I'm trying to create a gap between the header (image + navigation bar) and the content part (white box below navogation bar). With margin/padding on several places it does increase the space in top of the white box, but doesn't create a transparent gap where I can see the background image.
The header with id=branding is pushed with
#branding {
margin-top: 30px;
}
to the bottom, therefore it creates the gap on the top of the page. When I try to add a margin-bottom: 30px; to this CSS it increases the space on the top of the white box.
The page I'm working on is this.
The page is based on a template, therefore I'm not 100% sure what I should insert here as code parts!
Thanks in advance!
If I understand your problem, try to set background-color of the wrapper as transparent
.wrapper {
background-color: transparent;
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
-moz-box-shadow: 0 0 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
box-shadow: 0 0 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
}
And then add background-color to header and content, now you can add margin bottom to the header or margin top to the content.
#branding {
margin-top: 30px;
background-color: #f2f2f2;
}
.container {
margin: 5% auto;
max-width: 978px;
background-color: #f2f2f2;
}
After that you could see the background image of your site.
HTH
To your website have a gap you have to make a few change to your CSS.
On the .wrapper remove the background. Then on .header-image add yuor pixel value.
.header-image{
margin-bottom: your pixel value;
}
Then #main put background-color: #fff; and add padding: 50px 10px 50px;
#main{
background-color: #fff
padding: 50px 10px 50px;
}
Finally take off the width off of .container.
Next time put your code here in SO for people do not have to go look at your website.
http://jsfiddle.net/94k1wuhu/
When looking at my fiddle my problem should be obvious to you. I created a border-image to create a ribbon effect (cool idea, isn't it? :D) but apparently the background-color sets the background for the border too. Does anyone have an idea to solve this?
HTML:
<div id="main">
<p>Without background-color:</p>
<h1>Home</h1>
<p>With background-color:</p><br /><br />
<h1 id="bg">Home</h1>
</div>
CSS:
body {
background-color: #333;
}
#main {
background-color: #efefef;
width: 300px;
height: 700px;
padding: 30px 20px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
h1 {
margin-left: -40px;
padding: 3px 10px 3px 20px;
color: #fff;
display: inline;
letter-spacing: 1px;
border: 20px solid transparent;
border-image: url(http://altistest.square7.ch/templates/pscal/images/h1br.png) 20 20 20 20 stretch;
}
#bg {
background-color: #72b743;
margin-top: 20px;
}
In browsers that support it, you can add:
background-clip: padding-box;
This allows the background (colour and/or image) to extend to the border but not 'beneath' it, clipping it to the padding area. Possible values are (quoted from the link, given below):
border-box
The background extends to the outside edge of the border (but underneath the border in z-ordering).
padding-box
No background is drawn below the border (background extends to the outside edge of the padding).
content-box
The background is painted within (clipped to) the content box.
References:
background-clip.
I've got an issue when i try to put 2 divs, both them them floating to the left side, one with width 80% and the other the 20%. Then i'd like to draw a border on the right side of the first div and a box-shadow of 5px, because each div has a different color.
So I've just searched on this site and i've found this solution:
Border issue in Floating div
But it's bad idea IMHO.... i've a resolution of 1920px width and i can't put 48% for the width of a DIV.... for 4px border i'll got a white space in the webpage for the 2% - 2px.
You could say, just add the background color to the body: i could because each DIV has already it's own, but it's also a problem OF SPACE, PROPORTIONS!!!
Another problem i'm experiencing with: i've set the height 100% (on the second div, 20% width)and it works in the example; but in the real website, which is the height also set to 100% the DIV doesn't occupy the whole height of the column but just until the margin limit of the last image.
The last problem: box-shadow with floating div it's bad idea...
should i put the box-shadow on the last div, just for the left side, instead of the right side for the previous div?
