When I go to call:
enableShorthandMethods from the file "MagicalRecord+ShorthandMethods.h"using :
#import <MagicalRecord/MagicalRecord+ShorthandMethods.h>
there is an error:
Duplicate interace definition for class MagicalRecord.
I'm getting:
duplicate interface definition for class MagicalRecord.h
MR has been added with cocoaPods.
pod 'MagicalRecord'
pod 'MagicalRecord/ShorthandMethodAliases'
I tried to follow the following guide:
https://github.com/magicalpanda/MagicalRecord/blob/master/Docs/Installing-MagicalRecord.md
To no avail.
After running
'find . -iname "MagicalRecord.h"'
There was a remaining copy of the file from the previous non-pods installation. The got rid of this very message.
Turns out it was something to do with an XCode5 project using ARC. Setting a flag for no ARC fixed the problem. An object associated with the MR was involved.
Related
We run a set of tests in a CI pipeline and call our test classes like this:
java -classpath junit-jupiter-api-5.0.1.jar:junit-platform-console-standalone-1.0.1.jar org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher --select-class xy.Test
If class xy.Test cannot be found on the classpath an error message appears but ConsoleLauncher's return value is 0! Since our CI system runs unattended the return value is the only important return value!
As I have seen this behaviour got updated in JUnit 5.0.0 M2 but I regard this as I mistake: If I define a class by --select-class and the class cannot be found then something has gone wrong!
As I countermeasure I hacked (by means of introspection) org.junit.platform.commons.util.BlacklistedExceptions by overwriting blacklist's field with OutOfMemoryError (=default) and PreconditionViolationException (=case where class could not be found).
(If the standard behaviour shall not be changed...) I think there should be a better way to get this behaviour!
I know this has been posted all over the place but I can not find what I need. I have a Arduino project that I must have vector or another way of allocating a dynamic array safely. I am trying to get the "StandardCplusplus" library to compile but I am getting an error
'Starting combiner'
"C:\Eclipse\eclipse\arduinoPlugin\tools\arduino\avr-gcc\4.8.1-arduino5/bin/avr-gcc" -Os -Wl,--gc-sections,--relax -mmcu=atmega2560 -o "D:/Development/MegaTesting/Release/MegaTesting.elf" ./.ino.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/algorithm.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/associative_base.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/bitset.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/char_traits.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/complex.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/del_op.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/del_opnt.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/del_opv.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/del_opvnt.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/deque.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/eh_alloc.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/eh_globals.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/exception.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/fstream.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/func_exception.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/iomanip.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/ios.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/iostream.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/istream.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/iterator.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/limits.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/list.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/locale.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/map.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/new_handler.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/new_op.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/new_opnt.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/new_opv.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/new_opvnt.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/numeric.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/ostream.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/queue.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/set.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/sstream.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/stack.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/stdexcept.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/streambuf.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/string.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/support.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/typeinfo.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/utility.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/valarray.cpp.o ./libraries/StandardCplusplus/vector.cpp.o arduino.ar "-LD:/Development/MegaTesting/Release" -lm
arduino.ar(new.cpp.o): In function `operator new[](unsigned int)':
C:/Eclipse/eclipse/arduinoPlugin/packages/arduino/hardware/avr/1.6.10/cores/arduino/new.cpp:26: multiple definition of `operator new[](unsigned int)'
./libraries/StandardCplusplus/new_opv.cpp.o:C:/Eclipse/eclipse/arduinoPlugin/packages/arduino/hardware/avr/1.6.10/libraries/StandardCplusplus/new_opv.cpp:24: first defined here
c:/eclipse/eclipse/arduinoplugin/tools/arduino/avr-gcc/4.8.1-arduino5/bin/../lib/gcc/avr/4.8.1/../../../../avr/bin/ld.exe: Disabling relaxation: it will not work with multiple definitions
arduino.ar(new.cpp.o): In function `operator new(unsigned int)':
C:/Eclipse/eclipse/arduinoPlugin/packages/arduino/hardware/avr/1.6.10/cores/arduino/new.cpp:22: multiple definition of `operator delete[](void*)'
makefile:83: recipe for target 'MegaTesting.elf' failed
./libraries/StandardCplusplus/del_opv.cpp.o:C:/Eclipse/eclipse/arduinoPlugin/packages/arduino/hardware/avr/1.6.10/libraries/StandardCplusplus/del_opv.cpp:25: first defined here
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [MegaTesting.elf] Error 1
06:23:57 Build Finished (took 21s.666ms)
I have searched here and online and there seems to be a bunch of fixes but none of them work. There was some mention of including a pnew.cpp in one of your files but this file is not in the library anywhere.
