I need to fix a problem on an existing web page, I need to center elements that have float : left; inside one big <div>. I don't want to remove the floating, and I'm wondering what is the best way to center those elements and make them on two rows.
.big {
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
background: gold;
}
.a {
margin: 5px;
width: 50px;
height: 20px;
text-align: center;
float: left;
background-color: red;
}
<div class="big">
<div class="a">1</div>
<div class="a">2</div>
<div class="a">3</div>
<div class="a">4</div>
</div>
Floating makes this weird. Otherwise
.big{
width:150px;
height: 150px;
background: gold;
text-align: center;
}
.a{
display: inline-block;
margin: 5px auto;
width:50px;
height:20px;
text-align: center;
background-color:red;
}
<div class="big">
<div class="a">1
</div>
<div class="a">2
</div>
<div class="a">3
</div>
<div class="a">4
</div>
</div>
You may use flexbox.
.big{
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background: gold;
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
}
.a {
flex: 0 0 35%;
margin: 5px;
width: 50px;
height: 20px;
text-align: center;
float: left;
background-color: red;
}
<div class="big">
<div class="a">1
</div>
<div class="a">2
</div>
<div class="a">3
</div>
<div class="a">4
</div>
</div>
I do not believe there is a point in floating if you do have no intention of wanting to float to the top and to the left. You need to master the use of both position and display properties. This I believe is what you are looking for. I have put explanations underneath explaining what the relevant display and position properties, as well as why I used what I did.
.big {
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
background: gold;
}
.a {
position: relative;
left: 12px;
display:inline-block;
margin: 5px;
width: 50px;
height: 20px;
text-align: center;
background-color: red;
}
Positioning is how the element is positioned in the document. The options in CSS are either static, relative, absolute, fixed.
Static: This is the browser default. It is not affected by positioning, and will just be positioned in the natural flow of the page.
Relative: Will cause element to be positioned relative to it's initial position. (i.e.: if the element is positioned at X (initial position), then will be moved depending on what properties put in)
Absolute: Will cause element to be positioned relative to next parent element. An important thing to note about this is that elements are removed from the flow of the page meaning that it is possible to have multiple elements stack on top of one another.
Fixed: Will cause element to be fixed relative to the browser window, commonly known as viewport itself. If you scroll down, the position will be fixed, hence the name.
Display
This is how the browser will treat the type of "box"/element that is used (all elements can be considered boxes, as per the box model).If you have trouble grasping the concept, put element {border: solid black} into all your css elements and you'll see what I mean.
There are multiple displays will only get into the 3 of the arguably most important ones: block, inline, inline-block.
Block: element will take up the maximum amount of horizontal space necessary. Think of the li as an example. The list point will take up the maximum amount of horizontal space, and thus each separate li can be considered a block.
Inline: element will take up the minimum amount of horizontal, and vertical space necessary to fit within the flow. Think of the anchor a tag, as it will take up the minimum amount of space necessary to fit within the flow of a paragraph.
Inline-block: Considered an inline value but with the ability to change the width and height of the element.
For your example, I have used the relative positioning element (positioned it right 12px relative to where it originally was) and changed the display to be inline-block, as divs are naturally block elements and thus, without the inline-block display feature, they would have only stacked 1 at a time.
Related
I want to center a DIV within a parent DIV. I have tried using the recommende dsolution on SO -- How to horizontally center a <div> in another <div>?, but its not centering it. The basic layout is this
#revealScoreMobile {
padding: 10px;
display: block;
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
}
.stats {
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
background-color: red;
margin: 0 auto;
}
<div id="revealScoreMobile">
...
<div class="stats" style="">
<div class="score">5.0</div>
(<span class="votesCast">1</span> votes cast)
</div>
</div>
and yet as you can see from the Fiddle -- https://jsfiddle.net/5Lgu0uw3/2/, the child DIV is not centering within the parent, despite the fact I have
text-align:center;
in there. What gives? What else do I need to do to center that DIV within its parent?
I am not completely sure what you want, but if you want the inner DIV NOT have the full width, but only as much as its text contents require, make it an inline-block and erase the widthsetting (or give it a widthsetting less than 100%). inline-blocks are affected by text-align: center
(note that I erased some superfluous settings, but put the ... content into its own DIV, since it otherwise would be on one line with the subsequent inline-block.
#revealScoreMobile {
padding: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
.stats {
display: inline-block;
text-align: center;
background-color: red;
}
<div id="revealScoreMobile">
<div> ... </div>
<div class="stats" style="">
<div class="score">5.0</div>
(<span class="votesCast">1</span> votes cast)
</div>
</div>
As others have suggested in the comments, text-align: center; only applies to text content, not the inner div.
