I have run into and issue when styling quotes. So what I'm trying to do is pull the quotation marks down a bit relative to the text so that it lines up well. I played around with relative and absolute positioning but could not figure it out. This program will become a random quote generator and the position of the end quote has to be such that it lines up the same way relative to the text if it there is a quote that takes up several lines.
body {
background-color: rgb(44, 62, 80);
}
.quoteMachine {
margin: 100px auto 0 auto;
padding: 40px 60px;
max-width: 600px;
min-height: 225px;
border-radius: 5px;
background-color: white;
}
.theQuote {
text-align: center;
font-size: 30px;
color: rgb(44, 62, 80);
}
.quotetationMarks {
font-size: 60px;
font-weight: 600;
}
.quoteAuthor {
text-align: right;
font-size: 20px;
color: rgb(44, 62, 80);
}
.twitterButton {}
<div class="quoteMachine">
<div class="theQuote">
<blockquote><span class="quotetationMarks">“</span > They call me Mister Tiibs <span class="quotetationMarks">”<span></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="quoteAuthor">
- hello
</div>
<button class="twitterButton"></button>
<button class="newQuoteButton"></button>
</div>
Since the spans are inline elements, you could add vertical-align: middle; to .quotetationMarks and that would move them down toward the middle of the rest of the string.
Alternatively, you could add position: relative; top: 10px; if you need more precise control.
Maybe adding vertical-align: sub; to .quotetationMarks is what you are looking for?
You can also use fontawesome, that's always a good option. -> http://fontawesome.io/icon/quote-right/
Edit: While vertical-align: middle; is a very valid and elegant approach, sometimes you've got a very specific position in mind for the quotation marks. If you need to match a mockup to pixel perfection, this approach grants you the flexibility.
You might get some mileage out of using pseudo-elements to render the quotes, and relative/absolute positioning to get them "just so".
This is especially important to help position them across line breaks. (I've edited my example to force a line break, in order to illustrate the robustness of this approach.)
From MDN:
Just like pseudo-classes, pseudo-elements are added to selectors but instead of describing a special state, they allow you to style certain parts of a document. For example, the ::first-line pseudo-element targets only the first line of an element specified by the selector.
And specifically for the ::before pseudo element:
::before creates a pseudo-element that is the first child of the element matched. It is often used to add cosmetic content to an element by using the content property. This element is inline by default.
These quotes you're styling are cosmetic content, so I think that this is a great use-case for the ::before pseudo element.
I've forked your codepen here: http://codepen.io/cam5/pen/kkxpbX, but here are the relevant parts
<!-- quote HTML -->
<blockquote>
<span class="quotationMark quotationMark--left"></span >
They call me…<br /> Mister Tiibs
<span class="quotationMark quotationMark--right"></span >
</blockquote>
and the CSS:
/* quote css */
.quotationMark {
position: relative;
}
.quotationMark--left::before,
.quotationMark--right::before {
font-size: 60px;
font-weight: 600;
position: absolute;
top: -15px;
}
.quotationMark--left::before {
content:"\201C";
left: -45px;
}
.quotationMark--right::before {
content:"\201D";
right: -45px;
}
This CSS Tricks resource is great when you're trying to locate the ISO for putting a certain glyph into a CSS content rule: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/html/glyphs/
Setting the parent element, the .quotationMark to display: relative; will mean that the top, right, left values passed to the children (the pseudo-elements) of it bearing the position: absolute; property are calculated relative to their parent.
Related
I'm trying to prevent period and other punctuation characters after inline blocks (with a specific class) from being wrapped to the next line. I want to avoid wrapping the inline block and subsequent punctuation it in a no-wrap-styled tag, since that requires knowing in advance where all of these situations might come up and I do not know that. I could use JavaScript to inject that structure everywhere it's needed, but I'd like to avoid it if possible, since my intuition is that that could get messy.
It is a requirement to preserve the background and padding, so display: contents will not work:
display: contents makes that the div doesn’t generate any box, so its background, border and padding are not rendered. However the inherited properties like color and font have effect on the child (span element) as expected.
