I am trying to create a multi-tiered menu with a breadcrumb navigation, without using javascript. I have come across loads of pure css menus and breadcrumbs, but never combined and working together. Here’s a design of what I’m trying to achieve (click on the ‘more’ hamburger menu):
https://invis.io/857RUKE6M
And this is what I have so far in my html/css (see codepen link below). Please forgive the crude/hacky code. At this point I am simply testing ideas, I will simplify and beautify my code once I’ve found a solution.
http://codepen.io/jessbenz/pen/LZWjjz
Here's a code snippet, but please look at the codepen link above to get a better feel:
<div class="smart-nav">
<input type="radio" id="bread-home" class="breadcrumb" name="bread" />
<input type="radio" id="bread-women" class="breadcrumb" name="bread" />
<input type="radio" id="bread-womens-clothing" class="breadcrumb" name="bread" />
<div class="smart-nav-panels">
<ul id="home">
<li>
<input type="radio" name="first">
<label>1 Women</label>
<ul id="women">
<li>
<input type="radio" name="second">
<label>1.1 Women's Clothing</label>
<ul id="womens-clothing">
<li>
<label>1.1.1 Women's Shirts</label>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<input type="radio" name="first">
<label>2 Men</label>
<ul id="men">
<li>2.1 Men's Shirts</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
and my sass:
.breadcrumb:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels ul {
display: none;
}
#bread-home:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels > ul {
display: block;
}
#bread-women:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels {
#home, #women {
display: block;
}
}
#bread-womens-clothing:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels {
#home, #women, #womens-clothing {
display: block;
}
}
#bread-home:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels li input:checked > ul:first-child {
display: block;
}
.smart-nav-panels {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
ul {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: lightgrey;
}
ul, li {
list-style: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
> ul:first-child {
ul {
left: 100%;
}
}
li {
input + label + ul {
display: none;
}
input:checked + label + ul {
display: block;
// left:0;
}
}
}
input:checked ul {
display: block;
}
If you click through the women's clothing in my codepen sample, you’ll see I am half way there with achieving what I need. The top horizontal radio buttons represent the breadcrumbs and vertical radio buttons within the gray block represent the tier menu. The problem comes in when I select a breadcrumb radio. The correct slide is displayed but then if I select a radio within the menu again, it isn’t displaying because my breadcrumb css is taking preference and hiding the relevant content. I guess herein lies the issue with not using javascript. How do I make both my navigations aware of each other with pure css? It could be that this approach of combining two radio navigations is the incorrect one. I really hope someone can share their wisdom. :)
Thanks in advance
You don't shy away from a challenge, do you? :)
Before I launch into any more detail, I would say that the short answer is "build a static site". In other words, assuming one of your design constraints is "no javascript", move the problem to a place where you do have the luxury of using decision logic / code to make it easier to solve (ie: the server).
Even if you manage to solve this problem (and I'm not sure it's possible given the constraints of HTML/CSS), the next problem you're going to have is attaching any sort of behaviour to it all. You're going to want to load specific content based on the menu selection, and the only way you're going to do that is with:
a javascript event, or
a static link (anchor element, hence the 'why' behind my short answer)
One could load all of the content and perhaps find a way to display it conditionally, but then the question is "how deep does the rabbit hole go?". Plus if you're building for feature phones and/or slow connections, loading all of the content is going to have a negative impact on the user experience.
Having said all of that, I managed to simplify the CSS slightly and fix a bug with the display of subcategories (see comments inline). Note that only the 'Women' category behaves as expected as there are styles missing for 'Men' & 'Kids'.
