Is it possible to make the PC as a web storage? - html

I am looking for a space storage for my website because my hosting server has a limited space storage and my question is... Is it possible to make the PC as a web storage?
Thank u for the answers...

You can use ownCloud 8 with Ubuntu Server operating system.
You will need to have a static IP address as well.
But this is a very bad idea for what you are trying to do.
Its always recommended to use real time cloud servers instead of your pc
for example :
Use
Youtube to host your videos ,
Imgur to host images,
GoogleDrive to host files
There are lot of other options you can think

Related

Local images in HTML

I'm an high school student and I'm working on something for fun. I've linked a local file stored on my computer to my webpage. What can I do to make it possible for other devices to access the local html file? (meme1.html)
<div id="button">
<a href="C:\Users\Desktop\MEME GENERATOR\meme1.html">
<img src="https://openclipart.org/image/2400px/svg_to_png/140365/1306313012.png" alt="Click here!" height="20%" width="20%"></a>
</div>
<div id="wrapper">
<h1><span class="tight-2">Happy Birthday!</h1>
<h2>Go ahead, press the button to generate memes!<span class="tm">™</span>.</h2>
</div>
Basically, when you host the site online you have to change the linked file path to the one of the server instead of your local machine.
Edit: If youre using plain HTML my answer stands, if you use a backend platform like Django, Flask or dotNet Core then the urls are dynamicly stated in your webapp.
By default, the local file is only available to the system it resides on. For instance this link you've created:
<a href="C:\Users\Desktop\MEME GENERATOR\meme1.html">
is telling the browser to look in the C: drive of the machine it's currently installed on. Every other system in your network (and the world, for that matter) will likely not be to pull that file because MEME GENERATOR isn't a folder on their system, so they will see a 404 (file not found) error.
That said, you can load links within your network by using network addresses. This will be the machine's network IP address, typically starting with 192.168.
That said, in order to load the file, the machine that it is running on will need to have a port open for the client machine's browser to connect to. This is typically port 80, unless SSL is in use, in which case it's typically port 8080, for HTTP traffic.
In doing so, the computer that is serving up the files becomes, logically, a 'server'. And this is the core of the client (user) to server relationship that the whole of the internet and networking is built upon.
Since you're on Windows, you can use something like XAMPP or WAMP to run a server locally that will have Apache installed, which can serve files through these ports. You're going to need to read up on these technologies a lot to get a file going, and be forewarned that this will open your system to hacking and the like.
EDIT: rereading your question, you are maybe trying to get this file to load on your website? If this is the case, then you need to upload the file to your website, and then it will have a folder structure similar to a local Windows file. [YOUR.DOMAIN.COM]/[whatever folder you create on your server in the public directory]/meme1.html
Do you mean? That you want other people to access your website?
Few ways to do that.
One thing you could do is to send the whole directory to the individual to who you want to send the webpage to.
Or the other way is what you can do is host the webpage on a hosting website. There are a lot of hosting websites that would host your websites for free.
That way anyone with a given URL can access the website.

How best to deploy this multi-tier app?

We currently have an application that runs on one dedicated server. I'd like to move it to OpenShift. It has:
A public-facing web app written in PhP
A Java app for administrators running on Wildfly
A Mysql database
A filesystem containing lots of images and documents that must be accessible to both the Java and PhP apps. A third party ftp's a data file to the server every day, and a perl script loads that into the db and the file system.
A perl script occasionally runs ffmpeg to generate videos, reading images from and writing videos to the filesystem.
Is Openshift a good solution for this, or would it be better to use AWS directly instead (for instance because they have dedicated file system components?)
Thanks
Michael Davis
Ottawa
The shared file system will definitely be the biggest issue here. You could get around it by setting up your applications to use Amazon S3 or some other shared Cloud file system though fairly easily.
As for the rest of the application, if I were setting this up I would:
Setup a scaled PHP application, even if you set the scaling to just use 1 gear this will allow you to put the MySQL database on it's own gear, and even choose a different size for it, such as having medium web gears (that run php) and a large gear that runs the MySQL database. This will also allow your wildfly gear to access the database since it will have a FQDN (fully qualified domain name) that any of your applications on your account can reach. However, keep in mind that it will use a non-standard port instead of 3306.
Then you can setup your WildFly server as whatever size you want, but, keep in mind that the MySQL connection variables will not be there, you will have to put them into your java application manually.
As for the perl script, depending on how intensive it is, you could run it on it's own whatever sized gear with some extra storage, or you could co-locate it with either the php or java application as a cron job. You can have it store the files on Amazon S3 and pull them down/upload them as it does the ffmpeg operations on them. Since OpenShift is also hosted on Amazon (In the US-EAST region) these operations should be pretty fast, as long as you also put your S3 bucket in the US-EAST region.
Those are my thoughts, hope it helps. Feel free to ask questions if you have them. You can also visit http://help.openshift.com and under "Contact Us" click on "Submit a request" and make sure you reference this StackOverflow question so I know what you are talking about, you can ask any questions you might have and we can discuss solutions for them.

