I'm building a Google Chrome extension at the moment and I have a question about when to use an event page.
A quick look at the Chrome extension docs shows that Google really want its developers to use event pages, if possible.
My extension currently uses a background page, but I was wondering if I should switch to an event page?
This is what my extension does:
When matched with a particular website, it injects a script that adds buttons for the user to access extra functionality.
Most of this extra functionality consists of doing fairly computationally expensive operations on user-entered data - this is all done in the background page (it is all it does).
When a user wants to run these operations on their data they press a button and this passes a message, from the injected script to the background page, which then passes a message back containing the results of its operations.
Essentially, all the background page is doing is waiting for message passing from an injected script in one particular website and then running some operations. Since it doesn't need to be active all the time, this suggests that I should be using an event page.
Can anyone confirm if this would be a good idea for me? Or are there reasons why I should stick to a background page?
Allowing the background page to suspend (chrome.runtime.onSusend) is great, because it will free up system resources. The page will automatically be launched when a matching event happens (chrome.tab.onUpdated etc). I can't think of any compelling reason to use a persistent background page. You can always store any long term state in chrome.storage.local or indexedDb, etc.
Related
I am making a chrome extension that fetched JSON data from CoinMarketCap.com API and currently I have it running in the background script. I'm not 100% sure what the purpose of the page is really. I was wondering if I could simply fetch the data from the popup script after I click a button within my popup?
Each button represents a different coin. I basically want to get the price of a chosen coin and display it on whatever page the user is on when they double click the coin in a text article. Eventually I want to make it so you can double click any coin and have it show a live price conversion while you're on the web-page.
The point of a background page is to be always available (running if persistent: true, woken up / recreated for registered events if persistent: false).
A popup's lifetime is determined by its visibility. The moment the user clicks away and closes it, the page is closed (as if the tab with it was closed), so it can no longer process any events and its state is lost.
As long as:
The data you need fetched is to be received/processed while the popup is open
Any state you need to persist between popups being shown can be stored in chrome.storage
Then you don't need the background page to do the fetching. Popup page has the same level of access to Chrome APIs.
However, consider this scenario: suppose you want the data to be ready as soon as popup is opened (at least, you want it to be fresher than "since last time"). You may want to do periodic updates even while the popup is closed to refresh the data. You can only do that reliably with a background page (and, say, chrome.alarms API). Then you can cache the latest available data in chrome.storage and use that in the popup.
Background pages have their uses as some code that can run periodically regardless of user actions, and to be able to always react to events.
According to Changes to Cross-Origin Requests in Chrome Extension Content Scripts now you have to do your fetches in Background Script. Not in Content Script.
I am trying to implement a hard limit on a how long a web page can load via a Chrome extension. I have seen a number of implementations that suggest using a content script to call window.stop(), but in some cases the browser is never going to execute that JavaScript because it's still attempting to load a page that is going to time out. An example of such a site is http://blackhole.webpagetest.org.
At a very basic level, I need the extension to be able to hit the "Stop" button in the browser after a specified amount of time.
Any suggestions on how to accomplish this in Chrome?
I'm working on an extension that's supposed to use the content of the page to determine whether to show an interface to the user.
The ways to show an interface, if I'm correct, are using a browser action or a page action.
And neither can be triggered programmatically. But content scripts could be written to inject an equivalent GUI into the webpage.
So, does it make sense to modify the DOM using content-scripts to display an interface as a substitute for page action? It seems like an obvious work around to me, and I'm sure there are good reasons to not let page actions be triggered programmatically.
Well, modifying DOM must be done by only Content Scripts, as that is the reason they exist.
Want to fetch any data from current page, alter anything in the page, add new UI in the page - whatever, content script will help you do that.
It has nothing to do with Page script Or Browser Script.
YES, you can not programatically trigger page/browser action. It has to be done by explicit clicking.
But if you want to open a UI by clicking a chrome extension, then there is a popup js for that.
Is there any way to completely duplicate the state of a current tab in Google Chrome? I want an exact copy of the current state of the page without having to reload the page in another tab.
An example use case:
While browsing a "slideshow" on a news website, I want to preserve the current slide that I'm on, but create a duplicate so that I can continue viewing the next slide. If I simply Right-Click and "Duplicate" the tab, the new page will completely Reload, reprocessing all of the Javascript and running the pre-slideshow advertisement again.
In short "NO" you can't.
I am not expert on this
but a similar behavior can be achieved in some ways i know :
Dump the whole DOM
Never tried this though. You can convert the DOM to a string, pass it to the new window and then parse it as a document. This will let you lose your DOM events and State manipulation javascript. (But that's good for your case)
var dtab = window.open('about:blank', 'duplicate_a_tab');
dtab.document.open();
dtab.document.write("... yout html string ..");
dtab.document.close();
Develop an extension
Let the users continue on the current tab with the current state, your extension should be able to capture the screenshot of that area and open that screenshot in new tab. There are plenty of screenshot taking extensions are available in the market.
If that website is your own
You can develop your services that uses state locally like progressive web apps. Give a link separately to 'duplicate' which will eventually open the same URL in different tab with the same local state and with the flag do-not-sync.
This will not work when the user uses browser inbuilt duplicate
feature.
I've been working on a new website and practicing my JS/jQuery/AJaxy skills. Last night I wanted to take a look at how long the page was taking to render and see if there were any areas I could clean up to increase speed. While the page loads in about 200 - 300 ms every time, I'm seeing a large amount of blank space between resource loads under the network inspector.
http://i.imgur.com/7ng6m.jpg
Has anyone else seen this or know what I can do to minimize that time (talking about the blank space between like the html and the first css file)?
Quite possibly it is caused by the extensions you have installed. AdBlock, LastPass and Google quick scroll took altogether about 200 ms on my machine.
Unfortunately, these extensions are invoked on every site and block loading the additional resources.
Try it with out of the box browser setup, the loading time will increase tremendously.
You've got a bunch of images loaded just after the page has been loaded (the load and DOMContentLoaded events have fired - the blue and red vertical lines across the Timeline). I can see that the images are loaded by the JQuery library (the Initiator column), perhaps to build a gallery or something.
So, the case is that JQuery loads the images after the page load, presumably in the onload handler (this can look like $(document).ready(handler) in your code, but other options are possible, too).
The delay between the initial page load and requesting the first resources is almost certainly caused by Chrome extensions. To find the culprit: Record a timeline in the Timeline tab in Chrome Developer Tools; Identify the scripts that are running during the Parse HTML phase; Work out which extensions they're from.
To record a timeline:
Open the timeline tab and click record.
Reload the page and then stop the recording. (A couple of seconds should be enough.)
To find the culprit:
Find the first main Parse HTML block on the timeline. On the row below you will probably see one or more Evaluate Script blocks. These are the culprits.
Click on one of the Evaluate Script blocks and find the script name in the bottom pane. Mouse-over the script name. The tooltip will have the URL of the script, which should be of the form chrome-extension://{long_identifier}/{path}
Memorise the first few letters of the identifier and search for it in the chrome://extensions/ page. This tells you which extension is causing the problem. Try disabling it - you should see a difference.
Repeat for the other Evaluate Script blocks.
In my case, I have 20 extensions installed but only two were causing a delay: LastPass and Fauxbar. I've chosen to leave them enabled because for me the productivity benefit of these extensions outweighs the downside of the added latency.