It makes the content of the column (in this case .album_photo) position: relative, sets the inner wrapper of the element ('.photo_link img') position: absolute; with a height of 100%. To keep the shape of the column, you use a pseudo-element that has a padding-top: 100%. The reason why this works is because percentage based padding is always relative to the width of the element. Thus with a padding of 100%, it will always be just as tall as it is wide. You can use the same method to create ratio based container sizes too (e.g. 3:1 ratio for slideshows having absolutely positioned slides). It's a neat trick.
#import url(https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/twitter-bootstrap/3.3.7/css/bootstrap.min.css);
.album_photo {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.photo_link img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
.album_photo:after {
content: '';
display:inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
width: 100%;
height: 0;
padding-top: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="album">
<div class="col-xs-3">
<div class="album_photo">
<img src="//placehold.it/300x200" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-3">
<div class="album_photo">
<img src="//placehold.it/300x200" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-3">
<div class="album_photo">
<img src="//placehold.it/300x200" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-3">
<div class="album_photo">
<img src="//placehold.it/300x200" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
try this
img{
aspect-ratio:1;
}
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/aspect-ratio
You can scale the images in any way, by simply applying a width & height. For example, You can say
.full-width-height { width: 100%; height: 100%; }
You can also use min-width, max-width, min-height and max-height.
However, you will run into aspect ratio issues with this.
You have two options that will keep aspect ratios in check using CSS and
.auto-width { width: auto; height: xxx; }
.auto-height { width: xxx; height: auto; }
Bootstrap provides a responsive class you can use as well. The class is img-responsive which you can read about here. This class is often used with center-block helper class.
you want your "album_photo" class to have a width and height of 100%, because those will fill the space in the parent element which has a class of "col-xs-3"
CSS:
.album_photo {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
set margin and padding to 0 and you will see that the img fits nicely in the parent element.
Related
So i have a hexagonal image and when i do ng-repeat i want the result to be as follows.
The width of the container has to be 448px and the images need to be responsive.
This is what i have tried.
CodePen
HTML
<div class="hexagons">
<img src="images/hexagon5.png" alt="">
<img src="images/hexagon6.png" alt="">
<img src="images/hexagon5.png" alt="">
<img src="images/hexagon6.png" alt="">
</div>
CSS
.hexagons {
max-width: 448px;
height: 800px;
position: relative;
}
.hexagons img:nth-child(even) {
position: relative;
top: -115px;
left: 193px;
}
.hexagons img:nth-child(odd) {
position: relative;
}
The result:
Can someone please guide me through this.
This can be achieved by simply offsetting each even elements by half the height of the hexagon, example:
HTML
<div class="hexagons">
<div class="hex"></div>
<div class="hex"></div>
<div class="hex"></div>
<div class="hex"></div>
</div>
CSS
.hexagons {
width: 300px;
}
.hex {
float: left;
width: 150px;
height: 100px;
}
.hex:nth-child(2n) { /* .hex:nth-child(even) works too! */
position: relative;
top: 50px; /* half of 100px */
}
Live example:
http://codepen.io/veksen/pen/GjYKBJ
Your pen corrected: http://codepen.io/veksen/pen/QKkLJg?editors=1100
Note that since images are block elements, I had to set them as blocks, and float them. The container has to be wide enough to accomodate two images (which are 256px wide). The even hexagons also needed to be shifted to the left.
Updated for responsive: http://codepen.io/veksen/pen/XjxWJo?editors=1100
Play with the percentages a bit, but you get the idea!
I am using bootstrap templates and have split the page into a fixed sidebar and the remaining part of the page is one big picture. However the picture will not match the height of the sidebar. There is always a white gap after the picture even though the sidebar has 100% height. So how can i make my picture take up 100% height?
My html:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row content">
<div class="col-sm-3 sidenav">
<div class="sidebar affix">
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-9 pic">
<div><img src ="homepage/pic5.jpg" class="img-responsive"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
My Css:
.row.content {
height: 684px;
}
.sidenav {
height: 100%;
}
.pic .img-responsive {
height: 100%;
}
.pic {
padding: 0;
position: relative;
}
.sidebar {
width: 22.5%;
top: 0px;
}
.pic > div {
position: absolute;
}
Try to change like this
.pic > .img-responsive {
height: 100%;
}
You are placing your img in an div which you give position absolute, while you give the img position relative in the div with position absolute.
position: absolute
Places an element absolute, meaning on its self. There for any heights or width of any elements around it will not effect the element, it is absolute.
