Loop through JavaScript Object but keep key with value - html

var data = {
2016-09-24: {
0: {amount: 200, id: 2},
1: {...}
},
2016-09-25: {
0: {amount: 500, id: 8},
1: {...}
}
}
I want to represent the above data in a view like:
"**" would be a div with a card class:
*****************************************
* <h2>2016-09-24</h2> *
* *
* <li>amount: 200</li> *
* <li>amount: 40</li> *
* *
*****************************************
*****************************************
* <h2>2016-09-25</h2> *
* *
* <li>amount: 500</li> *
* <li>amount: 90</li> *
* *
*****************************************
I have yet to reach the layout but stuck at the loop. Im using React es6:
dailySales(){
Object.keys(data).forEach(function(key) {
var dates = key;
var val = data[key];
let sales = val.map(function(s, i) {
//console.log(s.amount);
});
});
}
The above commented out console.log would return all amount. How to segment each value with the date (key)? This question is similar to this one.

In the wise words of Leonardo DiCaprio in "Inception", "we need to go deeper"
You're super close and on the right track. You need to loop over the nested objects again and you'll get what you're looking for:
Object.keys( data ).map( function( date, i ) {
// here you have the date
return (
<div key={ i }>
<h1>{ date }</h1>
{ Object.keys( data[ date ] ).map( function( item, j ) {
// and here you have the item by its key
var rowItem = data[date][item];
return (
<p key={ rowItem.id }>Amount: { rowItem.amount }</p>
);
})}
</div>
);
});
https://jsfiddle.net/64s0yvvz/1/

Related

Rank, Dense Rank functionality in typescript

I am trying to implement a rank/dense rank functionality using typescript on a large set of data. Is there a library function or an easy way to implement this in foundry typescript.
If you want to get the rank or a dense rank for objects in TypeScript, you could implement a rank function either for an object set or all objects of a particular type like this:
import { Function, FunctionsMap, Integer, OntologyObject } from "#foundry/functions-api";
import { Objects, ExampleDataFlight, ObjectSet } from "#foundry/ontology-api";
export class MyFunctions {
#Function()
public async rankSetOfFlights(flightSet: ObjectSet<ExampleDataFlight>): Promise<FunctionsMap<ExampleDataFlight, Integer>> {
const flights = await flightSet.allAsync()
return rank(flights, compareFlight)
}
#Function()
public async rankAllFlights(): Promise<FunctionsMap<ExampleDataFlight, Integer>> {
const flights = await Objects.search().exampleDataFlight().allAsync()
return rank(flights, compareFlight)
}
}
// A comparison function, as per https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/sort
const compareFlight = (a: ExampleDataFlight, b: ExampleDataFlight): number =>
(a.date ?? Infinity).valueOf() - (b.date ?? Infinity).valueOf();
/**
* Creates a FunctionsMap from an object to its (sparse) rank or dense rank, for a given comparison function.
*
* Example call 1:
* rank(
* [{ value: 10 }, { value: 15 }, { value: 15 }, { value: 20 }],
* (a, b) => a.value - b.value,
* 'sparse',
* )
*
* Example output 1:
* Map<[
* { value: 10 } -> 1,
* { value: 15 } -> 2,
* { value: 15 } -> 2,
* { value: 20 } -> 4,
* ]>
*
* Example call 2:
* rank(
* [{ value: 10 }, { value: 15 }, { value: 15 }, { value: 20 }],
* (a, b) => a.value - b.value,
* 'dense',
* )
*
* Example output 2:
* Map<[
* { value: 10 } -> 1,
* { value: 15 } -> 2,
* { value: 15 } -> 2,
* { value: 20 } -> 3,
* ]>
*/
const rank = <T extends OntologyObject>(objs: T[], compareFn: (a: T, b: T) => number, how: 'sparse' | 'dense' = 'sparse'): FunctionsMap<T, Integer> => {
const map = new FunctionsMap<T, Integer>();
if (objs.length === 0) return map;
// Sort the objects, so we can iterate through them in order
const sortedObjs = objs.sort(compareFn)
// Iterate through the sorted objects, keeping track of the current rank
let rank = 1;
sortedObjs.forEach((obj, i) => {
// Increase the rank when the current object is greater than the last one
if (i >= 1 && compareFn(obj, sortedObjs[i - 1]) > 0) {
if (how === 'sparse') rank = i;
if (how === 'dense') rank++;
}
// Set the rank for the object in the map
map.set(obj, rank)
})
return map;
}
This is likely to work well for smaller datasets, and currently Foundry will limit you to running it on 100,000 objects in most cases. You can try filtering your object set (e.g. in Quiver or Workshop) before passing it to the function to help with this.
You mentioned in your question that this is for a large set of data. For larger datasets it's probably best to use the built-in Spark rank and dense rank functions in a transform, for example in Code Repositories. To do this, a transform like this might help:
from pyspark.sql import functions as F
from pyspark.sql.window import Window as W
from transforms.api import transform_df, Input, Output
#transform_df(
Output("/path/to/flights_ranked"),
source_df=Input("/path/to/flights"),
)
def compute(source_df):
return (
source_df
# (you can also use .partitionBy() on the window definition)
.withColumn("rank", F.rank().over(W.orderBy("date")))
.withColumn("dense_rank", F.dense_rank().over(W.orderBy("date")))
)

How to filter dates in JSON so I can get items within 3 days ahead or 2 weeks ahead?

I have the sample array of doctors who has the dates when they are available.
"items": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Fonzie Althrop",
"speciality": "Thoracic Surgery",
"offline_available": "12/20/2020",
"price": 3600
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "Nerte Brodley",
"speciality": "Pediatric Hematology-Oncology",
"offline_available": "11/20/2020",
"price": 500
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "Row Lindholm",
"speciality": "Radiologist",
"offline_available": "11/12/2020",
"price": 3000
},
{
"id": 4,
"name": "Davidson Houliston",
"speciality": "Neurological Surgery",
"offline_available": "11/10/2020",
"price": 8300
}, ... ]
I need to filter them by dates when they are available. I think I managed to solve how to filter doctors who available today. But I have additional filters that show doctors who available within next 3 days and within 2 weeks. My current code looks this way:
function App () {
const [data, setData] = useState(importedJSON)
const [dataToRender, setDataToRender] = useState(importedJSON)
const [filters, setFilters] = useState([]) // other filters
const [dateFilters, setDateFilters] = useState('')
useEffect(() => {
let copyArr = [...data]
if (filters.length) {
filters.forEach(item => {
copyArr = copyArr.filter(dataItem => {
return dataItem[item] === true
})
})
}
if (dateFilters) {
switch (dateFilters) {
case 'today':
copyArr = copyArr.filter(item => {
let today = new Date().toLocaleDateString()
console.log(item.offline_available.toString() === today.toString())
return item.offline_available.toString() === today.toString()
})
break
// case 'next3days':
// copyArr = copyArr.filter(item => {
// let date = new Date(item.offline_available)
// let today = new Date()
// // console.log(date.toString() == today.toString() )
// // console.log(item.offline_available)
// // return item.offline_available.toString() === today.toString()
// })
// break
default:
console.log('noooo')
}
}
setDataToRender(copyArr)
}, [filters, dateFilters, data])
const handleFilters = (value) => {
setFilters(value)
}
const handleDateFilters = (val) => {
if (val) {
setDateFilters(val)
} else {
setDateFilters('')
}
}
return (
<div className='App'>
<div className='container'>
<ul className='filters-list'>
<Availability filter={handleFilters} dateFilter={handleDateFilters} />
...
