I have two nested divs. The inner one is transform: scale(0.5).
Both are display: inline-block;.
What I need to happen is the outer div fits it's width to the width of the inner one. That's what I supposed to happen but not. What occur is that the outer div «thinks» the inner div has it's original size.
The outer div fits it's width to the inner's width only if the inner div is transform: scale(1) but not using an scale factor less than 1, for example: 0.5 (see example).
I need some way to achieve this by CSS in an elegant way.
.red {
background-color: #f00;
}
.green {
background-color: #0f0;
}
.box_1,
.box_2 {
display: inline-block;
}
.box_1 {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
transform: scale(0.5);
transform-origin: left top;
}
<div class="box_2 green">
<div class="box_1 red">Hello World</div>
</div>
Any idea on how to solve this?
A brutal way would be to virtually reduce space needed by element.
Your example shows a known width & height, so it makes it easy. else you would need a javascript method.
.box_1 {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
transform: scale(0.5);
transform-origin: left top;
margin-bottom:-150px;
margin-right:-150px;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/0bc4sxk3/1/
Scaling up would mean positive margins.
Transform only happens at screen, elements still use initial room and place needed in the flow of the document.
I think that one solution is to wrap the scaled-down element into an element with overflow: hidden.
The wrapper should have the exact dimensions of the scaled-down content.
This solution was best for me.
.wrapper {
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
transform: scale(0.5);
transform-origin: left top;
}
.box_1,
.box_2 {
display: inline-block;
}
.red {
background-color: #f00;
}
.green {
background-color: #0f0;
}
<div class="box_2 green">
<div class="box_1 red">Hello World</div>
</div>
Coming late to the party, but another way is to use a sizing element that is empty, not scaled, has the same external size as the scaled down element and sits underneath the scaled element. This drives the sizing of the parent, and the scaled element is then positioned absolutely on top of the sizing element.
.red { background-color: #f00; }
.green { background-color: #0f0; }
.blue { background-color: #00f; }
.container {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
}
.sizingBox {
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
transform: scale(0.5);
transform-origin: left top;
}
<div class="container green">
<div class="sizingBox blue"></div>
<div class="content red">Hello World</div>
</div>
If someone is looking for a copy-pasta React Componet, this seems to work based on Guy's code:
import * as React from "react";
interface Props
extends React.DetailedHTMLProps<React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>, HTMLDivElement> {
scale?: number;
style?: React.CSSProperties;
fullHeight: number;
fullWidth: number;
}
export const ScaleBox: React.FC<Props> = ({
scale = 1,
style,
fullWidth,
fullHeight,
children,
...rest
}) => {
return (
<div
data-comment={"ScaleBox Container"}
style={{ position: "relative", display: "inline-block", ...style }}
{...rest}
>
<div
data-comment={"ScaleBox Sizing Box"}
style={{ width: fullWidth * scale, height: fullHeight * scale }}
></div>
<div
data-comment={"ScaleBox Content"}
style={{
transform: `scale(${scale})`,
transformOrigin: "top left",
position: "absolute",
top: 0,
left: 0,
}}
>
{children}
</div>
</div>
);
};
Even later, I've built on mikeysee's React component and written one that works with content that sizes dynamically (it uses negative margins to avoid resizing the children's content):
import * as React from 'react';
import useResizeObserver from '#react-hook/resize-observer';
interface Props
extends React.DetailedHTMLProps<
React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>,
HTMLDivElement
> {
scale?: number;
style?: React.CSSProperties;
}
/**
* The ScaleBox is an element that scales its content using CSS transform scale
* and makes sure the flow around the box is as if the box had the size
* according to the applied scale.
*
* The parent element of a ScaleBox must have the overflow: 'hidden' style.
*/
export const ScaleBox: React.FC<Props> = ({ scale = 1, style, children }) => {
const [marginX, setMarginX] = React.useState('0px');
const [marginY, setMarginY] = React.useState('0px');
const divRef = React.useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null);
useResizeObserver(divRef, (target) => {
setMarginX(`${(scale - 1) * target.contentRect.width}px`);
setMarginY(`${(scale - 1) * target.contentRect.height}px`);
});
React.useEffect(() => {
if (divRef.current) {
setMarginX(`${(scale - 1) * divRef.current.offsetWidth}px`);
setMarginY(`${(scale - 1) * divRef.current.offsetHeight}px`);
}
}, [scale]);
return (
<div
ref={divRef}
style={{
...style,
transform: `scale(${scale})`,
transformOrigin: 'top left',
marginRight: marginX,
marginBottom: marginY
}}
>
{children}
</div>
);
};
Related
I`m trying to create a page, splitted horizontally or vertically. I want a nice transition between pages, splitted differently.