Look at my code here http://jsfiddle.net/9gp6J/
div#contenuto_body{
margin: 0 0;
padding: 0 0;
float: left;
width: 80%;
height: 100%;
background-color: #C90;
-moz-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 1px #333;
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 1px #333;
-ms-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 1px #333;
box-shadow: 0 0 5px 1px #333;
border-right: 4px solid #E6B800;
}
body{
margin: 0 0;
padding: 0 0;
}
div#ads{
margin: 0 0;
padding: 0 0;
width: 20%;
float: left;
height: 100%;
background-color: #CCC;
}
div#ads img{
width: 70%;
max-width: 200px;
display: block;
margin: 25% auto;
}
You could use the css3 feature calc(...) available in css3 depending on which browsers you are supporting this may suitable. Anything below IE9 doesn't support this so keep that in mind. Here's a fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/9gp6J/9/
Any other solution would have to involve negative margins such as:
div#contenuto_body{
...
margin-right: -4;
}
That should work anything IE7 and up.
for the border issue add a div inside the left div and give a right border to that inner div. This way the outer left div can remain 80% without the added 4px border problem.
HTML:
<div id="container">
<div id="left">
<div id="inner_left">
content left
</div>
</div>
<div id="right">
content right
</div>
</div>
CSS:
div#container {
height:200px;
}
div#left {
float:left;
width:80%;
height:100%;
background:red;
}
div#inner_left {
border-right:4px solid black;
height:100%;
}
div#right {
float:left;
width:20%;
height:100%;
background:green;
}
Check this jsfiddle
I have a <div> element and I want to put a border on it. I know I can write style="border: 1px solid black", but this adds 2px to either side of the div, which is not what I want.
I would rather have this border be -1px from the edge of the div. The div itself is 100px x 100px, and if I add a border, then I have to do some mathematics to make the border appear.
Is there any way that I can make the border appear, and ensure the box will still be 100px (including the border)?
Set box-sizing property to border-box:
div {
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
border: 20px solid #f00;
background: #00f;
margin: 10px;
}
div + div {
border: 10px solid red;
}
<div>Hello!</div>
<div>Hello!</div>
It works on IE8 & above.
You can also use box-shadow like this:
div{
-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0px 0px 0px 10px #f00;
-moz-box-shadow:inset 0px 0px 0px 10px #f00;
box-shadow:inset 0px 0px 0px 10px #f00;
}
Example here: http://jsfiddle.net/nVyXS/ (hover to view border)
This works in modern browsers only. For example: No IE 8 support.
See caniuse.com (box-shadow feature) for more info.
Probably it is belated answer, but I want to share with my findings. I found 2 new approaches to this problem that I have not found here in the answers:
Inner border through box-shadow css property
Yes, box-shadow is used to add box-shadows to the elements. But you can specify inset shadow, that would look like a inner border rather like a shadow. You just need to set horizontal and vertical shadows to 0px, and the "spread" property of the box-shadow to the width of the border you want to have. So for the 'inner' border of 10px you would write the following:
div{
width:100px;
height:100px;
background-color:yellow;
box-shadow:0px 0px 0px 10px black inset;
margin-bottom:20px;
}
Here is jsFiddle example that illustrates the difference between box-shadow border and 'normal' border. This way your border and the box width are of total 100px including the border.
More about box-shadow:here
Border through outline css property
Here is another approach, but this way the border would be outside of the box. Here is an example.
As follows from the example, you can use css outline property, to set the border that does not affect the width and height of the element. This way, the border width is not added to the width of an element.
div{
width:100px;
height:100px;
background-color:yellow;
outline:10px solid black;
}
More about outline: here
Yahoo! This is really possible. I found it.
For Bottom Border:
div {box-shadow: 0px -3px 0px red inset; }
For Top Border:
div {box-shadow: 0px 3px 0px red inset; }
You can use the properties outline and outline-offset with a negative value instead of using a regular border, works for me:
div{
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
background-color: grey;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
div#border{
border: 2px solid red;
}
div#outline{
outline: 2px solid red;
outline-offset: -2px;
}
Using a regular border.