Apache server - show page while server is offline

Since my server is running off my personal laptop, it has quite a lot of down time. Is it possible to have a page that shows up when someone tries to access the site while the server is offline?
Yes, with another server. You can't show pages without server.
If your server is unreachable, then the user browser shows a default page that explains that your server is unreachable...
With an external service (external server) it is possible. A lot of ways to do it. Look for solutions about load balancing for example.
But only with apache on your laptop, I think it is impossible.
Try superuser.com, you'll certainly get more answers about your problem.

Transferring files from PC to App local storage Windows phone 8

I am developing an app which would need to have files pushed to its local store for its consumption.
Is it possible to transfer files from a PC to a windows phone app local folder or say one of the Special-use folders in the local folder such as Shared/Media from a desktop application in a wired or wireless manner ? Are there any size restrictions as to the maximum data a local folder could contain for transfers done this way ?
On further research on WP8 storage i got to know about isolated storage explorer and i envision the desktop client to be similar to isolated storage explorer but customized and simplified only for the app is that possible ? meanwhile let me search more.
Yes - it does seem like it is possible. You can use the Isolated Storage Explorer in WP8.
Look at the Replacing files in the local folder in the following article on how to move files between your computer and your phone:
How to use the Isolated Storage Explorer tool for Windows Phone
Eventually i ended up using socket programming to solve this, Stephen Cleary's blog post here helped a lot to brush up the basics

storing images for my website

I want to setup seperate amazon ec2 instance where i store all my images uploaded via my website by users. I want to be able to show images from this exclusive server. I know how to setup DNS names which would point to this server. But i would like to know how to setup the directories, for example if i refer to an image url as http://images.mydomain.com/images/sample.jpg, then
images.mydomain.com is the server name and
images should be the folder name
now the question is should a webserver be running on this server which is what will serve the images or can i just make images folder public so that it is visible to entire world? How do avoid directory listing?
Pointer to any documentation would be greatly appreciated.
It certainly is possible to set up a separate EC2 instances to serve your images. You may have good reasons to do that--for example, you may want to authorize only specific users or groups of users to access certain images, in a way that's closely controlled by program logic.
OTOH, if you're just looking to segment the access of image/media files away from the server that provides HTML/web content, you will get much better performance / scalability by moving those files to a service that is specifically tuned for storage and web access. Amazon's S3 (Simple Storage Service) is one relatively straightforward option. Amazon's CloudFront content distribution network (CDN) or a competing CDN would be an even higher performance option.
Using a CDN for file access does add the complexity of configuring the CDN, but if you're going to the trouble of segmenting media access from your primary web server, and if you're expecting any significant I/O load, I've found it to be a high-return-for-effort-expended approach.
I would definitely not implement this as you are planning. You should store all your images in an Amazon S3 bucket and serve them via Amazon's CloudFront CDN. Why go through the hassle of setting up and maintaining an EC2 instance to do what Amazon has already done? S3 provides infinite storage, manages permissions, metadata, etc. CloudFront provides fast access to your images, caching them at edge locations all around the world. Additionally, you can use Amazon Route 53 (or some other DNS service) to point various CNAMEs to your CloudFront distribution.
If you're interested in this approach I'd be happy to provide more info on how to set this up.
Yes, you will definitly need to run a webserver on the machine. Otherwise it will not bepossible for clients to connect via http/port 80 and view the images in a browser. This has nothing to do with directory listing enabled. Once you have a webserver running, you can disable directory listing in its configuration.
Install an apache on your server and run it (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/install.html). You then setup what's called a 'site' in its configuration which is pointing to a local directory which will then be the base directory for your server. It could, for example, be /home/apache on a Unix system. There you create your images folder. If your apache is setup correctly you can then access your images via http://images.mydomain.com/images/sample.jpg.