Your CSS applies width: 100%; to .stats which is forcing it to take up the full width of it's parent container #revealScoreMobile, which is also width: 100%;. Secondly it needs display: inline-block; to override the previous display: table-cell; as present in your jsfiddle example.
Replace in your CSS:
.stats {
display: inline-block;
text-align: center;
background-color: red;
margin: 0 auto;
}
PART 1:
I am trying to make my parent div increase with height as the contents. it is a slide show contained in a parent div and the slide show is responsive. Everything sits fine but 10px padding is not reflected around the main container. Any help?
Example:
.mainer {
width: 100%;
background-color: red;
padding: 10px
}
.slide_wrapper {
width: 60%;
height: inherit;
top: 10px;
border: 0px solid black;
clear: left;
margin: 0 auto;
position: relative;
text-align: center;
}
<div class="mainer">
<div class="slide_wrapper">
<div class="carousel_slider">
<div class="item" style="width:100%;">
<img src="image.jpg" style="width:100%;height:auto" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Part 2:
(Bonus for me.)
Assuming that I am also trying to include a different div class="rightbox" to the right of the container class="carousel_slider". Both of them have to stay inside the main container. How can I achieve this? Part 2 is just a curiosity for me.
Any help?.
Thanks and appreciation in Advance.
Michelle
Your problem might be related to using a clear without a clearfix. I'm not entirely sure why you have clear:left to begin with really, you don't have any other floated elements to clear in your html. Anyhow, when you clear an element, it no longer takes up space normally. The item within the cleared element will still take up space, but you can't apply margins and padding normally to a cleared element without clearfix. Here's one you can use easily.
http://nicolasgallagher.com/micro-clearfix-hack/
That being said, clear + clearfix is fairly depreciated and you may find better results elsewhere. Try making .mainer relatively positioned, and absolutely position .slide_wrapper inside of it. That should allow you to set the width to 60% still and align it relative to the top and left of .mainer. Perhaps look into flexbox if you aren't using old versions of internet explorer. I'm not going to explain all of flexbox here as other's have already done it and better, but it allows you to align items intelligently to their parent container and is particularly helpful if you element has siblings.
padding: 10px on the parent is being applied, but you have top: 10px on the img that is pushing it down 10px and messing up the bottom padding of the parent. To increase the space between the top of the image and the parent without messing up the bottom padding of the parent, use padding-top or margin-top instead of top on the img
And to put .rightbox beside of .carousel_slider, make the parent display: flex and it will put those 2 children in adjacent columns in a row.
.mainer {
width: 100%;
background-color: red;
padding: 10px;
}
.slide_wrapper {
height: inherit;
border: 0px solid black;
clear: left;
margin: 0 auto;
position: relative;
text-align: center;
padding-top: 10px;
}
.slide_wrapper {
display: flex;
align-items: flex-start;
justify-content: center;
}
.rightbox {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
<div class="mainer">
<div class="slide_wrapper">
<div class="carousel_slider">
<div class="item" style="width:100%;">
<img src="http://kenwheeler.github.io/slick/img/fonz1.png" style="width:100%;height:auto"/>
</div>
</div>
<div class="rightbox">rightbox</div>
</div>
</div>
It appears that all the elements nested inside my parent divs are overflowing from the bottom border of my parental divs.
As you can see the image divs overlay the parent and the paragraph on the header
Similar questions have to deal with floating elements, but this is not the applicable here since I don't use those
Why is "position:relative" ?
Here is the code,
and a ready fiddle for your, very much appreciated ,tweaks.
https://jsfiddle.net/r96fxfgj/
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title>DISSECTIONS</title>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="dissections.css">
</head>
<body>
<div id="header">
<p><span>/<sup>*</sup></span>DISSECTIONS</p>
</div>
<div id="main">
<div class="photo" id="one"> </div>
<div class="photo" id="two"> </div>
<div class="photo" id="three"> </div>
<div class="photo" id="four"> </div>
<span class="stretch"></span>
</div>
<div id="footer">
<button id="about"> ABOUT </button>
<button id="contact"> CONTACT </button>
</div>
</body>
</html>
body {
overflow: hidden; /*prevents scrolling*/
font-family: courier;
}
div {
width: 98vw;
}
p{
font-size: 8vh;
}
span {
font-size: 15vh;
}
sup {
font-size: 8vh;
}
#header {
border: 2px solid black;
height: 20vh;
padding: 0;
}
#main {
border: 2px solid red;
height: 60vh;
margin-top: 5vh;
margin-bottom: 5vh;
padding: 0;
text-align: justify; /*justify*/
}
.stretch { /*justify*/
width: 100%;
display: inline-block;
}
.photo {
border: 2px solid black;
height: 100%;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
width: 20vw;
margin-left: 1%;
margin-right: 1%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-image: url(
http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/pictures/10000/nahled/1001-12380278201dXT.jpg);
}
#footer {
border: 2px solid blue;
height: 10vh;
bottom: 0;
}
There are a few separate but similar issues here. Most boil down to you're unintentionally setting a specific height for the parent which is smaller than the things it contains.
