I am consuming some XML exposed from a REST application and want to expose this as JSON in my own REST service.
Right now I have the following POJO:
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
#XmlType(name = "", propOrder = {
"salesMarket"
})
#XmlRootElement(name = "salesMarkets")
public class SalesMarkets {
protected List<SalesMarket> salesMarket;
public List<SalesMarket> getSalesMarket() {
if (salesMarket == null) {
salesMarket = new ArrayList<SalesMarket>();
}
return this.salesMarket;
}
}
Which produces the following JSON:
"salesMarkets": {
"salesMarket": [
{
"brands": {
"brand": [
"DAN"
]
},
"code": "999"
},
{
"brands": {
"brand": [
"DAN"
]
},
"code": "208"
}
]
}
My question is (using Jackson annnotations), is there a way to avoid the class name being serialized as JSON??, so I instead would have:
"salesMarket": [{
"brands": {
"brand": [
"DAN"
]
},
"code": "999"
}, {
"brands": {
"brand": [
"DAN"
]
},
"code": "208"
}]
I'm thinking some Jackson annotaion on the class SalesMarkets... But havn't been succesfull yet :-(
UPDATE:
Just realised that the SalesMarket class was referenced from another class - which is why the "salesMarkets" appears in the JSON. Is there a way to annotate the SalesMarkets field, so that it is ignored but not the fields contained there in?:
#XmlRootElement(name = "product")
public class Product {
#XmlElement(required = true)
protected String propertyID;
#XmlElement(required = true)
protected String season;
**protected SalesMarkets salesMarkets;**
protected Information information;
protected Features features;
protected Location location;
protected Address address;
protected Buildings buildings;
protected Pictures pictures;
protected Media media;
protected Prices prices;
protected Offers offers;
protected Availabilities availabilities;
protected Services services;
protected Concepts concepts;
...
You need to either remove
#XmlRootElement(name = "salesMarkets")
Or disable the feature on ObjectMapper:
objectMapper.configure(SerializationConfig.Feature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true)
To further unwrap salesMarkets field in Product instances you can do the following:
public class Product {
protected SalesMarkets salesMarkets;
public List<SalesMarket> getSalesMarkets(){
if(salesMarkets != null){
return salesMarkets.getSalesMarket();
} else {
return null;
}
}
}
Related
I'm trying to omit null values in my ResponseEntity.
My controller looks something like this:
#RestController
public class FooController {
//fields
//constructor
#PostMapping
public ResponseEntity<CreateFooResponseV10> createFoo(#Valid #RequestBody CreateFooRequestV10 foo, HttpServletRequest request) {
//some minor logic
return new ResponseEntity<>(aFooResponseV10Builder()
.withFirstName(foo.getFirstName())
.withLastName(foo.getLastName())
.withTestField(NULLABLE_OBJECT)
.build(), ...);
//I generated the builders from the output classes openapi-generator provided
}
// more stuff...
}
When NULLABLE_OBJECT is equal to null I expect the field to be omitted from the response like this:
{
"firstName": "John",
"lastName": "Doe"
}
But I either get these responses, depending on what I've tried so far:
{
"firstName": "John",
"lastName": "Doe",
"testField": null
}
or
{
"firstName": "John",
"lastName": "Doe",
"testField": {"present":false}
}
I generate my request/response objects (CreateFooResponseV10 and CreateFooRequestV10) with the use of openapi-generator
Here is my redacted api.json file:
{
"openapi": "3.0.1",
"info": { ... },
"servers": [ ... ],
"paths": {
"/foo": {
"post": {
...
"requestBody": {
"description": "Foo to be created",
"content": {
"application/foo+json;version=1.0": {
"schema": {
"$ref": "#/components/schemas/CreateFooRequest_V1_0"
}
}
},
"required": true
},
"responses": {
"201": {
"description": "Foo is successfully created",
"headers": { ... },
"content": {
"application/foo+json": {
"schema": {
"$ref": "#/components/schemas/CreateFooResponse_V1_0"
}
}
}
},
...