My solution is a background element with transform:rotateZ(0 or 90deg) and flex container with two elements:
<template>
<div id="app">
<div id="split-page-bg" :class="['split-' + splitType]"></div>
<div id="split-page" :style="{ 'flex-direction': flexDirection }">
<div id="split-page-part-first">
<p>Content #1</p>
<button #click="switchSplitType">{{ buttonText }}</button>
</div>
<div id="split-page-part-second">
<p>Content #2</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</template>
<script>
export default {
computed: {
buttonText() {
return (
"Switch to " +
(this.splitType === "horizontal" ? "vertical" : "horizontal")
);
},
flexDirection() {
return this.splitType === "horizontal" ? "column" : "row";
}
},
data() {
return {
splitType: "horizontal"
};
},
methods: {
switchSplitType() {
this.splitType =
this.splitType === "horizontal" ? "vertical" : "horizontal";
}
}
};
</script>
<style>
#app {
font-family: sans-serif;
font-size: 3rem;
height: 100vh;
width: 100vw;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#split-page-bg {
--w: max(200vw, 200vh);
--offset-percentage-vertical: 50vh;
--offset-percentage-horizontal: 50vw;
top: calc(-0.5 * var(--w) + 100vh - var(--offset-percentage-vertical));
left: calc(-0.5 * var(--w) + 100vw - var(--offset-percentage-horizontal));
width: var(--w);
height: var(--w);
position: fixed;
z-index: -10;
transition: transform 0.3s ease;
background: linear-gradient(0deg, #ff7d00 50%, #15616d 0%);
}
.split-horizontal {
--offset-percentage-vertical: 50vh;
}
.split-vertical {
transform: rotateZ(90deg);
}
#split-page {
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
display: flex;
}
#split-page-part-first {
flex: 0 1 50%;
}
#split-page-part-second {
flex: 0 1 50%;
}
button {
font: inherit;
}
</style>
Codepen
But it`s hard to work with separate background element. Sometimes background does not match with containers, there is a 1-2 px difference in width/height.
Question is, is there a better way for implementing this? Can I somehow animate containers like this and work with them in developer-friendly way?
I have a flex box to center 3 divs in the screen. all the three are wrapped around a flex container that has justify-content: center which centers them in the screen. However, since I am using animation and each div is being added one after another, the first div gets added at the center instead of the beginning, the second gets added such that both of the first and second are centered, and when the third is added, all of them are aligned such that the second div is exactly in the middle of the screen. I want to change that such that each div gets added in-place from left to right while all are centered in the screen.
React code:
function foo() {
const [items, set] = React.useState([]);
const transitions = useTransition(items, (item) => item.key, {
from: { transform: "translate3d(0,-40px,0)" },
enter: { transform: "translate3d(0,0px,0)" },
leave: { transform: "translate3d(0,-40px,0)" },
});
React.useEffect(() => {
for (let i = 0; i < rows.length; i++) {
setTimeout(() => {
set((items) => {
const newItems = [...items];
newItems.push({ key: i, code: rows[i] });
return newItems;
});
}, 1000 * i);
}
}, []);
return (
<center>
<div class="flex-container">
{transitions.map(({ item, props, key }) => {
return (
<animated.div key={key} style={props} class="flex-item">
{item.code}
</animated.div>
);
})}
</div>
</center>
);
}
Styling:
.flex-container {
height: 50vh;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
img{
width: 20%;
text-align: center;
}
}
.flex-item {
flex-basis: 14%;
align-self: center;
margin: 12px;
h4{
font-family: Lato;
font-weight:700;
color: white;
}
p{
color: white;
font-family: Lato;
}
}
Changing center to flex-start shifts everything to the beginning:
Adding fixed width doesn't work as well:
To solve your problem, simply align the cards the way you want them to look after they move, then apply the following CSS:
.card {
position: relative;
top: -100px;
}
If -100px is not enough, try -200px. The goal is that the cards will be off-screen at the top. Upon whatever action you desire, whether it be clicking a button like in my snippet below, or perhaps on page load, change the "top" property to 0, and it will place the card where it belongs in the normal flow of the page.
