I'm sending a post request in a test case, and I want to assert that a specific element, let's say with key 'x' exists in the response. In this case, I can't say seeJson(['x' => whatever]); because the value is unknown to me. and for sure, I can't do it with seeJson(['x']);.
Is there a way to solve this?
If it matters:
Laravel: v5.2.31
PHPUnit: 5.3.4
May it will be helpful for anyone else. You can write this test for your check response json structure
$this->post('/api/login/', [
'email' => 'customer3#example.com',
'password' => '123123123',
])->assertJsonStructure([
'status',
'result' => [
'id',
'email',
'full_name',
],
]);
Although it's not optimal at all, I chose to use this code to test the situation:
$this->post(URL, PARAMS)->see('x');
X is a hypothetical name, and the actual element key has a slim chance of popping up in the rest of the data. otherwise this nasty workaround wouldn't be practical.
UPDATE:
Here's the solution to do it properly:
public function testCaseName()
{
$this->post(route('route.name'), [
'param1' => 1,
'param2' => 10,
], [
'headers_if_any' => 'value'
]);
$res_array = (array)json_decode($this->response->content());
$this->assertArrayHasKey('x', $res_array);
}
Related
What will be the rules for my pretty url if I have the following scenario:
links like this where parameters may vary.
domain/?bt=<token>&e=<email>
or
domain/?lt=<token>&e=<email>
then should be processed in a controller/action. ie. mycontroller/get
Also, parameters should be accessible by $_GET inside the action.
the simplest way is based on the use of urlHelper
use yii\helpers\Url;
$myUrl = Url::to(['your_controller/your_action', 'bt' => 123, 'e' => 'myemail#gmail.com']);
Using the urlHelper function Url::to .. the url you need is properly formed depending of the urlManager configuration you have set in your config file
and the param a manager as show in the sample like entry in an array.
The post or get method is related to the type of metho you have in your ulr call if not other values are specified the url is formed as a get
and you can obtain the values you need in $_GET['bt'] and $_get['e']
http://www.yiiframework.com/doc-2.0/yii-helpers-url.html
http://www.yiiframework.com/doc-2.0/yii-web-urlmanager.html
http://www.yiiframework.com/doc-2.0/guide-runtime-routing.html
'urlManager' => [
'enablePrettyUrl' => true,
'showScriptName' => false,
'rules' => [
'<controller:\w+>/<id:\d+>' => '<controller>/view',
'<controller:\w+>/<action:\w+>/<id:\d+>' => '<controller>/<action>',
'<controller:\w+>/<action:\w+>' => '<controller>/<action>',
'' => 'call-backs/get',
'unsubscribes' => 'unsubscribes/get',
],
],
#scaisEdge, thank you for answering my question. maybe my question isn't that clear but this is the solution I made for my question after a hard find of clues and tips online.
All I wanted was that when a user clicks on a link, hitting the main page/main domain, it will go to my yii project (intended to be a webservice or an API like one) then will be handled by a precise controller and action.
'' => 'call-backs/get'
the code above answers the question. Cheers.
i'm currently trying to build a backend for a project. In this project you will be able to create "ContentElements" that can be used to display content in a page (in my case Sites). Every ContentElement can have multiple options. When a user creates a new Site with an ContentElement (e.g. header) he would enter all options of the element. For example:
"src": "/img/bg.jpg",
"text": "Lorem ipsum..."
In order to save the option's value per page it is used in, i store these values in a separate table (content_elements_sites_values).
My scheme currently looks like this: data scheme
So what i'm currently trying to do is when i get all data associated with the Site i also want to get the data from 'content_elements_sites_values'
$site = $this->Sites->get($id, [
'contain' => ['Templates', 'Colors', 'SiteTypes', 'ContentElements' => [
'ContentElementOptions' => [
'ContentElementsSitesValues'
]
]
],
'conditions' => [
// Just to explain my problem.
'ContentElementsSites.id' => 'ContentElementsSitesValues.content_elements_sites_id'
]
]);
I really don't know if this is even possible or even if my "design" is a total bull***t. But i cannot think of another way to store the filled in data. I'm very open to suggestions of a better way to store this data. Please ask if you need further information in order to help me.
Thank you in advance!
EDIT
I try to explain better what i want to achieve.
Every site can have multiple content_elements of the same type (association is stored in content_elements_sites junction table).
Every content_element can have multiple content_element_options
All content_element_options and content_elements are defined by an Admin.