}
}
}
},
"components": {
"schemas": {
"CreateFooRequest_V1_0": {
"required": [
"firstName",
"lastName"
],
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"firstName": { ... },
"lastName": { ... },
"testField": {
"description": "...",
"type": "string",
"nullable": true
}
}
},
"CreateFooResponse_V1_0": {
"required": [
"firstName",
"lastName"
],
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"firstName": { ... },
"lastName": { ... },
"testField": {
"description": "...",
"type": "string",
"nullable": true
}
}
}
}
}
}
As you can see in both the request and response testField is not required and can be nullable.
So when testField is null it should be hidden from the response, but when it contains some date it should be shown of course.
I've tried overriding jackson's ObjectMapper bean as explained in this answer. Didn't work.
I've tried adding spring.jackson.default-property-inclusion=non_null to the application.properties. Didn't work.
What I think should work is adding #JsonIgnore above testField of the generated classes, but I don't know if this is something needed to be done manually (for each schema component, can be a lot of manual work for something that is generated) or if this can be configured in the plugin somewhere.
Thanks in advance.
extra info
OpenAPI 3.0.1
Maven 3.6.3
Java 11.0.2
jackson-databind-nullable 0.2.1
openapi-generator-maven-plugin 4.2.2
You can set the following in application.properties
spring.jackson.default-property-inclusion = NON_NULL
See Customize the Jackson ObjectMapper
Note: To make use of this, you need to #Autowire the ObjectMapper, and not manually create it
Try registering the following bean in your spring context. It should override default bean
#Bean
public HttpMessageConverters httpMessageConverters() {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setSerializationInclusion(Include.NON_NULL)
return new HttpMessageConverters(
new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter(mapper));
}
You can generate the model classes with additional class annotations using OpenApi generator.
Just need to include this in your maven plugin:
<configOptions>
<additionalModelTypeAnnotations>
#com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude(com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
<additionalModelTypeAnnotations>
<configOptions>
see other config options here:
https://openapi-generator.tech/docs/generators/spring/
Try this code. I tested and it works.
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/testws")
public class TestWS {
#RequestMapping(value = "test", method = { RequestMethod.POST,
RequestMethod.GET }, produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
#ResponseBody
public ResponseEntity<TestBean> test(#Context HttpServletRequest request) {
TestBean testBean = new TestBean("John", "Doe", null);
return ResponseEntity.ok()
.body(testBean);
}
}
#JsonInclude(Include.NON_NULL)
class TestBean {
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
private String testField;
public TestBean() {
}
public TestBean(String firstName, String lastName, String testField) {
super();
this.firstName = firstName;
this.lastName = lastName;
this.testField = testField;
}
public String getFirstName() {
return firstName;
}
public void setFirstName(String firstName) {
this.firstName = firstName;
}
public String getLastName() {
return lastName;
}
public void setLastName(String lastName) {
this.lastName = lastName;
}
public String getTestField() {
return testField;
}
public void setTestField(String testField) {
this.testField = testField;
}
}
Json response:
{"firstName":"John","lastName":"Doe"}
I am trying to map the following JSON to my POJO using Jackson. I have the following JSON and following POJOs. kindly let me know how to map the JSON to POJO.
JSON string :
{
"Application": {
"id": "0",
"name": "MyApp",
"users": [
{
"User": {
"id": "2",
"name": "Beth Jones"
}
}
],
"groups": [
{
"Group": {
"id": "1",
"name": "SimpleGroup",
"users": [
{
"User": {
"id": "2",
"name": "Beth Jones"
}
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
The POJO according to the client specification is below :
package com.example.custom;
//import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonIgnoreProperties;
import com.example.Application;
import com.example.Group;
import com.example.User;
import java.util.Collection;
//#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class MyApplication extends Application {
private Collection<User> users;
private Collection<Group> groups;
public MyApplication(String id, String name) {
super(id, name);
}
public void setUsers(Collection<User> users) {
this.users = users;
}
public void setGroups(Collection<Group> groups) {
this.groups = groups;
}
#Override
public Collection<User> getUsers() {
return this.users;
}
#Override
public User getUser(String userId) {
for (User user: MyParser.myApp.getUsers()) {
if (user.getId().equals(userId))
return user;
}
return null;
}
#Override
public Collection<Group> getGroups() {
return this.groups;
}
#Override
public Group getGroup(String groupId) {
for (Group group: MyParser.myApp.getGroups()) {
if (group.getId().equals(groupId))
return group;
}
return null;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "MyApplication{" +
"users=" + users +
", groups=" + groups +
'}';
}
}
Mapping Logic :
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
MyParser.myApp = mapper.readValue(rewriter.getText(),MyApplication.class);
The resulting object is not able to capture anything as it is all null. Kindly help. Thanks in advance.