.container {
position: relative;
width: 360px;
height: 480px;
border: 1px solid black;
margin: 20px auto 0 auto;
}
.breadcrumb {
margin-top: -20px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
}
/*
.breadcrumb:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels ul {
display: none;
}
#bread-home:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels > ul {
display: block;
}
*/
/* hide all uls except the 'home' ul by default, replaces both of the above */
.smart-nav-panels ul ul {
display: none;
}
/*
#bread-women:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels {
#home, #women {
display: block;
}
}
#bread-womens-clothing:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels {
#home, #women, #womens-clothing {
display: block;
}
}
*/
/* these next 3 style definitions are very similar to what you had before (commented
above), except that there is no longer a need to unhide the 'home' ul, and we're
being more explicit about which uls to hide in correspondence with the state of the
breadcrumb nav */
#bread-home:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels {
#women {
display: none;
}
}
#bread-women:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels {
#women {
display: block;
}
#womens-clothing, #womens-shoes {
display: none;
}
}
#bread-womens-clothing:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels {
#women, #womens-clothing {
display: block;
}
}
/*
#bread-home:checked ~ .smart-nav-panels li input:checked > ul:first-child {
display: block;
}
*/
/* (i) the above didn't work because the ul isn't a direct descendant of the input,
rather it is a sibling, and in addition it doesn't matter which breadcrumb item is
checked now */
.smart-nav-panels li input:checked ~ ul {
display: block;
}
.smart-nav-panels {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
ul {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: lightgrey;
}
ul, li {
list-style: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
> ul:first-child {
ul {
left: 100%;
}
}
/* removed unnecessary styles here */
}
/* removed unnecessary style here */
This has solved some of the problems, but there are still many more. Solving some of them will, I suspect, create new ones. One immediate one I can think of is that you'll want to tie the state of the tiered menu to the breadcrumb in such a way that you only see as much of the breadcrumb as you're supposed to (right now you always see all of it).
At some point you're going to want events (for behaviour) and components will need to know about each other's state. While CSS has some state capabilities it provides nothing on the event front. These limitations, the cascading nature (discussed in depth in other questions, eg: lack of ancestor selector) and coupling to the HTML structure all contribute to make this a very hard problem to solve with HTML & CSS alone.
I understand the desire to have this type of navigation without JS and certainly this is an interesting problem to try and solve, but ultimately I think it's the wrong way to go about it.
There is a reason why javascript is so ubiquitous - our experience of the web as it is today simply wouldn't be the same without it.
(Thanks to Jess and other colleagues for the discussion that informed parts of this answer. I paraphrased liberally. Hopefully this is of benefit to someone else.)
Related
I want to have to click on a hamburger menu icon and then have the list display beneath my icon. I set up my hamburger menu icon with this style
.menu-btn div {
position: absolute;
left: 100%;
top: 64%;
padding-right: 8px;
margin-top: -0.50em;
line-height: 1.2;
font-size: 18px;
font-weight: 200;
vertical-align: middle;
z-index: 99;
}
.menu-btn span {
display: block;
width: 20px;
height: 2px;
margin: 4px 0;
background: #989da1;
z-index: 99;
}
The menu of options taht should appear after you click on the hamburger menu is
<div class="responsive-menu">
<ul id="menu">
<li>Vote</li>
<li>Search</li>
<li>About</li>
<li>Log In</li>
</ul>
</div>
but I'm unclear how to set up the style of the hamburger menu so taht it appears directly under the hamburger menu when you click on it. Right now, its appearing centered at the top of the screen -- https://jsfiddle.net/wtp1k57b/1/ . How do I set up such a style?
PS - I'm looking for a solution that doesn't rely on hard-coding numeric (e.g. top: 27px) pixel values. Certainly its good to get things to work in my little Fiddle, but in my broader application I can't guarantee how big or small that hamburger menu will be.
I would like to show a completely different approach without using display: flex.
HTML
Your approach uses too many wrappers in my opinion. You can definitely reduce the amount of divs. Moreover, you should always try to use semantic tags over general tags like div or ul. Consider looking at this article.
Hence, as #scooterlord already mentioned, you should use a button for the hamburger icon. Moreover, I recommend to use a nav instead of a list.
CSS
First of all, you should bundle the attributes for the same selector at the same place for the purpose of improved clarity. You should not have three sections where you apply the universal selector, but combine it into one. Moreover, do not set the box-sizing to a specific value, but rather set it to inherit, so you can always override this value for a specific element without having to do it for all of its children. Furthermore, I do not understand what you want to achieve with margin: 0 auto on all elements and body. It does not make any sense for me.