Another user can create a site and populate it with content_elements and enter content_elements_sites_value for all content_element_options. And as the same content_element (e.g. a paragraph or a list) can have multiple occurrences in the same site, i'll need to store every content_elements_sites_value the user entered.
Thats why i created the link between content_elements_sites and content_element_options.
Currently i'm using this query to get everything expect the value:
$site = $this->Sites->find('all', [
'conditions' => [
'Sites.id' => $id
],
'contain' => ['ContentElements' => [
'sort' => [
'ContentElementsSites.order' => 'ASC'
],
'ContentElementOptions' => [
'ContentElementsSitesValues' => [
'conditions' => [
'ContentElementsSitesValues.content_elements_sites_id' => 'ContentElementsSites.id',
]
]
]
]
]
]);
This results in empty content_elements_sites_values
(int) 1 => object(App\Model\Entity\ContentElementOption) {
'id' => (int) 7,
'content_element_id' => (int) 1,
'name' => 'Test',
'json_name' => 'test',
'option_type_id' => (int) 1,
'content_elements_sites_value' => null,
}
My scheme currently looks like this: data scheme
I'm wondering if this query is even possible. Or if the whole thing is just too flexible.
The way you have defined the relationships signifies that you wish to have a very modular approach so that a content element can be used with multiple sites and a content element option can be used with multiple content elements.
If that is the case, schema direction looks okay with few changes :
1) content_elements_sites_values table can have site_id column directly instead of content_elements_sites_id column as site will be always unique for an entry in that table so the connection id of content_elements_sites isn't required.
2) content_elements_sites_values table can be renamed to content_element_options_values.
3) You can remove id column from content_elements_sites and content_elements_sites_values junction tables.
maybe this is what you are looking for :
$site = $this->Sites->get($id, [
'contain' => ['Templates', 'Colors', 'SiteTypes', 'ContentElements', 'ContentElements.ContentElementOptions','ContentElements.ContentElementOptions.ContentElementsSitesValues'],
....]);
dont forget to define association relationship in model table.
I am completely new to Drupal. I inherited a very ugly and incorrect code, unfortunately. In fact I would like to implement a proper login-with-facebook feature, which was totally mis-implemented. It tried to identify users by their email address, however, for some reason, upon login with Facebook, users logged in with the wrong user. I would like to identify the user based on Facebook ID, however, there was no column for that purpose in the database.
As a result, I have implemented a small script, which added a facebook_id and a facebook_token to the table representing the users. However, these new columns are not seen by the drupal_get_schema function in bootstrap.
If I do this:
$schema = drupal_get_schema("users");
echo var_dump($schema["fields"]);
It shows the fields except the two newly created fields. This way a SchemaCache object is initialized. I assumed that the schema might be cached. So I tried something different:
$schema = drupal_get_schema("users", true);
echo var_dump($schema["fields"]);
to make sure that drupal_get_complete_schema(true) will be called. However, the fields are not seen this way either. Is there a way I can tell Drupal to acknowledge the existence of the two newly created columns? If not: what should I do? Should I remove the two columns from the database table and use db_add_field("users", "facebook_id") and db_add_field("users", "facebook_token") respectively? If so, where should I call these?
Sorry if the question is too simple or I am misunderstanding these technologies, but I have tried to solve this for hours and I am at a loss, because this is my first drupal/bootstrap project and the source-code using these does not help me at all.
EDIT:
Since, at the time of this writing I have not received any answers apart from a tool recommendation which did not address my question, I have continued my research in the area. I removed the columns from the database to create them in a Drupal way. I have implemented this function in user.module:
function user_schema_alter() {
db_add_field('users', 'facebook_id', array(
'type' => 'varchar', //was initially a bigint, but Drupal generated a query which always crashed
'length' => 20,
'not null' => TRUE,
'default' => ".", //was initially -1, but Drupal generated a query which always crashed
));
db_add_field('users', 'facebook_token', array(
'type' => 'varchar',
'length' => 300,
'not null' => TRUE,
'default' => 'unavailable',
));
}
and I invoke it from altconnect.module, like this:
$schema = drupal_get_schema("users");
if (!isset($schema["fields"]["facebook_id"])) {
user_schema_alter();
}
It creates the columns, but later the existence of those columns will not be known about and subsequently an error will be thrown as the code will try to re-create them. Besides the fact that I had lost a lot of time until I realized that Drupal is unable to support bigint fields having -1 as their default value I had to conclude that with this solution I am exactly in the same situation as I were initially, with the difference that with this Drupal solution I will always get an exception if the columns already exist, because the schema will not be aware of them and subsequently, the code will always enter that if.