I think you should model your JSON correctly, In the users list you shouldn't specify it again that the key is User, that should be preassumed that a list of users will only contain user, same goes for groups list.
IMHO the JSON should look something like this :
{
"application": {
"id": "0",
"name": "MyApp",
"users": [ . ==> Since this is a user List, it will definitely contains user.
{
"id": "2",
"name": "Beth Jones"
}
],
"groups": [
{
"id": "1",
"name": "SimpleGroup",
"users": [
{
"id": "2",
"name": "Beth Jones"
}
]
}
]
}
}
Now the POJO also needs some modification, I am just adding the bare-minimum POJO.
class Application { <====== Top Level Class
private Long id;
private String name;
private List<User> users; // Application has some Users
private List<Group> groups; // Application has some groups
}
class User {
private Long id;
private String name;
}
class Group {
private Long id;
private String name;
private List<User> users; // Each group has some associated users.
}
Now you can use any standard JSON library for Java and convert your JSON into POJO. This will simplify your structure and you won't face null issues with this structure.
I got a null object attributes after deserialization of a json response.
Developing under android, I'm using retrofit2 , moshi as converter (https://github.com/kamikat/moshi-jsonapi ) .
When debugging ,I saw a json response fully retrieved (not null attributes),but deserialization fails. Should I use GSON instead?
Here's my retrofit builder I use to make my json call: (no issue)
public static JsonServerInterface getSimpleClient(){
Retrofit retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl(BASE_AUTH_URL)a
.addConverterFactory(MoshiConverterFactory.create())
.build();
JsonServerInterface webServer=retrofit.create(JsonServerInterface.class);
return webServer;
}
My api json call,response contain UserModel with null attributes(deserialization fails without any error)
signInCall.enqueue(new Callback<UserModel>(){
#Override
public void onResponse
(Call<UserModel> call, Response<UserModel> response)
{
response.message();
}
}
My UserModel (as required by moshi ,but I think it lacks something):
#JsonApi(type = "users")
public class UserModel extends Resource {
#Json(name = "auth-token")
private String authToken;
#Json(name = "firstname")
private String firstname;
#Json(name = "lastname")
private String lastname;
#Json(name = "email")
private String email;
#Json(name = "created-at")
private String createdAt;
#Json(name = "updated-at")
private String updatedAt;
private HasMany<ActivityModel> activities;
My json response I saw when debugging http response, I retrieve without any trouve,but moshi sucks to deserialize it,and no errors are raised:
{
"data": {
"id": "21",
"type": "users",
"attributes": {
"auth-token": "t8S3BTqyPwN3T4QDMY1FwEMF",
"firstname": "aymen",
"lastname": "myself",
"email": "aymen.myself#gmail.com",
"created-at": "2017-11-13T22:52:39.477Z",
"updated-at": "2017-11-13T23:21:09.706Z"
},
"relationships": {
"activities": {
"data": [
{
"id": "81",
"type": "activities"
}
]
}
}
},
"included": [
{
"id": "81",
"type": "activities",
"attributes": {
"title": "activity 10",
"description": "how to draw a circle",
"start-at": "2017-11-13T23:06:13.474Z",
"duration": 10,
"created-at": "2017-11-13T23:06:32.630Z",
"updated-at": "2017-11-13T23:06:32.630Z"
},
"relationships": {
"user": {
"data": {
"id": "21",
"type": "users"
}
}
}
}
]
}
I find the solution after lot of hours:
I should use "Document" instead of UserModel
interface:
#POST("sign-in.json")
Call<Document> signIn(#Body Credentials credentials);
when calling:
signInCall.enqueue(new Callback<Document>(){
#Override
public void onResponse(Call<Document> call, Response<Document> response) {
hope it helps
colleagues!
