I am struggling with a challenge in a project I am working on.
JSFiddle example
I want to have all the buttons the same height.
when on a large screen they are all good.
But when i start to scale down they start getting different heights.
And this is an expected result.
But the people that are pulling the strings on this page want all buttons to be the same height.
When one text goes to the next line and makes the button bigger every button most get the same height.
this goes for all widths of the viewport.
I hope you can help me with this challenge.
For any more info I will update the question as soon as possible.
PS. I don't want to use CSS3 for this as it want to keep the Backwards Compatibility as high as possible.
because i have to add code here, this is the situation of my html.
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-12 col-md-6 col-lg-3">
This is a short text
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-12 col-md-6 col-lg-3">
This is a long text like this
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-12 col-md-6 col-lg-3">
This is a long text that is even longer tha the previous button
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-12 col-md-6 col-lg-3">
This is a short text
</div>
</div>
</div>
Flexbox might be your easier solution, I've found an article that tries to solve the problem you have.
Check this article: http://osvaldas.info/flexbox-based-responsive-equal-height-blocks-with-javascript-fallback
Code:
.row {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
overflow: hidden;
}
.button-primary {
background-color: #005f96;
color: white;
font-size: 20px;
margin: 2%;
display:flex-item;
width: 21%;
}
Demo:
https://jsfiddle.net/x2cqqcz7/
Extra:
I've removed the wrapping divs around buttons and also you'll probably use media queries.
This is a basic jQuery code I wrote for a similar project:
var eqheight = 0;
$('.col-eqheight-sm').each(function() {
if( $(this).outerHeight() > eqheight) {
eqheight = $(this).height();
}
});
$('.col-eqheight-sm').height(eqheight);
It loops through each child and updates the height accordingly.
P.S Advised to wrap it inside a viewport width checker if you only want to work for specific resolutions. Also, add a window resize listener if you want it to update each time the viewport changes.
Related
I have had a landing page built for me which is fairly simple layout. But the problem is the Banner Photo is swamping the page and I have to scroll to see completed page. Is there an adjustment I can make to HTML and/or CSS to reduce the height of the banner photo by about a third?
There are a lot of different approaches of doing this. I'll just show you one, that should perfectly fit your current page and needs.
<div class="col-lg-12 col-md-12 col-sm-12 col-xs-12 d-flex align-items-end overflow-hidden banner-image-container">
<img class="img-responsive" src="img/top-banner.jpg" width="100%">
</div>
(Inside your <style tag:)
.overflow-hidden {
overflow: hidden;
}
.banner-image-container {
max-height: 400px;
}
What I did is to limit the container around your image to a maximum height of 400px. Because your image is bigger then that, I added overflow: hidden; to the container, so it will cut the rest of the image off. Now your main focus in the image will be the building I guess. So I did move it all the way to the top with d-flex align-items-end.
I'm trying to put two images at the same line with Bootstrap, using two different columns. I aligned them, used some background color two see the result, etc.
But, when I change the resolution to see the responsive effect, they not resize by equal! the images haven't the same width, but yes, the same height. Does anyone have a guess?
Here is the HTML:
.coresq {
background-color: #131313;
}
.cordir {
background-color: #AAAAAA;
}
.top-shows {
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 0;
}
.top-shows [class^="col-"] {
padding-right: 0;
padding-left: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row top-shows">
<div class="col-xs-4 coresq ">
<img src="img/slogan_part_1.jpg" alt="imagem" class="slogan_l img-responsive"/>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-8 cordir">
<img src="img/slogan_part_2.jpg" alt="imagem" class="slogan_r img-responsive"/>
</div>
</div>
</div>
When the display reduces, the responsive properties don't resize equally. Shouldn't? Aren't they at the same line?
You have two different column sizes.
col-xs-4 and col-xs-8
you need to use same solumn size for both images if you want them to have same width.
col-xs-6 and col-xs-6 would be the sizes you are looking for.
One image is using double cols (xs-8) than the other (xs-4), so when resizing, the smaller column gets eaten.
Try resizing this external JSFIDDLE with equal cols
(Also, make sure the images are equal size as in the fiddle above)
After some research, I have looking about Flex, that can do it, and saw the new version of bootstrap (4, but still in alpha).
I've reading a lot about, and decided to test. It works! Exactly the way I asked before, with little changes on code.
Well, the custom css is the same, but the Bootstrap is 4 (alpha, for testing) and the HTML is here:
<div class="container">
<div class="d-flex flex-row">
<div class="col-xs-4 coresq ">
<img src="img/slogan_part_1.jpg" alt="imagem" class="slogan_l img-fluid"/>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-8 cordir">
<img src="img/slogan_part_2.jpg" alt="imagem" class="slogan_r img-fluid"/>
</div>
</div>
</div>
.
PS: I don't know why, but the code on snippet preview is cutting the last div ending the code. There is a single point on finish.
I have done some digging on SO and have found a a variety of resources regarding printing and bootstrap.css, but I have not seen a solution to this particular problem.