Since you do not want to use absolute positioning, I would strongly advise you to avoid using pixels as a measuring unit. They behave badly if some people change their default font-size because of poor eyesight or other reasons. Instead, consider to apply relative units like rem, em or %. By setting the root element's font-size to 62.5% you are still able to calculate as if you were using pixels (1rem = 10px).
As I already mentioned, I avoided to use display: flex for such a trivial thing. I do not understand why it should be used at this point. Therefore, I also had to change the positioning of the menu button. The navigation could be easily positioned using percentages for top and left.
As a side note: You should really try to only post the relevant CSS code - the first step for me was to remove all the irrelevant parts of it.
Final Solution
This is my final solution without Flexbox, without fixed sizes and without absolute positioning using px:
$('.menu-btn').click(function() {
$('nav').toggleClass('nav-open');
});
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing: inherit;
}
html {
font-size: 62.5%;
}
body {
font: 1.6rem/1.4 Benton Sans, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif;
-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
header {
width: 100%;
background-color: orange;
text-align: center;
padding: 1rem;
position: relative;
}
nav {
display: none;
width: 30rem;
padding: 5rem;
background-color: #ededed;
position: absolute;
right: 5%;
top: 100%;
}
.nav-open {
display: block;
}
nav a {
display: block;
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
padding: 1.4rem 1.6rem;
text-decoration: none;
cursor: pointer;
font-size: 2.2rem;
color: #000;
}
nav a:hover {
background-color: #111;
color: #fff;
}
.menu-btn {
position: absolute;
right: 5%;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -1.1rem;
display: inline-block;
cursor: pointer;
border: none;
outline: none;
background-color: transparent;
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 500px) {
.menu-btn, nav {
display: none !important;
}
}
.menu-btn span {
display: block;
width: 2rem;
height: 0.2rem;
margin: 0.4rem 0;
background: #989da1;
z-index: 99;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<header>
<h2>Page Title</h2>
<button class="menu-btn">
<span></span>
<span></span>
<span></span>
</button>
<nav>
Vote
Search
About
Log In
</nav>
</header>
Or see this fiddle.
Use the css properties: top and right to set the position of the element under your icon.
#menu
{
position: absolute;
top: 48px;
right: 2px;
background: #ededed;
list-style-type: none;
}
Use this CSS for your menu - no margin, and the position defined by the top and right settings:
#menu {
position: absolute;
width: 300px;
margin: 0;
padding: 50px;
background: #ededed;
list-style-type: none;
-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased;
top: 50px;
right: 0;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/meuexde6/
I left out the transition for the testing, but you should basically animate the right parameter from -100px to 0 to achieve what you seemed to have in mind.
ADDITION AFTER COMMENT:
To define the position of the menu in relation to the button, you have to apply position: relative to their common parent element, .mobile-nav. The position values of an element with position: absolute always relate to the first ancestor which has position: relative.
I changed the values in my updated fiddle accordingly to these:
#menu {
position: absolute;
width: 300px;
margin: 0;
padding: 50px;
background: #ededed;
list-style-type: none;
-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased;
top: 40px;
right: -32px;
}
Updated fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/meuexde6/1/
If you really want the menu to stick directly to the button (hard to say - it has no borders), just adjust the top and right values as needed.
HTML5 Semantic Elements.
details > summary {
padding: 2px 6px;
width:12px;
border: none;
list-style: none;
}
details > summary::-webkit-details-marker {
display: none;
}
ul{
list-style: none;
margin-left:0;
padding-left:0;
}
<details>
<summary>☰</summary>
<ul>
<li>a</li>
<li>b</li>
<li>c</li>
</ul>
</details>
So, here goes. I know you are asking for a solution to a specific problem, I solved it alright, but I couldn't help noticing that you are struggling with your code. You must simplify the way you think and your code will become leaner. The purpose of this forum is to help others become better, right? :)
HTML
It is good practice to keep the menu toggle button OUTSIDE of the menu - will solve a lot of issues - check below.