</ul>
<div className='app__title'>Doctors List</div>
...
<ul className='list'>
{dataToRender.map(item =>
<Doctor item={item} key={item.id} />
)}
</ul>
</div>
</div>
)
}
export default App
As you could see I tried to solve filtering within 3 days, but I struggle with dates.
Please give me a hint how to filter within 3 days and 2 weeks.
If you have additional comments to my code, please mention it as well, will appreciate so much.
You can do something like this:-
// 1. date createdAt - should be the date you want to compare
// 2. get date now
const now = Date.now()
// 3. get duration of time(in milliseconds) for 1 day
const ONE_DAY = 1000 * 60 * 60 * 24 // in milliseconds
// do something for the next three days
if(now < createdAt + (ONE_DAY * 3)) {
// do something
}

React - Remove item from array using its name / value

I have a JSONArrary like this:
myJsonArray = [
{
id: '1A',
name: 'GER'
},
{
id: '2B',
name: 'BRU',
},
{
id: '3C',
name: 'ARG'
}
]
I tried to many ways to remove a complete item. At the moment to remove it, the only value I have is id.
How I can remove (for example) the item with id: '1A' and get as result an array like this:
myJsonArray = [
{
id: '2B',
name: 'BRU',
},
{
id: '3C',
name: 'ARG'
}
]
You can use filter method to remove the item from array.
myJsonArray = myJsonArray.filter(x => x.id !== '1A');
A very simple solution would be:
let index = -1;
for( let i = 0; i < myJsonArray.length; i++ ){
if( myJsonArray[i].id === searchId ){
index = i;
}
}
if(index == -1){
//however you want to handle it
console.log("not found");
}
myJsonArray.splice(index, 1);

Sort a Json Array efficiently [duplicate]

I have an array of JavaScript objects:
var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
How can I sort them by the value of last_nom in JavaScript?
I know about sort(a,b), but that only seems to work on strings and numbers. Do I need to add a toString() method to my objects?
It's easy enough to write your own comparison function:
function compare( a, b ) {
if ( a.last_nom < b.last_nom ){
return -1;
}
if ( a.last_nom > b.last_nom ){
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
objs.sort( compare );
Or inline (c/o Marco Demaio):
objs.sort((a,b) => (a.last_nom > b.last_nom) ? 1 : ((b.last_nom > a.last_nom) ? -1 : 0))
Or simplified for numeric (c/o Andre Figueiredo):
objs.sort((a,b) => a.last_nom - b.last_nom); // b - a for reverse sort
You can also create a dynamic sort function that sorts objects by their value that you pass:
function dynamicSort(property) {
var sortOrder = 1;
if(property[0] === "-") {
sortOrder = -1;
property = property.substr(1);
}
return function (a,b) {
/* next line works with strings and numbers,
* and you may want to customize it to your needs
*/
var result = (a[property] < b[property]) ? -1 : (a[property] > b[property]) ? 1 : 0;
return result * sortOrder;
}
}
So you can have an array of objects like this:
var People = [
{Name: "Name", Surname: "Surname"},
{Name:"AAA", Surname:"ZZZ"},
{Name: "Name", Surname: "AAA"}
];
...and it will work when you do:
People.sort(dynamicSort("Name"));
People.sort(dynamicSort("Surname"));
People.sort(dynamicSort("-Surname"));
Actually this already answers the question. Below part is written because many people contacted me, complaining that it doesn't work with multiple parameters.
Multiple Parameters
You can use the function below to generate sort functions with multiple sort parameters.
function dynamicSortMultiple() {
/*
* save the arguments object as it will be overwritten
* note that arguments object is an array-like object
* consisting of the names of the properties to sort by
*/
var props = arguments;
return function (obj1, obj2) {
var i = 0, result = 0, numberOfProperties = props.length;
/* try getting a different result from 0 (equal)
* as long as we have extra properties to compare
*/
while(result === 0 && i < numberOfProperties) {
result = dynamicSort(props[i])(obj1, obj2);
i++;
}
return result;
}
}
Which would enable you to do something like this:
People.sort(dynamicSortMultiple("Name", "-Surname"));
Subclassing Array
For the lucky among us who can use ES6, which allows extending the native objects:
class MyArray extends Array {
sortBy(...args) {
return this.sort(dynamicSortMultiple(...args));
}
}
That would enable this:
MyArray.from(People).sortBy("Name", "-Surname");
In ES6/ES2015 or later you can do it this way:
objs.sort((a, b) => a.last_nom.localeCompare(b.last_nom));
Prior to ES6/ES2015
objs.sort(function(a, b) {
return a.last_nom.localeCompare(b.last_nom)
});
Underscore.js
Use Underscore.js]. It’s small and awesome...
sortBy_.sortBy(list, iterator, [context]) Returns a sorted copy of
list, ranked in ascending order by the results of running each value
through iterator. Iterator may also be the string name of the property
to sort by (eg. length).
var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo',last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
var sortedObjs = _.sortBy(objs, 'first_nom');
Case sensitive
arr.sort((a, b) => a.name > b.name ? 1 : -1);
Case Insensitive
arr.sort((a, b) => a.name.toLowerCase() > b.name.toLowerCase() ? 1 : -1);
Useful Note
If no change in order (in case of the same strings) then the condition > will fail and -1 will be returned. But if strings are same then returning 1 or -1 will result in correct output
The other option could be to use >= operator instead of >
var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
// Define a couple of sorting callback functions, one with hardcoded sort key and the other with an argument sort key
const sorter1 = (a, b) => a.last_nom.toLowerCase() > b.last_nom.toLowerCase() ? 1 : -1;
const sorter2 = (sortBy) => (a, b) => a[sortBy].toLowerCase() > b[sortBy].toLowerCase() ? 1 : -1;
objs.sort(sorter1);
console.log("Using sorter1 - Hardcoded sort property last_name", objs);
objs.sort(sorter2('first_nom'));
console.log("Using sorter2 - passed param sortBy='first_nom'", objs);
objs.sort(sorter2('last_nom'));
console.log("Using sorter2 - passed param sortBy='last_nom'", objs);
If you have duplicate last names you might sort those by first name-
obj.sort(function(a,b){
if(a.last_nom< b.last_nom) return -1;
if(a.last_nom >b.last_nom) return 1;
if(a.first_nom< b.first_nom) return -1;
if(a.first_nom >b.first_nom) return 1;
return 0;
});
As of 2018 there is a much shorter and elegant solution. Just use. Array.prototype.sort().
