Following the example on the wiki for finding nested elements (https://github.com/cheezy/page-object/wiki/Nested-Elements), I was able to find items in a modal.
The problem is, i need to select them by index number, is there a way to do with this without using the deprecated functionality that passes the functionality to the underlying driver?
Current code is as follows.
div(:add_line_modal, :id => 'add-line-modal')
select(:add_line_service_select) do |page|
page.add_line_modal_element.select(:index => 0)
end
Throws this
*** DEPRECATION WARNING
*** You are calling a method named select at %PROJECTDIRECTORY%
*** This method does not exist in page-object so it is being passed to the driver.
*** This feature will be removed in the near future.
*** Please change your code to call the correct page-object method.
*** If you are using functionality that does not exist in page-object please request it be added.
Look more careful at the example. The nested line is not just "unordered_list", it's "unordered_list_element".
When you want to describe an element outside an accessor you should add "_element":
# accessor
link('ok', text: 'ok')
# outside accessor
def ok
link_element(text: 'ok')
end
In your example you should use:
page.add_line_modal_element.select_list_element(:index => 0)
Related
I am new to Robot Framework and am trying to validate the contents of some JSON that is returned from a web service. The problem is that some attributes of the json objects have dashes in them and Robot doesn't seem to like this. I have something like the following
&{deployment} = list deployment ${deployment_name}
&{changeSets} = Set Variable ${deployment.ChangeSets}
&{myChangeSet} = Set Variable ${changeSets.my-change-set}
Should Be True ${myChangeSet.UseLocal}
Should Be Equal As Strings ${myChangeSet.Version} ${update_version}
But Robot fails on the 3rd line with the following error:
Resolving variable '${changeSets.my-change-set}' failed: AttributeError: my
I tried to escape the dashes but that still doesn't seem to work:
Resolving variable '${changeSets.my\-change\-set}' failed: SyntaxError: unexpected character after line continuation character (<string>, line 1)
I can't seem to find any information in the Robot docs with other ways to retrieve dict keys outside of the dot-notation. Any suggestions?
The use of dot notation is just a convenience. You can still access them the normal way (documented in the dictionary variables section of the user guide as &{NAME}[key]):
&{changeSets}[my-change-set]
Or, with extended variable syntax, which treats everything inside {} as a python expression:
${changeSets['my-change-set']}
Here is a working example illustrating these two methods:
*** Variables ***
&{changeSets} my-change-set=foo
*** Test Cases ***
Test 1
should be equal ${changeSets['my-change-set']} foo
Test 2
should be equal &{changeSets}[my-change-set] foo
I would like to know how to access to a function of a controller from inside another controller in Symfony2. In fact I have two controllers: "EventgroupeController" and "GroupeController". In the code of the controller "EventgroupeController" I put the instruction below:
return GroupeController::AfficheGroupeAction();
But when I run the code (or let's say the project I am developing), it displays this error message in Symfony2:
ContextErrorException: Runtime Notice: Non-static method Ikproj\GroupeBundle\Controller\GroupeController::AfficheGroupeAction() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in C:\wamp\www\Wkayet_project\PFESymfony2\src\Ikproj\GroupeBundle\Controller\EventgroupeController.php line 104
After having a look at this link: How to access a different controller from inside a controller Symfony2 in order to know how to access a different controller from inside a controller in Symfony2, I modified the content of the file services.yml as below:
parameters:
# ikproj_groupe.example.class: Ikproj\GroupeBundle\Example
services:
# ikproj_groupe.example:
# class: %ikproj_groupe.example.class%
# arguments: [#service_id, "plain_value", %parameter%]
controllerservice:
class: Ikproj\GroupeBundle\Controller\GroupeController
Then, I replaced the instruction: return GroupeController::AfficheGroupeAction(); by the lines below:
$yourController = $this->get('controllerservice');
$yourController1 = $yourController::AfficheGroupeAction();
return $yourController1;
But I still see this error message:
ContextErrorException: Runtime Notice: Non-static method Ikproj\GroupeBundle\Controller\GroupeController::AfficheGroupeAction() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in C:\wamp\www\Wkayet_project\PFESymfony2\src\Ikproj\GroupeBundle\Controller\EventgroupeController.php line 106
So, my question is: how can I resolve this problem and how can I access to the function AfficheGroupeAction() of the controller "GroupeController" from inside the controller "EventgroupeController"?
An action method must not be static.
$this->get('controllerservice')->youMethod();
Should work !
But with a good "application design", you should not have this need except if you want to forward a request from a controller to another ( example : backward compatibility ). In this case you can use the forward method provided by symfony2 base controller. ( http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/controller.html )
I'd like to add an event handler in my C++ code.