All my code contains that I am trying to compile is
#include "StandardCplusplus.h"
#include "Arduino.h"
void setup(void) {
Serial.begin(57600);
}
void loop(void) {
}
There are a couple of versions of this library out there and I have tried the two main forks that I can find and both of them generate this error.
Also I am using Eclipse with the Arduino AVR plugin to compile.
Edit
I thought that commenting out the lines did work until I tried to use a vector. Once I did the StandardCplusplus library got really mad saying that the function new was not defined.
I think that there needs to be something done to the StandardCplusplus library like in new/new_opv delete/delete_opv files? Or is there a better way?
Edit - 2
Alright so I went into the files:
StandardCplusplus/new_opv.h
StandardCplusplus/del_opv.h
And commented out the bodies for the functions and everything seems to be happy. I did a simple test and everything looks like it is working but now I am concerned that I might of removed something that something else in the library might need, can anyone tell me if my changes will hurt anything?
Edit - 3
Well the last fix didn't work so I tried going to another library all together and I am allot closer. I Downloaded this STL-AVR library and had to make a minor edit to vector.h now I am having problems with the pnew.cpp file. Looks like the template is calling a "new" function that is now defined in arduino but if I try to comment out this body I get that it is not defined. I am sure this is some sort of order of the includes or missing one can anyone help?
Those STL like libary versions you have were put together before operator new was added to the Arduino core. Now they are in the core you are getting a multiple definition error.
You can go into your core and comment out the bits causing the multiple definition error.
You can probably just get away with commenting out the function definitions in the .cpp:
C:/Eclipse/eclipse/arduinoPlugin/packages/arduino/hardware/avr/1.6.10/cores/arduino/new.cpp
If you still get the errors, also comment out the function declarations in new.h, but you shouldn't need to as multiple declarations are allowed, only definitions must be unique.
I've got a executable target called Foobar, a static library holding some common code called FoobarCommon, and a test target specifically for the common code called FoobarCommonSpecs.
Unsurprisingly, I have made both Foobar and FoobarCommonSpecs depend on the FoobarCommon library.
The Podfile looks something like the below:
target 'FoobarCommon' do
pod 'ReactiveCocoa'
...
end
target 'Foobar' do # links against to FoobarCommon in Xcode
...
end
target 'FoobarCommonSpecs' do # links against to FoobarCommon in Xcode
pod 'LLReactiveMatchers', :git => 'https://github.com/lawrencelomax/LLReactiveMatchers.git'
end
LLReactiveMatchers is a Pod that depends on ReactiveCocoa.
Note that in this situation, ReactiveCocoa is prsent in both FoobarCommon and also in FoobarCommonSpecs
The Problem
Whenever I run FoobarCommonSpecs, I get many duplicate symbol errors for ReactiveCocoa.
I want to say to Cocoapods that it should just IGNORE LLReactiveMatcher's dependency on ReactiveCocoa. It should just let Xcode do its job and it should link with the copy of ReactiveCocoa found in FoobarCommon. How do I do that?
Does the link_with directive have anything to do with anything?