It is not semantically right to use anything else rather than a button for the toggle function, so, why not use a button here? I also removed unnecessary clutter from your code, like some divs and the id - the id could be traded with the class, your call. I also removed .mobile-nav because it is not needed at all.
<button class="menu-btn">
<span></span>
<span></span>
<span></span>
</button>
<div class="responsive-menu">
<ul id="menu">
<li>Vote</li>
<li>Search</li>
<li>About</li>
<li>Log In</li>
</ul>
</div>
CSS
I absolutely positioned the menu-btn on the top right corner, and gave it a width equal to the #pageTitle height (which I set at 50px - a gold standard) to keep it rectangular; it should be a rule of thumb that the toggle buttons are rectangular and always the same height as the top navigation bar - in this case the before-mentioned id. The same I did for the .responsive-menu. I absolutely positioned it as shown below. The changes allowed me to remove a lot of css styling - now obsolete - like for example the absolute positioning of the ul menu inside the .responsive-menu.
.menu-btn {
position:absolute;
display:block;
right:0;
top:0;
width:50px;
height:50px;
background:yellow;
border:none;
padding:16px;
}
.responsive-menu {
position: absolute;
top: 50px;
right: 0;
display: none;
}
Javascript
By years of practice I realized that the most efficient way to toggle a menu instead of adding and removing classes is to add a class on the body tag; this can help heaps if you want to restyle anything else on the page depending on wether your menu is opened or not.
$('.menu-btn').on('click', function() {
$('body').toggleClass('responsive-menu-open');
});
Here is a working jsfiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/scooterlord/4atafhge/
I could have done a lot of other things in order to simplify the code even further - remove unnecessary ids and classes since most elements are considered unique and could be targeted using descendant classes, eg .responsive-menu ul, etc. After a lot of practice, you'll manage to think simpler and produce code with a smaller footprint.
Edit: Concerning the fact that you don't like the absolute pixels for alignment here is a trick.
Giving a fixed height to the parent container, equal to the toggle button's -in this case '#pageTitle' and setting its position to relative allows you to use top:100% to properly place the responsive menu exactly below the button (which is essentially the same height):
#pageTitle {
display: flex;
height: 50px;
position:relative;
}
.responsive-menu {
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
right: 0;
display: none;
}
Here is an updated fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/scooterlord/4atafhge/1/
Edit: Natalia, I gave it some thought and here is what I came up with. I created an absolutely positioned .menu-wrapper, inside of which I placed the button and the responsive menu with float:right and no positioning - aka they are positioned statically. No more pixel values! YAY!
.menu-wrapper {
position:absolute;
top:0;
right:0;
}
.menu-btn {
float:right;
...
}
.responsive-menu {
float:right;
clear:both; // to clear the .menu-btn and sit exactly below it
...
}
Here is a working fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/scooterlord/4atafhge/2/
I would like to achieve the effect of a scrolling line beneath anchor links to meet a client brief - I stupidly imagined a bit of CSS3 would easily achieve this without any bother, so I've setup something along the lines of the following code, and spent the past hour banging my head on the desk due to a very annoying bug I don't understand.
Everything works great on desktop, but on mobile (both iOS and Android) I experience an issue when I select a link - First click, the animation runs, and I have to click a second time to trigger the link (same happens with below codepen). It's baffling me and I wonder if anyone can shine any light on things for me!!?
http://codepen.io/pablodancer/pen/ZLJVOP
li {
display: inline-block;
list-style-type: none;
}
li a {
text-decoration: none;
position: relative;
line-height: 1;
height: auto;
padding: 0;
margin-right: 8px;
padding-bottom: 8px;
z-index: 1;
}
li a:after {
display: block;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
margin-top: 4px;
width: 0;
height: 5px;
background-color: blue;
content: "";
z-index: -3;
transition: width 0.3s;
}
li a:hover:after,
li.active a:after {
width: 100%;
}
<ul>
<li class="active">nme</li>
<li>bbc</li>
<li>blah3</li>
<li>blah4</li>
<li>blah5</li>
</ul>
I believe the double tap issue is only related to iOS. What I normally do is to simply hide the pseudo element on touch devices, either approach below will work.
