I'm aware that addChild (1) adds the object into a display container object, and (2) shows the object in the DisplayObjectContainer. What I want to know is what happens when an object is added into a DisplayObjectContainer?
To summarize my question is (are),
Is there any magic happens when addChild invoked? i.e. Something is happening in, for example, DisplayObjectContainer.
Let's say, I have MovieClip A and B. B has A as part of it. I called addChild (A) in B. In MainTimeline and Stage, I don't call addChild (B). Visually, since B hasn't been added, A won't be there too. However, does A is exist (e.g. the memory allocated), even though it's not on the Stage?
I have searched here and there in SO, but humongous amount of the questions asked related to mine are technical. I greatly appreciate any answer or pointer regarding my questions
Here is simplified explanation of what happens.
When you create MovieClip A (or any object) using the new keyword (or if using FlashPro an item that exists on the timeline where the playhead is), that object is in memory. So whether or not MovieClip A is on the display list, it is taking up memory in your application.
When you use addChild, here are some of those things that happen (not necessarily in order):
If the object being added already has parentage, it is removed from that parent (though scale and position are kept, and will now be relative to the new parent).
Events are dispatched on the new parent (and the old parent if applicable). Event.ADDED and Event.ADDED_TO_STAGE + Event.REMOVED / REMOVED_FROM_STAGE on the old parent.
The parent(s) of the newly added object, will now take into account the new child/grandchild. Things like hit tests, and bounds, and mouse overs etc.
On the next frame tick (the stage's refresh rate), that item will be drawn
All that said, once a movieClip is on the display list, there is performance drain VS just having that object in memory - so if an object doesn't need to be seen, it's more efficient to have it off the display list until it needs to be seen.
If using FlashPro/Animate, you should also be aware that if through code you do anything that manipulates the parentage of a timeline display object (addChild/removeChild/setChildIndex etc), that timeline object will no longer be managed by the timeline. That means that if you have an empty keyframe to remove an item from the timeline, that item will actually stay on the screen until you either explicitly remove it (removeChild(item)) or it's parent goes away.
Related
I have a UI object that, of course, should always be kept in front of all other objects. To do that, I decided to destroy and add it again each frame, like this:
removeChild(UI_Indicator)
addChild(UI_Indicator)
But nevertheless, objects that are created in it’s area still come on top of it. How is this even possible? I also tried the common
UI_Indicator.parent.setChildIndex(UI_Indicator,UI_Indicator.parent.numChildren - 1)
But it doesn’t work too. Any suggestions?
You are not destroying anything with removeChild(), you just stop displaying it. removeChild() isn't even necessary here. addChild() happily takes a DisplayObject that is already a child of the DisplayObjectContainer you called it on and re-adds the child again (to the top)
Instead of doing this readdChild()ing every frame, place your
allways-on-top DisplayObject on the display list once, then create
a DisplayObjectContainer, say a Sprite for example and add it
behind your indicator. Now add all your other DisplayObjects to
that container. This has the disadvantage of requiring you to add
everything to the container. The functionality breaks as soon as you
accidentally addChild() the regular way. This thought process
leads to the second solution below.
In your subclass of DisplayObjectContainer that includes the
indicator, override the methods that interact with the display list
(add/remove children, etc.) All those that could cause something to
get on top of your indicator. This puts you in full control of
what's going on when something is added to this container. You can
either incorporate solution 1 for simplicity's sake: delegate all
method calls to the inner container Sprite or, if you don't like
to have an internal container, do it without it and make sure that
no other child than your indicator is ever assigned the top most
index. You'd create an additional method to add the always-on-top child, like addTopChild() for example.
i am working with several nested movieclip objects in a project. but i get into trouble with the buttons i created and implemented in the nested movieclips:
to describe it in a simple way:
I have a main movieclip with five frames, including two buttons with listeners to browse between the frames. Then inside of one Frame I have another movieclip with its own buttons. i instanciated it by hand not through code and gave it a specific name like "nestedMc".
Now I dont want to build the Listeners for those buttons inside the class of the nested movieclip class but in its parent class, which works fine until i then goto another frame in the main movieclips timeline and come back.
obviously every time flash enters a frame its contents get created anew (and therefore get new instance names). I could now try solve this through filling the frames via code.
But maybe there is another way to make sure the frame contains the same instance everytime i enter?
Timeline scripting is a dirty business, and really, a carry-over compatibility layer for Actionscript 2 projects. Whenever possible, I highly recommend not doing it, and simply keeping all of your code in your document class. As you're experiencing, timeline code causes headaches.
