I am currently coding up my own website (basically a personal blog) w/ HTML5 and CSS3. However, the growing number of .html files (blog posts and other stuff) quickly raised a problem: say if I want to change something in my page header / footer (which I want to keep the same across the entire site), I would have to edit every .html file to get this done. Is there anyway that this process can be simplified to a one-time action? Mostly, I write html files in Brackets. Thanks in advance!
Why not save the files as .php, create another file for the header and footer, and include the header and footer ( <?php include 'header.php'; ?> ) files from each of the main files?
I am not familiar with with the Mediawiki script and having a hard time finding stuff. I need to make some pretty big changes to the header and body tags but I haven't figured out where and which file holds those two tags.
Does someone know the location and name of the files where I can edit the header and body content?
If you use the Vector skin (which is default) you can change the header and body within the file mediawiki/skins/Vector/VectorTemplate.php.
Be aware that this file is overwritten if you update MediaWiki.
I was wondering how other people are organising their assets for individual posts when using Jekyll. For example, if a post has an image, do you just dump it in a shared images folder? I don't really like the idea of doing this - it means that an image is completely separated from a post, when I think they should be paired.
I wrote a plugin to let me organise assets in subdirectories easily:
https://github.com/samrayner/jekyll-asset-path-plugin
{% asset_path my-image.png %}
in post 2013-01-01-post-title would output:
/assets/posts/post-title/my-image.png
in page my-first-page would output:
/assets/my-first-page/my-image.png
I prefer to think of images as stand alone assets that are included in zero or more pages. Most of the time, my images show up in a single page. There are times when I want to have them in multiple pages and in other cases I don't link an image at all. If your workflow is to put each image in a directory with a post, finding them starts to require a significant amount of searching and you have to come up with something different for images that don't belong to a specific post.
The approach I use is on the opposite side of the spectrum. I have a single image directory (served from "/images") and 100% of my images are housed there. Benefits of this are:
When I'm adding an image to a post it's easy to know what path to use. It's always:
/images/{image-name}
For example: http://alanwsmith.com/i/aws-20111017--0906-02. This makes it possible to write a plug-in so all you have to enter is the image name and the rest of the known path is filled out automatically.
With an application like Photo Mechanic, it's incredibly easy to browse the single directory locally and see every image. If I want to include an image on another page, this drastically reduces the time to find it.
There isn't a separate location/process if I want to send an image to someone without actually including it in a page (i.e. send them a direct link to the image file). I just throw the image in the standard directory and send the direct link.
If you want to get a little more advanced, keeping all your images in a single directory makes some nice tweaks possible as well. For example, even though the URLs for my images start with "/images", the images are actually stored in a directory outside of the ones jekyll uses. In my case, the top of my source tree looks like this:
./html
./source-files
./image-files
All of my images are stored in the "./image-files" directory. In my apache config, I've setup an alias so that the URL "/images" points to the "./image-files" directory. For example:
Alias /images /webroot/image-files
When I run jekyll, it process everything in "./source-files" and drops it in "./html". Because all of the images are outside those two directories, jekyll never sees/touches them. As your image library grows this will help speed things up and will prevent a tremendous amount of unnecessary file copying.
Another tweak I like in Apache is turning on:
Options +MultiViews
This lets you call your images without having to use the file extension (e.g. no '.jpg', '.png', etc...). You can see that in the example link I provided above. It doesn't really matter for performance. I just like the way it looks and it saves me from having to type the extension every time I'm calling an image.
MultiViews also makes it possible to replace an image of one format with another without having to recode anything else. For example, if you remove "some-image.gif" and replace it with "some-image.png", you wouldn't have to touch any HTML. It would still be served form "/images/some-image". Needing to make changes like that is probably exceedingly rare. I just think it's an interesting thing to be able to do.
Finally, you can make a single decision about allowing or disallowing your image directory to be browsed. Personally, I only want my images to show up where I place them. So, I've set the .htaccess file in my images directory to:
Options -Indexes
If you are going to be working on a site with many thousands or tens of thousands of pages and images, this might not scale. For a normal sized, personal site, I find that this approach makes maintaining images easier.
I have now managed to develop a Jekyll plugin that helps keep posts assets alongside the Markdown file:
https://nhoizey.github.io/jekyll-postfiles/
Just like you, I really hate having all images in one single shared folder.