(1) Using CSS media queries, it works in iOS 9+ and Android 5+.
#media (hover: none) {
li a:after {
display: none;
}
}
(2) Using a bit of Javascript + CSS:
(function(html) {
html.className += ('ontouchstart' in window) ? ' touch ' : ' no-touch ';
})(document.documentElement);
.touch li a:after {
display: none;
}
In addition, if you wish to keep the active style, you can use selector li:not(.active) a:after. You may also want to set li {vertical-align: top;} so the items can lineup nicely.
This is caused by a non-standard behavior adopted by WebKit on IOS.
Weird (but common) issue needs a weird (and simple) hack, here is how I solved it with only CSS and bullet-proof browser support.
Basically, the magic is using transforms and IOS/WebKit will not consider as hidden the pseudo element, so it will not force the double-tap behavior when it's shown on hover:
li a:after {
/* keep the element 'visible' and with a size */
display: block;
content: '';
width: 100%;
height: 2px;
...
/* then 'hide' it with a transform */
transform: scaleX(0);
...
/* add a nice transition */
transition: transform 600ms ease;
}
li a:hover:after {
/* 'show' the element by resetting the transform */
transform: scaleX(1);
}
Till now, it seems to do the trick, why? because the size of a transformed element is not computed in the reflow of the page :)
I have a goal that I'm trying to accomplish with HTML and CSS only: With an inline list of links that grow in size upon hover and change fonts (this has caused odd issues before),
A) Hovering one link shouldn't upset other links.
B) Keep it dynamic to avoid tailoring the CSS to each new link.
C) If margin: 0 20px 0 20px, that should be from the ends of the text -- This looks much cleaner, as it makes the spacing constant between links (see example for what should not be done). Fixed width containers usually violate this.
D) Upon hover, the text should stay vertically and horizontally centered in place.
E) Please try to keep it HTML and CSS only. If it includes JS or JQ, it would be more difficult to implement to to my lack of knowledge about the languages and the fact that the JSFiddle is just a stripped down example instead of my actual page.
My best right now fits the first two and last criteria without meeting the third, and it uses tables (I know):
JSFiddle
Or code:
<table><tr>
<td><div>ONE</div></td>
<td><div>TWO</div></td>
<td><div>THREE</div></td>
<td><div>FOUR</div></td>
<td><div>FIVE</div></td>
</tr></table>
And...
div:hover {
font-size: 130%;
font-family: comic sans ms;
}
div {
width: 10px;
margin: 0 30px 0 30px;
height: 20px;
}
The issue is that the margin is being measured from the div, not the text, making it so I'd have to tailor the margin to each link. Additionally, hovering will make it seem like the font / link moves down and to the right, violating guideline D.
This Works dynamically as long as the text isn't too long, but hovering upsets other links. It also violates D.
Any help would be appreciated.
Vertical alignment for inline text is handled easily with the line-height property. Make sure that for both the normal and large font-sizes the line height is the same. Eg. for normal text I used line-height: 1.5em, for the large text I used font-size: 130%; line-height: 1.15385em;. 1.30 × 1.15385 = 1.50
The main issue I see is that when hovering the browser needs the text in the original size for the layout, but it also needs the text in bigger size for display. One solution I see is duplicating the link text and show only one version depending on hover state:
HTML:
<ul>
<li><span>link 1</span><span>link 1</span>
<li><span>link 2, with some long text</span><span>link 2, with some long text</span>
<li><span>link 3</span><span>link 3</span>
</ul>
CSS:
ul, li {margin: 0; padding: 0;}
li { list-style-type: none; display: inline-block; line-height: 1.5em; }
li { border: 1px dotted red; position: relative; }
li a span:first-child { padding: 0 30px; }
li a span:last-child { position: absolute; width: 100%; left: 0; font-size: 130%; line-height: 1.15385em; text-align: center; visibility: hidden; }
li:hover a span:first-child { visibility: hidden; }
li:hover a span:last-child { visibility: visible; }
http://jsfiddle.net/g16Ldusx/2/
Instead of duplicating the link text in HTML, I would probably duplicate it using some javacript.
