When I use the Box java api, the BoxInfo.tags seems always empty, even when i know there are tags on the object.
Is there some way to get them?
List<String> tags = item.getInfo().getTags();
Oops i forgot
BoxItem.Info info = item.getInfo(BoxItem.ALL_FIELDS);
tags aren't returned by default.
Related
PATH = "D:\CDriver\chromedriver.exe"
driver = webdriver.Chrome(PATH)
driver.get('https://www.se.com/ww/en/about-us/careers/job-details/inside-sales-associate/006ZMV')
TITLE = driver.find_element_by_class_name('sdl-application-job-details__job-title')
print(TITLE)
driver.quit()
I have all the needed imports, I just wanted to leave them out.
When I run this the output SHOULD be: Inside Sales Associate
But instead it gives me this: <selenium.webdriver.remote.webelement.WebElement, the session and element code.
What do I need to do to make it print what it should print. I have tried by_tag_name('h1.sdl-application-job-details__job-title') but that gives the exact same.
There is a inbuilt title method available in Selenium. You can call that method on driver object not on web element.
Code :
driver.get('https://www.se.com/ww/en/about-us/careers/job-details/inside-sales-associate/006ZMV')
driver.title
print(driver.title)
or if you want to retrieve text inside any web element, you could probably do something like this :
class_value = driver.find_element(By.CSS_SELECTOR, "h1[class$='sdl-application-job-details__job-title']").text
print(class_value)
The find_element methods return web elements. Just pass print(TITLE.text)
<div data-collapse class="left-justify" id="requirements">
#Html.Raw(string.Format(#_stringLocalizer["RegisterNoticeMessage"], #Html.ActionLink(#_stringLocalizer["RegisterLinkDisplayName"], "Register")))
</div>
In this piece of code, #Html.ActionLink() is returning Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Rendering.TagBuilder instead of returning anchor element containing URL path to the specified action.
What is the right way to use #Html.ActionLink() in string.Format(). Or, do I missing anything, here?
The helper method Html.ActionLink always returns a TagBuilder object. When you pass such an object into a string parameter, the ToString() method will be called, resulting in your observed output (the class name: "Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Rendering.TagBuilder").
It seems to me you are trying to create a hyperlink in a rather weird way. Have you tried using the Url.Action helper method? This method returns a plain old string, ready to plug into any href attribute.
E.g. this code would be equivalent of what you're trying to achieve:
#Html.Raw(
string.Format(_stringLocalizer["RegisterNoticeMessage"],
"" + _stringLocalizer["RegisterLinkDisplayName"] + "")
)
Sidenotes:
It is possible get the string value of a TagBuilder, as illustrated in this post.
No need to repeat # when you're already working in Razor/C# context.
Be extremely careful when using Html.Raw as it might result in XSS vulnerabilities.
I can't believe I couldn't find examples online.
This is my simple Archetype.
This is what I tried:
<img src="#CurrentPage.ctaTopLeft.image" alt="#CurrentPage.ctaTopLeft.text">
but it gives this error:
'Archetype.Models.ArchetypeModel' does not contain a definition for 'image'
EDIT: This works:
<img src="#CurrentPage.GetPropertyValue("ctaTopLeft").Fieldsets[0].GetValue("image")" alt="#CurrentPage.GetPropertyValue("ctaTopLeft").Fieldsets[0].GetValue("text")">
Wondering if there is any shorter way of writing it?
Well, no - an Archetype property can have a complex, nested set of data quite often in collections which may also be nested. In fact, it's quite common to use a corresponding nested set of partial views just to render it out correctly if you have for example nested Archetype properties (it happens).
There are some tutorials/samples available for this sort of thing:
http://imulus.github.io/Archetype/ - Archetype home on Github
https://gist.github.com/kgiszewski/8863822 - this one is linked from the Archetype page above - gives some examples of usage with Razor/MVC.
There are also other packages designed to help you map Archetype properties to POCO as well - e.g. https://our.umbraco.org/projects/developer-tools/archetype-mapper/
I prefer the typed way of getting the properties.
var property = Model.Contet.GetPropertyValue<ArchetypeModel>("yourArchetypePropertyAlias");
if (property != null && property.Any()) {
foreach (var item in property) {
var imageId = item.GetValue<int>("yourImagePropertyAlias");
var text = item.GetValue<string>("yourTextPropertyAlias");
}
}
I have a method on which I'd like to run a JUnit test. I'm mocking the cq5 page using JMockit.