<div id="border"></div>
Using outline and outline-offset.
<div id="outline"></div>
Although this question has already been adequately answered with solutions using the box-shadow and outline properties, I would like to slightly expand on this
for all those who have landed here (like myself) searching for a solution for an inner border with an offset
So let's say you have a black 100px x 100px div and you need to inset it with a white border - which has an inner offset of 5px (say) - this can still be done with the above properties.
box-shadow
The trick here is to know that multiple box-shadows are allowed, where the first shadow is on top and subsequent shadows have lower z-ordering.
With that knowledge, the box-shadow declaration will be:
box-shadow: inset 0 0 0 5px black, inset 0 0 0 10px white;
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: black;
box-shadow: inset 0 0 0 5px black, inset 0 0 0 10px white;
}
<div></div>
Basically, what that declaration is saying is: render the last (10px white) shadow first, then render the previous 5px black shadow above it.
outline with outline-offset
For the same effect as above the outline declarations would be:
outline: 5px solid white;
outline-offset: -10px;
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: black;
outline: 5px solid white;
outline-offset: -10px;
}
<div></div>
NB: outline-offset isn't supported by IE if that's important to you.
Codepen demo
Use pseudo element:
.button {
background: #333;
color: #fff;
float: left;
padding: 20px;
margin: 20px;
position: relative;
}
.button::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
border: 5px solid #f00;
}
<div class='button'>Hello</div>
Using ::after you are styling the virtual last child of the selected element. content property creates an anonymous replaced element.
We are containing the pseudo element using absolute position relative to the parent. Then you have freedom to have whatever custom background and/or border in the background of your main element.
This approach does not affect placement of the contents of the main element, which is different from using box-sizing: border-box;.
Consider this example:
.parent {
width: 200px;
}
.button {
background: #333;
color: #fff;
padding: 20px;
border: 5px solid #f00;
border-left-width: 20px;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<div class='parent'>
<div class='button'>Hello</div>
</div>
Here .button width is constrained using the parent element. Setting the border-left-width adjusts the content-box size and thus the position of the text.
.parent {
width: 200px;
}
.button {
background: #333;
color: #fff;
padding: 20px;
position: relative;
}
.button::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
border: 5px solid #f00;
border-left-width: 20px;
}
<div class='parent'>
<div class='button'>Hello</div>
</div>
Using the pseudo-element approach does not affect the content-box size.
Depending on the application, approach using a pseudo-element might or might not be a desirable behaviour.
I know this is somewhat older, but since the keywords "border inside" landed me directly here, I would like to share some findings that may be worth mentioning here.
When I was adding a border on the hover state, i got the effects that OP is talking about. The border ads pixels to the dimension of the box which made it jumpy.
There is two more ways one can deal with this that also work for IE7.
1)
Have a border already attached to the element and simply change the color. This way the mathematics are already included.
div {
width:100px;
height:100px;
background-color: #aaa;
border: 2px solid #aaa; /* notice the solid */
}
div:hover {
border: 2px dashed #666;
}
2 )
Compensate your border with a negative margin. This will still add the extra pixels, but the positioning of the element will not be jumpy on
div {
width:100px;
height:100px;
background-color: #aaa;
}
div:hover {
margin: -2px;
border: 2px dashed #333;
}
11 Years Later but heres the answer:
Just use outline:
outline: 0.2vw solid red;
I hope i can help someone who sees this question also 11 Yeas Later.
for consistent rendering between new and older browsers, add a double container, the outer with the width, the inner with the border.
<div style="width:100px;">
<div style="border:2px solid #000;">
contents here
</div>
</div>
this is obviously only if your precise width is more important than having extra markup!