We want to write Rest Client to service which follow the HATEOAS principle. So we have the following HAL+JSON representation and we want to deserialize it using spring-hateoas :
{
"id": "1",
"title": "album title",
"artistId": "1",
"stockLevel": 2,
"_links": {
"self": {"href": "http://localhost:8080/rest/albums/1"},
"artist": {"href": "http://localhost:8080/rest/artist/1"}
},
"_embedded": {
"albums": [{ //can be array or object
"id": "1",
"title": "album title",
"artistId": "1",
"stockLevel": 2,
"_links": {
"self": {"href": "http://localhost:8080/rest/albums/1"}
}
}],
"artist": { //can be array or object
"id": "1",
"name": "artist name",
"_links": {
"self": {"href": "http://localhost:8080/rest/artist/1"}
}
} //....
}
}
We expected the java object like this:
HalResource {
Resource<Album> //entity
List<Link> // _links
List<Resource<BaseEntity>>{ //_embedded
Resource<Album>
Resource<Artist>
....
}
}
So we have custom resource representation with embedded(list of resources) and entity(single resource):
#XmlRootElement(name = "resource")
public class HalResource<EntityType, EmbeddedType> extends Resources<EmbeddedType> {
#JsonUnwrapped
private EntityType entity;
public HalResource() {
}
public HalResource(Iterable<EmbeddedType> content, Link... links) {
super(content, links);
}
public EntityType getEntity() {
return entity;
}
public void setEntity(EntityType entity) {
this.entity = entity;
}
}
DTO classes:
public abstract class BaseEntity{}
#XmlRootElement(name = "album")
public class Album extends BaseEntity {
private String id;
private String title;
private String artistId;
private int stockLevel;
// getters and setters...
}
#XmlRootElement(name = "artist")
public class Artist extends BaseEntity {
private String id;
private String name;
// getters and setters...
}
And we want to get something like this, where Entity will be Artist or Album, but HalResourcesDeserializer return Resource.class with null content.
HalResource<Album, Resource<Entity>> resources =
restClient.getRootTarget().path("albums/1").queryParam("embedded", true).request().accept("application/hal+json")
.get(new GenericType<HalResource<Album, Resource<Entity>>>() {});
By using #JsonTypeInfo and #JsonSubTypes anotations we successfully deserialized our JSON(you can see the example on the github), but we don't want to have some additional type filds and anotattions in our DTO and JSON format.
We see one solution that is create a custom deserializer which can processing that.
So the question is: What is the convenient way to deserialize our JSON(links + embedded container) using spring-hateoas?
We use spring-hateoas 0.16v(but we tried 0.19v) and glassfish jersey 2.22.1
Thank you!
I need to create the following in a loop, my has "name" and "id" where name will be used for the value property of the json object and id will be used for the "data" and query will be some string I can set.
I tried using keypair but could not figure out how to do this property. Any help would be appreciated.
{
"query": "Unit",
"suggestions": [
{ "value": "United Arab Emirates", "data": "AE" },
{ "value": "United Kingdom", "data": "UK" },
{ "value": "United States", "data": "US" }
]
}
I am trying to return results for this autocomplete widget
https://www.devbridge.com/sourcery/components/jquery-autocomplete/
You can just create an anonymous object. To return the JSON as indicated in your question, it would be
public JsonResult GetCities(string query)
{
var data = new
{
query = "Unit",
suggestions = new[]
{
new { value = "United Arab Emirates", data = "AE" },
new { value = "United Kingdom", data = "UK" },
new { value = "United States", data = "US" }
}
};
return Json(data, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
Side note: Unsure of the purpose of the method parameter?
I hate to go full blown on this, but maybe create your own classes?
public class DataValuePair
{
public string Data {get;set;}
public string Value {get;set;}
}
public class SearchResult
{
public string Query {get;set;}
public List<DataValuePair> Suggestions {get;set;}
}
And now you can return a JSON Result
return Json(mySearchResult);
Answer from OP:
Figured it out, below is the code
public ActionResult GetCities(string query)
{
var obj = new CitySuggestion();
obj.suggestions.Add(new Suggestion { value = "test1", data = "test1" });
obj.suggestions.Add(new Suggestion { value = "test2", data = "test2" });
obj.suggestions.Add(new Suggestion { value = "test3", data = "test3" });
return Content(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj), "application/json");
}
public class CitySuggestion
{
public CitySuggestion()
{
suggestions = new List<Suggestion>();
}
public List<Suggestion> suggestions
{
get;
set;
}
}
public class Suggestion
{
public string value { get; set; }
public string data { get; set; }
}