I followed document in firebreath.org (Callback from Scripts):
FB::JSObjectPtr doc = m_host->getDOMDocument()->getJSObject();
doc->Invoke("addEventListener", FB::variant_list_of("load", FB::make_callback(this, &mine::foo)));
but seeing following error:
/home/dq/manager/mine.cpp: In member function ‘void mine::init()’:
/home/dq/manager/mine.cpp:284:119: error: no matching function for call to ‘variant_list_of(const char [5], FB::JSAPIPtr)’
/home/dq/manager/mine.cpp:284:119: note: candidates are:
/usr/include/firebreath/ScriptingCore/variant_list.h:122:5: note: FB::detail::VariantListInserter FB::variant_list_of(FB::variant)
/usr/include/firebreath/ScriptingCore/variant_list.h:122:5: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/firebreath/ScriptingCore/variant_list.h:128:5: note: FB::VariantList FB::variant_list_of()
/usr/include/firebreath/ScriptingCore/variant_list.h:128:5: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 2 provided
In file included from /home/deqing/manager/mine.h:51:0,
from /home/deqing/manager/mine.cpp:37:
/usr/include/firebreath/ScriptingCore/JSCallback.h: In function ‘FB::JSAPIPtr FB::make_callback(const T&, F, bool) [with T = mine*, F = void (mine::*)(), FB::JSAPIPtr = boost::shared_ptr<FB::JSAPI>]’:
/home/dq/manager/mine.cpp:284:118: instantiated from here
/usr/include/firebreath/ScriptingCore/JSCallback.h:47:107: error: request for member ‘get’ in ‘instance’, which is of non-class type ‘mine* const’
/usr/include/firebreath/ScriptingCore/JSCallback.h:49:97: error: request for member ‘get’ in ‘instance’, which is of non-class type ‘mine* const’
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/mine.dir/manager/mine.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/mine.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
Looking into the implementation of make_callback(), I tried following instead:
FB::JSObjectPtr doc = m_host->getDOMDocument()->getJSObject();
doc->Invoke("addEventListener", FB::variant_list_of("load")(FB::JSAPIPtr(new FB::JSCallback(FB::make_method(this, &mine::foo)))));
Compile passed this time, but my function - mine::foo() is not called with document.load()
By using "Inspect Element" in chrome, in "Event Listeners" I can see a new listener is added for "load". However, the listenerBody is a <JSAPI-Auto Javascript Object>.
I'm afraid this is why mine::foo() is not called, Javascript don't know how to call it because it is not a function, only an object.
Any one know how to get this done?
Another way that I can think of is:
Register a custom event handler
Fire the custom event on init
I'd like to use something like:
registerEventMethod("myevent", &mine::foo);
so that when myevent is fired, mine::foo() can be called.
The question here is, mine::foo is not a JSObjectPtr, so this snippet of code wouldn't work.
What is the proper way to use registerEventMethod() in this case?
registerEventObject was really never intended to be called manually; it is used by the internal implementations of addEventListener and attachEvent. The purpose is to attach javascript handlers to events in the plugin.
I would recommend you use something like boost's signals and slots to implement your own c++-side event system; FireBreath's stuff was never intended to solve that problem. On the other hand, if you wanted to look at it it would probably be possible to extend FireBreath's functionality to support that and I have it on very good authority that the gatekeeper for FireBreath would probably entertain a pull request to that end. =]
I want to swap the content in answers table with ActiveRecord.
code 1:
Archieve::Answer.find_each do |answer|
str = answer.content
dosomething() #change the value
answer.update_attribute(:content,str)
end
But It doesn't change the value of content.
code 2:
Archieve::Answer.find_each do |answer|
str = answer.content
dosomething() #change the value
answer.reload
answer.update_attributes(
:content => str
)
end
Before update the :content attributes, I reload the record every time.
It can indeed change the the value.
Why?
What's the difference between code 1 & code 2?
Source Code
###1 Post Debug Message:
Updated Post:
Changed?: false
valid?: true
errors: #<ActiveModel::Errors:0xa687568>
errors: #<ActiveModel::Errors:0xa687568 #base=#<Archieve::Answer id: 9997190932758339, user_id: 4163690810052834, question_id: 3393286738785869, content: "狗狗生病，好可怜呀，", is_correct: false, votes_count: 0, comments_count: 0, created_at: "2011-11-06 18:38:53", updated_at: "2011-11-06 18:38:53">, #messages={}>
possible ActiveRecord 3.1.1 bug
The OP mentioned to me that he uses require "active_record" in a stand alone script (not using rails runner).
There is no separate Rails application for his task, he just uses a script. This is not necessarily bad, and has worked in earlier ActiveRecord versions, e.g. 2.x AFAIK -- maybe this is a regression in Rails 3.1 due to a new dependency?