I additionally use the setTimeout function to delay each subsequent card, and the transition property to animate the movement smoothly since it seems like that is your desired goal.
const left = document.getElementById("left");
const center = document.getElementById("center");
const right = document.getElementById("right");
function foo() {
left.style.top = "0";
setTimeout(function() {
center.style.top = "0";
setTimeout(function() {
right.style.top = "0";
}, 500)
}, 500)
}
#container {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
#container>* {
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
background: red;
margin: 0 0.5em;
position: relative;
top: -100px;
transition: top 1s ease-in-out;
}
button {
margin: auto;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="left"></div>
<div id="center"></div>
<div id="right"></div>
</div>
<button onclick="foo()" id="click-me">Click me!</button>
I've got transition(expand/NotExpand) on the grid cells of my CSS grid which is triggered onClick.
PROBLEM:
The problem is on the initial click, the expansion/transition won't play and the element would simply snap in to place. Of course this also has a reverse transition but since it's the second click of that child cell/element, the transition would play.
~Parent grid~
<template>
<div class="jobGrid myr" id="jobGrid">
<job-cell v-for="job in jobs" :key="job.id" :job="job" />
</div>
</template>
<style scoped>
.jobGrid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% ;
grid-template-rows: 25% 25% 25% 25% ;
grid-column-gap: 5%;
grid-row-gap: 3%;
margin: auto;
margin-top: 2%;
width: 90%;
height: 90%;
max-width: 90%;
max-height: 90%;
overflow-x: auto;
}
</style>
~Child cell~
<template>
<div class="scene" #click="toggleJobData($event)" :style="expandCSS" >
<div>
{{job.title}}
</div>
</div>
</template>
<style>
.scene {
background: peru;
transition: left 3s, top 3s, width 3s, height 3s;
}
</style>
<script>
export default {
props: ['job'],
data() {
return {
expand: false,
expandCSS: {zIndex: 1},
}
},
computed: {
gridCSS() {
return this.$store.state.job.jobSelectorCSS
}
},
methods: {
toggleJobData(e) {
let currentPos = e.target.getBoundingClientRect()
let expand = {
position: 'relative',
left: `${this.gridCSS.left - currentPos.left}px`,
top: `${this.gridCSS.top - currentPos.top}px`,
width: `1041%`,
height: `400%`,
//zIndex: 2,
}
let notExpand = {
position: 'relative',
left: '0px',
top: '0px',
width: '100%',
height: '100%',
//zIndex: 1,
}
if(!this.expand) {
this.expand = !this.expand
this.expandCSS = expand
}else{
this.expand = !this.expand
this.expandCSS = notExpand
}
}
}
}
</script>
*** This is what you will get onLoad, or the NotExpand state.
Here, I clicked "Job2" and it will expand beyond its cell to fill up the entire grid.
I assume that the transition is applied immediately after onLoad
I think the "missing transition" is lack of CSS properties for its initial state. Until the first click, there are no properties to transite from.
Try styling your child cell with the initial props, that would be transited, like this:
.scene {
background: peru;
transition: all 3s;
position: relative;
left: 0px; top: 0px;
width: 100%; height: 100%;
}
How can I position several <img> elements into a circle around another and have those elements all be clickable links as well? I want it to look like the picture below, but I have no idea how to achieve that effect.
Is this even possible?
2020 solution
Here's a more modern solution I use these days.
I start off by generating the HTML starting from an array of images. Whether the HTML is generated using PHP, JS, some HTML preprocessor, whatever... this matters less as the basic idea behind is the same.