If you use box-sizing: border-box means not only border,
padding,margin, etc. All element will come inside of the parent
element.
div p {
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
width: 150px;
height:100%;
border: 20px solid #f00;
background-color: #00f;
color:#fff;
padding: 10px;
}
<div>
<p>It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets</p>
</div>
Best cross browser solution (mostly for IE support) like #Steve said is to make a div 98px in width and height than add a border 1px around it, or you could make a background image for div 100x100 px and draw a border on it.
You can look at outline with offset but this needs some padding to exists on your div. Or you can absolutely position a border div inside, something like
<div id='parentDiv' style='position:relative'>
<div id='parentDivsContent'></div>
<div id='fakeBordersDiv'
style='position: absolute;width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 2;
border: 2px solid;
border-radius: 2px;'/>
</div>
You might need to fiddle with margins on the fake borders div to fit it as you like.
A more modern solution might be to use css variables and calc. calc is widely supported but variables is not yet in IE11 (polyfills available).
:root {
box-width: 100px;
border-width: 1px;
}
#box {
width: calc(var(--box-width) - var(--border-width));
}
Although this does use some calculations, which the original questions was looking to avoid. I think this is an ok time to use calculations as they are controlled by the css itself. It also has no need for additional markup or misappropriating other css properties that may be needed later on.
This solution is only really useful if a fixed height isn't needed.
One solution I didn't see mentioned above is the case where you have padding on your input, which I do 99% of the time. You can do something along the lines of...
input {
padding: 8px;
}
input.invalid {
border: 2px solid red;
padding: 6px; // 8px - border or "calc(8px - 2px)"
}
What I like about this is that I have the full menu of border + padding + transition properties for each side.
I'm on Win XP but this problem occurs on Firefox, IE, and Google Chrome. I want to align two DIVs on the same horizontal plane. I want the div on the left to occupy 24% of the screen and the div on the right to occupy the rest. Everything looks fine when my browser is maximized, but when I click the resize button to make the window smaller, the two DIVs are no longer on the same plane. The top of the right DIV appears beneath the bottom edge of the left DIV (the left boundary of the right DIV is still correctly aligned just after the right boundary of the left div).
How can I make both DIVs appear on the same horizontal plane, even when the window is not maximized? Here is the HTML I'm using ...
<div class="header">
<img src="logo.gif"/>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div id="contents">
<div class="categoryPanel"></div>
<div class="productDetailsPanel"></div>
</div>
</div>
and here is the CSS ...
.header {
width: 100%;
height: 63px;
background-color: #333366;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
}
.categoryPanel {
height: 600px;
width: 24%;
float: left;
margin: 10px 5px 0px 0px;
background-color: green;
}
.productDetailsPanel {
height: 600px;
border-color: #BBBBBB;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px;
float: right;
margin: 10px 10px 0 5px;
}
Thanks, - Dave
One way to kind of achieve the layout you want is to stop floating .productDetailsPanel, and give it a left margin of 25% (i.e. the width of .categoryPanel, plus spacing between them). (You’ll also want to remove the top margin on .categoryPanel.)
http://jsfiddle.net/uSbAs/
But that does mean the spacing between your columns will be defined as a percentage of the .container, rather than a fixed number of pixels.
On .productDetailsPanel, remove float: right and add overflow: hidden, job done; it's exactly what you asked for.
http://jsfiddle.net/thirtydot/KjZ8Q/
The reason overflow: hidden helps in this case is not obvious, read this.
In order for it to take up the entire space you would need to either fill it with something or provide a width. I've create a jsfiddle to show the results. Essentially I modified the .productsDetailsPanel by adding a width: 75%; removing the float:right; and modifying your margin: 10px 0 0 0;
Here is the new css for .productsDetailsPanel
.productDetailsPanel {
height: 600px;
width: 75%;
border-color: #BBBBBB;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px;
margin: 10px 0px 0 0px;
float: left;
background-color: red;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/rhoenig/qXvag/
This could work (float: left):
.productDetailsPanel {
height: 600px;
border-color: #BBBBBB;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px;
float: left;
margin: 10px 10px 0 5px;
}