Example:
var items = [
{ name: 'Edward', value: 21 },
{ name: 'Sharpe', value: 37 },
{ name: 'And', value: 45 },
{ name: 'The', value: -12 },
{ name: 'Magnetic', value: 13 },
{ name: 'Zeros', value: 37 }
];
// sort by value
items.sort(function (a, b) {
return a.value - b.value;
});
Simple and quick solution to this problem using prototype inheritance:
Array.prototype.sortBy = function(p) {
return this.slice(0).sort(function(a,b) {
return (a[p] > b[p]) ? 1 : (a[p] < b[p]) ? -1 : 0;
});
}
Example / Usage
objs = [{age:44,name:'vinay'},{age:24,name:'deepak'},{age:74,name:'suresh'}];
objs.sortBy('age');
// Returns
// [{"age":24,"name":"deepak"},{"age":44,"name":"vinay"},{"age":74,"name":"suresh"}]
objs.sortBy('name');
// Returns
// [{"age":24,"name":"deepak"},{"age":74,"name":"suresh"},{"age":44,"name":"vinay"}]
Update: No longer modifies original array.
Old answer that is not correct:
arr.sort((a, b) => a.name > b.name)
UPDATE
From Beauchamp's comment:
arr.sort((a, b) => a.name < b.name ? -1 : (a.name > b.name ? 1 : 0))
More readable format:
arr.sort((a, b) => {
if (a.name < b.name) return -1
return a.name > b.name ? 1 : 0
})
Without nested ternaries:
arr.sort((a, b) => a.name < b.name ? - 1 : Number(a.name > b.name))
Explanation: Number() will cast true to 1 and false to 0.
Lodash (a superset of Underscore.js).
It's good not to add a framework for every simple piece of logic, but relying on well tested utility frameworks can speed up development and reduce the amount of bugs.
Lodash produces very clean code and promotes a more functional programming style. In one glimpse, it becomes clear what the intent of the code is.
The OP's issue can simply be solved as:
const sortedObjs = _.sortBy(objs, 'last_nom');
More information? For example, we have the following nested object:
const users = [
  { 'user': {'name':'fred', 'age': 48}},
  { 'user': {'name':'barney', 'age': 36 }},
  { 'user': {'name':'wilma'}},
  { 'user': {'name':'betty', 'age': 32}}
];
We now can use the _.property shorthand user.age to specify the path to the property that should be matched. We will sort the user objects by the nested age property. Yes, it allows for nested property matching!
const sortedObjs = _.sortBy(users, ['user.age']);
Want it reversed? No problem. Use _.reverse.
const sortedObjs = _.reverse(_.sortBy(users, ['user.age']));
Want to combine both using chain?
const { chain } = require('lodash');
const sortedObjs = chain(users).sortBy('user.age').reverse().value();
Or when do you prefer flow over chain?
const { flow, reverse, sortBy } = require('lodash/fp');
const sortedObjs = flow([sortBy('user.age'), reverse])(users);
You can use
Easiest Way: Lodash
(https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.10#orderBy)
This method is like _.sortBy except that it allows specifying the sort orders of the iteratees to sort by. If orders is unspecified, all values are sorted in ascending order. Otherwise, specify an order of "desc" for descending or "asc" for ascending sort order of corresponding values.
Arguments
collection (Array|Object): The collection to iterate over.
[iteratees=[_.identity]] (Array[]|Function[]|Object[]|string[]): The iteratees to sort by.
[orders] (string[]): The sort orders of iteratees.
Returns
(Array): Returns the new sorted array.
var _ = require('lodash');
var homes = [
{"h_id":"3",
"city":"Dallas",
"state":"TX",
"zip":"75201",
"price":"162500"},
{"h_id":"4",
"city":"Bevery Hills",
"state":"CA",
"zip":"90210",
"price":"319250"},
{"h_id":"6",
"city":"Dallas",
"state":"TX",
"zip":"75000",
"price":"556699"},
{"h_id":"5",
"city":"New York",
"state":"NY",
"zip":"00010",
"price":"962500"}
];
_.orderBy(homes, ['city', 'state', 'zip'], ['asc', 'desc', 'asc']);
I haven't seen this particular approach suggested, so here's a terse comparison method I like to use that works for both string and number types:
const objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
const sortBy = fn => {
const cmp = (a, b) => -(a < b) || +(a > b);
return (a, b) => cmp(fn(a), fn(b));
};
const getLastName = o => o.last_nom;
const sortByLastName = sortBy(getLastName);
objs.sort(sortByLastName);
console.log(objs.map(getLastName));
Explanation of sortBy()
sortBy() accepts a fn that selects a value from an object to use in comparison, and returns a function that can be passed to Array.prototype.sort(). In this example, we're comparing o.last_nom. Whenever we receive two objects such as
a = { first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' }
b = { first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' }
we compare them with (a, b) => cmp(fn(a), fn(b)). Given that
fn = o => o.last_nom
we can expand the comparison function to (a, b) => cmp(a.last_nom, b.last_nom). Because of the way logical OR (||) works in JavaScript, cmp(a.last_nom, b.last_nom) is equivalent to
if (a.last_nom < b.last_nom) return -1;
if (a.last_nom > b.last_nom) return 1;
return 0;
Incidentally, this is called the three-way comparison "spaceship" (<=>) operator in other languages.
Finally, here's the ES5-compatible syntax without using arrow functions:
var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
function sortBy(fn) {
function cmp(a, b) { return -(a < b) || +(a > b); }
return function (a, b) { return cmp(fn(a), fn(b)); };
}
function getLastName(o) { return o.last_nom; }
var sortByLastName = sortBy(getLastName);
objs.sort(sortByLastName);
console.log(objs.map(getLastName));
Instead of using a custom comparison function, you could also create an object type with custom toString() method (which is invoked by the default comparison function):
function Person(firstName, lastName) {
this.firtName = firstName;
this.lastName = lastName;
}
Person.prototype.toString = function() {
return this.lastName + ', ' + this.firstName;
}
var persons = [ new Person('Lazslo', 'Jamf'), ...]
persons.sort();
There are many good answers here, but I would like to point out that they can be extended very simply to achieve a lot more complex sorting. The only thing you have to do is to use the OR operator to chain comparison functions like this:
objs.sort((a,b)=> fn1(a,b) || fn2(a,b) || fn3(a,b) )
Where fn1, fn2, ... are the sort functions which return [-1,0,1]. This results in "sorting by fn1" and "sorting by fn2" which is pretty much equal to ORDER BY in SQL.
This solution is based on the behaviour of || operator which evaluates to the first evaluated expression which can be converted to true.
The simplest form has only one inlined function like this:
// ORDER BY last_nom
objs.sort((a,b)=> a.last_nom.localeCompare(b.last_nom) )
Having two steps with last_nom,first_nom sort order would look like this:
// ORDER_BY last_nom, first_nom
objs.sort((a,b)=> a.last_nom.localeCompare(b.last_nom) ||
a.first_nom.localeCompare(b.first_nom)  )
A generic comparison function could be something like this:
// ORDER BY <n>
let cmp = (a,b,n)=>a[n].localeCompare(b[n])
This function could be extended to support numeric fields, case-sensitivity, arbitrary data types, etc.