Here's the Pug code that would do this:
//- start with an array of images, described by url and alt text
- let imgs = [
- {
- src: 'image_url.jpg',
- alt: 'image alt text'
- } /* and so on, add more images here */
- ];
- let n_imgs = imgs.length;
- let has_mid = 1; /* 0 if there's no item in the middle, 1 otherwise */
- let m = n_imgs - has_mid; /* how many are ON the circle */
- let tan = Math.tan(Math.PI/m); /* tangent of half the base angle */
.container(style=`--m: ${m}; --tan: ${+tan.toFixed(2)}`)
- for(let i = 0; i < n_imgs; i++)
a(href='#' style=i - has_mid >= 0 ? `--i: ${i}` : null)
img(src=imgs[i].src alt=imgs[i].alt)
The generated HTML looks as follows (and yes, you can write the HTML manually too, but it's going to be a pain to make changes afterwards):
<div class="container" style="--m: 8; --tan: 0.41">
<a href='#'>
<img src="image_mid.jpg" alt="alt text"/>
</a>
<a style="--i: 1">
<img src="first_img_on_circle.jpg" alt="alt text"/>
</a>
<!-- the rest of those placed on the circle -->
</div>
In the CSS, we decide on a size for the images, let's say 8em. The --m items are positioned on a circle and it's if they're in the middle of the edges of a polygon of --m edges, all of which are tangent to the circle.
If you have a hard time picturing that, you can play with this interactive demo which constructs the incircle and circumcircle for various polygons whose number of edges you pick by dragging the slider.
This tells us that the size of the container must be twice the radius of the circle plus twice half the size of the images.
We don't yet know the radius, but we can compute it if we know the number of edges (and therefore the tangent of half the base angle, precomputed and set as a custom property --tan) and the polygon edge. We probably want the polygon edge to be a least the size of the images, but how much we leave on the sides is arbitrary. Let's say we have half the image size on each side, so the polygon edge is twice the image size. This gives us the following CSS:
.container {
--d: 6.5em; /* image size */
--rel: 1; /* how much extra space we want between images, 1 = one image size */
--r: calc(.5*(1 + var(--rel))*var(--d)/var(--tan)); /* circle radius */
--s: calc(2*var(--r) + var(--d)); /* container size */
position: relative;
width: var(--s); height: var(--s);
background: silver /* to show images perfectly fit in container */
}
.container a {
position: absolute;
top: 50%; left: 50%;
margin: calc(-.5*var(--d));
width: var(--d); height: var(--d);
--az: calc(var(--i)*1turn/var(--m));
transform:
rotate(var(--az))
translate(var(--r))
rotate(calc(-1*var(--az)))
}
img { max-width: 100% }
See the old solution for an explanation of how the transform chain works.
This way, adding or removing an image from the array of images automatically arranges the new number of images on a circle such that they're equally spaced out and also adjusts the size of the container. You can test this in this demo.
OLD solution (preserved for historical reasons)
Yes, it is very much possible and very simple using just CSS. You just need to have clear in mind the angles at which you want the links with the images (I've added a piece of code at the end just for showing the angles whenever you hover one of them).
You first need a wrapper. I set its diameter to be 24em (width: 24em; height: 24em; does that), you can set it to whatever you want. You give it position: relative;.
You then position your links with the images in the center of that wrapper, both horizontally and vertically. You do that by setting position: absolute; and then top: 50%; left: 50%; and margin: -2em; (where 2em is half the width of the link with the image, which I've set to be 4em - again, you can change it to whatever you wish, but don't forget to change the margin in that case).
You then decide on the angles at which you want to have your links with the images and you add a class deg{desired_angle} (for example deg0 or deg45 or whatever). Then for each such class you apply chained CSS transforms, like this:
.deg{desired_angle} {
transform: rotate({desired_angle}) translate(12em) rotate(-{desired_angle});
}
where you replace {desired_angle} with 0, 45, and so on...
The first rotate transform rotates the object and its axes, the translate transform translates the object along the rotated X axis and the second rotate transform brings back the object into position.
The advantage of this method is that it is flexible. You can add new images at different angles without altering the current structure.