Lets say I have a setup like seen in this Plnkr: http://plnkr.co/edit/7ETXQyEvY7S16JTU9wYB?p=preview
and HTML like this:
<div class="col-xs-6 red">
testing
</div>
<div class="col-xs-6 blue hidden">
123
</div>
The CSS states that during printing the column will be hidden (on my real page the stle is not hidden but hidden-print), which is expected, but is there anyway to now have the col-xs-6 red now take up the empty space left by the hidden blue column.
I know you could override the style col-xs-6 to be width:100%, but that would affect other columns on the page that need to be left at width: 50%.
Has anyone had this problem before, if so how did you address it?
For Bootstrap 4 you need to do a modification from #Lance's answer.
#media print {
.col-print-12 {
max-width: 100%;
flex: 0 0 100%;
}
}
With the same HTML
<div class="col-xs-6 col-print-12 bg-danger">
Red Column is full width for print
</div>
<div class="col-xs-6 hidden-print bg-primary">
Blue Column is hidden for print
</div>
I suggest something like:
#media print {
.col-print-12{
width:100% !important;
}
}
Then your HTML can be:
<div class="col-xs-6 col-print-12 bg-danger">
Red Column is full width for print
</div>
<div class="col-xs-6 hidden-print bg-primary">
Blue Column is hidden for print
</div>
!important is needed to override the regular col widths since at least one set will also apply at print width.
I updated your plunk using xs as a proxy for the print view here to demonstrate the concept. One red column in mobile, Red and Blue columns in tablet or bigger.
Edit: if you want to do it with CSS only you would have to use the flex property. Take a look at this pen. Change display: flex to display: none on any column and see how they stretch to fit the available space (this renders bootstrap useless).
Create a div container inside the bootstrap column and apply visibility: hidden to it. You want to hide without removing it, meaning the browser will still show the space that the element occupies.
It's a good practice not to add your own classes to bootstrap columns but instead create a container inside it so you can apply your classes to.
display: none gets rid of the element entirely and affects the positioning of the other elements that were around it.
I have a page layout that involves a fixed sidebar to the left and a main container on the rest of the page to the right. Inside that right side container which is a div I have 2 elements
<div class="col-sm-12 col-md-5 col-lg-3">
<custom directive>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-12 col-md-7 col-lg-9">
<another custom directive>
</div>
The content of the second div is long so scrolling is implied.
What I want to do is make the first div sticky. So I applied a position:fixed to it in css but that takes it out of the context of the right side container which means the css classes responsive width don't work anymore. Also the 2 divs overlap.
I am looking for a clean way to handle this. The best I thought of is using a dummy div like so :
<div class="col-sm-12 col-md-5 col-lg-3 dummy-div">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-12 col-md-5 col-lg-3 sticky-div">
<custom directive>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-12 col-md-7 col-lg-9">
<another custom directive>
</div>
With this I thought of creating an element directive that uses jquery to set the witdh of sticky-div to the width of the dummy-div.
I still think this isn't a very nice solution though, and was wondering if there is a cleaner way?
First off do not duplicate Class you should just have one class="" with all of your class' inside it.
Instead of creating a dummy div to compensate from flow removal you should just give the non fixed <div> a margin or padding to compensate for the loss of the fixed <div>.
You could just use j query to gram the width of the container and inject like you mentioned.
another idea would be to use dynamic widths and match them up to the container.
e.g. 50% couple that with calc and I don't see any reason why you cant achieve the exact width of the so called parent of the fixed <div>.
The solution I went for in the end was keeping the dummy div and then calculating the width of the fixed div with media queries.
#media only screen and (max-width : 1200px) {
position: fixed;
width: 30%;
margin-left: 1.3em;
}
#media only screen and (max-width : 992px) {
position: relative;
width: 95% ;
margin-right: 1.3em;
}
I also needed the div to not be fixed for small screens where the layout goes vertical.
I am using twitter bootstrap 3 for a website and have a main content area and a sidebar. At present both columns are aligned left side-by-side but I want them to be placed centrally on the page.
I have seen a number of solutions on SO where a single column is aligned using the CSS:
.col-centered {
float: none;
margin: 0 auto;
}
This works but only for one of my columns. I tried nesting my two columns inside a column with size of twelve and tried to center that but to no avail.
I would prefer not to remove the float so that at small sizes the columns will stack but on all other sizes they would remain side-by-side.
Here is the basic structure of the HTML I am using:
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-8 col-md-7 col-lg-6">
</div>
<aside class="col-xs-12 col-sm-4 col-md-5 col-lg-6">
</aside>
</div>
</div>
Thanks in advance,
nav
Solved this problem by overriding the padding-left and padding-right of the .container class in bootstrap 3.
.container {
padding-right: 120px;
padding-left: 120px;
}
It might be better to do the above with percentages so that it scales. I was thrown off by the fact that my sidebar was not extending fully to the end of the container and as a result though it was not being centered.
Adding the above override did it for me.
Many thanks to #trevor for his test bed.