If you don't want the duplication and really don't want javascript, you can use the :before and :after pseudo-elements instead, and put the link text in a HTML5 data attribute. Not sure how good the browser support for this one is though.
HTML:
<ul>
<li>
<li>
<li>
</ul>
CSS:
ul, li {margin: 0; padding: 0;}
li { list-style-type: none; display: inline-block; line-height: 1.5em; }
li { border: 1px dotted red; position: relative; }
li a:after { content: attr(data-text); padding: 0 30px; }
li:hover a:after { visibility: hidden; }
li:hover a:before { content: attr(data-text); position: absolute; width: 100%; font-size: 130%; line-height: 1.15385em; text-align: center; }
http://jsfiddle.net/kyad4tfh/
Also, note that requirements A and C may conflict with each other. The margin between elements needs to be big enough to accomodate for the increased width of the text.
Is it possible to implement vertical layout with CSS only, and not with HTML elements?
I have a list of divs inside one div. By default the next element is right to the last, when there's no place on right, it is placed below.
I'd like to achieve the same with CSS style settings. Is it possible?
By CSS-only I mean, we have div and its children, and do not add anything special such as:
line-breaking elements ( <br/>, <div style="clear:both;"/> )
UL tags
tables (yes, still used, f.g. JSF almost exclusively based on them)
So:
<div id="menu">
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
</div>
And CSS implementing vertical layout:
#menu { ??? }
#menu a { ??? }
Is there a ??? that I could use to achieve what I want?
Display anchor tags as block elements.
#menu a {
display: block;
}
Do you mean something like this?
http://jsfiddle.net/7Y9jS/
#menu {
width: 300px;
}
#menu a {
display: block;
background: #ccc;
color: #000;
padding: 10px 0;
text-align: center;
margin-bottom: 2px;
}
<div id="menu">
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
</div>
set display block to a
#menu a {
display: block;
}
use float left
#menu a {
float:left;
}
and then add the class group to your #menu
.group:before,
.group:after {
content: "";
display: table;
}
.group:after {
clear: both;
}
.group {
zoom: 1; /* For IE 6/7 (trigger hasLayout) */
}
My current project involves setting up a bunch of sidebar links, such that the finished design looks like this:
The envelopes are supposed to move and overlap (i.e., change z-index), depending upon which icon/text is currently has :hover state.
I thought each would be a separate PNG file, but I've been given a sprite that looks like this:
Any suggestions how I could achieve this? Normally I'd just change the background position of the list elements each piece of text is in, but I don't think this is possible given the overlapping nature of these. Does he just need to export it differently?
Many thanks...
To me it looks like that sprite would work perfectly. The left most image is for when book is hovered, second image for twitter, third for facebook, forth for email. I'm guessing the last one is just the default state. Its tricky to make this work with pure css and :hover (but possible!), however, it would be extremely easy with javascript.
For the pure css solution, the div with the sprite would have to be the child of all the text elements, so you could change the background based on :hover on the parent (the text). If this isn't clear, I can make you some example code.
Edit:
Its not perfect, but its a proof of concept.
JsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/jp6fy/
CSS:
#side{
position:relitive;
height:341px;
width:250px;
}
#link1{
top:0;
}
.link{
position:absolute;
left:0;
top:85px;
height:85px;
padding-left:160px;
width:90px;
}
#image{
position:absolute;
top:-255px;
left:0;
z-index:-1;
background:url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/I2Y4k.png) -720px 0;
height:341px;
width:150px;
}
#link1:hover #image{
background-position:-540px 0;
}
#link2:hover #image{
background-position:-360px 0;
}
#link3:hover #image{
background-position:-180px 0;
}
#link4:hover #image{
background-position:-0px 0;
}
HTML:
<div id='side'>
<div class='link' id='link1'>
email
<div class='link' id='link2'>
facebook
<div class='link' id='link3'>
twitter
<div class='link' id='link4'>
book
<div id='image'></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
It is possible. (But ugly.)