CODE SNIPPET
.circle-container {
position: relative;
width: 24em;
height: 24em;
padding: 2.8em;
/*2.8em = 2em*1.4 (2em = half the width of a link with img, 1.4 = sqrt(2))*/
border: dashed 1px;
border-radius: 50%;
margin: 1.75em auto 0;
}
.circle-container a {
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 50%; left: 50%;
width: 4em; height: 4em;
margin: -2em;
}
.circle-container img { display: block; width: 100%; }
.deg0 { transform: translate(12em); } /* 12em = half the width of the wrapper */
.deg45 { transform: rotate(45deg) translate(12em) rotate(-45deg); }
.deg135 { transform: rotate(135deg) translate(12em) rotate(-135deg); }
.deg180 { transform: translate(-12em); }
.deg225 { transform: rotate(225deg) translate(12em) rotate(-225deg); }
.deg315 { transform: rotate(315deg) translate(12em) rotate(-315deg); }
<div class='circle-container'>
<a href='#' class='center'><img src='image.jpg'></a>
<a href='#' class='deg0'><img src='image.jpg'></a>
<a href='#' class='deg45'><img src='image.jpg'></a>
<a href='#' class='deg135'><img src='image.jpg'></a>
<a href='#' class='deg180'><img src='image.jpg'></a>
<a href='#' class='deg225'><img src='image.jpg'></a>
<a href='#' class='deg315'><img src='image.jpg'></a>
</div>
Also, you could further simplify the HTML by using background images for the links instead of using img tags.
EDIT: example with fallback for IE8 and older (tested in IE8 and IE7)
Here is the easy solution without absolute positioning:
.container .row {
margin: 20px;
text-align: center;
}
.container .row img {
margin: 0 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/s2/oz/images/faviconr2.ico" alt="" width="64" height="64">
<img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/s2/oz/images/faviconr2.ico" alt="" width="64" height="64">
</div>
<div class="row">
<img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/s2/oz/images/faviconr2.ico" alt="" width="64" height="64">
<img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/s2/oz/images/faviconr2.ico" alt="" width="64" height="64">
<img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/s2/oz/images/faviconr2.ico" alt="" width="64" height="64">
</div>
<div class="row">
<img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/s2/oz/images/faviconr2.ico" alt="" width="64" height="64">
<img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/s2/oz/images/faviconr2.ico" alt="" width="64" height="64">
</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/mD6H6/
Using the solution proposed by #Ana:
transform: rotate(${angle}deg) translate(${radius}px) rotate(-${angle}deg)
I created the following jsFiddle that places circles dynamically using plain JavaScript (jQuery version also available).
The way it works is rather simple:
document.querySelectorAll( '.ciclegraph' ).forEach( ( ciclegraph )=>{
let circles = ciclegraph.querySelectorAll( '.circle' )
let angle = 360-90, dangle = 360 / circles.length
for( let i = 0; i < circles.length; ++i ){
let circle = circles[i]
angle += dangle
circle.style.transform = `rotate(${angle}deg) translate(${ciclegraph.clientWidth / 2}px) rotate(-${angle}deg)`
}
})
.ciclegraph {
position: relative;
width: 500px;
height: 500px;
margin: calc(100px / 2 + 0px);
}
.ciclegraph:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 0; left: 0;
border: 2px solid teal;
width: calc( 100% - 2px * 2);
height: calc( 100% - 2px * 2 );
border-radius: 50%;
}
.ciclegraph .circle {
position: absolute;
top: 50%; left: 50%;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: calc( -100px / 2 );
background: teal;
border-radius: 50%;
}
<div class="ciclegraph">
<div class="circle"></div>
<div class="circle"></div>
<div class="circle"></div>
<div class="circle"></div>
<div class="circle"></div>
<div class="circle"></div>
</div>
Building off #Ana's excellent answer, I created this dynamic version that allows you to add and remove elements from the DOM and maintain proportionate spacing between the elements - check out my fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/skwidbreth/q59s90oy/
var list = $("#list");
var updateLayout = function(listItems) {
for (var i = 0; i < listItems.length; i++) {
var offsetAngle = 360 / listItems.length;
var rotateAngle = offsetAngle * i;
$(listItems[i]).css("transform", "rotate(" + rotateAngle + "deg) translate(0, -200px) rotate(-" + rotateAngle + "deg)")
};
};
$(document).on("click", "#add-item", function() {
var listItem = $("<li class='list-item'>Things go here<button class='remove-item'>Remove</button></li>");
list.append(listItem);
var listItems = $(".list-item");
updateLayout(listItems);
});
$(document).on("click", ".remove-item", function() {
$(this).parent().remove();
var listItems = $(".list-item");
updateLayout(listItems);
});
#list {
background-color: blue;
height: 400px;
width: 400px;
border-radius: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.list-item {
list-style: none;
background-color: red;
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<ul id="list"></ul>
<button id="add-item">Add item</button>
Here is a version I made in React from the examples here.