My two-part question is this: can this be done without a tag around the inline-block and punctuation, and, if so, how?
Screenshot (from Firefox 62 on macOS 10.13.6) in case rendering differences mask the problem:
div {
width: 309px;
background: #EEE;
}
span.help-block {
width: 111px;
background: #DDD;
}
span.inline-code {
display: inline-block;
background: #CCC;
color: #333;
padding-left: 4px;
padding-right: 4px;
padding-top: 1px;
margin-top: -1px;
padding-bottom: 1px;
margin-bottom: -1px;
font-family: Courier, Monaco, monospace;
font-size: .9em;
}
<div>
<span class="help-block">To escape commas, put quotes around the value, e.g., <span class="inline-code">a,b,c,"a,b,c"</span>. To escape those quotes, double them, e.g., <span class="inline-code">a,b,"a,""b"",c"</span>.</span>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/don01001100/ravjykdb/9/
I am trying to put a <p> tag inline with an <a> tag, but I can't figure out how. I've tried several display types in css, but they either don't work or do something weird to it.
(Here is a bunch of unnecessary words because the thing is saying there is too much code and not enough words. I think its pretty dumb because what I said is enough unless someone specifically asks for details about something).
Here's some example code:
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: #efefef;
}
header {
margin: 0;
margin-top: -10px;
background-color: #ffffff;
}
header p {
margin: 0;
font-family: "arial";
font-size: 50px;
color: #3c3c3c;
margin-top: 10px;
margin-left: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
header a {
}
#information {
width: 500px;
height: 250px;
background-color: #ffffff;
box-shadow: 7px 7px 4px grey;
margin-left: 100px;
margin-top: 150px;
}
#information p {
font-family: "arial";
font-size: 20px;
color: #1febff;
}
#delete {
margin-top: 2000px;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>SaHa | Color Scheme</title>
<link href="style.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" />
</head>
<body>
<header>
<p>SaHa</p>
Menu
</header>
<div id="information">
<p>Pretend that there is a bunch of important information here even though there really isn't.
This is normally where a message that actually means something would go, but this is just a
placeholder because I have nothing important to put here right now.
</p>
</div>
<div id="delete"></div>
</body>
</html>
In your HTML, try directly typing or after whatever text you want it to appear.
For example:<div>When i came<a> ut yiur name</a>so what do i do</div>
In your CSS body, try inline-block or just inline parameters with DISPLAY property to get any image or text into the normal flow of a line.
For example:
a {display:inline-block;}
Could you specify which elements in your example code you want inline?
Generally using display: inline and display: inline-block will make elements flow as if they were text. They will sit next to each other and jump to new lines when their container width gets too narrow. Browsers commonly apply display: block to <p> elements by default.
Assuming we are talking about the contents of your <header>, I added the following rule to your existing CSS. Check it out in action.
header p {
display: inline-block;
}
EDIT: Based on further comments, here is a solution to what you are looking for.
First of all I've wrapped your menu items in a nav element and made your main title a h1 element. Search engines like this better. A h1 element is also displayed inline by default and respects text-align properties on its parent container (which in this case is header).
<h1>SaHa</h1>
<nav>
Menu
Thing
Stuff
</nav>
On the CSS side I've made two crucial changes.
First, I've center-aligned your header text. This centers the new h1 element. Additionally I've set position: relative because we will need it in the next step.
header {
text-align: center;
position: relative;
}
Second, to position your menu to the right side of the screen I've lifted it from the regular flow of content with position: absolute. Now, by specifying either a top or bottom and left or right, we can position the menu anywhere in the header. Why the header? Because it is the nearest parent to nav that has a relative position. This is why we set it earlier!
nav {
position: absolute;
right: 10px;
bottom: 10px;
}
Try changing the values for right and bottom in this Codepen example. Try changing right to left and see what happens. What happens if you remove position: relative from .header?
I've been trying to solve the following problem.
If you run this code you will notice blue and red elements.
How can I hide the 'red element' when there is no text to display (span is empty). And I would like to do the same thing with 'blue element' when there is no text inside it shouldn't be visible.
The reason why is displayed is padding, but I would like to have padding because it looks nice.