I havent tested it but you should remove the position:absolute, position:relative and the div around your img.
I am using image width:100% (or 50%) for img, this calculates height automatically. This is ok sometimes, but not in my case.
I need to display two images in a line with the same height, but original images has different height (so in the result two images also have different height).
<div class="col-md-7 horizontal-list-media">
<img src="http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-Zingis-RUS.png" style="width: 50%" class="img-responsive">
<img src="http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-kazino-RUS-360x240.png" style="width: 50%" class="img-responsive">
</div>
As both images have different height, then the resulted images also has different height. I do not wish this. How to make both images the same height? Take in mind that images should be responsive when screen size changes, thus I cannot simply add height property of both images, I guess.
I also cannot change height of original images. I need to make it with css, if not possible - then with jquery.
Basically, you are looking for a way to keep your images in same aspect ration (height is always the same in relation to width). For this, there is a neat little CSS hack using pseudo-element and padding-top. See DEMO for example.
markup:
<div class="col-md-7 horizontal-list-media">
<div class="img-responsive">
<img src="http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-Zingis-RUS.png">
</div>
<div class="img-responsive">
<img src="http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-kazino-RUS-360x240.png">
</div>
</div>
css:
.img-responsive {
width: 100%;
float: left;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.img-responsive:before {
display: block;
content: "";
width: 100%;
padding-top: 56.25%; // this makes aspect ratio 16:9, adjust at will
}
.img-responsive img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
#media (min-width: 640px) {
.img-responsive {
width: 50%;
}
}
you can do it like this
var height = $('.image-container').height();
var width = $('.image-container').width();
if (height > width) {
$('.image-container img').css({
width: "auto",
height: "100%"
});
} else {
$('.image-container img').css({
width: "100%",
height: "auto"
});
}
.horizontal-list-media {
overflow: hidden;
}
.image-container {
overflow: hidden;
width: 50%;
/*define your height here*/
height: 100px;
}
.image-container img {
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="col-md-7 horizontal-list-media">
<div class="image-container">
<img src="http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-Zingis-RUS.png" style="" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="image-container">
<img src="http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-kazino-RUS-360x240.png" class="img-responsive">
</div>
</div>
you can do it this way
<div class="col-md-7">
<div class="col-sm-6 bx-img img1"></div>
<div class="col-sm-6 bx-img img1"></div>
</div>
and style is
div.bx-img{
height: 200px;
background-size: cover;
}
.img1{
background: url("http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-Zingis-RUS.png") no-repeat scroll 0 0;
}
.img2{
background: url("http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-kazino-RUS-360x240.png") no-repeat scroll 0 0;
}
or this way
<div class="col-md-7">
<div class="col-md-6 col-sm-6 col-xs-12" style="height:200px;background:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) url('http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-Zingis-RUS.png') no-repeat scroll 0 0 / cover "></div>
<div class="col-md-6 col-sm-6 col-xs-12" style="height:200px;background:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) url('http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-Zingis-RUS.png') no-repeat scroll 0 0 / cover "></div>
</div>
You were almost right. I have modified your code a bit. You have to set height of the parent div. Also use proper floating for positioning.
<div class="col-md-7 horizontal-list-media" style="height: 200px">
<img src="http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-Zingis-RUS.png" style="width: 50%;height: 100%; float : left" class="img-responsive">
<img src="http://moneyti.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/16-kazino-RUS-360x240.png" style="width: 50%;height: 100%; float : right" class="img-responsive">
</div>
Working example
http://www.bootply.com/rZirK5Z49w
I have a slightly unusual CSS challenge to overcome.
I have a two column layout, whereby the width of the left column is set by the width of a main image, and the right allowed to fill the remaining space. There is a container under the main image, which could have a natural width greater than the main image. However, I want this div to be the same width as the main image, and the overflow to be hidden. Here is my effort at attempting this:
.outer {
margin-right: 5px;
position: relative;
}
.left {
float: left;
}
.right {
width: auto;
overflow: hidden;
}
.contentOuter {
overflow: hidden;
}
.content {
width: 500px;
}
.inner {
background-color: grey;
color: white;
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
}
<div class="outer left">
<div class="image">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" />
</div>
<div class="contentOuter">
<div class="content">
<img src="http://placehold.it/500x50" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="outer right">
<div class="inner">
Hello world!