CodeSandbox Example
import React, { useRef, useEffect } from "react";
import "./styles.css";
export default function App() {
const graph = useRef(null);
useEffect(() => {
const ciclegraph = graph.current;
const circleElements = ciclegraph.childNodes;
let angle = 360 - 90;
let dangle = 360 / circleElements.length;
for (let i = 0; i < circleElements.length; i++) {
let circle = circleElements[i];
angle += dangle;
circle.style.transform = `rotate(${angle}deg) translate(${ciclegraph.clientWidth /
2}px) rotate(-${angle}deg)`;
}
}, []);
return (
<div className="App">
<div className="ciclegraph" ref={graph}>
<div className="circle" />
<div className="circle" />
<div className="circle" />
<div className="circle" />
<div className="circle" />
<div className="circle" />
</div>
</div>
);
}
You can certainly do it with pure css or use JavaScript. My suggestion:
If you already know that the images number will never change just calculate your styles and go with plain css (pros: better performances, very reliable)
If the number can vary either dynamically in your app or just may vary in the future go with a Js solution (pros: more future-proof)
I had a similar job to do, so I created a script and open sourced it here on Github for anyone who might need it. It just accepts some configuration values and simply outputs the CSS code you need.
If you want to go for the Js solution here's a simple pointer that can be useful to you. Using this html as a starting point being #box the container and .dot the image/div in the middle you want all your other images around:
Starting html:
<div id="box">
<div class="dot"></div>
<img src="my-img.jpg">
<!-- all the other images you need-->
</div>
Starting Css:
#box{
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
position: relative;
border-radius: 100%;
border: 1px solid teal;
}
.dot{
position: absolute;
border-radius: 100%;
width: 40px;
height: 40px;
left: 50%;
top: 50%;
margin-left: -20px;
margin-top: -20px;
background: rebeccapurple;
}
img{
width: 40px;
height: 40px;
position: absolute;
}
You can create a quick function along these lines:
var circle = document.getElementById('box'),
imgs = document.getElementsByTagName('img'),
total = imgs.length,
coords = {},
diam, radius1, radius2, imgW;
// get circle diameter
// getBoundingClientRect outputs the actual px AFTER transform
// using getComputedStyle does the job as we want
diam = parseInt( window.getComputedStyle(circle).getPropertyValue('width') ),
radius = diam/2,
imgW = imgs[0].getBoundingClientRect().width,
// get the dimensions of the inner circle we want the images to align to
radius2 = radius - imgW
var i,
alpha = Math.PI / 2,
len = imgs.length,
corner = 2 * Math.PI / total;
// loop over the images and assign the correct css props
for ( i = 0 ; i < total; i++ ){
imgs[i].style.left = parseInt( ( radius - imgW / 2 ) + ( radius2 * Math.cos( alpha ) ) ) + 'px'
imgs[i].style.top = parseInt( ( radius - imgW / 2 ) - ( radius2 * Math.sin( alpha ) ) ) + 'px'
alpha = alpha - corner;
}
You can see a live example here
There is no way to magically place clickable items in a circle around another element with CSS.
The way how I would do this is by using a container with position:relative;. And then place all the elements with position:absolute; and using top and left to target it's place.
Even though you haven't placed jquery in your tags it might be best to use jQuery / javascript for this.
First step is placing your center image perfectly in the center of the container using position:relative;.
#centerImage {
position:absolute;
top:50%;
left:50%;
width:200px;
height:200px;
margin: -100px 0 0 -100px;
}
After that you can place the other elements around it by using an offset() of the centerImage minus the offset() of the container. Giving you the exact top and left of the image.
var left = $('#centerImage').offset().left - $('#centerImage').parent().offset().left;
var top = $('#centerImage').offset().top - $('#centerImage').parent().offset().top;
$('#surroundingElement1').css({
'left': left - 50,
'top': top - 50
});
$('#surroundingElement2').css({
'left': left - 50,
'top': top
});
$('#surroundingElement3').css({
'left': left - 50,
'top': top + 50
});
What I've done here is placing the elements relative to the centerImage. Hope this helps.