I am sure you guys are best of the best and find solution.
Regards!
.myClassDer {
font-size: 34px;
color:white;
background: blue;
color: white;
border-radius: 25px;
padding: 7px;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
.myClassDie {
font-size: 34px;
color:black;
background: red;
color: white;
border-radius: 25px;
padding: 7px;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
<span class="myClassDer">here</span>
<span class="myClassDie"></span>
If you don't require support for IE8, you can use pseudo-state :empty (here for more examples ) to reset padding for all instances of .myClassDie without content, using the following code.
.myClassDie:empty
{
padding:0;
}
Updating your working example, it becomes:
.myClassDer
{
font-size: 34px;
color:white;
background: blue;
color: white;
border-radius: 25px;
padding: 7px;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
.myClassDie
{
font-size: 34px;
color:black;
background: red;
color: white;
border-radius: 25px;
padding: 7px;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
.myClassDie:empty
{
padding:0;
}
<span class="myClassDer">here</span>
<span class="myClassDie"></span>
<span class="myClassDie">ClassDie but with content</span>
In which I inserted two <span class="myClassDie"> to show you the behaviour with and without content.
Due to effective invisibility of "empty" case, if you want a more compact solution, you can collapse the two separate rules into only one, simply setting:
.myClassDie:not(:empty)
{
font-size: 34px;
color:black;
background: red;
color: white;
border-radius: 25px;
padding: 7px;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
In this case, only if .myClassDie is not empty, you'll apply all properties.
This is equivalent for this specific case, but if you want to see this DIV also if empty, limiting only to reset padding (for example because it has fixed size or borders), you must use first solution, not the more compact one.
Little precisation about :empty pseudo-class
Previous examples run correctly only if empty elements are effectively empty, this means that this code <span class="myClassDie"></span> is correctly targeted, but this one (that contains a whitespace) <span class="myClassDie"> </span> isn't.
In general, this could be an issue because often code is dynamically generated or otherwise contains white spaces due to code indentation.
In the past, Mozilla introduced its proprietary pseudo-class :-moz-only-whitespace, but no other browser currently supports this yet.
W3 also tried to solve this kind of problems, initially with analogue :blank pseudo-class (again with no browser support) in "Selectors Level 3", but this did not have expected success.
So, since beginning of 2018, W3 modified its definition to represent empty user input, rather than empty elements and contemporarily modified :empty definition to consider also white-spaces, but currently this last feature is not implemented too in different browsers.
Empty pseudo class only checks for empty text
.myClassDie:empty{
padding:0;
}
But for whitespaces use blank pseudo class
.myClassDie:blank{
padding:0;
}
There is a css pseudoclass empty which you could use here:
.myClassDie:empty {
display: none;
}
Your updated JSFiddle
You can do the trick with the CSS3 pesudo-class :empty
span:empty{
padding:0;
}
Note: using above selector you will not have to worry about which span
has value and which one has not. it will reset padding for those span
which are blank (empty).
I guess you could use above piece of code to hide the empty span's padding.
span:empty {
padding: 0;
}
you can you :empty also read the below like.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/pseudo-classes
.myClassDie:empty {padding:0;}
I have a use case whereby I want to draw rectangles in CSS. I need them to look like this:
I've managed to get the smaller and taller boxes drawn but can't work out how to draw those that drop below the line. Here's a fiddle
Heres' my HTML:
<div class="word">
<p class="letter taller"></p>
<p class="letter"></p>
<p class="letter"></p>
<p class="letter hanging"></p>
<p class="letter"></p>
<p class="letter taller"></p>
<p class="letter"></p>
</div>
Here's my CSS so far:
p {
display: inline-block;
}
.letter {
padding 1.618em;
border-width: 1px;
border-style: solid;
width: 2em;
height: 2em;
}
.taller {
height: 4em;
}
.hanging {
/* not sure what to implement here */
}
Using margins may affect other elements, especially if you plan on including other content on your page. (See this) I'd recommend using position: relative combined with top: 2em. What that does is it pushes the element down 2em, relative to the original position of the element.