You can use them by chaining them by sort priority:
// ORDER_BY last_nom, first_nom
objs.sort((a,b)=> cmp(a,b, "last_nom") || cmp(a,b, "first_nom") )
// ORDER_BY last_nom, first_nom DESC
objs.sort((a,b)=> cmp(a,b, "last_nom") || -cmp(a,b, "first_nom") )
// ORDER_BY last_nom DESC, first_nom DESC
objs.sort((a,b)=> -cmp(a,b, "last_nom") || -cmp(a,b, "first_nom") )
The point here is that pure JavaScript with functional approach can take you a long way without external libraries or complex code. It is also very effective, since no string parsing have to be done.
Try this:
Up to ES5
// Ascending sort
items.sort(function (a, b) {
return a.value - b.value;
});
// Descending sort
items.sort(function (a, b) {
return b.value - a.value;
});
In ES6 and above
// Ascending sort
items.sort((a, b) => a.value - b.value);
// Descending sort
items.sort((a, b) => b.value - a.value);
Use JavaScript sort method
The sort method can be modified to sort anything like an array of numbers, strings and even objects using a compare function.
A compare function is passed as an optional argument to the sort method.
This compare function accepts 2 arguments generally called a and b. Based on these 2 arguments you can modify the sort method to work as you want.
If the compare function returns less than 0, then the sort() method sorts a at a lower index than b. Simply a will come before b.
If the compare function returns equal to 0, then the sort() method leaves the element positions as they are.
If the compare function returns greater than 0, then the sort() method sorts a at greater index than b. Simply a will come after b.
Use the above concept to apply on your object where a will be your object property.
var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
function compare(a, b) {
if (a.last_nom > b.last_nom) return 1;
if (a.last_nom < b.last_nom) return -1;
return 0;
}
objs.sort(compare);
console.log(objs)
// for better look use console.table(objs)
Example Usage:
objs.sort(sortBy('last_nom'));
Script:
/**
* #description
* Returns a function which will sort an
* array of objects by the given key.
*
* #param {String} key
* #param {Boolean} reverse
* #return {Function}
*/
const sortBy = (key, reverse) => {
// Move smaller items towards the front
// or back of the array depending on if
// we want to sort the array in reverse
// order or not.
const moveSmaller = reverse ? 1 : -1;
// Move larger items towards the front
// or back of the array depending on if
// we want to sort the array in reverse
// order or not.
const moveLarger = reverse ? -1 : 1;
/**
* #param {*} a
* #param {*} b
* #return {Number}
*/
return (a, b) => {
if (a[key] < b[key]) {
return moveSmaller;
}
if (a[key] > b[key]) {
return moveLarger;
}
return 0;
};
};
Write short code:
objs.sort((a, b) => a.last_nom > b.last_nom ? 1 : -1)
I didn't see any implementation similar to mine. This version is based on the Schwartzian transform idiom.
function sortByAttribute(array, ...attrs) {
// Generate an array of predicate-objects containing
// property getter, and descending indicator
let predicates = attrs.map(pred => {
let descending = pred.charAt(0) === '-' ? -1 : 1;
pred = pred.replace(/^-/, '');
return {
getter: o => o[pred],
descend: descending
};
});
// Schwartzian transform idiom implementation. AKA "decorate-sort-undecorate"
return array.map(item => {
return {
src: item,
compareValues: predicates.map(predicate => predicate.getter(item))
};
})
.sort((o1, o2) => {
let i = -1, result = 0;
while (++i < predicates.length) {
if (o1.compareValues[i] < o2.compareValues[i])
result = -1;
if (o1.compareValues[i] > o2.compareValues[i])
result = 1;
if (result *= predicates[i].descend)
break;
}
return result;
})
.map(item => item.src);
}
Here's an example how to use it:
let games = [
{ name: 'Mashraki', rating: 4.21 },
{ name: 'Hill Climb Racing', rating: 3.88 },
{ name: 'Angry Birds Space', rating: 3.88 },
{ name: 'Badland', rating: 4.33 }
];
// Sort by one attribute
console.log(sortByAttribute(games, 'name'));
// Sort by mupltiple attributes
console.log(sortByAttribute(games, '-rating', 'name'));
Sorting (more) Complex Arrays of Objects
Since you probably encounter more complex data structures like this array, I would expand the solution.
TL;DR
Are more pluggable version based on #ege-Özcan's very lovely answer.
Problem
I encountered the below and couldn't change it. I also did not want to flatten the object temporarily. Nor did I want to use underscore / lodash, mainly for performance reasons and the fun to implement it myself.
var People = [
{Name: {name: "Name", surname: "Surname"}, Middlename: "JJ"},
{Name: {name: "AAA", surname: "ZZZ"}, Middlename:"Abrams"},
{Name: {name: "Name", surname: "AAA"}, Middlename: "Wars"}
];
Goal
The goal is to sort it primarily by People.Name.name and secondarily by People.Name.surname
Obstacles
Now, in the base solution uses bracket notation to compute the properties to sort for dynamically. Here, though, we would have to construct the bracket notation dynamically also, since you would expect some like People['Name.name'] would work - which doesn't.
Simply doing People['Name']['name'], on the other hand, is static and only allows you to go down the n-th level.
Solution
The main addition here will be to walk down the object tree and determine the value of the last leaf, you have to specify, as well as any intermediary leaf.
var People = [
{Name: {name: "Name", surname: "Surname"}, Middlename: "JJ"},
{Name: {name: "AAA", surname: "ZZZ"}, Middlename:"Abrams"},
{Name: {name: "Name", surname: "AAA"}, Middlename: "Wars"}
];
People.sort(dynamicMultiSort(['Name','name'], ['Name', '-surname']));
// Results in...
// [ { Name: { name: 'AAA', surname: 'ZZZ' }, Middlename: 'Abrams' },
// { Name: { name: 'Name', surname: 'Surname' }, Middlename: 'JJ' },
// { Name: { name: 'Name', surname: 'AAA' }, Middlename: 'Wars' } ]
// same logic as above, but strong deviation for dynamic properties
function dynamicSort(properties) {
var sortOrder = 1;
// determine sort order by checking sign of last element of array
if(properties[properties.length - 1][0] === "-") {
sortOrder = -1;
// Chop off sign
properties[properties.length - 1] = properties[properties.length - 1].substr(1);
}
return function (a,b) {
propertyOfA = recurseObjProp(a, properties)
propertyOfB = recurseObjProp(b, properties)
var result = (propertyOfA < propertyOfB) ? -1 : (propertyOfA > propertyOfB) ? 1 : 0;
return result * sortOrder;
};
}
/**
* Takes an object and recurses down the tree to a target leaf and returns it value
* #param {Object} root - Object to be traversed.
* #param {Array} leafs - Array of downwards traversal. To access the value: {parent:{ child: 'value'}} -> ['parent','child']
* #param {Number} index - Must not be set, since it is implicit.
* #return {String|Number} The property, which is to be compared by sort.
*/
function recurseObjProp(root, leafs, index) {
index ? index : index = 0
var upper = root
// walk down one level
lower = upper[leafs[index]]
// Check if last leaf has been hit by having gone one step too far.