You could do it like this: fiddle
Don't mind the positioning, its a quick example
The first step is to have 6 long columnar boxes:
The second step is to use position: absolute and move them all into the middle of your container:
And now rotate them around the pivot point located at the bottom center. Use :nth-child to vary rotation angles:
div {
transform-origin: bottom center;
#for $n from 0 through 7 {
&:nth-child(#{$n}) {
rotate: (360deg / 6) * $n;
}
}
Now all you have to do is to locate your images at the far end of every column, and compensate the rotation with an anti-rotation :)
Full source:
<div class="flower">
<div class="petal">1</div>
<div class="petal">2</div>
<div class="petal">3</div>
<div class="petal">4</div>
<div class="petal">5</div>
<div class="petal">6</div>
</div>
.flower {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
// We need a relative position
// so that children can have "position:abolute"
position: relative;
.petal {
// Make sure petals are visible
border: 1px solid #999;
// Position them all in one point
position: absolute; top: 0; left: 50%;
display: inline-block;
width: 30px; height: 150px;
// Rotation
transform-origin: bottom center;
#for $n from 0 through 7 {
&:nth-child(#{$n}) {
// Petal rotation
$angle: (360deg / 6) * $n;
rotate: $angle;
// Icon anti-rotation
.icon { rotate: -$angle; }
}
}
}
}
See CodePen
This question already has answers here:
White space around css3 scale
(12 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I have a little problem with scale transformation. I wish resize element, but when I do, my old size occupies the space, and the next element undergoes this old size. How to remove this constraints ?
HTML
<!-- White space with Scale -->
<div class="scale"></div>
<div class="scale"></div>
<!-- Whitout Scale -->
<div></div>
<div></div>
CSS
div:nth-of-type(even) { background: blue; }
div:nth-of-type(odd) { background: red; }
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
.scale {
transform: scale(0.5);
transform-origin: top left;
}
JSFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/c7d2s21y/
Thank you for your response.
var scaleTo = 0.5,
itemWidth = $('.scaleB').width(),
itemHeight = $('.scaleB').height()
;
function scaleThis(meausure) {
var output = meausure * scaleTo;
return output;
}
$('.scaleB').on({
'mouseover': function(event) {
$(this).css({
'width' : scaleThis(itemWidth) + 'px',
'height' : scaleThis(itemHeight) + 'px'
});
},
'mouseout': function(event) {
$(this).css({
'width' : itemWidth + 'px',
'height' : itemHeight + 'px'
});
}
});
.wrapper {
background-color: #cccccc;
}
.wrapper:after {
content: "normal";
}
.wrapperScale {
background-color: #dddddd;
}
.wrapperScale:after {
content: "wrapped";
}
.wrapper_jQuery:after {
content: "jQuery";
}
.wrapper div:nth-of-type(even),
.wrapperScale div:nth-of-type(even) {
background: blue;
}
.wrapper div:nth-of-type(odd),
.wrapperScale div:nth-of-type(odd) {
background: red;
}
.scale, .wrapperScale div, .scaleB {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
}
.scale:hover, .wrapperScale:hover {
transform: scale(0.5);
transform-origin: top left;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="wrapper">
<!-- White space with Scale -->
<div class="scale"></div>
<div class="scale"></div>
</div>
<!-- Whitout Scale -->
<div class="wrapper wrapperScale">
<div></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<!-- jQuery -->
<div class="wrapper wrapper_jQuery">
<div class="scaleB"></div>
<div class="scaleB"></div>
</div>
That's that CSS transformations actually do, it doesn't affect the surrounding elements, you can try to wrap the DIVs inside another element and apply the scaling to that element, but it will not affect other elements outside, just the contents, other than that, you will have to manipulate the actual sizes from your DIVs via java Script or a js library such as jQuery.
You try this code i hope work for you :
<style>
div:nth-of-type(even) { background: blue; }
div:nth-of-type(odd) { background: red; }
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
.scale {
transform: scale(1);
transform-origin: top left;
}
</style>