.hanging {
height: 4em;
position: relative;
top: 2em;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/WtuyL/6/
(On an unrelated note... here's a little bonus if you want to fully imitate the image and remove whitespace. You'll net to set a manual size to all <p> elements though.)
The simplest way is to use a negative margin-bottom to achieve this (you don't need to use positioning):
CSS:
.hanging {
margin-bottom: -16px;
height:4em;
}
JSFiddle
Note: also comment the whitespace between display:inline-block elements to remove it.
Reference - see this to see more hacks how to remove the whitespace between display:inline-block elements.
Try this.
.hanging {
height:4em;
margin-bottom:-1em;
}
I have a paragraph surrounded by decorative quotes. The layout is fluid, and for some width, only the decorative quote is wrapping, which I want to avoid.
Screenshot :
Code : http://jsfiddle.net/84EDh/1/ (Note: not tested outside of Chrome)
<p>
<span class="bigchar ldquo"></span>
Begin paragraph [...paragraph content...] end paragraph.
<span class="bigchar rdquo"></span>
</p>
css:
p { position: relative; }
.bigchar {
display: inline-block;
width: 20px;
}
.bigchar:after {
color: #aaa;
font-size: 50px;
position: absolute;
}
.ldquo:after {
content: '“';
top: -10px;
}
.rdquo:after {
content: '”';
bottom: -30px;
}
Possible solution:
Wrap the last word with the closing span in another span
[...paragraph content...] end
<span class="nowrap">
paragraph.
<span class="bigchar rdquo"></span>
</span>
Question:
Is there a more elegant way to achieve the no-wrapping of the last span of the paragraph ?
This is not very semantic, nor easy to achieve because, as you would expect, the content of the paragraph is dynamic, hence not easy to split at the template level.
Edit: css added
Instead of using a span, it's better to use a q, because that's what q elements were designed for!
So the HTML becomes
<p><q class="bigchar">This text is surrounded by quotes. I want
the text to wrap according it's parent width. This is no problem,
it's the default behaviour. However, I would like to avoid the
last span, containing a decoration quote, to wrap.</q></p>
with the CSS
q.bigchar::before {content:'\201C'; font-size:2em; line-height:0;
position:relative; top:.3em; margin-right:.13em;}
q.bigchar::after {content:'\201D'; font-size:2em; line-height:0;
position:relative; top:.3em; margin-left:.13em;}
resulting in this fiddle.
No extra markup is needed.
Note that since I leave the p alone, you can put all kinds of styles (like text-indent) on it, and it will behave as it should.
What about nesting span inside other span?
What we achieve this way is rdquo acting just as a regular text (that means: if you put either no space or non-breaking space between rdquo and last word, it's not going to break into two lines).
Demo here: http://jsfiddle.net/HFE9T/1/
Instead of using additional span elements, try using :before and :after on paragraph like this:
p:after {
color: #aaa;
font-size: 50px;
position: absolute;
content: '”';
bottom: -30px;
}
p:before {
color: #aaa;
font-size: 50px;
position: absolute;
content: '“';
top: -10px;
}
Updated fiddle here
Here is the final markup and CSS to achieve the expected behaviour, inspired by Michal Rybak but without the compromises (except the two span in the markup) :
HTML :
<p>
<span class="quote" attr-char="“"> </span>
Paragraph content Here.
Note the no-line-break here.<span class="quote" attr-char="”"> </span>
</p>
The attr-char attribute is pretty handy to be able to change the quote characters for different languages as with the q element (somewhat)
CSS :
p .quote {
position: relative;
margin-right: 30px; /* Indent text at paragraph beginning */
}
p .quote:before {
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
line-height: 20px;
font-size: 50px;
content: attr(attr-char); /* Take the character from markup */
}
p .quote:last-child:before {
margin-left: 10px; /* Give the closing quote some space */
}
Fiddle :
http://jsfiddle.net/HFE9T/4/
You can add a non-breaking spaces \00a0 before and after the quotes:
<style>
element:before {content: "“\00a0";}
element:after {content: "\00a0”";}
</style>
And then work your way around with negatives margins if you don’t want those space to show.