Consider instead just creating both states of your Stage (it sounds like that's what your two buttons are jumping between) and simply hiding them offstage or setting their alpha to zero and their mouseEnabled state to false. Furthermore, if the purpose of your frames is to play animation (a tween), consider instead switching to a much more powerful suite such as TweenLite. Moving an object over a hundred pixels (smoothly) can be as easy as:
TweenLite.to(redBall, 3, {x:100});
Now, if you're manually adding these items to the stage, as long as the object is a dynamic one, you can assign an instance name to it which will be saved between frame loads. Be aware the object name is not the same as the instanced name. For example:
var redBall:Ball = new Ball();
redBall.name = "bubbles";
The object's name is Ball, but it's represented as a variable called redBall. Its actual DisplayList name will likely be ambiguous (such as "Instance71"), and I can manually define it as "bubbles". 3 different names for the same object, all very different and necessary.
Even if you give the object a displayList name, you may not be able to reference it through code unless you enable Automatically declare stage instances, which basically creates on each object a pointer to the displayList object.
That said, you can always fetch the object by other means. Obviously, your buttons are always appearing, but you're trying to find a very specific object on the stage. At this point, we can use getChildByName() or getChildAt().
Hope that helps.
-Cheers
There was many discussions about this problem, but I want to pay attention on the situations that IMHO seems not so clear:
Yes the general rules are:
Remove chachedAsBitmap
Stop movieClip if playing
Remove events
Delete references
etc.
But let's look:
First Example:
I have nested sprite (ex: mainSprite), it contains other sprites with dynamic textFields in it (and are chached as bitmaps), just textFileds and MovieClips with event listeners on it (with weak reference).
When I need to remove this sprite I need first to remove all it's nested content via loops or just
removeChild(mainSprite);
mainSprite=null;
is just enough?
Second Example:
I have some sprite in which I'm loading bitmap and manipulating with bitmapData, later I'm just replacing content of this sprite with another bitmap, is allocated memory for older bitmap automatically erases and is overwritten or it still exists?
Third example:
I have some "graphics template" MovieClip (in library with Export for Actionscript property set on it) which I'm adding on the stage and filling with dynamic data (and adding event listeners), let's say that it's one scene of the app, on another scene I need same MovieClip with other dynamic data, but inbetween need to clear my stage (need something like transition animation which is also library MovieClip), what's the best way: to set this MovieClip visible property to false (while transition animation is plays) and then reuse it, or just remove it with removeChild and then add when add with addChild once more?
All I wrote is more about Air Mobile, cause in most cases for the desktop these situations aren't so problematic, but in case of mobile development they are.
You can visually monitor memory usage along with fps etc using this lib: http://code.google.com/p/flash-console/
hope that helps.
P.S. gc in flash is always a weird thing :)
First example: removing mainSprite from display list is enough if there are only weak listeners on its children.
Second example: I'd advice reusing the same object with visible = false. Recreating the same object is more resource expensive plus you get another instance of the same thing being in memory before it gets gc'ed.
Before I go making major change in my ongoing game project, I just want to hear from others if anyone has found any issues with getObjectsUnderPoint() function of the DisplayObject?
Update:
Not just the performance issue but any other limitations of using it (like it doesn't detect certain type of UIelements (just as example))
I will have three layers in my application (which an Isometric game)
Background -- This is just a background which stays in the bottom, has nothing to do with game
Middle Layer -- This is the playable area, Here all my game elements will be placed on this layer
Top Layer -- This is one dummy transparent layer covers entire playable area which interrupts all the mouse events. This is where I want to use the getObjectsUnderPoint()
So, player wants to click on the element, the top layer will interrupt the mouseevent and then check if there is something placed or just a plain background and take appropriate action like, notify the underneath object.
This really doesn't require to be done this way because I could simply add moues events for all those items placed on the map directly but because I would be using getObjectsUnderPoint() anyway to check if there is anything beneath the item.
If anyone can explain how this function works then it would be little easy for me to make a decision.
There was one annoying problem though. I don't know if they fixed it or not. At least it was there in 10.1 times.
If you have a container and you scaled it container.getObjectsUnderPoint will return wrong result. All the time. So everywhere where I needed getObjectsUnderPoint I had to call it from stage to get proper result.
It's an incomplete function. It returns graphical objects under the mouse, NOT all potential mouse targets for event or interaction purposes. It actually requires complex logic to examine the array returned by getObjectsUnderPoint to determine the mouse target, because the appropriate target (the one Flash would choose if you actually clicked that point) may not be in the list.