// If so, return result from last step.
if (!lower) {
return upper
}
// Else: recurse!
index++
// HINT: Bug was here, for not explicitly returning function
// https://stackoverflow.com/a/17528613/3580261
return recurseObjProp(lower, leafs, index)
}
/**
* Multi-sort your array by a set of properties
* #param {...Array} Arrays to access values in the form of: {parent:{ child: 'value'}} -> ['parent','child']
* #return {Number} Number - number for sort algorithm
*/
function dynamicMultiSort() {
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments); // slight deviation to base
return function (a, b) {
var i = 0, result = 0, numberOfProperties = args.length;
// REVIEW: slightly verbose; maybe no way around because of `.sort`-'s nature
// Consider: `.forEach()`
while(result === 0 && i < numberOfProperties) {
result = dynamicSort(args[i])(a, b);
i++;
}
return result;
}
}
Example
Working example on JSBin
Combining Ege's dynamic solution with Vinay's idea, you get a nice robust solution:
Array.prototype.sortBy = function() {
function _sortByAttr(attr) {
var sortOrder = 1;
if (attr[0] == "-") {
sortOrder = -1;
attr = attr.substr(1);
}
return function(a, b) {
var result = (a[attr] < b[attr]) ? -1 : (a[attr] > b[attr]) ? 1 : 0;
return result * sortOrder;
}
}
function _getSortFunc() {
if (arguments.length == 0) {
throw "Zero length arguments not allowed for Array.sortBy()";
}
var args = arguments;
return function(a, b) {
for (var result = 0, i = 0; result == 0 && i < args.length; i++) {
result = _sortByAttr(args[i])(a, b);
}
return result;
}
}
return this.sort(_getSortFunc.apply(null, arguments));
}
Usage:
// Utility for printing objects
Array.prototype.print = function(title) {
console.log("************************************************************************");
console.log("**** " + title);
console.log("************************************************************************");
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
console.log("Name: " + this[i].FirstName, this[i].LastName, "Age: " + this[i].Age);
}
}
// Setup sample data
var arrObj = [{
FirstName: "Zach",
LastName: "Emergency",
Age: 35
},
{
FirstName: "Nancy",
LastName: "Nurse",
Age: 27
},
{
FirstName: "Ethel",
LastName: "Emergency",
Age: 42
},
{
FirstName: "Nina",
LastName: "Nurse",
Age: 48
},
{
FirstName: "Anthony",
LastName: "Emergency",
Age: 44
},
{
FirstName: "Nina",
LastName: "Nurse",
Age: 32
},
{
FirstName: "Ed",
LastName: "Emergency",
Age: 28
},
{
FirstName: "Peter",
LastName: "Physician",
Age: 58
},
{
FirstName: "Al",
LastName: "Emergency",
Age: 51
},
{
FirstName: "Ruth",
LastName: "Registration",
Age: 62
},
{
FirstName: "Ed",
LastName: "Emergency",
Age: 38
},
{
FirstName: "Tammy",
LastName: "Triage",
Age: 29
},
{
FirstName: "Alan",
LastName: "Emergency",
Age: 60
},
{
FirstName: "Nina",
LastName: "Nurse",
Age: 54
}
];
//Unit Tests
arrObj.sortBy("LastName").print("LastName Ascending");
arrObj.sortBy("-LastName").print("LastName Descending");
arrObj.sortBy("LastName", "FirstName", "-Age").print("LastName Ascending, FirstName Ascending, Age Descending");
arrObj.sortBy("-FirstName", "Age").print("FirstName Descending, Age Ascending");
arrObj.sortBy("-Age").print("Age Descending");
One more option:
var someArray = [...];
function generateSortFn(prop, reverse) {
return function (a, b) {
if (a[prop] < b[prop]) return reverse ? 1 : -1;
if (a[prop] > b[prop]) return reverse ? -1 : 1;
return 0;
};
}
someArray.sort(generateSortFn('name', true));
It sorts ascending by default.
A simple way:
objs.sort(function(a,b) {
return b.last_nom.toLowerCase() < a.last_nom.toLowerCase();
});
See that '.toLowerCase()' is necessary to prevent erros
in comparing strings.
Warning!
Using this solution is not recommended as it does not result in a sorted array. It is being left here for future reference, because the idea is not rare.
objs.sort(function(a,b){return b.last_nom>a.last_nom})
This is my take on this:
The order parameter is optional and defaults to "ASC" for ascending order.
It works on accented characters and it's case insensitive.
Note: It sorts and returns the original array.
function sanitizeToSort(str) {
return str
.normalize('NFD') // Remove accented and diacritics
.replace(/[\u0300-\u036f]/g, '') // Remove accented and diacritics
.toLowerCase() // Sort will be case insensitive
;
}
function sortByProperty(arr, property, order="ASC") {
arr.forEach((item) => item.tempProp = sanitizeToSort(item[property]));
arr.sort((a, b) => order === "ASC" ?
a.tempProp > b.tempProp ? 1 : a.tempProp < b.tempProp ? -1 : 0
: a.tempProp > b.tempProp ? -1 : a.tempProp < b.tempProp ? 1 : 0
);
arr.forEach((item) => delete item.tempProp);
return arr;
}
Snippet
function sanitizeToSort(str) {
return str
.normalize('NFD') // Remove accented characters
.replace(/[\u0300-\u036f]/g, '') // Remove diacritics
.toLowerCase()
;
}
function sortByProperty(arr, property, order="ASC") {
arr.forEach((item) => item.tempProp = sanitizeToSort(item[property]));
arr.sort((a, b) => order === "ASC" ?
a.tempProp > b.tempProp ? 1 : a.tempProp < b.tempProp ? -1 : 0
: a.tempProp > b.tempProp ? -1 : a.tempProp < b.tempProp ? 1 : 0
);
arr.forEach((item) => delete item.tempProp);
return arr;
}
const rockStars = [
{ name: "Axl",
lastname: "Rose" },
{ name: "Elthon",
lastname: "John" },
{ name: "Paul",
lastname: "McCartney" },
{ name: "Lou",
lastname: "Reed" },
{ name: "freddie", // Works on lower/upper case
lastname: "mercury" },
{ name: "Ámy", // Works on accented characters too
lastname: "winehouse"}
];
sortByProperty(rockStars, "name");
console.log("Ordered by name A-Z:");
rockStars.forEach((item) => console.log(item.name + " " + item.lastname));
sortByProperty(rockStars, "lastname", "DESC");
console.log("\nOrdered by lastname Z-A:");
rockStars.forEach((item) => console.log(item.lastname + ", " + item.name));
A simple function that sorts an array of object by a property:
function sortArray(array, property, direction) {
direction = direction || 1;
array.sort(function compare(a, b) {
let comparison = 0;
if (a[property] > b[property]) {
comparison = 1 * direction;
} else if (a[property] < b[property]) {
comparison = -1 * direction;
}
return comparison;
});
return array; // Chainable
}
Usage:
var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
sortArray(objs, "last_nom"); // Asc
sortArray(objs, "last_nom", -1); // Desc
Given the original example:
var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
Sort by multiple fields:
objs.sort(function(left, right) {
var last_nom_order = left.last_nom.localeCompare(right.last_nom);
var first_nom_order = left.first_nom.localeCompare(right.first_nom);
return last_nom_order || first_nom_order;
});
Notes
a.localeCompare(b) is universally supported and returns -1,0,1 if a<b,a==b,a>b respectively.
|| in the last line gives last_nom priority over first_nom.