My test method looks like this
#Mocked
Page page;
#Mocked
PageManager pageManager;
Tag testTag = pageManager.createTag("someID","someTitle","someDescription");//i've left out the try catch for brevety
System.out.println(testTag.getTitle()); // always null here
public void testSomeMethod() {
new Expectations() {
// variables declared here are mocked by default
{
page.getProperties();
propertyMap.put("cq:tags", testTag);
returns(new ValueMapDecorator(propertyMap));
}
};
String propertyValue = methodToBeTested(page);
Assert.assertEquals(propertyValue, "someTitle");
}
And the actual method to be tested does this :-
public static String getTopic(Page page) {
String topic = null;
Tag[] tags = page.getTags();
System.out.println(tags.size()); // returns 0 when I run the test.
for (int i = 0; i < tags.length; i++) {
Tag tag = tags[i];
topic = tag.getTitle();
}
}
return topic;
}
This always returns null when I run the test; however the method to be tested works correctly in the real scenario.
I suspect I'm not setting/mocking PageManager correctly, and consequently, my testTag is null
How do I mock this correctly to get the output I'm looking for?
You're getting to this testing from the wrong side. The way mocks (usually - I've never worked with jmockit specifically) work is, you create a blank object that acts as an impostor. This impostor is not a true PageManager - it only acts as one, and introduces himself as one whenever asked. When someone asks that impostor to do something (like calling it's method), the impostor does not know what to do, so it does nothing and returns null. However, you can tell the impostor how to behave in certain situations. Namely, you can tell it what to do when a method is called.
In your case, you don't need to create actual tags to test that method - you only need to mock a page object that, when asked for it's tags, will return an array containing a mocked tag which, in turn, when asked for it's title, will respond with the title you actually want to use in your test.
I don't know jmockit, so I cannot provide any code snippet. This, however, is a general question not strictly connected to CQ5/AEM
You may not be able to find any 'setter' methods for all objects you are trying to mock and this is anyways not the correct approach to mock.
The best way as mentioned by is to use mocked pages. You can use the Expectations class (mockit.Expectations) to mock the values to be returned by certain methods in the object.
See this example of mocking a 'SlingHttpServletRequest' object in a MockedClass class.
#Test
public void testMethod(#Mocked final SlingHttpServletRequest request){
String indicator ;
new Expectations() {
{
request.getParameter("archive");
returns("true");
}
};
indicator = OriginalClass.originalMethod(request);
Assert.assertEquals(indicator, "true");
}
In a similar way, you can mock other objects and their desired values.
I have answered the same question here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2536290
I ran into the same issue. in order to resolve Tags, they must exists under /content/cq:tags/your/tag or /etc/tags (legacy).
The Page#getTags implementation makes a call to TagManager#getTags which in turn tries to resolve the actual tag resource in the repo. Since you are testing in an AEM context, you have to load these tags in the appropriate location for the MockTagManager to resolve them.
What this means is that you need to load your tags into the AEM test context just like you've loaded your resources (via json).
Take a look at the aem-mock TagManager impl here: wcm-io-testing/MockTagManager.java at develop · wcm-io/wcm-io-testing · GitHub start with the resolve method and debug your way to figure out where you need to add those tags.
I tried to find on Primefaces Documentation but I have not found how can I customize the filter function for SelectOneMenu.
I add filterMatchMode="custom" filterFunction="#{mainRandevuBean.ilFilter()}"
But I don't know how can I write bean filterFunction.
The filter is a javascript (client-side) function. It all IS in the PrimeFaces documentation, which you should always look into first, carefully, thouroughly.
So use filterFunction="myFilter"
and create a javascript function like
function myFilter(itemLabel, filterValue) {
// return true if this label matches, false otherwise
}
Just as a sidenote: primefaces documentation doesn't say anything semantically about the parameters. It also does not mention where the label comes from (in fact, the docs mention "the item value" which is not very clear).
In fact I used the JavaScript function to debug this in order to figure out what was provided by default as a label.
function filterList(label, filter){
alert("label="+label+" and filter="+filter);
return false;
}
At first I thought it would be anything like the text inside the HTML generated for each list item. But when debugging it I saw the alert said that the label was something like my.package.SomeValueObject#123456 (which is obvously the Java object toString on each item in the list).
You need to define the itemLabel property on the selectItems which is inside the selectManyMenu to generate a proper text value used by the standard filtering mechanisme. As far as I could figure out that is the only reason why you have to put itemLabel there. In the documentation itemLabel is specified before explaining filtering which is confusing.
And as far as I know the itemValue defaults anyhow to just the object value, so I believe following from the documentation is redundant.
itemValue="#{player}"
Hope it helps anyone :.)
I resolve this problem with autocomplete component. Primefaces autocomplete component with dropdown="true" property works like one menu.