In general it's best to set specific heights or widths only when your design actually needs those specific sizes -- otherwise just let the content flow dictate the size of its parents.
text in header overflowing the container: Fonts are a bit weird when it comes to sizing -- the value you put in font-size will match the text itself, but will also scale the padding above and below the text to a (typically) larger value (this is in addition to the normal padding attribute found on other elements). You can fix this by setting values for the text's line-height (a cheap but often-used hack for short headers is line-height:1px, which will remove all the extra padding. Don't use this if there's any chance the text will wrap to a second line, though, or the second line will overlap the first.)
images overflowing #main: you're setting #main as a percentage of the viewport height, but images at 100% of their actual size -- so depending on the window size the images may end up larger than or smaller than the container. Either use the same units for both, or don't set a height on #main at all (therefore letting the images dictate the height of the container.)
position:relative -- I don't see this in your code but I've seen it confuse a lot of people: position:relative counterintuitively doesn't affect the DOM node you attach it to, it affects the absolute-positioned children of that node. If a parent has position:relative, then any children with position:absolute will be placed relative to the parent's position instead of relative to the full window. If you're not using position:absolute (and you shouldn't unless absolutely necessary!) then you don't need position:relative.
This seems to be a box sizing problem.
Add this snippet to the top of your CSS (I always include it in my CSS reset), so that every element includes its children's padding and borders in its width/height:
* {
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
If you don't want to apply it to everything, you can apply the styles instead to your .main and .photo classes.
As for your header, the content is overflowing because you have a set height, if you set the height to auto the header height adapts. However if you want to preserve the height of the header, you can change the overflow property to overflow:hidden, which hides overlapping content; or overflow:auto which adds a scroll bar on overflow.
Here is the jsfiddle
In my example, giving either of the children elements a bottom margin causes its sibling to be pushed down by whatever margin I specify; I hadn't anticipated seeing anything move since the container is larger than each div. Why is this the case?
HTML
<div class=container>
<section></section>
<aside></aside>
</div>
CSS
.container {
background: whitesmoke;
height: 12em;
width: 12em;
}
.container section {
background: slategray;
display: inline-block;
height: 04em;
margin-bottom: 20px;
width: 04em;
}
.container aside {
background: gold;
display: inline-block;
height: 04em;
width: 04em;
}
Add vertical-align: top to your section element. As these elements are ìnline-block, they are not simply behaving as boxes anymore - they have flowing text properties. It is not really the margin that is pushing down the other element, it is the default vertical-align property they have.
jsFiddle Demo
Other Demo that shows the effect with text - the key is vertical-align
I have the following in my CSS. All margins/paddings/borders are globally reset to 0.
#wrapper{width: 75%; min-width: 800px;}
.content{text-align: justify; float: right; width: 90%;}
.lbar{text-align: justify; float: left; width: 10%;}
Now when I write my HTML as
<div id="wrapper">
<div class="content">
some text here
</div>
<div class="lbar">
some text here
</div>
</div>
the page renders correctly. However, when I inspect the elements, div#wrapper is shown as being 0px high. I would've expected it to expand till the end of div.content and div.lbar... Why does this happen?
Again, the page renders fine. This behaviour just perplexes me.
Content that is floating does not influence the height of its container. The element contains no content that isn't floating (so nothing stops the height of the container being 0, as if it were empty).
Setting overflow: hidden on the container will avoid that by establishing a new block formatting context. See methods for containing floats for other techniques and containing floats for an explanation about why CSS was designed this way.
Ordinarily, floats aren't counted in the layout of their parents.
To prevent that, add overflow: hidden to the parent.
I'm not sure this is a right way but I solved it by adding display: inline-block; to the wrapper div.
#wrapper{
display: inline-block;
/*border: 1px black solid;*/
width: 75%;
min-width: 800px;
}
.content{
text-align: justify;
float: right;
width: 90%;
}
.lbar{
text-align: justify;
float: left;
width: 10%;
}
Now, you can
#wrapper { display: flow-root; }
Compatibility https://caniuse.com/flow-root
History https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/clear-fix/