Subtraction works on numeric fields: var age_order = left.age - right.age;
Negate to reverse order, return -last_nom_order || -first_nom_order || -age_order;
Additional desc parameters for Ege Özcan's code:
function dynamicSort(property, desc) {
if (desc) {
return function (a, b) {
return (a[property] > b[property]) ? -1 : (a[property] < b[property]) ? 1 : 0;
}
}
return function (a, b) {
return (a[property] < b[property]) ? -1 : (a[property] > b[property]) ? 1 : 0;
}
}
Using Ramda,
npm install ramda
import R from 'ramda'
var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' },
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' },
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' }
];
var ascendingSortedObjs = R.sortBy(R.prop('last_nom'), objs)
var descendingSortedObjs = R.reverse(ascendingSortedObjs)
function compare(propName) {
return function(a,b) {
if (a[propName] < b[propName])
return -1;
if (a[propName] > b[propName])
return 1;
return 0;
};
}
objs.sort(compare("last_nom"));

Converting the Inline Json Data to Remote Json File

I used the answer at : YUI 3 -Datatable with Paginator + Query Builder + Sort tried
to for the samples http://jsbin.com/iwijek/10 and http://jsfiddle.net/UwjUt/ which have inline json data. I wanted to parse the remote json file for which I used the .get() as per YUI 3 docs. But bit does not do anything. plz check these examples and help me in parsing the remote json file.
{ var url = "file:///e:/Documents/json-search.txt";
var modelList;
dataSource = new Y.DataSource.Get({ source: url });
// comment
// var modelList = new Y.ModelList();
modelList = new Y.ModelList.Get({
source: url });
modelList.add();
}
json-search.txt
[{
name : 'Joe Bloggs',
company : 'ABC Inc',
state : 'AZ',
cost : 100
},
{
name : 'Jane Mary',
company : 'Bits and Bobs Ltd',
state : 'TX',
cost : 1000
},
{
name : 'Paul Smith',
company : 'PS Clothing PLC',
state : 'TX',
cost :400
},
{
name : 'Jack Jones',
company : 'jackjones.com',
State : 'NY',
cost: 9999
},
{
name : 'Crazy Horse',
company : 'Wacky Places Ltd.',
state : 'MI',
cost : 632
}]
I also tried to pass the datasource to the ModelList
YUI.add(
'datatable-filter',
function(Y) {
/**
Adds support for filtering the table data by API methods
#module datatable
#submodule datatable-filter
#since 3.5.0
**/
var YLang = Y.Lang,
isBoolean = YLang.isBoolean,
isString = YLang.isString,
isArray = YLang.isArray,
isObject = YLang.isObject,
toArray = Y.Array,
sub = YLang.sub;
/**
<pre><code>
var table = new Y.DataTable({
columns: [ 'id', 'username', 'name', 'birthdate' ],
data: [ ... ],
filters: true // this will render a filter input box for every column
});
table.render('#table');
</code></pre>
Setting `filters` to `true` will enable UI filtering for all columns. To enable
UI filtering for certain columns only, set `filters` to an array of column keys,
or just add `filters: true` to the respective column configuration objects.
This uses the default setting of `filters: auto` for the DataTable instance.
<pre><code>
var table = new Y.DataTable({
columns: [
'id',
{ key: 'username', renderFilter: true },
{ key: 'name' },
{ key: 'birthdate', renderFilter: true, filter : "=123", filterFn : customFilterFn }
],
data: [ ... ]
// filters: 'auto' is the default
});
To disable UI filtering for all columns, set `filters` to `false`. This still
permits filtering via the API methods.
filter via api:
var filterBy =
{
username : "=student",
name : "%richard",
birthdate : ">01-01-1975"
}
table.set("filterBy",filterBy);
As new records are inserted into the table's `data` ModelList, they will be checked against the filter to determine if they will be rendered
The current filters are stored in the `filterBy` attribute. Assigning this value at instantiation will automatically filter your data.
Filtering is done by a simple value comparison using '=', '!=', '<', '<=', '>', '>=' on the field value.
If you need custom filtering, add a filter function in the column's `filterFn` property. // TODO...
<pre><code>
function applePiesFilter(a) {
return a.get("type") == 'apple' ? true : false;
}
var table = new Y.DataTable({
columns: [ 'id', 'username', { key: name, filterFn: nameFilter }, 'birthdate' ],
data: [ ... ],
filters: [ 'username', 'name', 'birthdate' ]
});
</code></pre>
See the user guide for more details.
#class DataTable.Filters
#for DataTable
#since 3.5.0
**/
function Filters() {}
Filters.ATTRS = {
// Which columns in the UI should suggest and respond to filtering interaction
// pass an empty array if no UI columns should show filters, but you want the
// table.filter(...) API
/**
Controls which columns can show a filtering input
Acceptable values are:
* "auto" - (default) looks for `renderFilter: true` in the column configurations
* "true" - all columns have a filter field rendered
* "false" - no UI filters are enabled
* {String[]} - array of key names to give filter fields
#attribute filters
#type {String|String[]|Boolean}
#default "auto"
#since 3.5.0
**/
filters: {
value: 'auto',
validator: '_validateFilters'
},
/**
The current filter configuration to maintain in the data.
Accepts column `key` objects with a single property the value of the filter
E.g. `{ username: '%student' }`
E.g. `[{ username : '%student' }, { age : '<40'}]
#attribute filterBy
#type {String|String[]|Object|Object[]}
#since 3.5.0
**/
filterBy: {
validator: '_validateFilterBy'
},
/**
Strings containing language for filtering tooltips.
#attribute strings
#type {Object}
#default (strings for current lang configured in the YUI instance config)
#since 3.5.0
**/
strings: {}
};
Y.mix(Filters.prototype, {
/**
Filter the data in the `data` ModelList and refresh the table with the new
order.
#method filter
#param {String|String[]|Object|Object[]} fields The field(s) to filter by
#param {Object} [payload] Extra `filter` event payload you want to send along
#return {DataTable}
#chainable
#since 3.5.0
**/
filter : function (fields, payload) {
/**
Notifies of an impending filter, either from changing the filter in the UI
header, or from a call to the `filter` method.
The requested filter is available in the `filterBy` property of the event.
The default behavior of this event sets the table's `filterBy` attribute.