Most, if not all, of my images are useful in one single post, and keeping them alongside the Markdown file is really better for posts management:
I can drop a new post as one single sub-folder of /_posts/ in one step, without having to put the Markdown at one place and the image(s) at another
When I want to edit the image(s) of an existing post, I don't have to find the right image in a huge /assets/ folder, it is located just near the Markdown file
In my Markdown, I can use the image file name directly, without any path
If I want to use any Markdown editor with live preview, it works, no need for a specific assets folder configuration
I tried to have this for my blog (example post here).
For responsive images, I used the Jekyll Picture Tag plugin, but I had to fork it, because the Pull Request to deal with such paths was not accepted.
Now that Jekyll 3 is there, I wish it could let us use images both in a post folder AND in the /assets/ one, looking for an image marked with  in both, in that order.
For JavaScript and CSS, you may want to consider an asset pipeline. You can get a good performance improvement through bundling and compression. I also use CoffeeScript and Sass, so I needed a preprocessor to convert my assets. I use Jekyll Asset Pipeline to manage this whole process automatically when I run the jekyll command.
For images/video, I recommend you develop a convention for naming folders in your project. I generally have an "assets" folder then subfolders with the date of each post that holds the images related to those posts. If you have multiple posts per day, you might consider including the name of the post.
This answer:
Does not use plugins (works with GitHub Pages)
Allows you to keep images directly next to their relevant posts
Allows you to edit using Typora locally and see the images WYSIWYG
Just name your folders like _posts/2020-10-10-My-Title/ and include files like index.md and hero.svg or other images.
Then set your permalink: key in _config.yaml to :path.
Caveats:
Your folder names must be sluggified
Your images must all be SVG
I have a site with static HTML pages in the home directory. These HTML pages use relative paths to refer to images, css, and links i.e.
<img src="images/myimg.gif">
and
Contact Us
I also have a monolithic script whose URL is, i.e. http://mysite.com/myScript which uses "extra path info" to select functions... i.e. http://mysite.com/myScript/products shows a list of products. So in HTML generated from the script I need to refer to images, css and links like this:
<img src="../images/myimg.gif">
and
Contact Us
The problem is now I want to start moving common HTML into include files, (e.g. common header and footer), but the fact that the script and the static HTML refer to relative resources in different ways is complicating matters.
I don't want to use absolute paths because that messes up my colleague's work when she tries to work on the pages in DramWeaver, and it also makes the site less flexible.
What's the best way to solve this issue? One idea I had was to use URL rewriting in Apache to allow the URL to http://mysite.com/products to really use http://mysite.com/myScript/products but I don't have experience with URL rewriting so I don't know how easy that would be. Another idea I had was to use the META BASE attribute in HTML but I don't like the fact that I would have to hard-code that into every HTML page, and it would have to have the full URL hard-coded (e.g. http://mysite.com/) into each one. Any advice?
Can't you refer to your images with a slash at the beginning so all files linked to are from the root, no matter how deep you are in the directory structure you are? E.g:
<img src="/images/myimg.gif" />
EDIT:
You could use $_SERVER to get the path then use substr_count to count the number of slashes in the path. Add as many ../'s as you need based on that number. Would that work for you?
I took over an old HTML based site with all hard coded links, no frames etc. Theres who knows how many pages that have a link to abc.html (<--example).
I've been asked to go through the pages and change the abc.html link to 123.html (<--another example).
I could download the entire site from via FTP then use find and replace to go through all the files, then upload the changes.
Problem is the site is poorly organized and heavily nested so theres probably several hundred mg of junk I'd have to download just to be sure.
The other option is to change the html code of abc.html and put in something like
We've moved, you are currently being
redirected.
And use some sort of redirect.
Anyone have any other ideas on how to do this?
Why not using a software such as Actual Search and Replace ?
You will need to return HTTP 301 Moved Permanently on old links so that the search engines know that the content has moved and not just disappeared.
I made a list of all the files that contained the old link using
grep -lir "some text" *
(above taken from comandlinefu.com)
I then used the following command to replace all the matching text accordingly.
find . -name '*.html' -exec sed -ir 's/old/new/g' {} \;
(also taken from commandlinefu.com)
I used the sed version as it created backups of the html files and named them *.htmlr
Not ideal as I now have more junk, but I can easily delete them with
rm *.htmlr