# the OP's require statements:
require 'rubygems'
require 'logger'
require 'yaml'
require 'uuidtools'
require 'active_record'
complete code here: https://raw.github.com/Zhengquan/Swap_Chars/master/lib/orm.rb
maybe a dependency is missing, or problem with AR 3.1.1 when initialized stand alone?
It could be a bug actually
It could be that update_attribute() triggers a bug in the dirty-tracking of attributes, which then incorrectly assumes that the object has not changed, and as a result it will not be persisted, although the implementation of update_attribute() calls save() (see code fragment below).
I've seen something like this with an older version of Mongoid -- could be that there is a similar hidden bug in your ActiveRecord version for update_attribute()
In the Rails Console monkey-patch update_attribute like this:
class ActiveRecord::Base
def update_attribute(name, value) # make sure you use the exact code of your Rails Version here
send(name.to_s + '=', value)
puts "Changed?: #{changed?}" # this produced false in the OP's scenario
puts "valid?: #{valid?}"
puts "errors: #{errors.inspect}"
save
end
end
then try to run your Code 1 again...
you shouldn't see "Changed?: false".. if it returns false, although you changed the attribute, then there is a bug in your ActiveRecord version and you should report it.
Code 1:
NOTE: check the definition of update_attribute() (singular) here:
(please read the fine-print regarding validations -- it doesn't sound like a good idea to use that method)
http://ar.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Base.html#M000400
See also:
Rails: update_attribute vs update_attributes
The source code for update_attribute() looks like this:
2260: def update_attribute(name, value)
2261: send(name.to_s + '=', value)
2262: save
2263: end
it could fail if there is a bug with the dirty-tracking of attributes...
Code 2:
The second code looks correct.
There are a couple of things to also consider:
1) which attributes did you define as accessible, via attr_accessible ?
e.g. only accessible attributes will be updated via update_attributes()
http://apidock.com/rails/ActiveRecord/Base/update_attributes
2) which validations do you use?
are you sure the validations pass for the record when you call update_attribute?
See also:
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_querying.html
http://m.onkey.org/active-record-query-interface
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Base.html
I'm writing a simple Twitter client to play with coffeescript. I have an object literal with some functions that call each other via callbacks.
somebject =
foo: 'bar'
authenticateAndGetTweets: ->
console.log "Authorizing using oauth"
oauth = ChromeExOAuth.initBackgroundPage(this.oauthdetails)
oauth.authorize( this.afterLogin.call this )
afterLogin: ->
this.getTweets(this.pollinterval)
This code works perfectly. Edit: actually this.afterlogin should be sent as a callback above, not ran immediately, as Trevor noted below.
If, within authenticateAndGetTweets, I removed the 'call' and just ran:
oauth.authorize( this.afterLogin )
and don't use 'call', I get the following error:
Uncaught TypeError: Object [object DOMWindow] has no method 'getTweets
Which makes sense, since 'this' in afterLogin is bound to the thing that initiated the callback rather than 'someobject' my object literal.
I was wondering if there's some magic in Coffeescript I could be doing instead of 'call'. Initially I thought using the '=>' but the code will give the same error as above if '=>' is used.
So is there a way I can avoid using call? Or does coffeescript not obviate the need for it? What made '=>' not work how I expected it to?
Thanks. I'm really enjoying coffeescript so far and want to make sure I'm doing things 'the right way'.
As matyr points out in his comments, the line
oauth.authorize( this.afterLogin.call this )
doesn't cause this.afterLogin to be called as a callback by oauth.authorize; instead, it's equivalent to
oauth.authorize this.afterLogin()
Assuming that you want this.afterLogin to used as a callback by oauth.authorize, megakorre's answer gives a correct CoffeeScript idiom. An alternative approach supported by many modern JS environments, as matyr points out, would be to write
oauth.authorize( this.afterLogin.bind this )
There's no CoffeeScript shorthand for this, partly because Function::bind isn't supported by all major browsers. You could also use the bind function from a library like Underscore.js:
oauth.authorize( _.bind this.afterLogin, this )
Finally, if you were to define someobject as a class instead, you could use => to define afterLogin such that it's always bound to the instance, e.g.
class SomeClass
foo: 'bar'
authenticateAndGetTweets: ->
console.log "Authorizing using oauth"
oauth = ChromeExOAuth.initBackgroundPage(this.oauthdetails)
oauth.authorize(this.afterLogin)
afterLogin: =>
this.getTweets(this.pollinterval)
someobject = new SomeClass
you can put a lambda in the function call like so
auth.authorize(=> #afterLogin())
You have to use either the call or apply methods because they set the scope of the function (the value of this). The error results because the default scope is the window object.