#event filter
#param {String|String[]|Object|Object[]} filterBy The requested filter
#preventable _defFilterFn
**/
return this.fire('filter', Y.merge((payload || {}), {
filterBy: fields || this.get('filterBy')
}));
},
/**
Template for the row that will hold the filter inputs
#property FILTERS_HEADER_CELL_TEMPLATE
#type {HTML}
#value
**/
FILTERS_HEADER_ROW_TEMPLATE : '<tr class="{filterRowClassName}" tabindex="0"></tr>',
/**
Template for the row that will hold the filter inputs
#property FILTERS_HEADER_CELL_TEMPLATE
#type {HTML}
#value
//<select><option value="=">=</option><option value="%">%</option><option value="!=">!=</option><option value="!%">!%</option><option value=">">%gt</option><option value=">=">>=</option><option value="<"><</option><option value="<="><=</option></select>
**/
FILTERS_HEADER_CELL_TEMPLATE : '<th class="{className}" tabindex="0" rowspan="1" colspan="1" title="Filter by {colName}">' +
'<div class="{linerClass}" tabindex="0"><input type="text" data-yui3-col-key="{colKey}" class="{inputClass}"/></div></th>',
/**
Template for the row that will doesn't have filter inputs
#property FILTERS_HEADER_CELL_TEMPLATE_NONE
#type {HTML}
#value
**/
FILTERS_HEADER_CELL_TEMPLATE_NONE : '<th class="{className}" tabindex="0" rowspan="1" colspan="1" title="Filtering unavailable on this field"></th>',
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Protected properties and methods
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
/**
Filters the `data` ModelList based on the new `filterBy` configuration.
#method _afterFilterByChange
#param {EventFacade} e The `filterByChange` event
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_afterFilterByChange: function (e) {
var filters;
// Can't use a setter because it's a chicken and egg problem. The
// columns need to be set up to translate, but columns are initialized
// from Core's initializer. So construction-time assignment would
// fail.
// WHAT DOES THIS MEAN??
this._setFilterBy();
if (this._filterBy.length) {
// build the filter function
this._buildFilterFn();
// get the filtered data
this._filteredData = this.data.filter( { asList : true }, this._filterFn);
} else {
this._filteredData = this.data;
}
// 'hide' the filtered rows
this._hideFilteredData();
},
/**
#description if the row is not in the filtered data hide it, otherwise show it
#method _hideFilteredData
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_hideFilteredData: function () {
var i,len,clientId;
for(i=0, len = this.data.size(); this._filteredData.getById && i < len; ++i) {
clientId = this.data.item(i).get("clientId");
if(this._filteredData.getByClientId(clientId)) {
this.get("contentBox").one("tbody").one("[data-yui3-record=" + clientId + "]").setStyle("display","table-row");
} else {
this.get("contentBox").one("tbody").one("[data-yui3-record=" + clientId + "]").setStyle("display","none");
}
}
},
/**
Applies the filtering logic to the new ModelList if the `newVal` is a new
ModelList.
#method _afterFilterDataChange
#param {EventFacade} e the `dataChange` event
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_afterFilterDataChange: function (e) {
// object values always trigger a change event, but we only want to
// call _initFilterFn if the value passed to the `data` attribute was a
// new ModelList, not a set of new data as an array, or even the same
// ModelList.
if (e.prevVal !== e.newVal || e.newVal.hasOwnProperty('_compare')) {
// this._initFilterFn();
}
},
/**
Checks if any of the fields in the modified record are fields that are
currently being filtered by, and if so, refilters the `data` ModelList.
#method _afterFilterRecordChange
#param {EventFacade} e The Model's `change` event
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_afterFilterRecordChange: function (e) {
var i, len;
for (i = 0, len = this._filterBy.length; i < len; ++i) {
if (e.changed[this._filterBy[i].key]) {
this.data.filter();
break;
}
}
},
/**
Subscribes to state changes that warrant updating the UI, and adds the
click handler for triggering the filter operation from the UI.
#method _bindFilterUI
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_bindFilterUI: function () {
var handles = this._eventHandles;
// 'filterByChange' -> need to update UI
if (!handles.filterAttrs) {
handles.filterAttrs = this.after(
['filtersChange', 'columnsChange'],
Y.bind('_uiSetFilters', this));
}
if (!handles.filterUITrigger && this._theadNode) {
handles.filterUITrigger = this.delegate(['keyup','blur'],
Y.rbind('_onUITriggerFilter', this),
'.' + this.getClassName('filter', 'input'));
}
},
/**
Sets the `filterBy` attribute from the `filter` event's `e.filterBy` value.
#method _defFilterFn
#param {EventFacade} e The `filter` event
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_defFilterFn: function (e) {
this.set.apply(this, ['filterBy', e.filterBy].concat(e.details));
},
/**
Sets up the initial filter state and instance properties. Publishes events
and subscribes to attribute change events to maintain internal state.
#method initializer
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
initializer: function () {
var boundParseFilter = Y.bind('_parseFilter', this);
this._parseFilter();
this._setFilterBy();
this._initFilterStrings();
// dataChange : Y.bind('_afterFilterDataChange', this),
//
// filterChange : boundParseFilter
this.after({
'sort' : this._hideFilteredData,
'columnsChange' : boundParseFilter,
'filterByChange' : Y.bind('_afterFilterByChange', this),
'table:renderHeader': Y.bind('_renderFilters', this)});
// this.data.after(this.data.model.NAME + ":change",
// Y.bind('_afterFilterRecordChange', this));
// TODO: this event needs magic, allowing async remote filtering
// this.publish('filter', {
// defaultFn: Y.bind('_defFilterFn', this)
// });
},
/**
Add the filter related strings to the `strings` map.
#method _initFilterStrings
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_initFilterStrings: function () {
// Not a valueFn because other class extensions will want to add to it
this.set('strings', Y.mix((this.get('strings') || {}),
Y.Intl.get('datatable-filter')));
},
/**
#description Fires the `filter` event in response to user changing the UI filters
#method _onUITriggerFilter
#param {DOMEventFacade} e The `mouseout` event
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_onUITriggerFilter: function (e) {
var colKey = e.currentTarget.getAttribute('data-yui3-col-key'),
column = colKey && this.getColumn(colKey),
filterBy = this.get("filterBy") || {},
i, len;
e.halt(); // not doing anything anyway?