I fail to understand why is this so difficult in Drupal and I totally fail to understand why trying
db_add_field('users', 'facebook_id', array(
'type' => 'bigint',
'length' => 20,
'not null' => TRUE,
'default' => -1,
));
throws an exception due to syntax error. Maybe I should just leave this project and tell anyone who considers using Drupal to reconsider :)
I was able to find out what the answer is, at least for Drupal 6.
In user.install we need to do the following:
//...
function user_schema() {
//...
$schema['users'] = array(
//...
'fields' => array(
//...
'facebook_id' => array(
'type' => 'varchar',
'length' => 20,
'not null' => TRUE,
'default' => ".",
),
'facebook_token' => array(
'type' => 'varchar',
'length' => 300,
'not null' => TRUE,
'default' => 'unavailable',
),
//...
),
//...
}
//...
/**
* Adds two fields (the number is some kind of version number, should be the biggest so far for the module)
*/
function user_update_7919() {
db_add_field('users', 'facebook_id', array(
'type' => 'varchar',
'length' => 20,
'not null' => TRUE,
'default' => ".",
));
db_add_field('users', 'facebook_token', array(
'type' => 'varchar',
'length' => 300,
'not null' => TRUE,
'default' => 'unavailable',
));
}
When this is done, log in with the admin user and go to http://example.com/update.php
There you will see the thing to be updated. Run it. If you wonder why do we have to do all this, why don't we run some scripts directly, then the answer is that this is how Drupal operates. It simplifies your life by making it complicated, but do not worry, while you wait for update.php to do the updates which would take less than a second if it was your script, you can ponder about the meaning of life, quantum-mechanics or you can try to find out the reason this is so over-complicated in Drupal and you can go out for a walk. When you focus again, if you are lucky, update.php has completed its job and the two columns should be in the database.
I have a table named Play and I'm showing details of each record in Yii2 detail view widget. I have an attribute in that table recurring which is of type tinyint, it can be 0 or 1. But I don't want to view it as a number, instead i want to display yes or no based on the value (0 or 1).
I'm trying to change that with a function in detailview widget but I'm getting an error: Object of class Closure could not be converted to string
My detail view code:
<?= DetailView::widget([
'model' => $model,
'attributes' => [
'name',
'max_people_count',
'type',
[
'attribute' => 'recurring',
'format'=>'raw',
'value'=> function ($model) {
if($model->recurring == 1)
{
return 'yes';
}
else {
return 'no';
}
},
],
'day',
'time',
...
Any help would be appreciated !
Unlike GridView which processes a set of models, DetailView processes just one. So there is no need for using closure since $model is the only one model for display and available in view as variable.
You can definitely use solution suggested by rkm, but there is more simple option.
By the way you can simplify condition a bit since the allowed values are only 0 and 1:
'value' => $model->recurring ? 'yes' : 'no'
If you only want to display value as boolean, you can add formatter suffix with colon:
'recurring:boolean',
'format' => 'raw' is redundant here because it's just text without html.
If you want add more options, you can use this:
[
'attribute' => 'recurring',
'format' => 'boolean',
// Other options
],
Using formatter is more flexible approach because these labels will be generated depending on application language set in config.
Official documentation:
DetailView $attributes property
Formatter class
Formatter asBoolean() method
See also this question, it's quite similar to yours.
Try
'value' => $model->recurring == 1 ? 'yes' : 'no'
When json response sends response.success == false, I can see the console log showing me the error, but x-editable seems that doesn't catch the return, and the value in the screen is changed to the new one I had introduced, although it has not been really saved. Is there something wrong?
Here is piece of the CGridView code I use:
'class' => 'editable.EditableColumn',
'editable' => array(
'model' => $model,
'params' => array('YII_CSRF_TOKEN' => Yii::app()->request->csrfToken),
'url' => $this->createUrl('user/update'),
'success' => 'js: function(response, newValue) {
if(!response.success)
console.log(response.msg);
return response.msg;
}',
'options' => array(
'ajaxOptions' => array('dataType' => 'json')
),
)
EDIT 1:
Ok, I have been working on that, and I have found which is the problem. It seems that the javascript function I put on success is not working properly.
The if statement is catching correctly the response, but the return value is not being sended correctly. I explain: if I put a literal like that: return "test return"; the value is returned correctly, but if I put return response.msg; nothing is sended.
Of course, response.msg is not empty and contains the String message correctly.
Ok, I have been working on that and I found my stupid mistake... I was returning msg as array and I had to do this:
return response.msg[index];
Where index is where the message is stored.
It was really embarrassing losing time with that...