First you'd have to examine the object array in reverse, since the items are ordered back to front. You'd have to examine each object's entire parent chain, looking for a parent with mouseChildren = false that would cause it to intercept the event and become the target. Whether or not such an object is found, this final object you arrive at must have its mouseEnabled property set to true, otherwise you must skip it and move on to the next object in the array, which would be, for example, the next sprite or shape behind the one you initially checked. While going through the list, you must notice when the parent changes, at which point you need to assume that all children of that common parent had their mouseEnabled property set to false, in which case the parent would become the next candidate. This is actually extremely complicated, because you're working backwards in a bottom-up approach with an incomplete set of objects that was generated from the top-down.
To get actual potential mouse event targets, consistent with the default dispatching logic... it is actually easier to start from the stage in a top-down manner and walk backwards through the display hierarchy in a depth-first search, checking mouseChildren to determine whether you need to step into children, and checking mouseEnabled if it's to be a target, otherwise stepping into the container's children and repeating the process from back to front again. This is much more accurate, complete, and staightforward. The only problem is you have to code it yourself.
I am using the frames in the timeline of a .swf as pages in a flash app. The user can advance to the next page by clicking a button that takes her to the next frame. Similarly, it is possible to navigate to the previous frame/page as well.
Most of the content is placed on the stage (i.e. created by dragging an instance of a library symbol to the stage) but properties of those instances, such as .visible might be changed via actionscript. Also, some objects are loaded from external flash files and displayed programmatically with addChild / addChildAt.
The problem is, if I am on Frame N+1 and there is an object displayed on the stage programmatically (i.e. with addChild, not by having it placed on the stage) and navigate to Frame N where there is an object that is placed on the stage (i.e. dragged from the library),
then the instance of that object is undefined/null and throws an error if I try to set its properties (like .visible).
The error does not occur if I am moving to the NEXT frame, only if I am moving to the PREVIOUS one. Therefore I assume that some kind of initialization is not getting called while going one frame back.
I was also thinking that the objects would just not "live" to the next timeframe, that is, their value would be lost and re-initialized because of scope, but if there is no dynamically created object on the stage, I can navigate back and forth just fine.
Is there a way to ensure that the objects created on the stage do not disappear while navigating back to the previous frame?
The first, and more useful, part of the answer is this: timeline keyframes and scripts can give conflicting information about display objects - whether they should exist, where they should be, and so on. For example, when you add an item by playing into its frame, and then delete it with script, and then play into its frame again. When this happens, there's no unambiguously correct thing for Flash to do, so it tends to be unpredictable. I believe what generally happens is that once you fiddle with a given object via script, it's considered to no longer pay attention to the timeline - but your mileage will vary.
Having said that, the reason things are different when you play backwards is the second and more arcane part of the answer. Internally Flash functions differently when seeking forward and backwards on the timeline. Flash internally treats keyframes as changes to be applied in the forward direction, so as you play forward, it applies those changes in sequence. When you move backwards, however, from frame N+X to frame N, it doesn't scan through the intervening X frames reversing those changes - it jumps back to frame 1 and fast-forwards along to frame N. Normally, it amounts to the same thing and you don't need to worry about it, but when you get into the twitchy area where scripts and the timeline have a different idea of what should be on the stage, you're liable to see things behave differently depending on which way you jump (as you are now).
The super-short version is, for things to work predictably, try to ensure that any given object gets added, updated, and removed the same way - either all via script, or all via the timeline. When that seems impossible, fiddle with your content structure - usually, the best solution is to change your object into two nested ones, so that the things you want to do with script occur one level higher or lower than the things you want to do with the timeline.
I'm not sure I got your question right, but as3 does not instantiate elements on the timeline as soon as you gotoAndSomething, but later that frame.
That is, you can't
this.gotoAndPlay(10)
this.elementOnTimelineFrame10.DoSomething()
without errors.
I remember using this chunk of code in the past to work around this problem. It uses the Stage.Invalidate() function to wait for an Event.RENDER before trying to access and children, more info (although vague as hell) is here
private function init():void
{
stage.addEventListener(Event.RENDER, stage_renderHandler);
}
private function stage_renderHandler(evt:Event):void
{
// Run your code here
updateChildren();
}
private function enterFrameHandler(evt:Event):void
{
// triggers the RENDER event
stage.invalidate();
}
This also might me very costly (performance wise). I would strongly advise against dynamically adding/removing objects to an existing timeline, is there any way in which you can place an empty Sprite above the timeline animation and use that for all your dynamic content?
Hope this helps