if (column) {
filterBy[colKey] = e.currentTarget.get("value");
}
this.set("filterBy",filterBy);
},
/**
#description Build the filter function from the column config, this function is passed to the model list fiter() method
#method _buildFilterFn
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_buildFilterFn: function () {
var i,len,op1,op2, key, filter, filterFn;
filterFn = function(model,index,modelList) {
var key,filter,op1,op2,val,filter,passesFilter = true;
for(i=0,len = this._filterBy.length; i< len && passesFilter; ++i) {
key = this._filterBy[i].key;
filter = this._filterBy[i].filter;
val = model.get(key) || '';
op1 = filter.substr(0,1);
op2 = filter.substr(1,1);
if(op2 == '=') {
switch(op1) {
case '!':
// not equal
if(val.toLowerCase() == filter.substr(2).toLowerCase()) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
case '>':
// greater or equal
if(parseInt(val) < parseInt(filter.substr(2))) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
case '<':
// less than or equal
if(parseInt(val) > parseInt(filter.substr(2))) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
}
} else if (op2 == '%' && op1 =='!') {
// not like
if((val.toLowerCase().indexOf(filter.substr(2).toLowerCase()) > -1)) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
} else {
switch(op1) {
case '=':
// equal
if(val.toLowerCase() != filter.substr(1).toLowerCase()) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
case '>':
// greater than
if(parseInt(val) <= parseInt(filter.substr(1))) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
case '<':
// less than
if(parseInt(val) >= parseInt(filter.substr(1))) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
case '%':
// like
if((val.toLowerCase().indexOf(filter.substr(1).toLowerCase()) === -1)) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
default:
// consider to be like
if((String(val).toLowerCase().indexOf(String(filter).toLowerCase()) === -1)) {
passesFilter = false;
}
break;
}
}
}
return passesFilter;
};
this._filterFn = Y.bind(filterFn,this);
},
/**
#description Normalizes the possible input values for the `filter` attribute setting up the column config as appropriate
#method _parseFilter
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_parseFilter: function () {
var filters = this.get('filters'),
columns = [],
i, len, col;
col = this._displayColumns.slice();
this._uiFilters = false;
if(filters === 'auto') {
// look for key on columns
col = this._displayColumns.slice();
for(i = 0; i < col.length; i++) {
if(col[i].renderFilter) {
this._uiFilters = true;
}
}
} else if(filters === true) {
// provide UI filters for all cols
col = this._displayColumns.slice();
for(i = 0; i < col.length; i++) {
this._uiFilters = true;
this._displayColumns[i].renderFilter = true;
}
} else if (isArray(filters)) {
// provide UI filters on the specified cols (plural)
for (i = 0, len=filters.length; i < len; ++i) {
if(col = this.getColumn(filters[i])) {
this._uiFilters = true;
col.renderFilter = true;
}
}
} else if (filters) {
// provide UI filter on the specifed 'COL' (singular)
for (i = 0, len = col.length; i < len; ++i) {
if (col[i].key === filters) {
this._uiFilters = true;
this._displayColumns[i].renderFilter = true;
i = len;
}
}
}
},
/**
Initial application of the filters UI.
#method _renderFilters
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_renderFilters: function () {
this._uiSetFilters();
this._bindFilterUI();
},
/**
#description Parses the current `filterBy` attribute and updates the columns
#method _setFilterBy
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_setFilterBy: function () {
var columns = this._displayColumns,
filterBy = this.get('filterBy') || {},
filteredClass = ' ' + this.getClassName('filtered'),
i, len, name, dir, field, column;
this._filterBy = [];
// Purge current filter state from column configs
for (i = 0, len = columns.length; i < len; ++i) {
column = columns[i];
delete columns[i].filter;
if (column.className) {
// TODO: be more thorough
column.className = column.className.replace(filteredClass, '');
}
}
for (key in filterBy) {
if(filterBy[key]!='') {
// Allow filtering of any model field and any column
column = this.getColumn(key) || { _id: key, key: key };
if (column) {
column.filter = filterBy[key];
if (!column.className) {
column.className = '';
}
column.className += filteredClass;
this._filterBy.push(column);
}
}
}
},
/**
Array of column configuration objects of those columns that need UI setup
for user interaction.
#property _filters
#type {Object[]}
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
//_filters: null,
/**
Array of column configuration objects for those columns that are currently
being used to filter the data. Fake column objects are used for fields that
are not rendered as columns.
#property _filterBy
#type {Object[]}
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
//_filterBy: null,
/**
Replacement `comparator` for the `data` ModelList that defers filtering logic
to the `_compare` method. The deferral is accomplished by returning `this`.
#method _filterComparator
#param {Model} item The record being evaluated for filter position
#return {Model} The record
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_filterComparator: function (item) {
// Defer filtering to ModelList's _compare
return item;
},
/**
Applies the appropriate classes to the `boundingBox` and column headers to
indicate filter state and filterability.
Also currently wraps the header content of filters columns in a `<div>`
liner to give a CSS anchor for filter indicators.
#method _uiSetFilters
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_uiSetFilters: function () {
var columns = this._displayColumns.slice(),
filtersClass = this.getClassName('filters', 'column'),
filtersHidden = this.getClassName("filters","hidden"),
filterRowClass = this.getClassName("filters","row"),
filteredClass = this.getClassName('filtered'),
linerClass = this.getClassName('filter', 'liner'),
i, len, col, node, liner, title, desc;
this.get('boundingBox').toggleClass(
this.getClassName('filters'),
columns.length);
/// NEED TO ADDRESS
if((node = this._theadNode.one("." + filterRowClass))) {
node.remove(true);
}
if(columns.length>0 && this._uiFilters) {
tr = this._theadNode.appendChild(Y.Lang.sub(
this.FILTERS_HEADER_ROW_TEMPLATE, {
filterRowClassName: filterRowClass }));
for (i = 0, len = columns.length; i < len; ++i) {
if(columns[i].renderFilter) {
tr.append(Y.Lang.sub(
this.FILTERS_HEADER_CELL_TEMPLATE, {
className: this.getClassName("filter","cell"),
colKey : columns[i].key,
colName : columns[i].label || columns[i].key,
inputClass : this.getClassName("filter","input"),
linerClass: linerClass
}));
} else {
tr.append(Y.Lang.sub(
this.FILTERS_HEADER_CELL_TEMPLATE_NONE, {
className: this.getClassName("no-filter")
}));
}
}
}
},
/**
Allows values `true`, `false`, "auto", or arrays of column names through.
#method _validateFilters
#param {Any} val The input value to `set("filters", VAL)`
#return {Boolean}
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_validateFilters: function (val) {
return val === 'auto' || isBoolean(val) || isArray(val);
},
/**
Allows strings, arrays of strings, objects, or arrays of objects.
#method _validateFilterBy
#param {String|String[]|Object|Object[]} val The new `filterBy` value
#return {Boolean}
#protected
#since 3.5.0
**/
_validateFilterBy: function (val) {
return val;
return val === null ||
isString(val) ||
isObject(val, true) ||
(isArray(val) && (isString(val[0]) || isObject(val, true)));
}
}, true);
Y.DataTable.Filters = Filters;
Y.Base.mix(Y.DataTable, [Filters]);
},"0.1", {
requires : []});
YUI().use('datatable-sort','datatable-filter',function(Y) {
// comment
//var modelList = new Y.ModelList();
var url = "file:///e:/Documents/json-search.txt";
var modelList, datasource;
modelList = new Y.ModelList();
datasource = Y.DataSource.IO({ source: "file:///e:/Documents/json-search.txt" });
modelList.plug(Y.Plugin.ModelListDataSource, {
source : datasource, });
datasource.sendRequest();
var dataTable = new Y.DataTable (
{
columns : [ {key:"name",label:"Person",renderFilter:true,filter:"Joe"},"company",{key:"state",renderFilter:true},{key:"cost",renderFilter:true}],
data : modelList, sortable : true, filters : 'auto'
}).render("#table");
modelList.item(1).set("id",102);
Y.one("#showhidefilters").on("click",function(e) {e.halt();Y.one("#table").one(".yui3-datatable-filters-row").toggleClass("yui3-datatable-filters-hidden");});
});