FIREBREATH 1.6 -- VC2010 --
No logging with FBLOG_TRACE("StaticInitialize()", "INIT-trace");
settings
outMethods.push_back(std::make_pair(FB::Log::LogMethod_File, "U:/logs/PT.log"));
...
FB::Log::LogLevel getLogLevel(){
return FB::Log::LogLevel_Trace;
...
changing "FBLOG_TRACE" to "FBLOG_INFO" logging to Logfile works. I don´t understand the reason.
function not inserted in its respective area
FB::Log::LogLevel getLogLevel(){
return FB::Log::LogLevel_Trace; // Now Trace and above is logged.
}
Discription Logging here.
Enabling logging
...
regenerate your project using the prep* scripts
open up Factory.cpp in your project. You need to define the following function inside the class definition for PluginFactory:
...
About log levels
...
If you want to change the log level, you need to define the following in your Factory.cpp:
Referring to the above that means somewhere in "Factory.cpp". that´s incorrect. The description should say -->
If you want to change the log level, you need to define the following function inside the class definition for PluginFactory:
I drag it from bottom of "Factory.cpp" to inside Class PluginFactory.
Now it works as expected !!!
The entire purpose of having different log levels (FBLOG_FATAL, FBLOG_ERROR, FBLOG_WARN, FBLOG_INFO, FBLOG_DEBUG, FBLOG_TRACE) is so that you can configure which level to use and anything below that level is hidden. The default log level in FireBreath is FB::Log::LogLevel_Info, which means that nothing below INFO (such as DEBUG or TRACE) will be visible.
You can change this by overriding FB::FactoryBase::getLogLevel() in your Factory class to return FB::Log::LogLevel_Trace.
The method you'd be overriding is: https://github.com/firebreath/FireBreath/blob/master/src/PluginCore/FactoryBase.cpp#L78
The definition of the LogLevel enum:
https://github.com/firebreath/FireBreath/blob/master/src/ScriptingCore/logging.h#L69
There was a version of FireBreath in which this didn't work; I think it was fixed by 1.6.0, but I don't remember for certain. If that doesn't work try updating to the latest on the 1.6 branch (which is currently 1.6.1 as of the time of this writing but I haven't found time to release yet)
I've tried
CONSTANTS seq = <<5,6,7>>
but TLC gives me a syntax error:
Error: TLC found an error in the
configuration file at line 1. It was
expecting = or <- and didn't find it.
I've also tried to include the Sequences module in the configuration file, to no avail.
So... what do I have to do to assign a sequence?
I don't remember ever facing this problem and my TLC is too rusty to try and give you a first hand answer (I just restarted using the TLA+ toolbox).
From the post linked bellow, however, I figure that you can't instantiate constants with sequences through the TLC config files.
http://bbpress.tlaplus.net/topic/creating-a-sequence-from-a-set
Even though the question is old, leaving an answer may help future TLAers.
You can't directly assign to a constant in the TLA+ file. If you're using the toolbox, write CONSTANTS seq, then in the model add the tuple you want as an ordinary assignment.
So it turns out that you need a separate .tla file for that. Suppose you have "Main.tla" as you source file. You want MyConst to have value <<1,2,3>>. TLA+ toolbox generates MC.tla where it puts the constants:
---- MODULE MC ----
EXTENDS Main, TLC
const_uniq12345 = <<1,2,3>>
====
in MC.cfg, there will be the line
CONSTANT MyConst <- const_uniq12345
Note that MyConst = const_uniq12345 won't work -- if you use = instead of <-, MyConst will contain model value const_uniq12345 instead of <<1, 2, 3>>
I used https://github.com/hwayne/tlacli to be able to run TLC from command line (TLA toolbox has awful UX), and I was able to supply a tuple constant with help of extra .tla file like this. I used meaningful name instead of const_uniq12345 too, of course. Had to call java -cp /path/to/tla2tools.jar ... manually, though (got the full command using --show-script option of tlacli), because currently tlacli doesn't handle <- in the config.