</div>
</div>
But as you can see, .contentOuter stretches to the width of its contents, regardless of what I attempt.
One major caveat I have is that apart from .content having a fixed width, I don't want any other hard-coded widths in my CSS; everything should be completely fluid, and the dimensions of the columns determined by the dimensions of the .image img.
So, I am after something that visually looks like this, but without the hard-coded max-width on .content:
.outer {
margin-right: 5px;
position: relative;
}
.left {
float: left;
}
.right {
width: auto;
overflow: hidden;
}
.contentOuter {
overflow: hidden;
}
.content {
max-width: 350px; /* Hard-coded for demo purposes */
}
.inner {
background-color: grey;
color: white;
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
}
<div class="outer left">
<div class="image">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" />
</div>
<div class="contentOuter">
<div class="content">
<img src="http://placehold.it/500x50" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="outer right">
<div class="inner">
Hello world!
</div>
</div>
One option, though that depends on further requirements you may have, it so simply add to the lower block:
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
This takes it out of the flow, and the enclosing element will not take its width into account for sizing, only that of the image on top. The overflow: hidden will then hide whatever overflows.
The drawback is that the height of the enclosing element (or the position or subsequent elements) will not take into account the size of this element.
jsFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/jacquesc/rsz0hb1g/
A quick way to solve this would be to simply use some jQuery. It would only take two lines of code to achieve this.
var imgWidth = $('.image').width();
$('.content').width(imgWidth);
I have a horizontal layout with width: auto and height: 100%, but the body or container doesn't stretch to keep the aspect ration of my image.
I need the layout to be like this seen in this attached image:
I will use these images as a background of the panel divs.
Here is my code:
HTML
<body>
<div id="cover" class="panel">
<img src=""/>
</div>
<div id="panel1" class="panel">
<img src=""/>
</div>
<div id="panel2" class="panel">
<img src=""/>
</div>
<div id="panel3" class="panel">
<img src=""/>
</div>
<div id="panel4" class="panel">
<img src=""/>
</div>
</body>
CSS
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
}
body {
width: auto;
height: 100%;
}
.panel {
width: auto;
height: 100%;
float: left;
}
.panel img {
width: auto;
height: 100%;
z-index: -1;
}
You can also see it at this jsfiddle.
I floated the .panel to the left so it will display it all horizontally, but the container is not accomodating the width of all the panels, they just stack on top of each other.
Note: I don't want to have a fixed with, I need it to be responsive.
Here's an example of what I want to accomplish (jsfiddle).
As you can see there's no vertical scrollbar only the horizontal scrollbar is showing and when you resize the viewport the images adjust its width and height and keeps its aspect ratio.
Here's an update of your original fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/rsPRz/45/
Trying to stay as close to your original code as possible...
HTML
<html>
<body>
<img src="http://i978.photobucket.com/albums/ae265/horizoncars/lambo-cover.jpg"
/><img src="http://i978.photobucket.com/albums/ae265/horizoncars/lambo-left-2.jpg"
/><img src="http://i978.photobucket.com/albums/ae265/horizoncars/lambo-left-1.jpg"
/><img src="http://i978.photobucket.com/albums/ae265/horizoncars/lambo-right-1.jpg"
/><img src="http://i978.photobucket.com/albums/ae265/horizoncars/lambo-right-2.jpg"/>
</body>
</html>
CSS
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
}
body {
overflow-x: scroll;
overflow-y: hidden;
white-space:nowrap;
}
img {
display: inline-block;
}
I think you need to keep all of them in a parent div whose width and height will be equal to the window width and height
The example you have shown is working fine because it has single image. When you are using multiple images/div you should divide the width equally for the div and give max-width:100% to the image in it.
I have used only 4 divs for example. Check this demo http://jsfiddle.net/rsPRz/34/
With a div.container and a little help of jQuery you might get along.
Updated link: http://jsfiddle.net/rsPRz/37/
widthSum = 0;
$('.panel img').each(function() {
widthSum += $(this).width();
});
$('.container').width(widthSum);
Is this a possible solution for you?