As a :hover selector can only affect elements inside (or directly adjacent) to the triggering element, the solution is to nest the trigger elements: (jsFiddle)
<style>
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
position: absolute;
left: 100px;
}
#image { background: black; }
#trigger1, #trigger1:hover #image { background: red; }
#trigger2, #trigger2:hover #image { background: green; }
#trigger3, #trigger3:hover #image { background: blue; }
</style>
<div id="trigger1">
<div id="trigger2">
<div id="trigger3">
<div id="image"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
But preferably, you'd get the envelope sprites exported separately (you can of course still use CSS sprites). That should give you simpler HTML and CSS, a smaller image, and you'll avoid having to muck around with nested absolutely positioned elements, each having its own coordinate system.
I tried an approach which keeps the markup fairly simple, with only one extra non-semantic div per item:
<ul>
<li id="email">
<div class="background"></div>
<em>Email</em> chris
</li>
<li id="facebook">
<div class="background"></div>
<em>Facebook</em> follow us
</li>
<li id="twitter">
<div class="background"></div>
<em>Twitter</em> your life away
</li>
<li id="book">
<div class="background">
</div><em>Book</em> a project
</li>
</ul>
I positioned all the different copies of the background div at the same place, then varied the background position based on the hover states:
/* First, just style the document and the list text in general.
skip on for the important bit */
body {
background-color: black;
color: white;
}
ul {
width: 350px;
margin-top: 40px;
position: relative;
}
li {
margin-right: 40px;
font-family: "Century Gothic", Helvetica, sans-serif;
text-align: right;
margin-bottom: 0px;
padding: 15px 4px 25px 0;
}
li em {
text-transform: uppercase;
display: block;
}
li:hover {
color: red;
}
/* From here down is the important bit */
/* Set up the sprite in all the .background divs */
div.background {
background-image: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/I2Y4k.png);
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 341px;
width: 160px;
}
/* By default, turn off the background in all the divs */
div.background {
display: none;
}
/* Just picking an arbitrary item to show the default, non-hover background */
#email div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: -737px;
}
/* If we're hovering over the list as a whole, disable the default background,
so it doesn't show up underneath the background we want to display */
ul:hover #email div.background {
display: none;
}
/* For the email item, which shows our arbitrary default background, override
to the email background on hover with more specificity than the default rule */
ul:hover #email:hover div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: 0px;
}
/* For all other items, override to their background on hover */
#facebook:hover div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: -375px;
}
#twitter:hover div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: -189px;
}
#book:hover div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: -556px;
}
Working, though slightly rough example, in this jsFiddle.
Note that it's okay to have multiple copies of the sprite in multiple different divs; the browser will just grab one copy for its cache and use that for all instances of the image.
Could you create an image map and then hover swaps the image to the one with the correct envelope in front. See this link on an interesting link
google search link on idea
My method with clean HTML.
.nav { position: relative; }
.nav li {
margin-left: 179.8px;
list-style-type: none;
}
.nav li:before {
position: absolute;
left: 0; top: 0;
content: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/I2Y4k.png);
clip: rect(0 899px 341px 719.2px);
margin-left: -719.2px;
z-index: 1;
}
.nav li:hover:before { z-index: 2; }
.email:hover:before {
clip: rect(0 179.8px 341px 0);
margin-left: 0;
}
.facebook:hover:before {
clip: rect(0 359.6px 341px 179.8px);
margin-left: -179.8px;
}
.twitter:hover:before {
clip: rect(0 539.4px 341px 359.6px);
margin-left: -359.6px;
}
.book:hover:before {
clip: rect(0 719.2px 341px 539.4px);
margin-left: -539.4px;
}
<ul class="nav">
<li class="email">Email</li>
<li class="facebook">Facebook</li>
<li class="twitter">Twitter</li>
<li class="book">Book</li>
</ul>